Dr. Grimesby Roylott is depicted as the murderer of his step-daughter, Julia, in the short-story, “The Adventure of the Speckled Band,” written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Sherlock Holmes was not guilty of killing Dr. Roylott; although, Holmes may have been able to handle the situation with more tranquility. Primarily, Sherlock Holmes had been hired to protect Helen Stoner; he had not been deliberately attempting to kill Dr. Roylott. Furthermore, Holmes was only using self-defense when he eyed the swamp adder. Clearly unaware of the consequences, Dr. Roylott had been seated in the chair directly under the ventilator. Therefore, Holmes was not responsible for the death of Dr. Grimesby Roylott as he was only endeavoring to defend Helen. Sherlock …show more content…
Grimesby Roylott was extremely intelligent meaning that Sherlock Holmes would not have known he would allow the snake to bite him. Dr. Roylott had numerous practices in India with several deadly animals. In fact, he owned a cheetah and a baboon that roamed freely through his front yard. He planned out the murder of Julia paying close attention to cause and effect details thoroughly. Dr. Roylott worked with this snake often. He was not dead, so he had not sat in the chair, previously. He was able to train the snake with milk to do what he pleased. Dr. Grimesby Roylott even had a leash with a noose at the bottom to catch the snake. There was no way in its entirety that Sherlock Holmes or Dr. Watson could have predicted Dr. Grimesby Roylott would be bitten by the snake. If Dr. Roylott had been so educated, how could he have made such careless mistakes? Although Dr. Roylott had the greatest fault, Sherlock Holmes could have been more careful when the snake entered Julia’s …show more content…
Grimesby Roylott. Holmes was only used to promise protection to Helen Stoner from her step-father. Although he hit the snake, it was out of self-defense to protect himself. When the snake reached Dr. Roylott’s chamber, Holmes had no possible way of knowing that Dr. Roylott would be bitten by it. Though it may have been difficult, Holmes could have thought for a small amount time before striking the swamp adder about what may occur. As a result, Helen could be happily married with the ultimate knowledge of the occurrences behind her step-father’s chamber door. Sherlock Holmes sensed the astounding completion behind this difficult case, even though it may have costed him his
I learned many things about Philip Caputo and his tour of duty. He described how he felt in the beginning about the Vietnamese people, which was not as much hate since him and the other soldiers were not as knowledgeable about all the conflict that was taking place in Vietnam. Caputo was very opinionated towards his views of the Vietnamese people. He actually felt sorry for all the villagers who had to see and deal with the negative environment that was brought upon them, and bear the Marines who probed their homes for prohibited Viet Cong relations. Caputo did not find it fair how the American troops mistreated the villagers and protected the concept of apprehending the Viet Cong. However, throughout the end of his tour, he and his men disliked the VC very strongly, learned how to hate and wanted to kill them.
“I have had a happy life and thank the Lord. Goodbye and may God bless all!”(199), these were the last words of Chris McCandless in a picture with him smiling and waving good-bye. Into The Wild by Jon Krakauer is an extension of an article first published in Outside magazine. In the book, Krakauer further explains the journey of Chris McCandless, while providing his own insight to provide the reader a better understanding of the McCandless reasoning. McCandless lived a nomadic life after he graduated from college, traveling from South Dakota to Mexico. However, his two year journey proved fatal when he took a trip to Alaska, his greatest undertaking. Among his remains several books were discovered, including a copy of Walden by Henry D. Thoreau
Chris McCandless "I think that Chris McCandless was bright and ignorant at the same time. He had no common sense, and he had no business going into Alaska with his romantic silliness. He made a lot of mistakes based on ignorance. I don’t admire him at all for his courage, nor his noble ideas. Really, I think he was just plain
The sight of the snake is so heartbreaking that even the man is left to rethink
For a while he finished the stories, but with debts and great public support he created another collection of the Holmes stories, due to the fact they were in high demand. Conan Doyle sadly died in Crowborough, Sussex, England, on July 7, 1930. Holmes is an intellectual detective who although spends a lot of the time by his self still depend on a valiant partner to accompany him on his cases, in this case Dr Watson. Dr Watson, in the Sherlock Holmes stories, is portrayed as particularly as an average British person helping his friend in his cases. Because he is portrayed as this it helps us see ourselves in the story along with Holmes therefore, intriguing the reader to usually read more.
“Black Awakening in Capitalist America”, Robert Allen’s critical analysis of the structure of the U.S.’s capitalist system, and his views of the manner in which it exploits and feeds on the cultures, societies, and economies of less influential peoples to satiate its ever growing series of needs and base desires. From a rhetorical analysis perspective, Allen describes and supports the evidence he sees for the theory of neocolonialism, and what he sees as the black people’s place within an imperial society where the power of white influence reigns supreme. Placing the gains and losses of the black people under his magnifying glass, Allen describes how he sees the ongoing condition of black people as an inevitable occurrence in the spinning cogs of the capitalist machine.
