Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Initiating&managing change
What are the Impacts of Cultural Diversity on Organizations
Professional development in an organization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Initiating&managing change
1. How did Domtar’s strategies align with its mission? Explain your answer.
The Domtar's strategies introduced by the Royer focusing and targetting on the statement of purpose in a more extended manner. He essentially presented two strategies which are the client benefit through training and degree of profitability (return of investment). These strategies are concentrated on three fundamental factors for the growth and survival in the industry. To make this strategies beneficial, the Royer chose to further expand the arrangement with three major areas of the organization "the clients, shareholders, and our selves" The last focus is most imperative as it begins the period of progress for Domtar. They adjusted every component of the both stratagies
…show more content…
Given the difficulty of organizational change, what factors contributed to the success at Domtar? How did Domtar’s management at all levels contribute to reducing resistance to change? What else might they have done?
The basic victory components of the Domtar are the strategies used to reshape the interior organizational structure. The acknowledgment of the Royer that the genuine potential is stowed away in the "ourselves" is additionally impressive. The best contribution is made by the Kaizen master traded from the Bombardier. All these movements lead the firm towards the accomplishment of objectives and targets. To determine the accomplishment of the change procedure, preparing sessions also introduced by the Royer in the Domtar.
The resistance is also taken care of by the same strategy, the Kaizen master, as it understand the potential of the workers with good expertise and created imaginative innovative approaches and ways to finishing things effectively and productively. The role of the magegers is additionally important in this procedure as they decrease the trouble of change from workers by including them into the improving things
…show more content…
The managerial staff kept tabs on the training of the employees to make them understand that they are the true stake/asset of the organization and the triumph is in their hands
Creative utilization of Technology/skills: The task to engraving the thought on the personalities of the employees, not from the Domtar's additionally from the merger and obtaining is likewise considerable fact. The circumstances took care of by the managers with their approach of including worker's ability in the operating procedure/process
Practices new data and information: the responsibility recognized by the Royer is to make the information and information plus the expertise the workers posses in practice. This strategy profits the organization in a positive way and the firm apply these approaches in their recently gained companies either merger or procurement.
4. Take the critical facts in the Domtar case and place them into the appropriate phases of the training model presented in the chapter. Begin with the triggering event and provide a rationale for why each fact belongs in the phase in which you have placed
S, Rawat 2001, Organisational Change and Forces Prompting Change, Academic Paper Review, Shovoong viewed on 2nd April 2011, on http://imgs.shvoongstatic.com/images/2011/_v_070420111027/scp.PNG">
Leading Change was named the top management book of the year by Management General. There are three major sections in this book. The first section is ¡§the change of problem and its solution¡¨ ; which discusses why firms fail. The second one is ¡§the eight-stage process¡¨ that deals with methods of performing changes. Lastly, ¡§implications for the twenty-first century¡¨ is discussed as the conclusion. The eight stages of process are as followed: (1) Establishing a sense of urgency. (2) Creating the guiding coalition. (3) Developing a vision and a strategy. (4) Communicating the change of vision. (5) Empowering employees for broad-based action. (6) Generating short-term wins. (7) Consolidating gains and producing more changes. (8) Anchoring new approaches in the culture.
In today’s ever changing world people must adapt to change. If an organization wants to be successful or remain successful they must embrace change. This book helps us identify why people succeed and or fail at large scale change. A lot of companies have a problem with integrating change, The Heart of Change, outlines ways a company can integrate change. The text book Ivanceich’s Organizational Behavior and Kotter and Cohen’s The Heart of Change outlines how change can be a good thing within an organization. The Heart of Change introduces its readers to eight steps the authors feel are important in introducing a large scale organizational change. Today’s organizations have to deal with leadership change, change in the economy,
Organizational change is a very big risk for organizations. The process of change can be very difficult for employees as well as the leaders implementing the changes. The changes are usually planned to improve the company. However, sometimes change can destroy a company when things don’t go as planned. From a change in management to a change in the company structure, or way of doing daily task, organizations must carefully execute the process of change and use change strategies that will ensure success.
