There are eight established elements of thought and reasoning point of view, purpose, question at issue, information, Interpretation and inference, concepts, assumptions, implications and consequences. There are times when elements are combined into a new category to make it possible for conclusions to be made. Point of view is paired with assumptions. My reason for pairing point of view with assumptions is due to the fact that our assumptions are our points of view. An example of this would be if we are against smoking in a public places and feel that it is hazardous to your health. Our point of view would be the not smoking in public places and the assumption would be how we feel it is hazardous to our health. The next category is purpose and question of issue if …show more content…
The reason I feel the concepts relates to interpretation and inference is that a lot of theories and law go through a process where the end result makes a conclusion or has makes a statement. Concepts consist of theories, definitions, axioms, laws, principles, and models. These are all used in the thinking process to make things have a meaning. As we go about these steps we can come to a set conclusions or interpretation of our theories. The last category is information and implications and consequences. According to criticalthinking.org (2007), information includes the facts, data, evidence, or experiences we use to figure things out. It does not necessarily imply accuracy or correctness. With this being said information can relate to implications and consequences because, they are claims or truths. Claims or truths have to be proven to be validated as a solution. This means information has to be collected to provide data, facts, observations, and experiences. This can relate to many thins one for example would be a pharmaceutical company trying to introduce a new drug and they say it will be better than any other similar drug on the
point of view. It is used in multiple situations for various reasons. The outcomes are not that
An assumption is a thought or opinion that is accepted as being true, without enough or any proof. In The Scarlet Letter and The Minister’s Black Veil, this occurred a lot in their community. Both stories were solemly based on this theme. Judgment went along with assumption. The people of the community in The Scarlet Letter used assumption as a way to justify an excuse of judging Hester Prynne. The people of the community in The Minister’s Black Veil, used assumptions to think of ways to describe how minister, Mr. Hooper, has changed. Punishment leads to judgment, false facts, confrontation, and change.
The four elements of a contract are the agreement, the consideration, contractual capacity, and a legal object. The oral agreement between Sam and the chain store satisfies the agreement element of a contract definition because when the chain store offered to sell Sam 's invention at their stores, Sam accepted by agreeing to ship 1000 units in exchange. The second element of a contract, the “consideration of each party,” is satisfied because Sam and the chain store have something to give the other (1000 units of the invention in exchange for the exclusive sales of the product at their stores). The third element is “contractual capacity,” which may or may not be fulfilled since we do not know Sam 's age or whether
Each reason (or argument) will be a paragraph. You will create an outline of how you would write those paragraphs. “Reasoning” is different than the “reasons” – it is the logic that you use to make sense of the evidence. Evidence means little without the reasoning behind your conclusions.
Stimulating characters that evolve with the plot are fundamental in most novels. These characters could range from the Mary Sue protagonist to the chaotically evil antagonist. In A Lost Lady, Niel Herbert is a significant character along this spectrum. Although Willa Cather herself pointed out he is merely a "peephole" and a "subordinate" to the woman she truly cared for, Niel is a central aspect since he carries the story (132: 20). Early in the novel, he is already portrayed as the classic hero as he injures himself trying to alleviate the woodpecker of its pain. A more intense insight, however, is gathered from him as the plot develops and as he matures. Consequently, Niel discredits initial presumptions about him as he presents qualities and ideologies that make him detrimental to Cather's fictional society, which may be viewed as a microcosm of the actual world. Accordingly, through the patriarchal ideals Niel embraced, the unfounded biases he held, and the ulterior motives he possessed, his heroic stature is unmerited.
The first approach is assessing the Law according to its target audience. This is beneficial as it defines the context in which the text is applying itself to. Hays mentions, “Connecting texts to their contexts is a basic tenet of proper interpretive method. The Law is part of a story, and this story thus provides a critical context for interpreting the Law.” This approach can be problematic as meaning of a particular law could be misinterpreted to fit the context in which it is placed in. The Law may be given in a specific instance; however, it could have a general meaning, which could be lost using this approach.
