Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Dulce et decorum est by wilfred owen analysis
Dulce et decorum est by wilfred owen analysis
How did World War 1 affect British literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Dulce et decorum est by wilfred owen analysis
Propaganda Dissected
When suggesting what is considered propaganda and what isn’t, correlates to the motive behind the information that is being presented. Propaganda can be presented in any form that depicts a message and forms an opinion, but the effects are not always negative. Plato famously banning poetry from his ideal republic on the grounds that it tells beautiful lies that “feed and water our passions” rather than our reason” isn’t exactly a positive or negative connotation. It is plausible that Plato wanted to influence society to stay focus on changes to society that would help civilization instead of wasting time entertaining themselves with fantasy stories. In the eyes of one, poetry could be a waste of time and doesn’t do anything
…show more content…
In Wilfred Owen famous poem Dulce Et Decorum Est uses the death of a soldier from a poisons gas to call out the propagandists who praised the glories of war through posters, flyers, and newspaper articles. During the height of the war the need for recruitment of soldiers was depicted as if the women encouraged it and society embraced it. The ugly truth was never portrayed and the harsh reality, that war was horrific, terrifying, brutal, and deadly, was ignored. Owen writes the poem describing unimaginable experiences that are the harsh reality of what the war was like at the time. The first line states “ Bent double, like old beggars under sacks, Knock-kneed, coughing like hags,” is the first insight at the difference between the young, clean cut, spiffy uniform solider that was posturized to encourage recruitment to the actuality of soldiers who are exhausted beggars the complete contrary to what was depicted. This poem was written as a rebuttal to a specific poet Jessie Pope, who patriotic poems epitomized the glorification of war that Owen so …show more content…
Pope’s poem Who’s for the Game is written to persuade young lads to help their country in the fight or war. Pope uses many references to compare war to a sports game as many young men can relate to. Another propaganda tactic she uses is appealing to the emotions of young men “Who’ll grip and tackle the job unafraid? And who thinks he’d rather sit tight?” in which she is questioning the pride of soldiers. Pope doesn't leave out that the chance of an injury isn’t possible, “Who would much rather come back with a crutch”, but what she fails to mention is the possibility of death and she portrays the chance of injury as nothing more than a hurt
Similarly, Wilfred Owen’s poem “Dulce et Decorum Est” describes a soldier who witnesses the death of his comrade from poisonous gas. Using imagery and irony, Owen presents a blunt contrast between the propaganda practiced for recruitment and the truth behind the suffering endured by the soldiers. While presented in different formats, both literary works criticize the romanticism of war, arguing that there is no glory in the suffering and killing caused by conflict.
In the poem “Who’s for the game?”, the author Jessie Pope uses an extended metaphor to toy with prideful behaviour to insinuate a challenge for men, in order to convince them to enlist for the Great war. The metaphor “Who’s for the game”, compares the great war to a enjoyable activity. Most games are usually fun and an exciting pass time that many people are eager to partake in. The comparison of a thrilling activity makes the war sound more appealing to the men who are considering to join the war effort. In the quote “Who’ll grip and tackle the job unafraid.”, Pope uses vocabulary that is associated with sports to bring an uplifting and an exciting tone to the poem. This is a crucial poetic device in the poem that assists to convince men to
Through the meaning behind these poems are different. They each share a similar point of view which is that they are talking to young men about war. For example in The Call Pope expressed the glory that young men would get by going to war in stanza three, Who'll earn the Empire's thanks / Will you my laddie? (17-18) Jessie Pope beliefs on war is that by young men going to fight for their country they will be treated as heroes. If they chose not to join they would be considered disrespecting their country. Furthermore, Wilfred Owen does the same thing in Dulce et Decorum Est though his views on war are inverted as opposed to what Jessie Pope believes. He personally feels the war is not the best thing that young men should to do for gratitude
“Dulce et Decorum Est” shows how one soldiers need to survive indirectly causes another soldiers death. From the very beginning of the poem the reader sees how the war affects the soldiers. Fighting in the war has aged the soldiers, the once young men now “bent double, like old beggars under sacks, knock-kneed, coughing like hags” trudge through the warzone (Owen 1-2). The men, completely drained f...
In conclusion, depending on the position from which one views war, the standpoint may vary ranging from being supportive of the soldiers because those who die are dying for the country or they are completely unsupportive of war activities because it is a brutal and gruesome experience involving countless unnecessary injuries and deaths. Affected by a number of factors, the authors of the two poems have chosen opposing standpoints on the issue of war where Tennyson glorified it with the main message that it is an honour to die for one's country whereas the other, Owen suppresses the idea of war by illustrating all the horrid experiences of a soldier.
Jessie Pope’s language is very much colloquial and as before mentioned, very informal, and this was mainly because it wasn’t addressing the older men to join, but it convinced younger boys to as well. This adds to the propaganda theme and this sort of language is throughout the poem, which makes me understand even more why Owen had to hark Pope and all the pro-propagandists in the world, because it does very much show how these people treated the war – they thought of it as a game where you win some you lose some, but they didn’t realise that this wasn’t a game and real people with families, their lives were at risk and unfortunately they paid for their mistakes.
