Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Violence in movies
Unforgiven (Eastwood 1992), is a western unlike any westerns that we have watched for class. This meaning, I really enjoyed the interpretation of a western that Unforgiven portrays . Clint Eastwood, the director of Unforgiven and the actor of the protagonist William (Bill) Munny, is no stranger to the western genre. In many of his westerns, Eastwood stands by the ideas of “purgative violence as a central path to cultural and personal restoration” (Plantinga 1998), but in Unforgiven, has a very apparent approval for violence. It is said by Plantinga, in the same article that “the traditional Western embodies an American ideology of redemption and purgative violence.” This simply meaning, what we all know about the western genre, that the genre …show more content…
This is the part of the film where the violence is out in full force and this is the part of the film the violence in Unforgiven is unavoidable and quintessentially what a western is about. The final climatic shootout is a nod to the western genre and follows the formula of all of the great westerns that came before Unforgiven. It is bloody, violent and heroic. Munny’s character arch hits its final stop on the curve at this moment. He is successful in retrieving revenge for his beloved partner, Ned. He accepts the person he is and always has been. Unforgiven is known as “a serious revision of the Western genre, a worthwhile examination of the consequences of violence, and the psychological satisfactions of the traditional Western form is perhaps a major factor in its critical and commercial success.” (Plantinga 1998). The contemporary aspects of the western genre in the film is what challenged the western values, but are, in my opinion along with Munny’s character development, are what makes Unforgiven such a successful
In “The Thematic Paradigm,” University of Florida professor of film studies, Robert Ray, defines two types of heroes pervading American films, the outlaw hero and the official hero. Often the two types are merged in a reconciliatory pattern, he argues. In fact, this
In the article “The Thematic Paradigm” exerted from his book, A Certain Tendency of the Hollywood Cinema, Robert Ray provides a description of the two types of heroes depicted in American film: the outlaw hero and the official hero. Although the outlaw hero is more risky and lonely, he cherishes liberty and sovereignty. The official hero on the other hand, generally poses the role of an average ordinary person, claiming an image of a “civilized person.” While the outlaw hero creates an image of a rough-cut person likely to commit a crime, the official hero has a legend perception. In this essay, I will reflect on Ray’s work, along with demonstrating where I observe ideologies and themes.
In “The Thematic Paradigm,” Robert Ray explains how there are two vastly different heroes: the outlaw hero and the official hero. The official hero has common values and traditional beliefs. The outlaw hero has a clear view of right and wrong but unlike the official hero, works above the law. Ray explains how the role of an outlaw hero has many traits. The morals of these heroes can be compared clearly. Films that contain official heroes and outlaw heroes are effective because they promise viewer’s strength, power, intelligence, and authority whether you are above the law or below it.
The film is one of the major channels for communication social issues and matters regarding numerous aspects of living. Subjectively, directors pick up pertinent matters such as spirituality, war, relationship and others, create scripts and transform them into motion pictures, which the audience can watch and learn about the issues in an entertaining way. Clint Eastwood is one of the well know directors in Hollywood, whose films have turned to be classical productions that reflect different aspects of humanity and life. In his classic film “The Pale Rider,” Eastwood picked a biblical story about an equestrian, which is told in the books of Revelations. Using the protagonist, Eastwood fused the story into
The setting of the film, Unforgiven takes place in Wyoming in 1880. This date is significant in American history for a number of reasons. After Abraham Lincoln enacted the Union Pacific Railroad Act, this railroad company laid down tracks connecting the East to the West and reached Wyoming starting in 1867. This line connected seven towns including the Capitol, Cheyenne and a military structure, Fort Laramie, with 50% of the population living along these railroad junctions (CITE; CITE). Tensions of race and gender identity constitute a significant portion of the historical significance of the times and also reflect on modern day politics. In 1699, ninety percent of the American colonies consisted of English ethnicities. Afterward, in post-Civil
The 1992 winner of the best movie of the year, Unforgiven, is viewed by many to clash with the society of 1992 involving certain aspects of feminism and racism just to name two. This movie won four academy awards including best picture, best supporting actor, best director, and best editing but it was actually nominated for nine which is pretty phenomenal considering the amount of money it cost to make the film. In this movie, morality is in question throughout the whole film, as well as the power money actually has on people. The plot of Unforgiven focuses on the character William Munny (Clint Eastwood), who gave up his life as a thief, murderer, and villain for the love of a woman and to raise the family they were soon to have. Unlike most other movies of that era, Unforgiven didn’t seem to have a good ending with the death of Ned Logan played by Morgan Freeman and certain other factors that will be mentioned later.
While the western frontier was still new and untamed, the western hero often took on the role of a vigilante. The vigilante’s role in the frontier was that of extralegal verve which was used to restrain criminal threats to the civil peace and opulence of a local community. Vigilantism was typical to the settler-state societies of the western frontier where the structures and powers of government were at first very feeble and weak. The typical cowboy hero had a willingness to use this extralegal verve. The Virginian demonstrated this throughout with his interactions with Trampas, most notably in the interactions leading up to the shoot out and during the shoot-out itself. “Others struggled with Trampas, and his bullet smashed the ceiling before they could drag the pistol from him… Yet the Virginian stood quiet by the...
Somewhere out in the Old West wind kicks up dust off a lone road through a lawless town, a road once dominated by men with gun belts attached at the hip, boots upon their feet and spurs that clanged as they traversed the dusty road. The gunslinger hero, a man with a violent past and present, a man who eventually would succumb to the progress of the frontier, he is the embodiment of the values of freedom and the land the he defends with his gun. Inseparable is the iconography of the West in the imagination of Americans, the figure of the gunslinger is part of this iconography, his law was through the gun and his boots with spurs signaled his arrival, commanding order by way of violent intentions. The Western also had other iconic figures that populated the Old West, the lawman, in contrast to the gunslinger, had a different weapon to yield, the law. In the frontier, his belief in law and order as well as knowledge and education, brought civility to the untamed frontier. The Western was and still is the “essential American film genre, the cornerstone of American identity.” (Holtz p. 111) There is a strong link between America’s past and the Western film genre, documenting and reflecting the nations changes through conflict in the construction of an expanding nation. Taking the genres classical conventions, such as the gunslinger, and interpret them into the ideology of America. Thus The Western’s classical gunslinger, the personification of America’s violent past to protect the freedoms of a nation, the Modernist takes the familiar convention and buries him to signify that societies attitude has change towards the use of diplomacy, by way of outmoding the gunslinger in favor of the lawman, taming the frontier with civility.
Alex Vernon. "Staging Violence in West's "The Day of the Locust" and Shepard's "True West"." South Atlantic Review 65.1 (2000): 132-151. Print.
Although the scenery of isolated towns, mystic rivers, and endless forests is consistent with the western genre, the philosophical tone of the movie is not. The philosophy of a true western film deals a character fighting with guns to maintain honor (and of course order and justice). He kills because he has to and that is the end of it. In Dead Man, William Blake appears to be doing the same thing. He begins to use his gun for survival, but it is different. The gun actually stands for something in the film. Blake becomes a poet by the use of his gun, which mirrors the legendary American poet whose name he shares. The guns show how disgusting it is in American society to kill and Jarmusch doesn’t glamorize it in the way that Hollywood blockbusters about violence do.
Few Hollywood film makers have captured America’s Wild West history as depicted in the movies, Rio Bravo and El Dorado. Most Western movies had fairly simple but very similar plots, including personal conflicts, land rights, crimes and of course, failed romances that typically led to drinking more alcoholic beverages than could respectfully be consumed by any one person, as they attempted to drown their sorrows away. The 1958 Rio Bravo and 1967 El Dorado Western movies directed by Howard Hawks, and starring John Wayne have a similar theme and plot. They tell the story of a sheriff and three of his deputies, as they stand alone against adversity in the name of the law. Western movies like these two have forever left a memorable and lasting impressions in the memory of every viewer, with its gunfighters, action filled saloons and sardonic showdowns all in the name of masculinity, revenge and unlawful aggressive behavior. Featuring some of the most famous backdrops in the world ranging from the rustic Red Rock Mountains of Monument Valley in Utah, to the jagged snow capped Mountain tops of the Teton Range in Wyoming, gun-slinging cowboys out in search of mischief and most often at their own misfortune traveled far and wide, seeking one dangerous encounter after another, and unfortunately, ending in their own demise.
Django Unchained is an American film produced by Quentin Tarantino and released in December of 2012. Set in down South of American in late 1858, The story line was before the American civil war. The plot line was like any other pre-civil war movie that involved the buying and selling of African American, but with an ultimate twist like no other movies set in this timeline. Tarantino offers a story of bloody revenge that seems entirely justified because of the atrocities inflicted on the hero. At last, Django Unchained is less a requital show, but rather more, it is a revenge fantasy because Django is an anecdotal character with no conceivable real-life counterpart. The reason I could be so affected by a film that offers such a fantastical story
In many American films we put emphasis on a type of “hero”. This hero can come in many forms in Robert B. Ray’s article “The Thematic Paradigm”, Ray categorizes the heroes of the movie as being either the “official hero” or the “outlawed hero”. According to Ray these heroes’ can be differentiated in categories such as age, society, women, politics, and the law. One character who is a hero, but differentiates from Rays categories of official and outlaw hero is Leonardo DiCaprio’s role of Billy Costigan in the movie The Departed who is a mix of the official hero and the outlaw hero.
Machuco, Antonio. "Violence and Truth in Clint Eastwood's Gran Torino." Anthropoetics. 16.2 (2011): n. page. Web. 23 Feb. 2012.
Using Kant’s ethical framework, the depiction of violence in Hacksaw Ridge fails to pass the necessary tests. It’s not a moral portrayal. To explain this conclusion, it is useful to examine the violence on display from each of the three facets of Kant’s ideas: the good will, the means/end formulation, and the universalization formulation. Since the two formulations of the categorical imperative are the same, according to Kant, an action must pass both iterations of the rule, and this one does not.