More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on why football is bad for kids
Effects of head injuries in contact sport
Essays on why football is bad for kids
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Damaging the Future
A parents worst fear is to have something tradgic happen to their child, especially if it was something that was caused by a sport, such as football. “Don’t Let Kids Play Football” is an article that is warning parents and children about the dangers of playing high contact sports. In the article published in The New York Times, Dr. Bennet Omalu, a physician who diagnosed CTE shares research that shows the long term effects of high impact sports and discusses the possibilities of brain damage. ”Don’t Let Kids Play Football” is rhetorically persuasive because Dr. Omalu uses moral duty to appeal to audience’s emotions and uses evidence to support the research on CTE.
Dr. Omalu’s findings in “Don’t Let Kids Play Football”
…show more content…
brings needed awareness to people about Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy, and its irreversible brain damage. People are unaware of the permanent damage that these sports can have on the players. Some may think that it is just a simple concussion, but it reality it can be something much worse. There have been many cases of permanent brain damage and even sudden death. ”Given the negative cognitive effects of concussions, and it has the potentially impair school achievement and, if concussion management is not managed appropriately, there can be long term negative impact on cognitive development and ability to resume sports participation” (Caine, Maffulli,& Purcell, 2014). This creditable outside source has come to the same conclusion as Dr.Omalu finding. Dr.
Omalu uses numerous examples of pathos in his article. Dr. Omalu states “Depending on the severity of the condition, the child now has a risk of manifesting symptoms of C.T.E. like major depression, memory loss, suicidal thought and actions, loss of intelligence as well as dementia later in life” (Omalu, 2015). This is an effective use of pathos because it puts the audience in a situation where they see a loved one experiencing depression or memory loss. These are just a few of the many consequences that are possible for those who engage in these kind of physical activities. This can also have a large impact on the families of those who are suffering from one of these symptoms. Dr. Omalu also use pathos by appealing to the moral duty of the audience by asking the question “are we endangering that child? “(Omalu, 2015). As humans we all have a set moral that we follow in everyday life. These ethics are used as standards to define the boundaries of what is acceptable for humane society.
What is ethos? Ethos is credibility of the persuader.” Dr. Omalu was the first to publish findings of chronic traumatic encephalopathy in American football.” Which makes Dr. Omalu a very credible source. He also is a Nigerian American physician, forensic pathologist, and a neuropathologist. Makes it certain that he Dr.Omalu knows what he’s talking about when he stated, ” In more than 30 years of looking at normal brain cells in the microscope, I have yet to see a neuron that naturally creates
…show more content…
a new neuron to regenerate itself” (Omalu, 2015). In addition Dr. Omalu use logos, which is sentence or argument used to convince or persuade the targeted audience by employing reason or logic. This can vary from the structure of the paragraphs, to the facts given by the writer or diction of the article. One of the examples that Dr.Omalu states, “In 2011, the two leading and governing professional pediatrics associations in the United States and Canada, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Canadian Pediatric Society, published a position paper recommending that children should no longer be allowed to engage in high-impact contact sports, exemplified by boxing, and willfully damage their developing brains”(Omalu,2015). This quote is good example of logos because it supports the Dr. Omalu’s claim of brain damage caused by high impact contact sports. Another example of logos is when Dr.Omalu says, “We’ve known for more than 40 years that alcohol damages the developing brain of a child. We’ve known since the mid-70s that asbestos causes cancer and other serious diseases”(Omalu,2015). The quote convinces the audience that society has recognizes other dangers for several years but when it comes dangers of football is not treated as serious. In conclusion, Dr.
Omalu makes a valid argument about why children should not be allowed to play football. He has done many years of research and has found many findings about how these contact sports are harmful to everyone who participates in them. He gives valuable information that parents, and guardians should take into consideration before they let their child play football or any contact sports. He clearly uses rhetorical tools to help make his case, and overall he is very effective as a writer. If an age restriction were to be put into force, it would eliminate the amount of head traumas and other head related injuries that children are getting today, and can prevent future issues from occurring. Though this may seem unreasonable to some, it is something that should be put into effect in order to prevent these traumas for occurring. Even though he was not successful in convincing parents and guardians of letting the child play football it was still a very well written and detailed article. Many people should take what Dr. Omalu has to say into great consideration in order to prevent more tragedies from happening. It has important information that really conveys the dangers of football, which makes “Don’t Let Kids Play Football” rhetorically
persuasive.
Bennet Omalu, a pathologist, believes football is too dangerous for children. He applies a number of rhetorical strategies, including parallelism, argument by analogy, rhetorical questions, and Appeals to Ethos and Logos to make his point.
After first reading the essay “Sports Should be Child’s Play,” I believe David Epstein made a valid point when discussing the issue of children participating in competitive sports at a too young of an age. He effectively delivered his argument by giving an appropriate amount of evidence without crowding the piece and losing the reader. There were certain sections of the essay that would have been difficult to understand without context, however Epstein was able to guide the reader and explain the evidence and situation when necessary. The title of the essay drew me in because “child's play” coincides with something that can be easily accomplished and is enjoyable. However sports, at the higher level, are challenging and are required to be taken seriously. If children are playing at competitive level too early in their life, it can cause a loss of enjoyment and be detrimental to their physical and mental health.