The poem "Dulce et Decorum Est", an anti-war poem by Wilfred Owen who was an English footsoldier, states that it is not sweet and fitting to die a hero's death for a country. Right off in the first line, Owen describes the troops as being "like old beggars under sacks" (1). This metaphor indicates that the men are battle weary and suggests reluctance. They also have been on their feet for days and appear to be drained of youth as they "marched asleep" (5) and "limped on, blood-shod" (6). Overall, in the first stanza, Oundjian 2 there seems to be a tension between old and young because it shows how the impact of an endless war has reduced these once energetic young men to the point where they could be referred to as "old" (1), "lame" (6) and...
In ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’. Owen, throughout the poem, creates the impression of the trenches for the reader and stanza one helps to set the scene. The soldiers, who have been fighting for a long time in the trenches, are finally returning to their billets to rest. The exhaustion of the men is shown here through similes which compare the men to old beggars and hags, ‘like beggars under sacks’ and ‘coughing like hags’, although they were young men, showing just how exhausted they were and the effects the war is having on them physically. Also, the men are ‘blood-shod’ which makes them seem more like horses than human beings. Owen also uses metaphors in stanza one to describe the terrible tiredness the men were suffering from, ‘men marched asleep’. The stanza describes how the poor conditions of the trenches are putting a strain on the soldiers, until they are ‘knock-kneed’ and having to ‘trudge’ through the ‘sludge’ to get to their place of rest. They are ‘drunk with fatigue’ and limping with wounds or loss of boots. This stanza also illustrates the ...
The poem ‘Dulce et Decorum Est’ by Wilfred Owen portrays the horrors of World War I with the horrific imagery and the startling use of words he uses. He describes his experience of a gas attack where he lost a member of his squadron and the lasting impact it had on him. He describes how terrible the conditions were for the soldiers and just how bad it was. By doing this he is trying to help stop other soldiers from experiencing what happened in a shortage of time.
Wilfred Owen’s “Dulce et Decorum Est” and E. E. Cummings’, “next to of course god america i” are poems that critique patriotic propaganda. Both poems use words and images to effectively depict the influence that patriotic propaganda has on war. “Dulce et Decorum Est” uses descriptive words to create realistic images of the horrors soldiers are faced with during combat, whereas “next to of course god america i” uses sarcasm to inform readers that the abuse of propaganda can be used to manipulate others. The attitudes they convey are quite similar; both suggest that propaganda is a lie; it is not sweet and fitting to die for one’s country. It is ingrained in soldier’s minds that to die for ones country is a great and honourable sacrifice.
In ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’, Owen compares the solders who are men to ugly, old, sick women through the simile “coughing like hags”, highlighting that the men no longer possess strength, masculinity, exceptional physical skills and potency. As a result, the soldiers’ eradicated youth and innocence portrays the dehumanising effect that the soldier’s have faced through their experiences of the war. Additionally, Owen further explores this dehumanising effect through the exaggerated movement of the soldiers in the hyperbolic metaphor “We cursed through sludge”, illustrating the ghastly and gruesome environment made up of a mix of materials such as body parts of other fellow soldiers, blood and mud. The horrendous conditions the soldiers faced for a long period of time had a drastic impact on the soldier’s mental health which in turn lead to post-traumatic stress disorder or shell-shock disorder and lost of potency. Owen also portrays that not only did the war affect a few soldiers, but all the soldiers through the repetition of “all”. Ultimately, it is conveyed that the soldiers had to unwillingly sacrifice their human attributes and was dehumanised as a result of human conflict. Similarly, in ‘The Next War’, Owen
Wilfred Owen’s poem “Dulce et Decorum Est” makes the reader acutely aware of the impact of war. The speaker’s experiences with war are vivid and terrible. Through the themes of the poem, his language choices, and contrasting the pleasant title preceding the disturbing content of the poem, he brings attention to his views on war while during the midst of one himself. Owen uses symbolism in form and language to illustrate the horrors the speaker and his comrades go through; and the way he describes the soldiers, as though they are distorted and damaged, parallels how the speaker’s mind is violated and haunted by war.
Wilfred Owen's poem "Dulce Et Decorum Est" was written during his World War I experience. Owen, an officer in the British Army, deeply opposed the intervention of one nation into another. His poem explains how the British press and public comforted themselves with the fact that all the young men dying in the war were dieing noble, heroic deaths. The reality was quite different: They were dieing obscene and terrible deaths. Owen wanted to throw the war in the face of the reader to illustrate how vile and inhumane it really was. He explains in his poem that people will encourage you to fight for your country, but, in reality, fighting for your country is simply sentencing yourself to an unnecessary death. The breaks throughout the poem indicate the clear opposition that Owen strikes up. The title of the poem means "It is good and proper to die for your country," and then Owen continues his poem by ending that the title is, in fact, a lie.
...Unlike other poets who glorified war and eluded people’s mind Owen brought the reality of war and death in front of people’s eyes. War is not just fighting for your nation and gaining victory, it is looking at death and inhumanity eye to eye and experiencing agony, suffering and reality. The name of heroes and heroism just remains in words but the reality is the inhuman situation faced during the war. In my opinion war is not a solution to all problems, there is no need for bloodshed, killing, violence and destruction. The problems, the difference of opinion and disputes can be settled by non violence, agreements and understandings. Mahatma Gandhi proved to the world that you can achieve your aim by means of non violence and peace. He rightly said: “I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent.”
The war imagery in Pope’s poem helps define and clarify the point of view Pope has on the even that has occurred. It also gives Pope a poetic platform on which to condemn the opposite side. He uses the imagery to describe the victim of war, the way death and battle are in war, and the opposing sides of this war and why they are battling; creating a new view of the woman’s suicide and her as a soldier for love.