Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Society in the chesapeake colonies
Society in the chesapeake colonies
Social structure of chesapeake and new england colonial
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Society in the chesapeake colonies
Published on the heels of Billing’s article, Douglas Greenberg’s “Crime, Law Enforcement, and Social Control in Colonial America” (1982) examines the effectiveness and factors of colonial law enforcement. Unlike New England’s legal system, which he describes as the most effective in seventeenth century America, “the Chesapeake colonies weathered a terrifying degree of conflict that was reflected not only in personal assaults and frequent thefts, but in substantial political violence as well.” He argues that the Virginia colony was at an innate disadvantage in terms of social order since the unequal sex ratio and age distribution meant a high level of violent crime. As such, stable family units which could have helped in subduing such undesired …show more content…
Specifically addressing the charges of fornication and bastardy, he writes “Virginia courts may have shown somewhat more interest in undertaking such prosecutions, but in both colonies death rates were so high and birth rates so low that any birth, whether legitimized by marriage or not, was cause for celebration rather than criminal prosecution.” Further mitigating the more violent elements of Virginia law was the fact that the death penalty was seldom carried out except for the most heinous crimes due to the chronic labor shortage in the …show more content…
Its rulers were unable to govern, its social institutions were ill-defined, its economy was undeveloped, its politics were unstable, and its cultural identity was indistinct.” Yet despite this near-anarchic atmosphere, David Hackett Fischer in Albion’s Seed: Four British Folkways in America (1989), concludes that the legal system was fairly effective because it succeeded in fulfilling its main purpose, to strictly enforce the colony’s hierarchical system. Therefore, the proliferation of moral crimes or violence committed among colonists of lower status was irrelevant in determining the deterrent effect on society because that was never the primary intent of the colony’s legal system. The Virginia courts enforced this hierarchical/patriarchal idea of showing deference and respect to one’s “superiors,” whether it involved the relationship between master and slave, father and son, or husband and wife. Violent crimes which threatened this social system were therefore savagely punished, and as a result “there was remarkably little violence by the poor against the rich, or by the humble against the elite.” A defendant’s position within those relationships played an important role in assigning their punishment. Virginia law considered the murder of a patriarch treason, punishable by death. Moreover, literate members of society belonging disproportionately to the elite class could always
...his seemingly routine case of fornication and premarital pregnancy proved to be significant for early American legal history. The unfolding of this story and the legal changes that it brought about makes evident that by the end of the seventeenth century, The Eastern Shore had shaped a distinct legal culture. The characters involved in each case also revealed the extent the powerful players were able to shape the law to their own self-interests. The goal of the powers to be was to protect property interests, protect personal reputation and liberty, and to maintain social order.
In Woody Holton's Forced Founders, that most revered segment of the revolutionary generation, the elitist gentry class of Virginia, comes across very much as a group of self-serving reactionaries, rather then the idealized revolutionaries of the great patriotic myth of popular history. He sets about disassembling a central portion of the myth created by earlier generations of Consensus historians, by asserting that rather then gallantly leading the charge for independence, Virginia's elitist gentry resorted to independence as their last and only means of saving their elite ruling status, their economic futures, and even their very lives many feared. While this is very much an example of revisionist history, Holton has not so much rewritten history, as he has provided the back story of the complexity and diversity of the Virginia colony on the eve of the American Revolution. For while the book's title may insinuate otherwise, lowly groups like slaves and Indians discussed here are afforded only the status of “founders” by pressing those traditionally thought of in this role to take the plunge for independence. Still the papers and correspondence of the iconic figureheads of the revolutionary generation like Washington, Jefferson, and Madison make up the bulk of primary sources.
Breen, T. H., and Stephen Innes. Myne Owne Ground: Race and Freedom on Virginia 's Eastern Shore, 1640-1676. 25th anniversary ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. 142 pages (kindle edition).
John Ruston Pagan’s book, Anne Orthwood’s Bastard, is split into sections describing the different components of sex and law in early Virginia. Pagan describes these components through the story of Anne Orthwood, John Kendall, and their bastard son, Jasper. Anne Orthwood was born an illegitimate child. There was much shame and disgrace for illegitimate children. Although illegitimacy made Anne’s life especially hard, she also faced the same pressures as other members of her generation. Her generation was dealing with shortages of land and labor; increasing prices, rent, and unemployment rates; and declining wages. These struggles caused many people to emigrate from Britain to the Americas.
Through the first chapter of this book the focus was primarily on the notion of controlling crime. The best way to describe crime policy used in this chapter is comparing it to a game of ‘heads I win, tails you lose’. This chapter also addresses the causes for decline in America’s
For the purpose of this paper, the most intriguing point about this is what Boudreau further argues in his book, which is that these formal judicial incentives contradict the rule of law by propagating already existing socio-economic inequalities as well as inequalities within class, gender and ethnic relations (p.8). In the following essay I will discuss Michael Boudreau’s argument and his ability to accurately and sufficiently demonstrate the existence of this contradiction in the rule of law within the city of Halifax from the years of 1915 to 1935. I will do this by analysing the effectiveness of demonstrating what I took to be the premises behind his argument which is as follows. That in interwar Halifax, to respond to increased criminality brought about by a prompt shift in modernity, the city required the justice system and the rule of law to function without due
Law and Order in the Late Nineteenth Century In this essay I am going to write about Londonin the nineteenth century and also about the creation of the metropolitan police force. During the 19th century Londonwas different then what it is now for instance there was no major police force and most of the police was made up of volunteers. 75% of the crime in Londonwas petty theft; only 10% of the crime was made up of violent crimes such as murders so there really wasn't any need for a police force which explains why there wasn't one.
