Don Manuel A Saint Or A Charlatan?

763 Words2 Pages

When first reading about the directions for this essay, I was curious on what you, Dr. Ehman, meant by the question: Was Saint Manuel a saint or a charlatan? The descriptors were obviously opposite of each other and I thought to myself.. is it possible for someone to be both? Like most, when I first began to read the story by Manuel de Unamuno, I immediately considered the priest, Don Manuel, to be a saint. In fact, from what I read I considered him to be the definition of a saint and wondered if later in the story a connection to God (other than his appointment as a priest) would be discussed. I even thought it was silly to ask this question because it was obvious that he was a saint and as we can see the title of saint was evident in his name. Regardless, I could not help but to think that somewhere in the story lied a twist. After Lazaro appeared I knew a secret about the great priest himself was sure to happen and after reading the story I realized that there indeed seemed to be a dilemma: Was Don Manuel a saint or a charlatan? With great thinking I believe he was both.
A saint. Don Manuel is a saint because he fostered a heart of benevolence. He went beyond what anyone could do to make sure that his people were happy. Even though he secretly did this with deceit, you must see how extraordinary one is to hide their belief or lack of for the sake of the peace of a village. The villagers looked up to Don Manuel to the point where they practically wept at the sound his voice. For many people, faith or having a shared belief stabilizes society and is the main connector of communities. With belief evident in their community, the villagers learned to depend, help, and love one another even if Don Manuel was the cause of that. For i...

... middle of paper ...

... of saint because he had the strongest desire to do good for others. He exemplified great virtue and because of this a community was able to move forward.
As I stated before, though lack of belief would surely paint him as a charlatan, I believe Saint Emmanuel to be a saint. He had a great heart and surely practiced pious behavior. He was the opposite of selfish and made it a priority that the villagers not live in suffering or confusion. When the villagers died, he made sure that they died with hope even though he himself had uncertainty of the unknown. Personally, being a saint is not about being perfect or being close to God as possible. Thus, being whether or not you are considered a saint should not be measure on how “holy” or honest you are because like in Don Manuel’s case, deceiving the villagers was the only way that he could made in impact on their lives.

Open Document