Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Fast food restaurants and obesity
With obesity rates this high, America is facing a huge crisis that could become even greater in the future
Is fast food the reason for obesity in america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Fast food restaurants and obesity
It is not a secret that USA is becoming fatter. Zinczenko, in his article “Don’t Blame the Eater”, believe that fast food restaurants and corporations are the ones to blame for the increasing weight gain in America today. Zincenko argues that the lack of healthy options in the United States today is a key concern. “But where, exactly, are consumers-particularly teenagers- supposed to find alternatives. Drive down any thoroughfare in America, and I guarantee you’ll see one of our country’s more than 13,000 McDonald’s restaurants. Now, drive back up the block and try to find someplace to buy grapefruit” (Zinczenko, 154). For me, this quote is absurd because how can you blame the business for a person’s personal decision to eat there? It is the …show more content…
consumers fault for caving into the temptation of fast food and making the choice to dine there. There are plenty of healthier options around America today as well that by far exceeds the nutritional value of any fast food. In addition to this point, Zinczenko argues without warning the consumers of the nutritional information, “we’ll see more sick, obese children and angrier, litigious parents” (Zinczenko, 155). Even though I do agree that restaurants and large corporations should put out more nutritional labels and health facts about their products, this would not alter the eating habits of most Americans. If people want a quick burger, they’ll buy one regardless if they know if it is unhealthy or not. One article that discusses this controversy of how to deal with the obesity issue in America is “What You Eat Is Your Business” by Radley Balko.
In his article, Balko agrees with the opinion that people need to take more responsibility for their own personal health and well-being. “Instead of manipulating or intervening in the array of food options available to American consumers, our government ought to be working to foster a sense of responsibility in and ownership of our health and well-being. But we’re doing just the opposite” (158). Balko suggests that the government is babying the American population by putting the blame of obesity in corporations and business’s hands rather than the people of whom are buying the health hazardous products. In addition, one of Balko’s other arguments is that sense the American health care system has become collective enough to a point in which society has stopped worrying about its health in general because individuals know that if they do end up with some sort of health issue, the money will be there to support them. This money he says comes from everyday people in America that pay taxes. If this type of system continues in the United States, the country will continue to get fatter and fatter. However, Balko says that if the government tightens up its grip by integrating in effective changes to some health care policies and putting responsibility back into the people’s hands, then America will gradually slim …show more content…
down. Yves Engler’s article, “Obesity: Much of the Responsibility Lies with Corporations” relays a similar but more drastic idea regarding Zinczenko’s article.
“To combat the obesity epidemic we need tighter limits on fast-food marketing. Junk food companies should be kicked out of schools. Perhaps governments should subsidize fruits and vegetables as well as other healthy products” (Engler, 180). These ideas are farfetched and unrealistic. Though taking out junk food in schools and limiting corporations marketing schemes would probably help out the country’s overall health, we cannot take away the freedoms of the people and the business. America stands for freedom and being able to have unalienable rights, and deciding whatever you want to eat is one of them. You cannot just take junk food out of schools filled with kids and put a hold on extreme marketing in which every business has a right to take forth on. It is almost contradicting the morals and values the United States stands for and represents every
day. Thousands and thousands of arguments, thoughts, and opinions can be made about the ongoing and growing obesity phenomena occurring in the United States. Authors, politicians, and everyday citizens believe they have the solution to the problem but really they don’t. Obesity is a problem no governing body or any other organization can fix by themselves. It all has to deal with Americans taking back responsibility for their own personal actions, choices, and well-being. We have to as a society stop relying on other people, buying into mass marketing schemes by large fast food corporations, and quite simply just making healthier choices that will have less negative effects on our bodies. If the American people do not have the discipline and determination to accomplish this however, then the country will continue to get fatter and fatter each passing year and become one of the unhealthiest countries in the world, like it already has become.