There has recently been an acknowledgement that children could develop brain injuries through playing football and it was suggested in the episode that no one under the age of fourteen should play tackle football. Although, in my personal opinion, I believe that tackle football is still very dangerous to play even after the age of fourteen. Due to the fact the brain is not fully developed until the mid-twenties, there are negative results playing tackle football could have on children to young adults. Although young people playing football may be more susceptible to the negative consequences playing football can have on the brain, it does not mean those over a certain age are invincible to such problems, as learned from the episode.
Ethos: A key element of ethos is the speaker credibility. Ethos is also created when the writer is an expert and/or the writer uses evidence from reliable source Autism speaks a non-profit organization is providing first responders training at the national level is an important step towards increasing the safety of the autism community, by ensuring that first responders have the tools they need to effectively responds to an an emergency involving a child with autism (Autism Speaks, 2017).
Daniel J. Flynn’s argument of why Football Does a Body Good is extremely convincing. The evidence that he presents throughout the essay debunks the counterargument of how dangerous football can be. The essays is full of statistics and examples of how football can positively benefit you. The facts that are presented are effectively used to refute all the negative claims against the dangers of football. He successfully argues toward the benefit of football by presenting appeals to reason, and showcasing his credibility throughout the essay, but he unfortunately does not keep an unbiased tone for the duration of the essay.
Are young children putting their health and even their lives at risk if they partake in the sport of football? Some claim that the American sport is far too dangerous and the risk of concussions and injuries far outway the pros of the physical sport, while others insist that technological improvements and new regulations have made the sport safer. Jonathan Zimmerman, a professor of history and education at New York University, argues in his paper, “We Must Stop Risking the Health of Young Football Players,” that football is a sport that is too dangerous for the youth. He states his belief that technological improvements in helmets and changes in the rules of the sport have had little effect on reducing injuries and that nothing has worked.
The author has use pathos when writing the article by saying they was no body willing to send a 13 year kid who loves watching harry potter to jail. The society does not provide us with any mental health centres or different alternatives so that they will be a solution for the mental sickness. The author makes the use of pathos so as to speak about the kind and decent part of her audience.
Ethos is established right in the beginning of the film by having an accredited neurologist from Harvard University, Joshua Buckholtz, talk about the issue at hand and how he has been studying this topic for years and trying to find a correlation with the brains of rampage killers working differently as opposed to your typical human being. There were several other examples of ethos with many psychologists adding to the topic. There was a juvenile detention center talked about in the film that deals with kids who struggle with violence and acting out and it is ran by a psychologists who tries to
Putting them through possible head trauma so early in life while their brains are still working on developing could cause irreparable damage. There have been studies proving the change in children’s brains before and after concussions. When a brain is changing due to constant trauma, that should be a red flag for parents. According to the director of Marist College’s Center for Sports Communication, Keith Studler, trying to teach complex plays is absurd, since young children barely understand simple concepts. For young kids with developing minds and bodies, moving and exploring should come before memorizing playbooks. Starting them young may result in the child having bad form and skill, due to the fact that they are just trying to hit people, and not actually learning how to play the game correctly and safely. Studler also stated that the sport teaches kids to act rough and selfish, as well as that masculinity is strength, while femininity is cheering from the sidelines. He added that older players may be able to separate the sport from life that's not as easy for the younger
...e their life as well as the children. The children receive a ton of pressure from their families to perform at a high level so they will feel satisfied as parents that their football player performed well. Thus the families’ obsession of high school football in particular the parents’ obsession proves to be a continuous and damaging cycle for the high school football players.
Children who are active recklessly engage in activities where injuries can occur. Nobody can predict when or how seriously anybody will get injured during an activity, however, the risks of children playing tackle football is prevalent where the dangers are imminent. The game of tackle football on a youth level is dangerous for children since they are developing physically and mentally. According to an article from The Atlantic, “America’s most dangerous football is in the peewee leagues, not the National Football League” (Barra, 2013). According to a journal article, “sports injuries account for approximately 23% of pediatric emergency department injury related visits” (Podberesky, Unsell & Anton, 2009). “Of these sports injury-related
A topic that has recently come into great interest in the media is whether or not children and teens should play competitive sports. Some may say that they should because sports can teach valuable life lessons. Others believe the chance of injury is too great. While some children can sustain injuries from sports, studies have shown that children are more likely to injure themselves biking than playing football or any other sport. “Sports do not build character.
Every sport has its tricks and ways of doing things the right way. You can assure anyone that the sport their child is playing is safe, because there is always a stronger, bigger, faster player than them. Personally, I believe football is a demanding sport that requires a lot of strength, and stamina. If you read the article “Hard Knocks” by Alan Schwarz, it gives a brief story about a young football player. “The autopsy showed that his brain was in the early stage of chronic traumatic encephalopathy, more commonly known as C.T.E.” Many football players die from this condition.
One reason, out of many, that football should be banned from high school is because it can, eventually, cause C.T.E. – a head-trauma-induced disease that causes impulse-control problems, memory loss, and dementia. C.T.E. is a problem because it can cause someone to commit suicide; how one acquires this
Jessica Statsky, in her essay, “Children need to Play, Not Compete” attempts to refute the common belief that organized sports are good for children. She sees organized sports not as healthy pass-times for children, but as onerous tasks that children do not truly enjoy. She also notes that not only are organized sports not enjoyable for children, they may cause irreparable harm to the children, both emotionally and physically. In her thesis statement, Statsky states, “When overzealous parents and coaches impose adult standards on children's sports, the result can be activities that are neither satisfying nor beneficial to children” (627). While this statement is strong, her defense of it is weak.