Kegan, R. & L. Laskow Lahey. (2009). Immunity to Change: How to overcome it and unlock potential in yourself and your organization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Kegan, R., & Laskow Lahey, L. (2009). Immunity to change. How to overcome it and unlock the potential in yourself and your organization. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Change is the only constant in life. And therefore it should be understood as part of a continuing work in progress that calls for a much broader canvas that seeks out competing voices, and works with the resulting ambiguities, contradictions and tensions of messy reality (Graetz, F. & Smith, A., 2010). In this submission I try to show that organizational change is majorly based on the environment surrounding it much more than the desire of the members or change agents working in that organization. This view diverts from that of Lippitt, (1958) who suggests that implementing planned organizational changes successfully depends on premeditated interventions intended to modify the functioning of an organization. It also diverts from the traditional approaches to organizational change that generally follow a linear, rational model in which the focus is on controllability under the stewardship of a strong leader or ‘guiding coalition (Collis, 1998). In this discussion therefore, comparison made between the different philosophies of change and I try to show that successful change implantation largely depends on an organizations appreciation of what goes on around it rather than what they have planned as a strategic direction.
It is very clear that the problems experienced in the companies are not lone standing but in most of the cases they are dependent on each other and there are strong bonds or relationships with regards to the cause and effects between them. It is therefore important to form or establish a strong cause and affect between them.
This paper will be broken down into six sections profiling each critical part of implementing and managing change in an organization. The sections included are; outline for plan creating urgency, the approach to attracting a guiding team, a critique of the organizational profile, the components of change, and how to empower the organization.
The main problems that are affecting the company were the high level of labour turnover, below target production rates, high levels of scrap, the employees had little input in the decision making, therefore resulting in low motivation and job satisfaction, and didn't have enough feedback on there performance. Added to this was the conflict between the supervisors and employees in the production and packing areas, and the grading and payment levels wasn't satisfactory to the employees.
For this assignment we will discuss some theories on organizational change learned during this class and how they relate to the case study of NASA (The Challenger and Columbia Shuttle Disaster). First we will look the images of managing change used by NASA in the case study. Then we will discuss the types of change(s) NASA under took. Next we will look at some of the challenges of change that NASA faced. Next we will discuss some of the resistance to change that NASA dealt with. Then we look at how NASA implemented change. Next we will discuss vision and change and the impact in the case study. Finally we will discuss sustaining change as it relates to the changes implemented by NASA in the case study.
Kotter, J. P. (2007). ‘Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail’. Harvard Business Review, January: 96-103.
...ople for stability. In this todays modernised world, change has become inevitable and there is no doubt that change has to occur in order to survive and achieve success through a number of ways such as focusing on internal strengths, exploiting external forces and making potential threats into opportunities. In the long run, there are clearly more benefits rather than disadvantages because change does not have to be met with negativity. It needs to be embraced through cooperation between managers and employees, clear organisational culture and rewards that improve performance that are not based on tightly structured procedures. Ultimately, overcoming the difficulties of organisational change shows how management systems and people rewarded for stability is not just black and white but is shades of grey and how it is approached will determine its success or failure.
Force of change is a positive factor that an organization must put in place in order to drive and develop the entire organization’s environment. In this process of change more of resistance factors will try to hinder the change. The organization in this case experiences a repulsive force which absolutely adheres to reserve the existing ways of handling of issues. In the process the firm faces the competitive challenges from other organization and in meanwhile diseconomies of scale. Organizational change process is the progression of a given institution, far from its present state and towards some desired prospects to propagate its performance effectiveness. The organization’s work strategy persistently changes for better. Afterwards, the members’ organization must acclimatize to organization’s forces of change in a bid to conserve its relevancy and effectiveness. Lewin’s force field theory of change serves as a convenient model in understanding the change process. The role of the organization leader is both intense and diverse. For the organization to propel in its management processes, the organization leader must adhere to his increasing responsibilities of change. The leader must be the primary catalyst to speed up the mechanism used to assure the members of positivity effect of change and the expected period of its existence.
Toribio, C. T., & Hernandez, R. G. (2011). Coping with resistance to change in organizations (Unpublished masters thesis). Linnaeus University, Sweden. Retrieved from http://lnu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:425506