Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Priciple nd techniques of interview
In depth interview analysis
In depth interview analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Priciple nd techniques of interview
The interviewer in the video EBS Trust (1998) did and excellent job of setting the scene for a proper interview. The interviewer arranged the interview in a proper interview room with a desk and chairs for himself and the victim he was interviewing (EBS Trust, 1997). The one thing that I think could have been better about the room was the bulletin board behind the interviewer. The board had several posters on it which could be distracting to someone if they are in their line of sight. The interview was conducted in a great manner as the interviewer followed an appropriate interview sequence. The interviewer touched on all aspects of the 7 stages of interviewing sequence which are an introduction, establishing rapport, broaching the subject …show more content…
The one thing that I think he could of done better was during the victims first time telling him the entire events he was taking notes right from the start. He should have got her to tell him the entire story and just focus on her and paid attention to the story before he began taking notes. The interviewer also did a great thing when he got the victim to draw out the scene of the crime on a piece of paper. He would then use this paper throughout the interview to make sure he knew exactly where she was, and it also helped her in recreating the story in her mind. Another thing that I think the interviewer could have done is try and build more rapport at the beginning of the interview. I also didn’t notice any mirroring done by either the interviewer or the interviewee. I also think the interviewer had the basics of an interview plan that he was following. He began by getting her entire story and then he got her to draw out the crime scene on a piece of paper, and finally he even got himself and her to act out the incident itself using their bodies. Weather this was planned, or the interviewer just randomly did this I thought he did an excellent …show more content…
I thought he did a good job of the proxemics of the interview sitting himself in front of the victim at the table at an appropriate distance (EBS Trust, 1998). At one point he also places his hand on her in a reassuring manner telling her that she was doing a fantastic job (EBS Trust, 1998). The one thing I think he could have done better with would have been to make more eye contact with the victim especially when she told him her story for the first time. Another thing that he did great was throughout the interview while he was seated in his chair his body language appeared very open and interested like when he was leaning forward in his chair towards the victim. Something I was surprised that he did which was great was when trying to get her to retell exactly what happened he got himself and the victim to stand up and act out the scene with their
The documentary commenced with Griffin and Kovner exploring the life of Nancy Lanza who had been portrayed by the media as the person to blame for her son’s actions but also to be questioned on whether or not she truly was a victim. The reporters tried
The book is great with the plot mainly focused in the courtroom, but it feels like the author put the plot of the story from different events that happened to younger people and not from one whole event. Finally, the document went into depth of how the defense attorney went on to get every piece of evidence as possible to make the eyes of the jury see that Brenton Butler was not the person that shot and killed the
This movie really tied everything we’ve been discussing in class and seeing it unfold was actually really eye opening. I found it important going forward to make sure I do not fall into that tunnel vision mentality and to make sure I follow the evidence rather than fitting the suspect to the evidence. Again, I found it interesting like in the Norfolk Four case and in the Central Park 5 case police neglected to look at surrounding crime areas to see if any other cases matched the same modus operandi. If the police did look at surrounding cases they would have established a link between previous assaults and the assault that took place in the park that night. I was amazed how the detectives did not connect how each of the confessions varied by who did what and how they attacked the victim. It was Korey Wise in the video that kept putting up his hand when asked how big was the rock and he was just moving them back and forth. Police also neglected to look at the attack patterns of where the group first was hassling people in the park. They would have found that the boys were at one end of the park, while the victim was being attacked and there was no way they could have been in two places at once. I also found troubling during the time was the media portrayal of the Central Park 5, how they were painted as vicious young men, who brutally attacked a harmless white women. Even after each one of them was exonerated from the crime the media still portrayed them as vicious men. As we discussed in class, I think a lawyer like a magistrate should be available 24/7 when it comes to juveniles, because I believe that this five did not know their Miranda Rights and what they were entitled. If they knew what their rights were I believe the confessions never would have happened and none of them would have gone to
A Quistclose trust arises when money is paid to a recipient for a specific purpose, if that purpose fails the money is held on trust for the payer. It mostly arises in insolvency cases where the proprietary rights have to be established. However, this type of trust has been thought to be inconsistent with the traditional trust principle. Many have suggested the Quistclose trust must be treated as any other fully fledged security device taking into account the protection it offers the payer on insolvency and should therefore be registrable. This essay critically analyses the concept of Quistclose trust, whether it differs from the resulting trusts.
In my interview Shayna Bennett, I asked her questions that were pertinent to the issue at hand. All of my questions were directed towards how she and her faculty handled this situation as well as the different methods that were used to pinpoint the issue. The reason I chose to do an interview is because I wanted to get a first-hand experience as to how one should handle children with behavioral issues because of a domestic abuse problem. The answers that were given seemed pretty
...he interviewers were trained to ensure that interviews were conducted in a fully confidential and relaxed mode, free from any consequence to the respondent.
Overall, the investigator did a good job of the interview. The cons of the interview include the introduction, establishing rapport, and allowing the subject to tell the story. The introduction consisted of the interviewer sitting down with a statement form and getting right to the facts of what happened at the scene. In this case, the interviewee was clearly traumatized by what happened and the interviewer did not take any time to establish and rapport. Throughout the interview, the interviewer kept interrupting when she was thinking, she gave non-verbal gestures showing that she was thinking, such as closing her eyes and whenever the interviewer started talking she put up her hand (telling him to stop talking). The pros to this interview were broaching the subject of the interview, review and clarification, summary and conclusion, and keeping the subject informed. The interviewer got right to the purpose of the interview without it being awkward to the interviewee. Towards the end of the interview, the interviewer went over the sketch again to clarify and pinpoint the detail (Slide 3, 14:41). He also clarified the weather, which took the interviewee’s mind of the situation for a couple of seconds. Before he ended
This event overall was very quality. They loaded the auditorium with people as a judge sat on the top of the stage. They escorted in a :criminal” in. Later we would learn he was a drunk driver. He had killed an innocent teen, and injured two others. The girls parents are testifying against him for the murder of their daughter.
The first thing I noticed when watching this is the position of the camera, it is almost a point of view shot of Erin, slightly offset of the doctor, but none the less she is slightly below the camera, and we are very close up. To me this seems to emphasise her nervousness, and when there is a jump cut to a further away angle we, as the audience, are put in the position of the interviewer. We are then treated to a mid shot of the doctor himself; Erin behind the camera still waffling on nervously, the doctor does not seem impressed. In the background we see several skyscrapers, which gives us the impression we are high up, a metaphor perhaps for Erin's real place, i.e. the bottom.
...ust fine, however the female witness had to be reminded by the judge a few times about pausing and not answering questions until there is a ruling. After the prosecution would rest, the defense then asked cross examination questions of each witness. After the direct examination and cross examination, the judge would ask the prosecutor if they had any re-direct questions. If the prosecution did not have re-direct questions, then the judge asked the jury if they have any questions for the witness. If there were none, the witness was then released. This occurred for each of the three witnesses that I saw testify. I was able to watch the questioning until they broke for the lunch recess.
The first video, provided by Highline College, went over the very specific steps of effective reference interviewing. The steps they developed were the following: Set
..., creative and balanced. He looks over the police work and reason that they got the wrong guy.
Conducting an interview is not as straightforward as it may seem. On paper the idea is that an interview is “‘a meeting of two persons to exchange information and ideas through questions and responses, resulting in communication and joint construction of meaning about a particular topic’” (Esterberg 2001:83). In the social sciences, being able to interview individuals allows the research to observe individual experiences, while also speaking to the broader sociological dynamics of a society. In Qualitative Methods in Social Research, Esterberg describes interviewing as a “relationship between two individuals…two individuals come together to try to create meaning about a particular topic. While participating in this relationship, they also draw
I think that the interview with Kelly was interesting in that she mentioned decriminalization of sex trafficking that I think she made good arguments for. When I first thought about the bodies of the workers, I never thought of the possible empowerment that they may feel being able to reduce negative stigmas through legislation and being able to do what they want with their bodies but receiving protection for assault and trust in the police. I think that this interview was a good balance of perspectives of what needs to be done about helping workers who are voluntarily or voluntarily part of sex trade working and that the common tie between them is that they need resources to help with their socio-economic well being.
I was not playing with my pen or smiling during the interview. I was able to look at my client and be professional about the situation that my client was trying to explain to me. The other things that I had notice about myself during the video was, I had lead forward toward my client and was actively listening to him. I was able to give him empathy not sympathy toward his issues. The whole time I did not feels that I was not able to speak freely because the client is my family member. During the first session I was trying so hard and I was thinking that I have to have all the solution to my client. Moreover, I was able to see make my client feel comfortable and share the issue that he had with his co-worker in dept. In the end my client feels that sometime it is okay to talk about things or topic that he is not interested in as long as he feels comfortable enough to have a conversation with other on the topic. The last thing that I have notice that I did that was not okay was touching or you say playing with my hair. I did not realized it until I saw myself on the