Balko’s use of informative statistics makes the reader think about government’s role with obesity, and how much they should to do with it being solved. For example, President Bush put $200 million into his budget for anti-obesity measures, and some Senators, including Joe Lieberman, made the call for a “fat-tax” on high calorie foods. Although it appears these politicians and government officials are all trying to help society and this growing problem in America, many would agree they are just hurting the cause. I remember when I
Throughout the United States many American’s go through and eat at fast food places such as, McDonalds, Burger King, and Jack ‘n the Box. Mainly unaware of the amount of weight one can gain if consuming it on a daily bases or even two times week, can cause health issues, diabetes and possibly obesity. This was the main premise for writer Dave Zinczenko essay Don’t Blame the Eater, who makes an argument that many people are becoming obese and diabetic because of the fast food they eat. He asks a regarding his concern; Shouldn 't we know better than to eat two meals a day in fast-food restaurants?, As a way to engage the general public, like parents and teenagers, he expresses his argument through his own experience when he was a teenager eating at fast food places and information on the fast food industry in regards to how many calories are in the food.
He begins his argument by commenting about kids suing McDonald’s for “making them fat” (Zinczenko 462). Zinczenko ponders the absurdity of this claim considering how food choices are based on personal responsibility. However, he then considers the overwhelming availability ratio of fast food to fresh food while sympathizing he was once obese himself (Zinczenko 462). Zinczenko uses the primary argument that fast food companies are deceiving consumers with misleading advertisement, hidden nutrition facts, and calorie risks. He believes companies are encouraging the public to eat their unhealthy foods by omitting alarming information and levying “good” deals. In consequence, fast food companies are increasing the chances of obesity and diabetes in consumers by stimulating poor eating
Balko develops an angry tone about the fact that government believes unhealthy people should depend on healthy people or they should not hold any responsibility. Actually, Balko complains the way government prohibits any private insurer to charge additional fee of obese clients is unwise. Balko’s claim is that if people had to pay more financially, they would be more cautious about their choices on what foods should they consume. I agree with him on this point, because if insurers want to charge overweight clients with higher premiums, the clients would try to be fit in the average range to avoid paying any hard-earned money from their pocket. Balko evokes ethos appeals by demonstrating if the government is willingly paid for his anti-cholesterol medicine, then what the motivations for exercising are. He makes the audience sympathize with him by saying that what the government does is wrong. Toward the end, Balko implies that people will make better choices if there is no one responsible for those choices.
The article “Don’t Blame the Eater” by David Zinczenko, is an article aimed to bring attention to the ever increasing obesity rates in the United States, which he believes has been caused be the ever increasing amount of fast food restaurants in the United States.
In his article “What You Eat Is Your Business,” Radley Balko emphasizes that we ought to be accountable with what we eat, and the government should not interfere with that. He declares that the state legislature and school boards are already banning snacks and soda at school campuses across the country to help out the “anti-obesity” measure. Radley claims that each individual’s health is becoming “public health” instead of it being their own problem. Balko also states, “We’re becoming less responsible for our own health, and more responsible for everyone else’s.” For instance, a couple of new laws have been passed for people to pay for others’ medicine. There is no incentive to eat right and healthy, if other people are paying for the doctor
In “Don’t Blame the Eater”, by David Zinczenko and in “What You Eat is Your Business”, by Radley Balko both authors discuss and make their stance’s clear on their believed cause of obesity in America. On one hand, Zinczenko argues that it is not the consumers fault for putting themselves at risk of becoming obese or being diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, but that it is the fast-food companies fault. While on the other hand, Balko argues that we as individuals hold responsibility on whether or not we are putting ourselves at risk for obesity.
