Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The constitution of the united states analysis essay
The constitution of the united states analysis essay
Article 1 of the constitution essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The constitution of the united states analysis essay
In a nation with over 300 million people, it is impossible for the president of the United States to not be involved in all parts of American society. The diverse ethnic, racial, and socio-economic groups in America give many different ideas on the way a president should govern. Article II of the constitution gives little specifications about the role of the president, and if they are overstepping their boundaries. The constitution grants the President the power to enforce laws, serve as commander in chief, appoint officials, and approve legislation. The vague description of powers leads to interpretation based on new situations. Brilliance is found in the simplicity of Article II. By leaving the description of powers vague, the presidency …show more content…
In general, it can be agreed that keeping the nation out of extreme conflict, a strong economy, social progress, and transparency can be markers of a president's success. Domestic and foreign policy success impacts the perception of the United States. Both foreign and domestic affairs must be balanced to have a successful nation. If a president focuses only on foreign affairs, Americans suffer. If the president focuses on domestic affairs, foreign relations struggle. Having a president with a large position is essential to keeping the balance between the two. In history, we can see the development of the presidency from a domestic role to that of an international leader. Abraham Lincoln was faced with the issue of the Civil War and is credited as keeping the Union together. Article II of the constitution could not have anticipated war of this scale, and illustrated that presidents can be made by their circumstances. With the mess in the United States, Lincoln was not concerned with foreign affairs, keeping a rather small …show more content…
The world has become connected in ways the founders never could have imagined, but this change was anticipated. Article II does not serve as a checklist for the success of a president. It serves as an outline for what is expected, and it is up to the society to judge if it is being met. The notion that the presidency is “a hopeless mess” presents a viewpoint of distrust in the system itself. While writing the constitution, it could never have been conceived the intricacies of international relations and the current social issues we face. The leader of our nation must carry some consistent characteristics. They must have a desire to want to improve the country. They must be diplomatic, and willing to work with others domestically and globally. Our presidency and the executive branch is not a mess. Taking out the politics of policy is essential to creating a good society, and the president must be at the forefront of this issue. Objectively one can assess if a president is doing a good job by the strength of the economy, the state of social equality, and if the government discloses their actions. Secretive governments pose a threat to the integrity of our whole system, and politicians must begin to change the secrecy surrounding politics. It is understandable to withhold information if it could be a threat to national security. The leader of our nation should be
Of the most powerful people in the world, the President of the United States of America hits the top of the list. Even though the policy agendas that presidents set as they take office often go unfulfilled, the office of President is still one of the most envied spots to have. But why could this be? It is because the United States is the most powerful nation in the world and with the President as the leader, he is said to have the most power in the world ("Top Ten Most Powerful Countries in the World"). With power comes responsibility and with this position he must govern a country while abiding by the rules.
Throughout the 20th century, successive presidents pursued foreign policy in different ways but with one objective and that is to make America the most powerful nation on earth. Despite the challenges of each administration during this century, presidents found a way to put American at the frontline as the undisputed super power. President Taft pursued an aggressive foreign policy by introducing dollar diplomacy which was meant to encourage U.S. investments in the Latin America and the Caribbean. He used government officials to promote this policy in hope that it will create markets for American products in the region. President Wilson made a promise to the American people that he will focus on domestic policy agenda and rarely will his administration
During the "Roaring Twenties" people were living up to the modern standards of society. Then the Great Depression began and the joy and excitement disappeared and tension manifested. In the time period of 1920-1941 America experienced major global events that occurred in extremely short rapid intervals of time. From the end of World War I in 1918 to the Roaring Twenties, straight to the Great Depression in 1929, into the beginning of World War II in 1939, and all the way to the horror of the Pearl Harbor attack in 1941, America faced these occurrences with difficulty and confusion. But with the presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt, quick and immediate responses were made to stabilize America. Among his responses
Between 1895 and 1920, the years in which William McKinley, Theodore Roosevelt, William Taft, and Woodrow Wilson reigned in the presidents, the United States struggled for not only justice at home but abroad as well. During this period policies such as Roosevelt’s Big Stick diplomacy, William Taft’s Dollar diplomacy, and Woodrow Wilson’s Moral diplomacy were all used in foreign affairs in hopes of benefit for all involved. However, it would be appropriate to say that self-interest was the most important driving factor for American policy and can be exemplified through economic, social, and political relations.
Presidential power has become a hot topic in the media the in recent years. There has been extensive debate about what a president should be able to do, especially without the involvement of Congress and the American people. While this debate has become more publicized since the Bush administration, similar issues of presidential power date back to Truman and the Korean War. As with much of the structure of the U.S. government, the powers of the president are constantly evolving with the times and the executives.
The Executive Branch is explained in Article II of the Constitution. It explains the president’s term of office, the procedure for electi...