Holmes and Watson were to guard Helen from a mysterious whistle she heard in the early morning, every single morning. The whistle she heard was the same whistle that Julia (her sister) had heard when she came upon her fate. The night that they were going to investigate, they stayed in Helen’s room; Julia’s old room. They woke up to the whistle and Holmes smacked the snake in the face. The snake ended up going back into Dr. Roylott’s room and killing him by venom. Helen was saved by Holmes in the situation where she would have been murdered by her own father and let her be married with no interference. Holmes, however, could have done another action that did not include hitting the snake and making it bite Dr. Roylott. Holmes had banged the snake in the head, which caused it to be aggravated and bite the first person it saw. Holmes could not have predicted where Dr. Roylott was sitting in his
“The Rattler” is a story that is written by Donald Beattie that expresses a survival and protective tone to persuade readers to side with the man that killed the snake in order to protect a larger community of animals and humans. Beattie is presenting the story to a large group of people in attempt to persuade them. Beattie uses imagery, simile, and pathos to develop a root of persuasion and convince the audience to reanalyze the man’s actions.
It wasn’t just Holmes who suffered though, Patrick Prendergast was another man who appeared to psychopathic because of
With all of the women in Holmes’ life it would seem Holmes had every opportunity given to him to settle down and live a normal life. So why would he continue down the path he was? Out of all the women in Holmes’ life it was his second wife, Myrtle Z. Bellman’s father Holmes tried to swindle and kill, he was unsuccessful (America’s Serial Killers).
...he met the detective, fell victim to Moriarty’s games. “Moriarty is playing with your mind too. Can’t you see what’s going on!” (Sherlock). During Holmes’ last days before his faked suicide, he pleads with John to see reason through Jim’s manipulations, as does Desdemona with Othello’s accusations. Even Sherlock’s oldest friend Detective Inspector Greg Lestrade was doubting Holmes’ credibility.
Throughout six seasons of AMC’s ongoing hit show The Walking Dead, Rick Grimes, the main protagonist, has grown from: a tough guy police officer with a soft heart for helping others (almost always coming with a great personal risk) to the ultimate leader and survivor. Rick’s character arc during the first five seasons of the show, were about the ongoing growth/development of Rick, along with little benchmarks along the way in the form of gruesome but necessary murder. During Rick’s character arc, he goes through three major phases that reflect his morals and view of the world. These changes are then highlighted by the various brutal gory kills Rick has achieved. We as viewers get an in depth look at this gradual evolution as he fights to survive
Watson than there is in the short story. In the case of Helen Stoner, the movie allows you to see aspects of her character that you do not see in the written story such as her relationship with her sister and stepfather. While it does say in the book that the sisters were “chatting about her approaching wedding,” more development is present in the movie because it shows the sisters together reminding the audience that they were close companions and that the loss of Julia was devastating to Helen. Another example of this character development is with Dr. Watson. In the movie adaptation, a short clip was added while Holmes and Watson investigated the house in which Julia had died. In the clip, Dr. Watson is shown examining foot prints on the lawn and explains to Holmes that he is trying to be as observant as he is. Though this clip may not seem like an important part of the story, it adds to Watson’s character by showing him as a student of Sherlock Holmes. While the movie does make the characters more dynamic, it also removed some of the suspense that the written version created.
Everyone dreams of being a hero however the path is narrow. The mantle of responsibility is important aspects and the presence of the heroic traits must be shown in some form. However, there will always be outliers and deemed delusional who attempt to be heroes. In Watchmen, Moore creates an omnipotent hero who lacks humanity in the portrayal of the Dr. Manhattan as a psychopathic anti-hero.
Conflict creates “rising action” leading the character towards the climax of the story. In the story it seemed that there was external conflict between Dr. Roylott, the stepfather and the two daughters. It appeared to be conflict of interest due to the inheritance of the money. He killed the first daughter and tried to kill the second daughter in order for him to receive all the money. The different conflict that was explored was man versus man, Sherlock Holmes versus Dr. Roylott. Dr. Roylott appears at Sherlocks Holmes’s home, frustrated because his stepdaughter went to Holmes for help; the quote used “I will do nothing of the kind. My stepdaughter has been here. I have traced her. What has she been saying to you?.” Roylott threatened Holmes to not interfere, but he does either way. Holmes going to Roylotts house made the story more interesting for the readers with regards the different finds that he saw. An internal conflict seems to arise with Helen and her stepfather. She loves her stepfather but is afraid that he might have something to do with her sister’s death. This causes Holmes to investigate the