Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender roles in latin america
Gender inequality in latin america essays
Gender roles in latin america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the seventeenth century, it is the Spanish Golden age which is a period of arts and literature in the area of Spain. During the Spanish Golden age were denied the women the right of an equal opportunity as the men, and made them do housework and forbid them from the chase of knowledge. Not all women have the courage to stand out and for their self and changes what is wrong during their era. And this era came along a nun that will be the role model for feminism for existing long period of time, this woman is Sor Juana Ines de la Cruz. The word “Sor” is in her name because she is a sister, a nun. She is a poet and a writer. Her poetry, meanwhile, states in bold language the potency of the feminine in both love and religion. Yet, a bishop in …show more content…
her era, Don Manuel Fernandez de Santa Cruz does not approve Sor Juana and was against women trying to read and write. He set out to sabotage her career as he leaked a letter of hers to ruin her reputation. The letter bishop leaked out is Sor Juana’s critiqued a famous 40 -year-old Jesuit sermon. Sor Juana uses the Polemical style in her book and made a successful argument against the bishop. Sor Juana Ines de la Cruz is an illegitimate child. Her father is Spanish and her mother is Creole. Her grandfather was the person that raised her. Sor Juana had a special talent and passion of reading and writing. After reading all her grandfather’s book, she concluded an idea to ask her mother to send her to University of Mexico. Juana’s mother dresses her with male clothes to be able to camouflage inside University of Mexico. At age of ten, Ramirez realize Juana had the talent of literature, so she gave an opportunity for Juana to study in Mexico City. After studying alone Juana desired to further seek a life of independence and freedom from authority. Which was very rare to have a women loves reading and writing and bypassing the infection of era of trending women in housework. She didn’t want to be a member in the higher class, she decided to become a sister, and separation from the world to find her religious and non-religious worry she became a famous Sor (sister) in the Spanish era. Polemical style’s is to disappoints the readers and force its members to recognize your position even if they do not agrees. The Bishop of Mexico was pretending to be impressed by her, asked Sor Juana to put her critique on the sermon in writing. The bishop published Sor Juana’s writing without her knowing and send her a response with a harsh critique he wrote under the name Sor Filotea de la Cruz. When Sor Juana respond to the Bishop’s critique, Sor Juana uses the polemical style. An example of her polemical style in her “Respose to the most Illustrious Poetess Sor Filotea De La Cruz”, she stated, “allow me to kiss your hand, your most favored” (75). This gave a very good example of polemical style because this show Sor Juana able to use sarcasm, satire and invective. At first, this quote may look like a respectful response to Sor Filotea and it was actually praising him, but she was saying this while illustrate Sor Filotea as a women. Sor Juana was calling the bishop, Don Manuel Fernandez de Santa Cruz, a woman. Which mean she does not accept the bishop the right to have education and should let the women to be education and have a better use of it. Another quote she responded “the most illustrious poetess Sor Filotea de la Cruz” (1). Sor Juana uses sarcasm, invective, satire, wit, stunning to upset and insult the bishop. Sor Juana’s uses of polemical style was very effective.
The mind war between Sor Juana and the Bishop grab the audience’s attention and made the audience want to read more. The evident of Effectiveness of Sor Juana polemical style is when she asking to “kiss her hand”. Which symbolic the kisser is definitely a woman. And she manage to upset the Bishop successfully. The assertion show that Sor Juana was right about the argument with the Bishop and sho quoted the things Bible and church with any illegal doing. Sor Juana’s statement does not go out of the line from Bible and church. Her polemical style of argument was effective in this event because she point out how women were told that they does not have the right to get education. The book, How write a sentence and how to write one, by Standley Fish mentions how someone can do something, he say “if he liked sentences he could begin” (1), which Sor Juana really liked the use of Polemical style and be include in her …show more content…
writings. Writings often reflect the treatment of women in the Spanish colonization of the Americas. In the meantime, women are expected to stay at home to ensure the absolute male domination. Sor Juana in one of the most famous poem, "In a lighter vein," laughed th men always assume women want to be blamed. From the beginning of the poem, in a row, Sor Juana mockery refers to men. This will give a hint of the atmosphere for the rest of the poem, the reader will automatically Sor Juana induction treat male population sarcastic attitude. She continued to point out that men blame their own right of "female frivolous". Although the men claimed that women are gentle people, Saul Juana shows that men have no sense of security, they are afraid to cry. Because of her brave, that wrote the text “Reply to Sor Filotea”. Sor Juana was defended the rights of women and the rights rights of women to have access to education, and condemned the Church for helping to keep women uneducated. Sor Juana explained the ways in which she believed education could be used to serve God and recounted her own life-long struggle to pursue education in a society that did not believe women should be learned. For daring to stand up to the patriarchal and misogynist policies of the Church, Sor Juana was officially censured. She was no longer allowed to publish her work, reading her work was prohibited by the Church and she was forced to give away her library of books. She died in the convent in 1695. For example, critiques, Sister Juana’s response is very secretive but deliberately states her views about her no religious rights in her work.
