Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research methods
Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research methods
Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research methods
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Conducting an interview is not as straightforward as it may seem. On paper the idea is that an interview is “‘a meeting of two persons to exchange information and ideas through questions and responses, resulting in communication and joint construction of meaning about a particular topic’” (Esterberg 2001:83). In the social sciences, being able to interview individuals allows the research to observe individual experiences, while also speaking to the broader sociological dynamics of a society. In Qualitative Methods in Social Research, Esterberg describes interviewing as a “relationship between two individuals…two individuals come together to try to create meaning about a particular topic. While participating in this relationship, they also draw According to Qualitative Methods in Social Research, the goal of a semistructured interview is “to explore a topic more openly and to allow interviewees to express their opinions and ideas in their own words” (Esterberg 2001: 87). This form of interviewing permitted me to get a deeper understanding of someone else’s perspective about how they see the world around them, particularly the bus usage in Williamsburg. I wanted to interview a person who rode the bus daily and who had created their own perspective of the bus uses in Williamsburg. I created an interview guide that would help me develop a flow of questions that would ultimately reach the main focus of my interview. Since I had chosen to do a semistructured interview I was able to be much freer in my exchange with my interviewee. In the interview, I would ask a question and listen to her answer, and if I felt that I could develop another question from her answer, I did. The conversation flowed and I allowed the interviewee to structure the interview and to order the questions through her She used the WATA bus system daily, since she lived off-campus and did not have a car. I got her email though another student from my qualitative research class. From the first email, the student was willing to be interviewed. I explained the purpose of the interview as and I was able to schedule a date for the interview quite quickly. When it came time for the interview, we met in a study room in the library. Once she arrived and became comfortable, I explained to her what the informed consent was and how I would keep her identity confidential. She did not ask me any questions about the informed consent or any other ethical problems. She just smiled and told me she was not really worried about her confidentiality. I tried to talk as little as possible and to ask questions that would keep her talking. I felt that our rapport developed slowly in the beginning but once she saw that all I wanted were her thoughts and opinions, she opened up much easily. From the moment she came into the room, I tried to make the process of interviewing as casual as I could make it. I let her choose her seat and moved according to how she sitting. I also picked a study room in the back of the library when no one would walk by. She answered all of my questions and did not try to be evasive in any way. Once we got into the interview she smiled, laughed, and even made facial
The first interview I scheduled was with the Assistant Village Manager, Ms. Jablonski. We had a phone conversation that made it seem like she did not have time for the conversation. She had my questions ahead of time and was able to prepare. She mentioned that she was busy and only had twenty-five minutes to talk and said she would not have any other time to speak to me. I felt rushed and pressured to pick the most important questions from my list.
During the interview, she answered all the questions that I have brought up to her, which let me know
McClish, Mark. “Susan Smith” http://www.statementanalysis.com/susan-smith/ Advanced Interviewing Concepts. May 6, 2002. Web, Feb. 7, 2012
In-depth interviews are one of the research methods used when qualitative research is desired over quantitative research. Also, by using in-depth interviews as his research method, Messner is able to acquire much more detailed information, which will enhance the quality of his final data, making the study more efficacious and fulfilling. But, as with any research method, in-depth interviews have their strengths and weaknesses. Most importantly, with any research method, optimal levels of representativeness, replicability, reflexivity, reactivity, and objectivity should be
I must admit I began the interview with a few preconceived notions about my interviewee but as with any interview, if you pay particular attention to the person’s verbal and non-verbal cues it can give you tremendous insight as to who someone is at heart. Additionally, the medium in which an interview is conducted can greatly influence how the answers are interpreted. The interviewer needs to understand how to interpret what is being said and how it’s being said regardless of the medium. Interviews can also tell you a lot by what the person doesn 't say by interpreting the silence or noticing if the person strays off topic. Furthermore, interviews can give insight into the interviewer as well
What surprised me the most was the how easy it was to conduct the interview. It’s not as scary asking someone else questions rather than answering them. My confidence got the best of me, I had written my questions ahead of time, but I hadn’t really practiced saying them out loud as a consequence of this decision Miller didn’t understand what a couple my questions meant. Also, I found it was easy to maintain eye contact but, the most difficult thing I found was it was hard jolting down her answers as I went along because her questions were so abrupt. Next time I conduct an interview I will become very familiar with all my questions so I can establish a better
I know that she was hesitant about doing the interview since she said she “doesn’t follow politics”. After her telling me she didn’t want to do the interview, I wanted her to do it even more because I thought it was interesting for a person who is a parapro in World History and U.S. History to not be interested
During the interview with Wati and Dewi, there are no interactions between the participants and researcher. Researcher neither asks questions nor provides responds to the participants’ views. In this process, researcher does not attempt to direct or restrict the topic. Instead, researcher allows the participants to freely sharing their views and stories in a natural way, following their own intenti...
The unstructured interview approach, is an excellent way of creating multiple realities by giving the control of the interview over to the participants being interviewed and inviting them to tell their stories peaked by only an open-ended question. This method requires an environment in which the participants readily open up (Hill, 2001). To the credit of the current study, the interviewees did provide detailed accounts when interviewed. Additionally, as the stories are elicited by the participants own volition, they can cover a broad range of topics allows for unplanned comments and topics to come up that may have otherwise been left untouched in a more structured methodology (Kvale, 1983). However, because the responses are so gloriously open ended they are difficult to compare across different cases, and large amounts of irrelevant data must be sifted through in a time consuming manner. The benefit of qualitative phenomenological research is that while most scientific methods focus on what can be physically observed and quantitatively measured, this leaves a gapping hole in our ability to evaluate the human condition as most of what we do is determined by unseen forces in our psyches (Kvale, 1983). Therefore, open-ended phenomenology allows researchers to break the restrictive mold and attempt to discover insights into lived experience that would normally remain invisible to more traditional scientific study (Dale,
The purpose of research interviews is to explore the views, beliefs, and motives of individuals on a specific matter for example factors that influence their daily life. They also provide a clear understanding of social issues and an insight that is required from the participant (British dental journal, 2008).The many types of research interview in qualitative research namely are the structured, semi-structured, unstructured and in-depth interview. I will explain them further since they can be used to explore
I interviewed my good friend Nayab at the Undergraduate Student Government Office, here at Hunter College. Nayab suffers from hypothyroidism. It should be noted that I have a mild case myself, so I am very familiar with her complaints and experiences. She felt comfortable being interviewed with two of our friends in the room, but I was worried it would influence her responses to my questions, making the atmosphere less personal and intimate. Despite my apprehension, she answered rather openly and did not seem uncomfortable at any point. Because we were in a public area, we had a couple interruptions, such as having to change rooms and being asked questions about other student’s whereabouts, but once again this did not seem to affect Nayab very much.
Qualitative research is an approach that attempts to situate an activity that locates the observer in the world by providing the study to occur in their natural setting and by attempting to make sense of, or interpret information (Denzin and Lincoln, 2005). A characteristic of qualitative research is to use a variety of empirical materials such as personal experience, interviews, and questionnaires. It is imperative to understand the task at hand and how to fully carry out the study when using a qualitative research approach in order to find out the information needed. One view of qualitative research is it involves examining individual’s experiences and documenting those experiences in detail (Jones, 2011). By documenting these observations the researcher is ensuring validity in his or her data and giving the correct creditability to those who participated in the study.
The purpose of this analytic approach toward the Oprah Winfrey and Lance Armstrong interview is to identify the characteristics of interviews. While observing the interview I will be applying the concepts of the fundamental characteristics of interviews, traditional and nontraditional forms of interviewing, relational dimensions to interviewing, perceptions of interviewer and interviewee, communication interaction, listening for feedback and the interview situation. To gather information I looked at the interview online and a transcript provided by Armchair Spectator.
When the interview started we actually got along great. We were both very comfortable and because we had met each other the day before the sense of familiarity was still there. But I think the biggest thing that made my interview get along so smoothly was because I had changed my interview strategy from informal questions, to improvised on the spot active participation. I made her feel more like it was us having a normal conversation then an interviewer/interviewee dynamic. She understood all my questions and would initially answer in a short answer till I asked her more about it, getting her to open up. The gist of her answers were all I could have predicted, because my questions had been proven before by scientists, exercise had a very positive emotional and mental effect on her, she was more relaxed and focused and her confidence and self-esteem improved . But one answer surprised me. When I asked her when she felt stressed because of exams other time specific stressors did you exercise? she said no, although she felt less stress when exercising she did not work out when being stressed in those specific time stressors because she felt she didn’t have time to do them. Which seems counter intuitive but makes sense because she is under a time stress that she could wait out and not a lingering
The interviewee and I both felt very comfortable, I didn’t sense much distress until I got to the controversial topics, which is great. Both parties should be comfortable when it comes to an interview. Also, although I did wait long periods before talking sometimes and I also cut her off once, I do feel like I did get a decent amount of information from her. I also asked open-ended questions too. I actually didn’t ask any leading questions in this interview which is why I got such lengthy answers from her but I did compound some questions which I wouldn 't do next time because the trend seems to be that she would respond to the last question I asked instead of acknowledging everything I said. Another thing I feel that I did well was listening. I did not talk very much, she did the talking for about ¾ of the interview which is