Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Discuss Equality In Education
Equality in education essay 100 words
Equality in education essay 100 words
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Since the beginning of the first education reformation, there has always been criticism on how education should be provided and taught. Throughout time, different countries have made reformations to provide better educations to their people. These examples range from creating a better school system, to providing free education in elementary and secondary school. Education reform is not over as it is still an ongoing process in the making that may never end. Education reform first started to happen in ancient Greece with Socrates, Plato and other great Greek scholars. They studied the “how’s” and “why’s” of life. They also believed in creating a better education system for the common people. It went so far as Socrates creating the first university …show more content…
in the world. Socrates’s student and successor, Plato, helped continue and reform Socrates’s university (Smith). Plato disliked some of the ways Socrates taught his university so Plato made the first reform to Socrates University. Socrates created. Scholars found out through Plato’s writings that, “Plato’s disliked the Sophists (particularly as teachers of rhetoric) and his concern that teachers should know their subject” (Smith). Go forward, in today’s 21st century, America’s education reformation has been on the decline due to their ignorance (Mark). If America is to ever fix their education system, they must see what other top ranked countries in education are doing and apply them to their education system to create a more “equal and opportune” society. Today, America has been praised as being the best country in the world in education, technology, and overall (Shapiro). If you ask an American, more than likely, they might have the same opinion yet, America ranks 14th in education, 11th in cognitive skills, and 20th in educational attainment out of 40 world nations according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (Pearson). Ironically, America also ranks 2nd in the world in ignorance (Mark,). America is not the greatest country in the world anymore and the one of the biggest reasons why it is not is because of its corrupt education system. America is trying to fix it by creating laws to create a more “equal and opportune” society, but instead they have created a more corrupt education system. America passed “No Child Left Behind” (NCLB) in 2002 and Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) in December of 2015 which was a reformation of “The Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1964” (ESEA) that was designed to fight the “War of Poverty” (Califano). The ESEA program instead created a more corrupt education system. In America, the Elementary and Secondary Education Act was the most significant and highest funded federal legislate law for education in American history. This law was to provide each child with a fair and equal opportunity to receive a quality elementary and secondary education. By creating this law, it now stated that every Math and Science department could get however much supplies they needed to help their students receive an equal education. LBJ signed this act due to his policy of stopping the “War on Poverty” (Califano). Part of the law also states that the U.S. needs to renew or reformed this law every five years based on how well their education programs are doing. The problem is that America has only updated this law twice since 1964. The most significant is when NCLB and ESSA came out. In March of 2001, former Speaker of the House John Boehner started the reformation of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1964. He created H.R. 1 and by January of 2002 the bill called “No Child Left Behind was signed into law by former President George W. Bush. For the first time since the Elementary and Secondary Education Act was passed, America had created an updated law to help the education system in America. Little did the people know that this law would create a more corrupt education system. NCLB has failed due to funding problems and some implied corruptions. NCLB has spilled billions and billions of federal tax dollars on public education to try to provide the best education possible for our students yet, America has not generated the best results to prove that our education programs are working (Klein). NCLB states that if schools are falling behind, they must provide better education opportunities for their students (HR 1, 107th Cong. 2002). The irony is that the underfunded schools don’t have the money to provide better education to their students by getting better teachers and tutors. This problem started when NCLB was passed and granted states to make up test score standards for their students to pass (Klein). At the time President George W. Bush changed the original purpose of NCLB. He had a friend in Texas who made a living with standardize testing so instead of teaching kids creativity and imagination, schools now taught kids how to pass a standardize test. NCLB states” that states must test students in reading and math in grades one through eight and once in high school” (Klein). States got to decide what “proficiency” should look like and what kind of test to take. With this, schools were now judged yearly by the federal government to see how much money should be granted to each state. This is called the Adequate Yearly Progress. The goal was to get every child up to grade level in reading and math by 2014; however, no state has gotten up to 100% percent in their proficiency bar level (Klein). NCLB was never intended to do more damage to the education system, yet we see more and more problems arising as a result of Congress doing nothing to fix it.
