Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Multitasking can make you lose focus
Multitasking can make you lose focus
Multitasking is a bad thing: author rosen 412. Please cite for me
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Multitasking can make you lose focus
Carr (2010) writes about how the Internet makes us less intelligent in his article “Does the internet make you dumber?”. He states that the Net causes distractions and leads to lack of focus, and also it is turning us into shallower thinkers. Carr argues that the Net has bad effects on our brain and different media technologies impact negatively on how the brain works. He believes that using screen-based media leads to the brain’s weaknesses in cognitive processes because of following only a specific instruction. Moreover, Carr talks about how multitasking makes it difficult for us to sustain concentration. Two important issues from the article that I would like to discuss are Carr’s statements on how multitaskers distract easily and how the …show more content…
Net results in the dominance of brain’s short-term memory over its long-term memory. I personally agree with both of them. The first issue is about media multitasking. Carr (2010) refers to the scientific studies in which the brains of multitasking Internet users are shown to change as a result of their behavior. Consequently, such changes would make them more distracted. I think that, nowadays, the Internet is the significant cause of an increase in people’s multitasking. By spending much time on the Net, especially using tools such as Facebook or any other social media outlet, the users become more distracted, by temporary activities, and would think less deeply. In my case, I have realised that I was losing my own capacity for concentration. Even when I was away from my computer, my mind seemed hungry for quick hits of information. I asked myself, could my loss of focus be a result of all the time I have spent online? As a result, I believe that multitaskers have to try hard enough to control over their attention because they distract easily. The next important idea is about short-term memory.
Carr (2010) states that the internet makes it harder for users to remember anything and also for the brain to move memories into the long-term memory. Furthermore, he thinks that by skimming information, the ability to read longer texts like novels will be diminished. I agree with him that for being able to retain vast quantities of knowledge in our long-term memory, paying deep attention is definitely needed. I believe that readers are less likely to remember information when they expect it to be available on the Internet. In my opinion, the Net is hampering our abilities to recall information. Whenever any break happens while doing my assignments, e.g. checking emails or sending a text message, it takes a couple of minutes for my brain to be able to concentrate again. So, the division of attention can cause some disabilities to focus the mind and then it results in the dominance of brain’s short-term memory. In conclusion, multitasking has effects on the users’ abilities to retain their concentration, and also short-term memory overcomes long-term memory due to using the Net. Carr’s thesis is interesting and I agree with him. It is important to remember that excessive use of the Internet might cause permanent changes to the way our brains act; therefore, we, as users, have to pay more attention to the new digital age of media
consumption.
In the article, “Multitasking Can Make You Lose…Um…Focus,” Alina Tugend centralizes around the negative effects of multitasking. She shows that often with multitasking, people tend to lose focus, lack work quality, have an increase in stress, and in the end she gives a solution to all these problems. Tugend conveys her points by using understandable language, a clear division of subjects, and many reliable sources, making her article cogent.
Students may easily lose their attention and concentration with easy access to such incredibly rich store of information. With such new technologies as television, internet and social networks, people nowadays tend to multitask more often as they have easy access to a large amount of information. However, such easy access may sometimes be a distraction. Study “Your Brain on Computers” reports that heavy multitaskers perform up to 20% worse on most tests compared to performance of light multitaskers. Working efficiency of people, who multitask, is claimed to be significantly lower. The same is with concentration. (Crovitz 353) As a result, they are not engaged in working process. Students tend to be easily distr...
In the chapter “Attention Deficit: The Brain Syndrome of Our Era,” from The New Brain, written by Richard Restak, Restak makes some very good points on his view of multitasking and modern technology. He argues that multitasking is very inefficient and that our modern technology is making our minds weaker. Multitasking and modern technology is causing people to care too much what other people think of them, to not be able to focus on one topic, and to not be able to think for themselves.
“Attention Deficit: The Brain Syndrome of our Era”, “‘Plug In’ Better: A Manifesto”, and “Your Brain on Computers”: A Critical Analysis of the Efficacy of the Methods by which the Authors Convey Their Ideas Technology and our exposure to it are changing our lives; of this there is no doubt. The issue regarding what form that change will take and the effects of it on our physical and emotional health, however, are more contentious, and experts’ opinions on it run the gamut. In “Attention Deficit: The Brain Syndrome of our Era”, neurologist Dr. Richard Restak examines what effect technology has on our brains, and posits that technology, as well as the increasing demand on our brains to perform multiple tasks at once, is causing a decrease In “‘Plug In’ Better: A Manifesto”, technology writer and commentator Dr. Alexandra Samuel states that she believe that there is a middle ground between completely “plugging in” and “unplugging”. She states that we should approach our online interactions in the same ways we approach our offline ones.
The internet is our conduit for accessing a wide variety of information. In his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid,” Nicholas Carr discusses how the use of the internet affects our thought process in being unable to focus on books or longer pieces of writing. The author feels that “someone, or something, has been tinkering with [his] brain” over the past few years (Carr 731). While he was easily able to delve into books and longer articles, Carr noticed a change in his research techniques after starting to use the internet. He found that his “concentration often [started] to drift after two or three pages” and it was a struggle to go back to the text (Carr 732). His assertion is that the neural circuits in his brain have changed as a result of surfing endlessly on the internet doing research. He supports this statement by explaining how his fellow writers have had similar experiences in being unable to maintain their concentrations. In analyzing Carr’s argument, I disagree that the internet is slowly degrading our capacity for deep reading and thinking, thereby making us dumber. The Web and Google, indeed, are making us smarter by allowing us access to information through a rapid exchange of ideas and promoting the creativity and individualization of learning.