Beside on that, Balko argues with the government recommendation of health care systems, and it is willing to pay for citizens’ medication due to poor eating and living habits. He says, “Your heart attack drives up the cost of my premiums and office visits” (467). How it is possible to make offers for people instead of fighting companies that sell unhealthy food. He also points out, “For decades now, America 's health care system has been migrating towards socialism” (467). His point is that if the government would start to put lows to these companies in order to stop their widespread. As a result, the government needs to address this problem by providing health care systems, and this requires citizens to pay for it. I believe it is true that government might make a billion of dollars from health care systems as profits. On the other hand, government does not do anything for the companies that provide unhealthy food or food that has more than the average amount of calories so the government truly allows these companies to spread out their products, and citizens are
"All Food Sales in Schools Should Offer Healthier Options." Should Junk Food Be Sold in Schools? Ed. Norah Piehl. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2011. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 14 Apr. 2011.
Obesity has become an epidemic in today’s society. Today around 50% of America is now considered to be over weight. Fast-food consumption has been a major contributor to the debate of the twenty-first century. Chapter thirteen, titled “Is Fast-Food the New Tobacco,” in the They Say I Say book, consists of authors discussing the debate of fast-food’s link to obesity. Authors debate the government’s effects on the fast-food industry, along with whether or not the fast-food industry is to blame for the rise in obesity throughout America. While some people blame the fast food industry for the rise in obesity, others believe it is a matter of personal responsibility to watch what someone eats and make sure they get the proper exercise.
The following essay is an analysis of two interesting topic about fast food, and the damage that it causes in the American population. The first article is “Don’t Blame the Eater” by David Zinczenko, who blames the fast food companies about the fast food consumption. The other article is “Junking Junk Food” by Judith Warner. In this article she makes an analysis about the banning of junk food, specifically cookies, in a school of Pennsylvania, criticizing different points of view, and actions from the authorities.
In David Zinczenko's article “Don't Blame the Eater”, argues that the reason behind individuals turning to fast-food for affordable meals is because there are a lack of alternatives to browse for a healthier way of life. He also raises the question "Where, exactly, are consumers - particularly teenagers – supposed to find alternatives?" David also claims that there are big number of fast-food restaurant all over the country illustrating by giving the example of McDonald’s restaurants. So fast-food is easily available food at any place. David also argues that the fast-food restaurants are the least expensive and most convenient nutrition option we have. David also blames fast-food restaurants for not giving calorie information charts on packages. On the basis of David’s point of view clearly
Are your children getting all the right nutrition in their school lunches? Do they know what their lunch options are and whether or not they contribute to obesity? David Zinczenko in his essay, “Don’t Blame the Eater,” tries to persuade readers that consumers are obese because of the lack of food options, and how innutritious foods at fast food restaurants is harmful to the human body. He claims that when only unhealthy meals are available, there are many different health problems that result such as obesity and diabetes. While I both agree and disagree with Zinczenko that eaters aren’t to blame, I will assert that school lunches have an impact on childhood obesity (like fast food restaurants) and also how it is a young eater’s responsibility whether or not to eat the healthy nutritional foods.
“Don’t Blame the Eater” is an article by David Zinczenko that explains to Americans, specifically overweight young Americans, about the risks eating at fast food restaurants and its cause of affecting one’s health. In his article, he tries to address the issue about America’s food industries by using literal devices such as tone, logos, ethos, diction, and organization in order to spread his message. He begins his article by addressing the topic and as he continues writing, he supports his topic by writing about personal experience and moves onto the reasons why his topic in a serious issue. Although he shows an overall clear progress, he does tend to have a few problems with his writing that could be improved.
Although Balko’s argument clearly outlines the need for consumers in taking responsibility for their own eating habits, his logic exhibits some fallacies. Balko’s comment, “Your heart attack drives up the cost of my premiums and office visits,” is geared towards government spending (para 5). Not only does he introduce this loaded question fallacy in a harsh, angry tone, but it is implied that obese Americans are the cause of high cost medical premiums. This fallacy of Balko is potentially damaging to his argument in the way he personally views Americans and consumers who are obese and over-weight as lazy and not willing to become healthy in order to help keep society’s premiums low. Although, Americans should take responsibility for their actions,