For example, two years after NCLB was put into law, North Carolina had 9 schools in the state that needed some levels of improvement. 5 years later, that number rose to 521 schools (Turner). This was due to low performing schools not able to provide a so called “quality education” by the states. When an underperforming school didn’t meet the state’s requirements, they were given sanctions and were told to fix their problems or more consequences will follow. The problem was that schools were not given more money to fix their sanctions so they were left to start to cut programs. If schools still didn’t fix their sanctions, the state would tell the school to go tell their students to start looking to transfer to another school in the district. Lastly, if schools still didn’t meet their sanctions, they were then forced to shut down the school. Schools got overwhelmed with stacks and stacks of sanctions. The problem was that rich districts could afford to fix every problem while poor districts were forced to cut programs to gain more money and struggle to provide an “equal and quality” education for their students (Turner). Schools were now left on their own to fix their sanctions without government …show more content…
assistances. If America is to ever become the greatest education country in the world again, they must first stops being so ignorant. They must look at other countries that have great education systems such as the top country in Asia (South Korea) and the top country in Europe (Finland) (Pearson). In South Korea, ABC news did an interview to see why and how the South Korean education system is the best in the world. ABC news interviewed a principle name Chung Chang Yong who stated that “no one just drops out of a school. A student may transfer to another school, but no one just drops out. To drop out of a school is a major disaster, a catastrophe” (Landrum 45). How did a country that was sub-par to a third world country in the 50s become the leading country in education today? South Koreans have discipline through their families and throughout community; South Koreans also have lots of help from their federal government. The federal government encouraged religious companies and wealthy companies/people to donate money to start creating better schools (Landrum 45). Students are pressured by their families and society to go to school. The kids who fail to go to school are considered a disgrace in their family’s and society’s eyes. At Ewha High School in South Korea, which is the top performing school in the country, students are selected by the federal government to go to private schools or public schools. Families will sacrifice everything they have to send their kids to private schools if selected (Landrum 45). The South Korean government also enforces a national curriculum and spread resources more evenly than America does (Landrum 45). In the US, Americans are more laissez-faire on their students completing secondary schools or not. There is no pressure from society and it all depends on the family you are born into. It is not to say that America doesn’t have great education system because America has the top high schools and universities in the world. The problem today is that the education system is spread unevenly and unequally. In Finland, ranked 5th in the world, there is a vice versa approach to educating their students (Pearson).
There are shocking comparisons on how they educated their students compared to South Korea. Finnish students get less than half an hour of homework a night as long with no school uniforms, honor societies, valedictorians, tardy bells, classes for the extra ordinary students, or standardized tests. These kids don’t even start school until they are seven yet they have the smartest kids at 15 compared to all other students in the world (Gamerman). So how does Finland rank so high in education? Like Americans, Finnish kids also are one of the top countries to waste hours throughout the day but are still on track to being the world’s most productive workers. What Finland does is quite remarkable. They create well trained teachers and teach children responsibility at a young age instead of putting kids in schools. Since children don’t go to school until they are seven, their parents educated their kids how to be responsible young adults. Once the children start school, they are equally trained by teachers. There are no students who finish first instead they focus on the weaker students to catch up than concentrating on the more advance students in getting further ahead
(Gamerman). Today, America has made drastic changes to their education system due to all-time highs on graduation rates and all-time lows of drop-out rates. They just recently updated the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1964 and NCLB with a new law called the “Every Student Succeeds Act”. This bill reauthorizes and amends the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA). The bill addresses issues “such as accountability and testing requirements, distribution and requirements for grants, fiscal accountability requirements, and the evaluation of teachers” (S.1177, 114th Cong.). As it has not fixed the American education system as a whole, America has now made drastic measures to ensure that their students can try to get a proper college preparatory education no matter the circumstances on their living location with the passing of “Every Students Succeeds Act”. In conclusion, America as a whole is struggling to finish secondary school and getting a college degree. In other countries such as South Korea and Finland, they distribute their education funds more equally and have a strong family support. If America is to ever change their education system, they must first start with their people. In both South Korea and Finland, families support each other to go to school and do everything possible for their kids to get a great education. If kids don’t go to school, they are looked down upon by their family and society. Once America has a strong family support system, America then needs to start implementing better education with in the public school systems. The Secondary and Elementary Education Act and NCLB are a start for America to create a more “equal and opportune” society, but America needs to implement more laws that have worked in other leading countries. Unless this happens, America will keep falling behind to more and more countries.
All of this leads to obsessing over disciplining and having high test scores to compete with other school around the area. In Finland, they have no standardized tests that students need to take. When people are in trouble in Finland, an approach is taken to help them and support them. This is different in America. This supports the example of Harold as none of the teachers at the school took the approach to help Harold or even to support him. Many accusations were said that Harold is the problem and not the teachers. However, as Rose took a stand for Harold and helped him as he started to give up. With the standardized testing, it puts students with similar scores in the same classes. From this, Millie was put in a remedial class which was stated as an average class. As the schools soon start to care about the results of the standardized tests, the school start to focus on math, science,and reading which leads kids to being the same. This makes school not fun and the students end up dreading on going to school. In Finland, not only do the school focus on math, science, and reading they also focus on other important studies such as the arts, humanity, and physical education. Focusing on it all gives the students the ability to become creative and be their own individual person. Ken Robinson also proves that giving students the individual attention that they need helps them thrive to meet the goals that they have in education. Ken Robinson claimed, “Education does not go on in the committee rooms of out Legislative Buildings, it happens in the classrooms and schools. And the people who do it are the teachers and the students. And if you remove that discretion it stops working” (TEDtalks 13:15). When a teacher teaches a student will learn. Taking the actions to actually
Labaree discusses how the United State’s education is in a school syndrome, as people in America want schools to teach society’s ideals as well as let people express their individuality. These two demands are polar opposites that cannot be achieved. As the focus goes towards balancing these in hopes of improving society as a whole, the bettering of actual student learning is put on pause. Labaree talks about the beginning of education reform, in the 19th century, being the most successful in developing society; however, as education reform continued throughout time, its effectiveness wore off. He then addresses how the desire for education reform is more about improving society than it is about learning. He finishes his argument by providing possible solutions to fixing this problem, but states that fixing this problem will never happen because no one is willing to give up both demands. Overall, Labaree goes in wonderful detail explaining the problems of education reform. What made me choose this article was that he addressed the desire that people have on school systems in promoting both society normality and individuality. This correlates well with my topic in whether public school systems promote conformist ideals or individuality.
Reforms in education always occur when the educational system is in a period of unrest or crisis. Century after century show how hotly debated this topic is. Moreover, individuals, including, business leaders, parents, school boards and presidents feel they have the right ingredient to solve the problems of our educational system. It is unfortunate, but history is repeating itself, and we are now in a period of crisis in the education system in the 21st century (Tyack and Cuban, 1995).
Many individuals have been affected negatively by trouble makers in school. Troublemakers have either disrupted classes or bullied other students. Yes, trouble makers may harm one’s learning environment, but should they be kicked out of school? Though many individuals argue that troublemakers will not change and hold the class down, they should not be kicked out because they need help. Most of these kids that are disobedient do not know the distinction between right and wrong. We should not withdraw trouble makers from school, rather, we should help these troublemakers and teach them right from wrong. In the article “Let’s Really Reform Our Schools” by Anita Garland, she states that American high schools are disasters because there are troublemakers (694). She asserts that the withdrawal of troublemakers in schools would make the learning environment peaceful for students who want to learn
The problem is that there are not enough high quality schools in all areas especially the ones that have low income families. The NCLB did get more kids in school, but it does not mean that they actually received a quality education or even graduated for that matter. Although, there are great teachers working at public schools; there are also too many bad ones. They are the kind of teachers who do not actually care if their students learn the material they are teaching, and are only really there for the paycheck. As for the NCLB act it was more of a never ending failing cycle. First off the act states that people are able to choose what school they want to go to when that clearly is not the case because each city has district lines. Then the act claims that all schools have to do is apply for grants and ask for money from the government or they can get money based off of the schools’ test scores. When these schools in bad neighborhoods have no money to implement programs to help students do better in school, and in turn they cannot get any money because they are not meeting the state’s standards. That is how this act becomes a failing cycle, and is only able to actually work for the nice public schools because they are the ones meeting the state’s standards which meaning they are more likely to receive any money or grants from the government. Yes, we are
In The Smartest Kids in the World and How They Got That Way, Amanda Ripley investigates the education systems of three of the world’s highest performing countries offering insight into the components necessary to raise education in the United States from its current mediocre place on the world stage. By involving three teenage American exchange students, Ripley gained access to firsthand experience of the familiar US system as compared to the highly competitive systems in Finland, South Korea and Poland. The author proposes that, although the systems vary greatly, commonalities in cultural valuation of education, rigor and teacher quality have made students from these three countries the “smartest kids in the world.”
Every year a significant percentile of the American population struggle with finding access to a quality education that their finances can maintain. Finnish writer, Anu Partanen, contrast the American School Systems and their lack in accomplishments as compared to the educational programs in America. Along with her contrast in the two countries she offers a probable fix to changing the way America operates in her recent essay: Finland’s School Success What Americans Keep Ignoring. Partanen juxtaposes both Finland and America, utilizes ethos, and even provides a visual in order to reinforce her argument on the situation.