Paul and Elder’s eight elements of thought directly support the Army officers as they work through the Army Problem Solving Process by expanding their ability to think critically and creatively. The following eight elements enhance a problem’s solvers perspective on what is important; making the best possible decision the same goal as the Army Problem Solving Process. The eight elements of thought are Point of view; Purpose; Question or problem; Information; Inferences and conclusions; Concepts and theories; Assumptions; and Implications/Consequences. Point of view-Drs. Paul and Elder suggested this as a starting point in the Army officers thought process. Drs. Paul and Elder believe that within the Point of View, decision makers should look at their view through the follow-on analysis of frames of reference, Perspectives, and Orientations . While combining the totality of the Point of View, Army leaders look at a problem from a “place which they are viewing the problem.” Furthermore, the Point of View element brings to the Army Problem Solving Process the leader’s ability to “reflect of who the people are inside, what they use to make their assumptions and their decision.” Utilizing the Point of view element assists in the Problem Solving Process by providing leaders with guidance from commanders to the problem solvers to create alternatives to solve a problem. According to US Army ATTP 5-01, 2001, par. 11-25, 2-14, alternatives and possible unpopular ideas or
When talking about an argument, it should be written in a manner that unfolds both the strengths and limits of the argument. The point of an argument is to come to a conclusion as close to the truth or realistic solution. In the twentieth-century, British philosopher Stephen Toulmin asked the question of where is the love and what are the uses of an argument. Stephen Toulmin then conducted a method constructing and analyzing an argument. This method, named after Stephen Toulmin, is called the Toulmin model. The Toulmin model involves breaking down an argument into six basic parts, looking at all supporting points and views both for and against the argument.
Logic can be understood as the relationship between concepts. As such, there are four major
Bolman & Deal list six assumptions behind the Structural Frame. 1) Organizations exist to achieve established goals and objectives. 2) Organizations work best when rationality prevails over personal preferences and external pressures. 3) Structures must be designed to fit organizational circumstances.
The point of view element of fiction stories is that perspective in which a story is told. The point of view is that of the person telling the story and the method in which the reader knows what is happening ("The Elements of Fiction").
How we approach the question of knowledge is pivotal. If the definition of knowledge is a necessary truth, then we should aim for a real definition for theoretical and practical knowledge. Methodology examines the purpose for the definition and how we arrived to it. The reader is now aware of the various ways to dissect what knowledge is. This entails the possibility of knowledge being a set of truths; from which it follows that one cannot possibly give a single definition. The definition given must therefore satisfy certain desiderata , while being strong enough to demonstrate clarity without losing the reader. If we base our definition on every counter-example that disproves our original definition then it becomes ad hoc. This is the case for our current defini...
By showing the thoughts of what Chomsky and Adler said, I will show how many others have a different idea about language. Words have been given a belief to have a true meaning to them, but in reality not so many words have a true meaning. In order to find their true meaning we have to look at how they are used and then come up with the true meaning. But what sometimes ends up happening is that the word can mean a so many things in many situations, which gets confusing. Rather they have many different meanings, which can only be found through text has to found through knowledge. Sometimes the meaning of words is so vague it is difficult to understand their meaning at all. Unless we are aware of the exact context in which it is being used, we would probably not agree on the subtle differences. Knowledge plays into affect by adding a whole new view to looking at a word. With knowledge, the interpretation of words can be figured out faster and more efficient. The way of interpreting the human language makes this method an efficient one.
In these forms of reasoning it is possible to distinguish contingent aspects with regard to the role which the use of a method and the application of a procedure play within any conceptual process: communicable by virtue of the codes and the prescribed norms, comparable in every time and place by virtue of the reproducibility of the procedures.
3. The coherence of a system of beliefs is increased by the presence of inferential connections between its component beliefs and increased in proportion to the number and strength of such connections.