Spaeth, Harold J. and Edward Conrad Smith. The Constitution of the United States, 13th ed. New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 1991 (paper). ISBN 0064671054.
The president has a significant amount of power; however, this power is not unlimited, as it is kept in check by both the judicial and legislative branches. The president is held responsible for passing legislation that will improve the lives of everyday Americans, even though he shares his legislative powers with Congress. The sharing of power acts as an impediment to the president’s ability to pass legislation quickly and in the form it was originally conceived. However, Americans do not take this into account when judging a president, as they fully expect him to fulfill all of the promises he makes during his campaign. By making promises to pass monumental legislation once elected without mentioning that Congress stands as an obstacle that must be hurdled first, the president creates unrealistic expectations of what he can fulfill during his time in office (Jenkins-Smith, Silva, and Waterman, 2005). A president is expected to have the characteristics that will allow him to efficiently and effectively lead the nation and to accomplish the goals he set during his campaign (Jenkins-Smith et al., 2005). There have been a handful of presidents that have been immortalized as the ideal person to lead the United States and if a president does not live up to these lofty expectations the American public will inevitably be disappointed. Since every president is expected to accomplish great things during his presidency, he is forced to created and project a favorable image through unrealistic promises. The combination of preconceived ideas of the perfect president and the various promises made by presidential candidates during their campaign create unrealistic expectations of the president by the American public.
Richard E. Neustadt, the author of Presidential Power, addresses the politics of leadership and how the citizens of the United States rate the performance of the president's term. We measure his leadership by saying that he is either "weak or "strong" and Neustadt argues that we have the right to do so, because his office has become the focal point of politics and policy in our political system. Neustadt brings to light three main points: how we measure the president, his strategy of presidential influence, and how to study them both. Today we deal with the President himself and his influence on government action. The president now includes about 2000 men and women, the president is only one of them, but his performance can not be measured without focusing on himself.
The American Presidency is undoubtedly one of the most widely recognized popular icons throughout the world. Although to most foreigners or those who have never resided in the United States or know little of its history, the executive branch of government may seem to be as dull and unyielding as the rest of the American politics, for those few rare individuals who have taken the time to examine and closely scrutinize this office of the American political system and its recent history, quite the opposite will be said. Unlike Congressional or local elections where typically a number of individuals of the same ideological background must be elected in order for a particular issue to be addressed by the government, when it comes to the presidency, one person, although checked by various other divisions of the same government, has the power and responsibility to literally, as history has proven, change the world. The American people, "like all people everywhere, want to have our (political) cake and eat it too. We want a lot of leadership, but we are notoriously lousy followers" (Genovese). In other words the expectations the public has of the executive office are ever-changing since we demand that our leaders keep up with the evolving world around us and them. Throughout the past seventy eventful years alone, the American people's views, perceptions and demands of the Executive Office of American government have evolved simultaneously with the political and social events of that same time period.
Understanding and evaluating presidents’ performance often poses challenges for political experts. The nation votes one president at the time and each presidency faces different tests. The environments surrounding a presidency have a tremendous impact on the success and failure of that presidency. In addition, the president exercises his power through a check and balance system embody in the Constitution. As stated in (Collier 1959), the Constitution created a government of “separated institutions sharing power.” As a result, a president works with others institutions of the government to shape the nation’s agenda. Thus, determining a presidential performance becomes difficult, especially when it comes to comparing the performance among presidencies.
In my opinion, being a good leader firstly he should be able to take full advantage of favorable circumstance, able to rule the country under a chaotic situation. Besides he made attractive promises to gain popular support, skilled in using of propaganda, amoral. Moreover he should have the organizational ability and has the ambition to make his country powerful in the world. In addition, he could use his words to twist and manipulate the minds of people into believing that what he was saying. Using this power, he could get people to do anything for him, which prove his amorality. He should be skillful in carry out successful policy to bring the country to economic prospect, since economy is very important to a country.
People look up to the president as a leader and it is he /she’s duty is to make decisions based on the majority of the populus, but if he/she is obnoxious, rude, or unprofessional, the president may be a poor example of what the president’s duty is to people of the United
There is a controversy among the American people about our current president, President Obama. Some people find he is not a trustworthy man and that he has done nothing to better our country but in fact has only brought it down. His foreign policy, domestic policy, and promises he has made to the U.S citizens in the beginning have taken a toll on how the American people look up to him and respect him as our president. President Obama’s foreign policy was something that really stood out to the American people. His stand on the foreign policy is to “end war in Iraq responsibly, finish the fight against the Taliban and Qaeda in Afghanistan, secure nuclear weapons and loose nuclear materials from terrorists, and renew American diplomacy to support strong alliances and seek a lasting peace in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict” (The Obama-Biden Plan).
Being a president can be very difficult. There are many characteristics of being a president. The president has to be respectful, and to be responsible, and also be open minded and to listen carefully. The president needs to be respectful to people around him.