The cultural development of the Chesapeake Bay colonies and New England colonies differed greatly because the people who were attracted to each were very different. The New England colonies were founded by the Puritans who sailed across the Atlantic for religious freedoms during the Great Migration away from the threatening climate in England. The people who came to America were largely families hoping to start a new life. Because the puritan religion unified them and their goal to set up Go’s Kingdom in America, the founding families were able to organize centralized town life. The colonies grew fast because of the even sex ratio but the family structure of the colonies largely remained the same where men were the head of house and women must obey men’s decision, although women did enjoy certain rights like divorce. The Chesapeake Bay colonies to the south on were much different in purpose therefore fundamentally different in cultural development. These colonies were originally founded for economic purposes and instead of families, most of the original inhabitants of these colonies were men looking to make money. Many aspects of the Chesapeake Bay colonies culture led contributed to the town structure being very different than Puritan colonies. The main s...
The author takes the time to describe activities and people including the issues surrounding illegitimacy, the Kendall's, the court clerk, the ship’s surgeon, the midwife among others. These stories and people are the small but vital components of ‘micro’ topics that constitute micro-history. Together, the ‘micro’ topics reveal to the readers the legal system of Virginia and England, the role of women in the society, contracts and sale of servants, criminal fornication and the involvement of the church in state
Simon, Johnathan. “Power, Authority, and Criminal Law.” Simon, Johnathan. Governing Through Crime : How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear. Oxford University Press, 2007. 341.
Throughout the chapter “Hierarchy”, Wood explores this structure and how traditional it was. Wood continuously reminds the readers of the fact that “in some respects colonial society [is] more traditional than that of the mother country,” (Wood 12). Hierarchy was very ingrained into the colonists’ minds and since the colonists were still subjects of the King of England, they followed much of the monarchial structure that was set in England. The monarchial structure is essentially the same as hierarchy, except with one person at the top instead of a group of people. Wood notes that the colonists had no other social system to derive from than England’s, so many similarities between both societies existed. Also, the fact that Americans were fascinated by the King and perhaps more patriotic than the English people became a large part of the reason why Americans believed “hierarchy of a monarchial society was part of the natural order of things,” (Wood
One of the earliest American social groups was the 17th Century Puritans. This society had an extremely unique and strict manner of thinking that was entirely based on inequality. This is clearly represented by the writings of the Puritan leader John Winthrop. In “A Model of Christian Charity,” Winthrop outlines the societal rationale, and in turn, the disparity of equality in his society. The gist of the Puritan way of life is that, by the grace of God, certain individuals were empowered with the ability to be enlightened and the capability of achieving much within the society itself. However, by the same reasoning, some individuals were also destined to take the lesser roles in society, and as a result, had no power to move up within the ranks because of this inescapable predetermination. Thi...
The way that the police investigated cases, such as Helen Jewett murder was by gathering material evidence, observation, and testimonies from witnesses that they could link to the person who they suspected of committing the crime (Cohen, P. 1998, pg.9 &11). The police of this time were not an organized force or had any real training, they were consider to be more of a security force (Cohen, P. 1998, pg.8). Although the police force of the 1800’s used similar investigating tactic as our law enforcement do today they were missing one-hug aspects that we have, and that is DNA evidence. What can be interpreted about the criminal justice system in New York in the 1800’s is that even though they were not trained, they had a grasp on what had to be
Throughout time, organized crime has existed and persisted. All over the world there is criminal activity, but in the 1920’s, organized crime sprung up in the United States. Previous to this, in 1919, the 18th amendment was placed and this made all production, use, and distribution of alcohol illegal in response to the temperance movement. When the demand for alcohol was increased, people had to find a way to make the supply. Bootlegging and it’s profit led to the rise of organized crime in the 1920’s.
In 1761, at the beginning of the industrial revolution, England’s population consisted of 6.3 million inhabitants whereas 80 years later the population rose to 14.9 million, rising even with war and emigration transpiring. 1 The industrial revolution was a big step for Great Britain but not all benefitted, especially the poor and working class. One of the biggest negative side effects was poverty which increased the amount of street peddlers in the city streets. As that number grew many people grew upset complaining that they were blocking shops and taking up space, forcing street traders to move out to country borders, giving them less business and forcing them deeper into poverty. 2 With the beginning of the industrial revolution in the late 1700’s came the Crime Wave of the 1780’s where city prisons were filled to capacity and the amount of crime pushed forward policing levels and prosecution rates. This was only the beginning of a whole new era of criminal reform. 3 As the industrial revolution took its course throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth century, the negative effects such as varying food prices and gruesome working and living conditions spurred rising crime rates, especially in property crime, leading to numerous police reforms and acts. Although these changes were not very effective in curbing the high crime they did end up laying a foundation for more successful reforms in the future.