Not only she did not reveal bishop of Puebla and use an extreme respectful works by replying to the unreal name of Sor Juana’s name “Sor Filotea.” The theme of women’s, when especially on her, the power to have an education for the women and a non-religious nun in the entire of the reply. She corrected her theme by speaking of her own great gifted ability and actions as well as citing Biblical figures. She mention that if women was well educated the world would be better and not injured. She also quote, “if the Church…does not forbid it why must others?” (61).
While she was being criticized by the outside rumor of the De La Cruz, Sor Juana use the rest of her life facing for the women rights for a secular lifestyle. She response to the bishop very respect and she inputting her own reasoning and bible sources. Sor Juana leaves a big legacy in the chase of intellectual fairness between male and female in that time of era in Mexico. She consider a talented person with unlimited amount of polemical style ready to be put in her poems. She was consider one of the members of Golden Age of Spanish
era. Sor Juana Ines de la Cruz influenced the feminist movement by specifically motivating personally, by focusing on one specific work from Sor Juana has influenced my views on the feminist movement. Many have recognize her as the mother of rights of women. Her use of Polemical style and the use of subordinating style sentence was very effective. Her sarcasm and irony helped her polemical style of argument and gave the audience to recognize her point of view. If you don’t read the passage careful, you will not see Sor Juana’s sarcasm is include in the passage. And by reading her “response to the most illustrious poetess Sor Filotea De La Cruz” she argued with the bishop was very jarring.
Christine De Pizan’s work in The Book of The City of Ladies pioneers a new genre of feminist literature that exposes a time period from the perspective of its female population. Due to this, De Pizan justifiably earns the title of a revolutionary author. However, to say that De Pizan revolutionized the conditions of women in the medieval ages and onward is an overstatement. In her book, De Pizan critiques sexist arguments in order to defend women against misogyny. The change that De Pizan presented in medieval culture was gradual because she was attempting to amend people’s perspectives on women rather than offer any institutional rectifications. She worked to establish that women can be just as mighty as men, and thus, they are not innately inferior. However, her goal was not to ensure that women have equal access to exercise and pursue their virtuous roles. Therefore, if observed
The figures of Sor Juana and Catalina de Erauso are larger than life. They did things no other women (and most men) during the 17th century could have ever dreamed of. Sor Juana was a nun who, through her confined cloister, produced works of literature and theology that are now part of both the Mexican and Catholic Cannon. De Erauso on the hand roamed free, she abandoned her religious life and instead took up the garb of a man and set out for the New World. Both of these women did not do what women were expected to do. Sor Juana’s life in the covenant should have been one of quiet contemplation and De Erauso should have never left the covenant she was a part of. In addition not only did De Erauso abandon her vows but she attempted, and succeeded, at passing herself off as a man which allowed her to do things that, if her true identity was known, every apparatus available in the Empire would have brought her to swift justice. These women went against the norms of what was expected ...
Both Mary Wollstonecraft and Sor Juana de la Cruz are writers of the Enlightenment period, but they each approach women’s rights in a different way. While De la Druz was a Catholic nun from Mexico ad preferred to study and be alone, Wollstonecraft asserted women’s rights for all through publications directed at the masses. During the Enlightenment, people began to question old authoritative models like the Church. Our texts states, “thinkers believed inreason as a dependable guide. Both sides insisted that one should not take any assertion of truth on faith, blindly following the authority of others; instead, one should think skeptically about causes and effects, subjecting all truth-claims to logic andrational inquiry” (Puchner 92). Indeed,
Sor Juana de la Cruz is born into a wealthy family in 1648 that lived near Mexico City, Mexico. After being a part of the Viceregal court and a lady in waiting, Cruz begins her spiritual journey and joins the convent. Here, Cruz explores both secular and non-secular studies. She is an exceptionally talented writer with a passion for reading, learning, and writing. She is scolded for the information she writes and is told to focus exclusively on religious dogma. Soon after the Bishop of Pubela reads one of her letters, he publishes it (without her knowing), and she responds with a respectful yet sarcastic letter (Lawall and Chinua 155-156). Cruz’s “Reply to Sor Filotea de la Cruz” was written during the period of Enlightenment of Europe (1660- 1770). This era in Europe casted an opaque shadow over women’s rights to educate themselves and self-expression. Sor Juana’s piece however is both inspirational and empoweri...
Women are not only assumed to only take care of their family, but to not have the education that they do rightfully deserve. Women can contribute to the world as plentiful and gloriously as men can, but the chances are not given to them. For example, when Minerva tells Trujillo that she dreams of attending the University to study law, he replies "'The University is no place for a woman these days'" (99). Trujillo implies that by going to school to heighten her education, it would be ...
La autora Alfonsina Storni se presenta con su feminismo indirecto en su ensayo titulado “Autodemolición;” no escribe sus opiniones directamente, los describe sarcásticos, con ironía, y lo opuesto a la realidad. Storni era muy inteligente y sabia mostrar una visión feminista. Esto se ve muchísimo en carta de Sor Juana en la “Carta a Sor Filotea.”