Recently, Finland is considered one of the best when it comes to education and how they have come to teach their children. Finland, is located in Northern Europe and main religion, is that of Evangelical Lutheran. In Finland their government is called a republic and their main language is Finnish. When it comes to how to act the Finnish people are very modest and will often downplay being praised, as they are modest people. When it comes to how one should behave the Finnish culture believes that you should always act in a proper and courteous manner as it is the most important to never to be disrespectful. They believe in talking in moderate tones and do nothing that would call attention, as this wa...
The controversial topic about the function of school is discussed at many school board and PTA meetings throughout America. In Anita Garland’s opinion, schools are not functioning properly. Garland states her reasons as to why the purpose of school has to change in her article, “Lets Really Reform Our Schools”, where she starts off by saying, “Desperate illnesses require desperate remedies. And our schools are desperately ill.” She proceeds to list the remedies in order to transform our schools into a more healthy, successful environment. First, Garland claims that the students who are not interested in studying should not be allowed, better yet, never forced to attend school with kids who want to receive
Ravitch justly describes No Child Left Behind as failed law. She notes that, though the intentions were good and well meaning, the results were just the opposite. Why was this? Well, as ravitch puts it, NCLB was a “punitive law based on erroneous assumptions about how to improve schools.” It assumed that reporting test scores to the public would be an effective lever for school reform, changes in governance would lead to school improvement, shaming schools that were unable to lift test scores every year (and the people who work in them) would lead to higher scores, low scores were caused by lazy teachers and lazy principals, and that higher test scores are synonymous with good education. So, what is the solution? Let us look to New Orleans.
The No Child Left Behind Act, standardized testing, and the large use of technology are some of the reasons why the United States is falling behind in educational rankings. The No Child Left Behind Act was set into place with the goal to improve student performance in school, and close the achievement gap between students; as Stecher, Vernez, and Steinburg state, “When Congress passed the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), it established an ambitious goal for the nation’s states, districts, and schools: All children will be proficient in reading and mathematics by the 2013-2014 school year” (1). While the No Child Left Behind Act was implemented with good intentions, the act itself is one of the main reasons the United States is falling behind in educational rankings. One of the most common complaints from parents surrounding the No Child Left Behind Act is the weakest link factor: the weakest student sets the pace in the classroom. The weakest student takes attention away from children whose learning level is above theirs....
Schools will try to keep their image and they will say everything is fine. It's like if someone's trying to keep their parents figuring out that they have bad grades, that person tells their parents everything is fine, in order to keep there things like there phone, tv, door, room and board. But everything isn't, there failing three classes and they have no idea what’s going on in any of them. What this scenario is meaning is that schools will always try to keep and get more federal funding. There only going to tell you that they're working on it.
There are platitudes of issues and elements that pertain to the educational process as well as curriculum development that are addressed on a routine basis. As many researchers have discussed, and administrators and teachers alike have grown to understand, if this current educational model/system is to produce creative, productive, active, and technologically savvy students-citizens the worst actions are perhaps having no actions at all (Stansbury, 2013). In addition to the grandiose mistakes of becoming stagnant (progress), educators and administrators are faced with increasing demands at the highest levels; this of course is making reference to both federal and state legislation such as No Child Left Behind, perhaps the most groundbreaking legislation to date. These rigorous demands are curriculum based, creating definitive and innovative opportunities for educators, especially those in positions to promote and formulate new curriculum models as well as propose the implementation of a new curricula into the system, to better prepare students within their educational system/process exactly what the demands of a 21st century requires. These demands are in reference to an article written by Richard Long titled Career Success Demands Strong 21st Century Literacy Skills. Long states several skills that will be required if American students are to play catch –up with the rest of the world as well as perhaps attain their position at the top of the upper echelon of world educational rankings (Long, 2010).
First, it is necessary to examine the current paradigm within education in order to determine exactly what it is about the modern system that requires changing. One of the most immediate concerns comes as a result of the school facilities the...
Education is a vital part of society. It serves the beneficial purpose of educating our children and getting them ready to be productive adults in today's society. But, the social institution of education is not without its problems. Continual efforts to modify and improve the system need to be made, if we are to reap the highest benefits that education has to offer to our children and our society as a whole.