Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What are the qualities of a police officer
Characteristics of good cops
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What are the qualities of a police officer
Introduction There are an array of qualities and characteristics that can be identified to gauge and define a successful law enforcement organization. The qualities and characteristics demonstrated collectively by the members of a law enforcement organization can further support the organization’s mission statement, vision, and core values. An organization must have a strategic plan designed to provide improvements in performance and delivery of services. Law enforcement leaders must take a proactive and innovative approach in identifying supervisors, first line supervisors, and employees to implement improved strategies that are intended to guide the organization to further success.
Some of the qualities and characteristics used to define
…show more content…
The emphasis is on production and yields in this approach. Establishing goals maybe arbitrary or subjective and the challenges in using this model are the complexity, ambiguity, diffuseness, and changeability that typify educational goals (Cameron, 1986).
The second approach is the internal process model, sometimes called the natural systems model, sees an organization seeking to achieve goals as well as desiring to maintain itself as a social unit (Cameron, 1986). Effectiveness in this tactic is gauged by organizational health, constancy, internal processes, and the achievement of goals.
The third approach is the open systems model, sometimes referred as the system resource model in which it focuses on the interdependence of the organization with its environment (Cameron, 1986). The fourth approach is the multiple constituencies model or the participant satisfaction model which sees effectiveness as the degree to which the needs of the various constituencies or stakeholders are met (Cameron, 1986). However, it has been noted is a conflict that can be resolved with conflicting needs and wants of other shareholders who may have varying measures of
…show more content…
Mintzberg (1991) also stated that without some concern for efficiency, all but the most protected of organizations must eventually falter. Efficiency generally means standardization and formalization; often it reduces to economy (Mintzberg, 1991).
Part 1- What are the characteristics of an effective organization? There are several characteristics that can be used to define an effective organization. Matthews (2011) stated that the three primary challenges that must be confronted when considering organizational effectiveness are the definition, measurement, and determinants of effectiveness. The characteristics of an effective organization is going to be multifaceted being that a sole viewpoint will not encompass the efficacy of any organization. Thibodeaux and Favilla (1996) define and characterize organizational effectiveness as the extent to which
Stojkovic, S., Kalinich, D., & Klofas, J. (2008). Criminal Justice Organizations: Administration and Management (4th edition). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/ Thomson Learning, Inc.
Chinn and Kramer’s critical reflection model is being utilized to analyze this theory. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate and analyze the Neuman systems model by using Chinn and Kramer’s critical reflection model. The following paper will discuss the clarity, simplicity, generalizability, accessibility, and importance as the criteria for critique as suggested by Chinn and Kramer (Meleis, 2012).
Right Management. (n.d.). Organizational Effectiveness: Discovering How to Make it Happen. Leadership Insights Journal. Retrieved from: http://www.right.com/thought-leadership/research/organizational-effectiveness-discovering-how-to-make-it-happen.pdf
“Before new chiefs can set a path for a new vision, they must have a clear understanding of the past. A police department’s organizational culture is a deeply ingrained, personal aspect of its functioning that must not be trivialized. Years of hard work and dedication by scores of individuals went into the creation of that culture, and it must be respected. However, if the culture is no longer in step with the expectations of the community, then changes must be made. Changes for the future must be carefully crafted to achieve the desired goal without disregarding the past. New chiefs can best accomplish this task by first listening to the variety of individuals that represent the stakeholders for their departments. Gaining input is important to obtaining an understanding of the values and expecta...
In Florida, every law enforcement official uses the tools of planning, management, and evaluation. For example, a patrol officer plans how to cover a beat, makes rounds or manage activities, and evaluates how they did at the end of the day. An officer plans what to do and how to do it before taking action. Unfortunately, this same approach is not consistently applied in police agencies and security operations as a whole. In fact, although a certain degree of planning is usually conducted by all prevention organizations, the major emphasis has traditionally been on the management and evaluation of an officers work; every sergeant knows to manage a police force in such a way that the commander will conclude that they are doing a good job. The major purpose of the discussion that follows is to provide crime prevention personnel information about planning, management, and evaluation so they can take advantage of those tools in performing their jobs.
Law Enforcement is a person or agency responsible for enforcing the law. With this being said, many businesses can be an example of law enforcement. Law enforcement can be policeman, lawyers, or just anybody that has the right to enforce the law. We are given laws for safety, and to protect our rights as citizens. One would think everyone should respect and follow the laws given. Once upon a time in The United States, every citizen respected the laws, and our morals were upright. Through out the years, our morals, or ethics, changed. Law enforcements got stronger, figured out they are untouchable, resulting in going against the law, and going against our moral beliefs. Although law enforcement can be helpful to citizens, their roles of ethics
...al Development in Small Police Departments. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 13(3), 243-254. doi:10.1350/ijps.2011.13.3.228
For a long time, the law enforcement agents and the judicial systems have been using the crime control and the due process models in an effort to establish and maintain justice in the society. In as much as these two models operate hand in hand, they both have similarities as well as several differences in how they operate in the judicial system. They are very effective in the judicial system because they both work towards providing justice, creating a great impact in the judicial system in the society (Edkins & Kansas, 2007). However, they have variations on their operation approaches in bringing justice to the people in the society. The reasons why at some point these two models seem to be similar is because they coil around the constitution, and the constitutional settings define their operational strategies to give comparable explanations of finding justice among the people in the society (Zalman, 2008).
All organizations, especially law enforcement agencies, require leadership. Maintaining a dependable leadership structure is key to the success of any organization. The philosophy of the modern style of police leadership involves a leader who is strong, competitive and unreceptive to change. Police leadership is based from an autocratic style which is founded on integrity and courage, embracing teamwork, involvement and shared leadership (Cordner & Scarborough, 2010). This style of leadership works well in an emergency situation in which rapid decision making and strict control is needed. The negative aspect to this style of leadership is the inability of the organization to function with the absence of leadership.
Each organizational element relates to one another. They have a building block effect where each element depends on the one before it in order to exist. The "organizational efforts (inputs and processes) contribute to organizational results (products and outputs) and these contribute to societal consequences and payoffs (outcomes)" (Strategic Planning in Education, 23).
It is therefore important to include various perspectives in approaching the change in an organization: bottom-up, top-down and peer-to-peer approaches will intersect and interact to create profound change – or the change will not be sustained.
Laszlo and Krippner (1998) describe a system as “a complex of interacting components together with the relationships among them that permit the identification of a boundary-maintaining entity or process. (p. 2) Systems Theory is based on studying how individual parts of a system interact with each other to produce certain behaviors. System theory can be classified as identifying patterns and behaviors. The roots of system thinking have been in existence since the early 20th Century and have since been formally identified as such. The process of systems thinking is being able to pay attention to the whole while focusing on the complex interrelationships that make up a system to encourage the development
Crime Prevention Introduction Crime rate is the ratio of crimes in a neighborhood to the amount of people that populate that specific area (Free Dictionary, 2016). Many officers respond to calls they receive, deal with the problem, and then move onto the next call. By reacting in this manner, it does not help the crime rates to decrease because they are not coming up with solutions to prevent crimes (Argosy University, 2016). Crime prevention is a proactive approach to come up with solutions to help reduce victimization, but the goal is to prevent the crimes altogether (Argosy University, 2016).
The question “how do we reduce crime” has been asked for many years. Numerous amount of research has been done on this topic to see if there are other ways to reduce crime. Reducing crime has been a heated debate for many years and continues to be an important topic to study. People often wonder if the policies that are currently in place even work to reduce crime. Statistics have shown for years now that the current techniques being used by police are not as effective as the some people might think there are. According to Weisburd and Eck (2004) our strategy for reducing crime has been based on the standard model for policing. According to this model, it can be applied to all people and situations as a way to reduce crime (Weisburd and Eck, 2004). Many argue that this model states that basic techniques can be used in all situations regardless of how much crime or types of crime there is in that location. This model has been criticized because it is too basic and doesn’t apply to every situation (Weisburd and Eck, 2004). Weisburd and Eck (2004) also found that this model had little effect on crime reduction. The goal is to find new ways to reduce crime because this model is not effective and it not working. Research has since found useful deterrents for crime. Although research has shown that many policies that are in place are ineffective, there are some other strategies that have successfully lowered crime rates.
The manager should be able to select and know these factors. As organization is created systems by people, the internal factors are mainly the result of management decisions. Not all of the internal factors are completely controlled by the management. Organization is influenced by many environmental factors. In the new millennium we have to learn how to live in a market economy. And the most important condition for this is a highly skilled managers. Ability to identify and analyze the internal elements of the organization and external factors is the key to the success of the business. The main factors in the organization that require management attention are objectives, structure, tasks, technology and people. An organization can be seen as a means to achieve the objectives that allows people to perform collectively what they could not carry out individually. Goals are desired outcome, which aims to achieve a group working together. The main objective of most organizations is profit. Income is a key indicator of the organization. People are the basis of any organization. Without people there is no organization. They shape the culture of the organization and its internal climate. They determine what the organization is. Manager generates frames, establishes a system of relations between people and include them in the process of