Advancements in technology have strived to make life easier for so many people. In most cases, the advancements have achieved its goal, but in the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicholas Carr questions if the improvements in society have unintentionally hindered our thought process overall. Carr begins the article by providing personal instances when his concentration seemed to diminish due to the internet. He explains how he now loses interest when reading lengthy portions, his mind just can’t seem to remain connected to his readings. He then proceeds to talk about how today’s life is surrounded by the internet, and explains the pros and cons of it. The negative side of it is that his mind now wonders off when seeking information from
Carr explains how the internet can distract us making it harder to focus on tasks. He explains how processing information has become harder. Notifications, ads, popups can make it difficult if you are trying to read an article or book (Carr 57). The internet has become the center of our attention (Carr 57). Carr is explaining how this is the reason why we are struggling to comprehend a certain piece of information. He adds in his article that scientists, researchers and educators have also noticed the difference in concentration. And in further detail, he explains that we fail to see the important information, thus affecting cognition. He says that the information we gather is not valuable unless we know the meaning behind it. Carr concludes with explaining that the more the internet evolves the less valuable information is to
Atlantic journalist Nicholas Carr confesses that he feels something has been “tinkering with his brain.” The internet, he fears, may be messing with our minds. We have lost the ability to focus on a simple task, and memory retention is steadily declining. He is worried about the effect the internet has on the human brain, and where it may take us in the future. In response to this article, Jamais Cascio, also a journalist for the Atlantic, provides his stance on the issue. He argues that this different way of thinking is an adaptation derived from our environment. Ultimately, he thinks that this staccato way of thinking is simply a natural evolution, one that will help to advance the human race.
These two articles are similar in the sense that they agree that the internet and computational objects are reshaping our brain’s structure by changing our neural circuit. By using examples from their personal experiences to identify a trend in technology use, the authors illustrate that the more we bury ourselves in technology the more we are unable to understand material which leads to loss of concentration and the ability to think for ourselves. As an author, Carr finds the internet a beneficial tool, but it’s having a bad effect on his concentration span. Carr points this out by stating “Immersing myself in a book or lengthy article used to be easy, now I get fidgety, lose the thread and begin looking for something else to do” (39). He is no
Steven Pinker and Nicholas Carr share their opposing views on the effects that mass media can have on the brain. In Carr’s Atlantic Monthly article “Is Google Making Us Stupid,” it explores his viewpoints on how increased computer use affects our thought process in a negative manner. Carr critically analyzes that having widespread access to the internet via the internet has done more harm by disabling our ability to think complexly like it is the researching in a library. On the other hand, Pinker expresses how the media improves our brain’s cognitive functions. Pinker expresses that we should embrace the new technological advances and all we need is willpower to not get carried away in the media. Although both authors bring very valid arguments
Although the Internet has increased how much we read, it has deteriorated our concentration level. We are no longer able to read long passages and stay interested. We have resorted to skimming or finding a shorter version. It has also affected our ability to take an analytical approach to what we read. We no longer go beyond comprehending the information we take in. Outside of using the Internet to “enhance” our mind, Carr has also made the point that it is a daily involvement. We incorporate it in our everyday lives, because it is a source of entertainment or serves as some type of convenience for us.
As a college student, using the internet and technology is a daily task. Everything you need for your classes: schedules, homework, quizzes, even tests are all online. The debate on technology and the brain suggests that technology may have an effect on brain, effect multi-tasking, and cause addiction.
...he Internet has altered the way we see text and how we read it. The computer or smartphone provides us with so many distractions and alternatives. When we get caught up in hyperlinks and our minds become hungry to find out new information. Before we know it we could spend hours and hours on YouTube looking up funny videos and get none of our homework done. If we isolate ourselves in a room with just a book or a newspaper we are likely to just focus on the book and comprehend a lot more because that is all we can do. We are just too lazy to read a whole book when we can just find out about it on the Internet. The Internet allows us to have fast access to simplified information. Instead of pushing ourselves to read the whole book we go for the easy way out, like Nicholas Carr said. I have experienced this first hand and that is why I agree so strongly with him.
Strayer, D. L., & Watson, J. M. (2012). Supertaskers and the multitasking brain. Scientific American Mind, 23(1), 22-29.
Multitasking is a poor long-term strategy for learning. People can’t filter out irrelevancy because multitasking has become a habit. A majority of people have the misconception multitasking will help them accomplish tasks in a faster manner, yet it does the complete opposite. Multitasking is not doing a plethora of tasks all at once, but rather switching from one task to another in a continuous cycle. Each time the brain switches task, there is lag time between that adds up. Multitasking distracts people from doing the task before them, so learning and memory becomes spotted and limited, and it doesn’t help that there is technology constantly at people’s fingertips. Multitasking is a poor strategy to to use why trying to complete a job. Multitasking has negative benefits in all aspects of life and is a habit that needs to be broken.