She takes her situation and beliefs and applies it to the general population explaining “[They] look at veiled women as quite, oppressed creatures” (Ridley 46), Muslim women are stereotyped and viewed by the general population as people with no say about their own lives. Muslim women deal with the judgment from outsiders who are ignorant to their true culture. They are viewed as lower class simply because of what they wear. Cisneros’ essay also included the problems of race, class, gender, and education. She felt that breaking the standards placed on her by her cultural norms it would displease her tradition loving father. He felt that Cisneros should find a husband and not focus on her education so much. Cisneros writes “I am the only daughter in the Mexican family of six sons” (Cisneros 366). This not only exemplifies the internal family issues of being the only female, but also the external problems of the norms placed on women in a Hispanic culture to be an ideal wife. Tan’s essay emphasized the fact that her race, gender, education and up-bringing played a role in people knowing her writing, even though she does not want it to. When informing the readers that her fans would often write not only about her work but also about “… [her] youthful indiscretions, the slings and arrows I suffered as a minority…” (Tan 1), this bothered Tan to an extent because she
In the story, there are many examples of women who suffer from a lack of an education. One of the Mirabal sisters, Patria, has a dream of becoming a nun, but Papa does not support her. “It started with Patria wanting to be a nun. Mamá was all for having religion in the family, but Papá did not approve in the least. More than once, he said that Patria as a nun would be a waste of a pretty girl. He only said that once in front of Mamá, but he repeated it often enough to me.” (Ch. 2 pg. 11) Papa believes that a woman cannot be more than a pretty face, that they should not pursue their interests and have an equal position in society. This describes that women were not allowed to become more than they could be. When Minerva tells her family that she aspires to become a lawyer, her mother does not take her seriously: Ay, Dios mío, spare me." Mamá sighs, but playfulness has come back into her voice. "Just what we need, skirts in the law!"(Ch. 1 Pg. 10) This shows that even Mama believes that women should not have a say in certain matters because she has a notion that women were not cut out for things like politics. Sometimes, even the women agree that they should not have equal representation as men. Mama seems to imply that it may be better for woman to preserve one’s innocence and integrity by avoiding politics. Minerva again argues that women deserve equality in their society. This is because at that time, the thought of a woman studying law was unusual. No one believed that a woman would be capable of studying law, which proved that women were not considered equal. Even though women were not given equal opportunities as men, the sisters fought for equality, and
Ihara Saikaku’s Life of a Sensuous Woman written in the 17th century and Mary Woolstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman written in the 18th century are powerful literary works that advocated feminism during the time when women were oppressed members of our societies. These two works have a century old age difference and the authors of both works have made a distinctive attempt to shed a light towards the issues that nobody considered significant during that time. Despite these differences between the two texts, they both skillfully manage to present revolutionary ways women can liberate themselves from oppression laden upon them by the society since the beginning of humanity.
One of the similarities is the right to inherit property, and sell goods in the marketplace. She was under patria potestad until the age of 25, because she was illegitimate child, and her grandfather has passed away, she was sent to live with her maternal aunt’s family in Mexico City (2). Sor Juana wrote about the promise-to-marry plight of women in her poem Hombres necios que acusais describing how men seduce women and blame the woman for the indiscretion (5). Gauderman describes the Convent as an asylum for women to escape the life of a married women, which was exactly why Sor Juana joined a Convent (Gauderman 37). Sor Juana did not go to the courts for justice for women’s rights, she wrote about
... middle of paper ... ... Sandra Cisneros took a risk and got remarkably far with her passion for mixing the cultures and the identities of women. Her voice is what emphasizes the article to show how the goal is to redistribute the language and culture, not criticizing the “New World”.
Her chief arguing points and evidence relate to the constriction of female sexuality in comparison to male sexuality; women’s economic and political roles; women’s access to power, agency, and land; the cultural roles of women in shaping their society; and, finally, contemporary ideology about women. For her, the change in privacy and public life in the Renaissance escalated the modern division of the sexes, thus firmly making the woman into a beautiful
These novels, poems and short stories show how sexism is very much an issue in past decades but also in present and future decades. The America that we live in wants to believe in the fact that all men and women are created equal, it has yet to do anything. Women are still seen as objects to an extent. We are still seen as Daisy or as Charlotte Perkins main character, or the woman Carlos Gomez Andres writes about. The fact that we might die from the loss of freedom, because one cannot escape from an unhappy marriage, is considered ridiculous.
This paper will explore why, for women of all kinds, the revolution against Diaz became a popular cause. It will also explore how various groups of women worked for revolutionary forces, why women of all classes were disappointed by their lack of progress, and how these groups of women were very separate from one another. Lastly, it will explore the post-revolutionary life of women in Mexico.
There is no question that Mariama Bâ’s novel, So Long a Letter, is undoubtedly a work of feminist literature. Although we are able to easily make this identification, it is much more difficult for us to define and explain how we were able to come to this conclusion. One explanation might be that the novel calls for a sense of equality and balance between the two sexes: