Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros and cons of intuition
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pros and cons of intuition
Journal #6 Ethics and Communication 1. Which source/ sources from the Ethical Compass (see class slides for a reminder) do you think influence you the most in your interpersonal ethical decision-making? Why do you think you most rely on that pointer? Where does it come from? The source from the Ethical Compass that influences me the most in my interpersonal ethical decision-making is Intuition. I think that I rely most on this pointer because most of the time I use it, something good always comes out of it. My intuition comes from my values; is this the right or wrong thing to do? 2. What do you do when your own pointers disagree with each other (ex: what seems logical to you differs from your gut feeling about something)? …show more content…
For example: What did my last experience teach me? How logical is it? What did my word of authority tell me about this subject? Was following my instinct the best decision last time? 3. What about when your pointers disagree with other people’s pointers (ex: your word of authority differs with their word of authority)? How do you analyze another person’s decision-making? When my pointers disagree with other people’s pointers, I usually just stick with my own unless they have better logic as to why I should go with their pointer. I analyze another person’s decision-making by seeing if they have a logical enough reason for why they chose the decision that they chose. 4. In class, we discussed situations where it might be okay to lie. How did you go about determining whether each situation would be okay or not? How did you go about “drawing the line” between what is okay and what
Everybody uses their ethical and moral compass every day. People have to see whether their choices are ethical and moral, we all use are ethical and moral compass all the time. In the story The Most Dangerous Game, Rainsford used his ethical and moral compass to decide whether to hunt humans with General Zaroff or not, he knew that saying no was ethically right and morally right aswell so he decided to make that decision. Not only Sanger Rainsford had to use his ethical and moral compass, Val Plumwood from Being Prey had to use her ethical and moral compasses. Val Plumwood decided to defend the alligators because she was trespassing in the alligators territory, her moral and ethical compass told her that it wasn't right
Morales-Sánchez, Rafael, and Carmen Cabello-Medina. "The Role Of Four Universal Moral Competencies In Ethical Decision-Making." Journal Of Business Ethics 116.4 (2013): 717-734. Business Source Complete. Web. 8 Apr. 2014.
For instance, in a situation where one has inadequate information in the mind, making the right decision may be hard and the conclusion made is wrong. Too much information is another challenge with thin slicing as pointed out earlier as one gets confused on the useful information to incorporate. Even though rapid cognition is accurate many times, it is also easy to misread someone or certain information using the first impression. Cognitive biases contribute to misinterpretation and one needs to be aware that one can also be wrong. The presence of likes and dislikes is another instance where thin slicing can make one stray. Here, the individual will only make a judgment based on what he prefers. The stereotypes and prejudice hinder this quick judgment as well therefore; it is not advisable to incline on a particular side when making a
In the area of decision making I believe myself to be more Thinking than Feeling. An example of the thinking preference can be seen in my role as a consistent, objective disciplinarian. My firm-mindedness in this area has produced children that are a joy to teach as well as to take out in public. Our family receives numerous compliments on how well behaved and delightful our children are. I believe it is my desire for justice and my clarity in rules and expectations that make this achievable for my children.
Every individual has a unique composite of values and is readily presented with contrasting choices in their daily lives. As individuals act on these choices, they are sometimes presented with a conflict of interest between the beliefs they hold and the actions they commit.
In brief, I agree that we, as humans, tend to be set in our ways and many of our problems are related to miscommunication, along with the fact that our judgments are biased because of our experiences and education. Even though I believe that it is human nature to lean towards the more interesting argument, I do not agree that all humans follow the individual in command without questioning as well as disagreeing with their views on at least one subject.
Thus, our predictions about others' beliefs or behaviors, based on casual observation, are very likely to err in the direction of our own beliefs or behavior. For example, college students who preferred brown bread estimated that over 50% of all other college students preferred brown bread, while white-bread eaters estimated more accurately that 37% showed brown bread preference (Ross, Greene, & House, 1977). This is known as the false consensus effect (Ross et al., 1977; Mullen, Atkins, Champion, Edwards, Hardy, Story, & Vanderlok, 1985). The false consensus effect provides the basis for the following demonstration, which emphasizes the need for systematic rather than casual observation. You can use the set of six questions, below, to investigate this.
In “The Meaning of Ethics”, Wheelwright shows us different characteristic phases that can be perceived in a moral deliberation. There are many solutions to a problem but Wheelwright believes one should follow these phases. In Phase ii: Rational elaboration of consequence, Wheelwright says, “As this step involves predictions about a hypothetical future, the conclusions can have, at most, a high degree of probability, never certainty. The degree of probability is heightened accordingly as there is found some precedent in past experience for each proposed choices” (265). In other words, Wheelwright wants us to explore our options in every pos...
...usually a point where a consensus is drawn and an action is deemed unmoral. Lying is not always a bad thing when done under the right circumstances.
In this theory, decisions are based on thoughts, which are believed as correct in any circumstance. (Kamm, 2006) The decisions process with this method can be timely to reach because things are cut and dry. Certain ethical codes that are universal and not to be broken.
It is difficult to make decisions and have intellectual judgment. Decisions are at times influenced by personal experiences, information presented, emotion, amongst other numerous factors, therefore it is a lengthy process. Even when a person is trying to make the best decision it may be the “wrong” choice due to the fact that it negatively impacts other people. For instance, allowing a person to bend the rules a bit may seem innocent, but it may hinder the other people that are following the rules (such as allowing someone to use the computer longer than what their allotted time
behavior and ethical decision making. I feel that only in this way will I be able to provide the
According to Treviño & Nelson, ethics are “the principles, norms, and standards of conduct governing an individual or organization” (as cited by University of Phoenix, 2012). Ethics are essential in the determination of what is right and wrong in a given situation (University of Phoenix, 2012). When we are born, we do not have any values, morals, or ethical systems in place, as these are learned and developed over time. Today, we are going to take a closer look at my personal ethics and the underlying ethical system that most closely applies to my life. We will also examine the effects that my ethics have on my performance within the organization. Finally, we will discuss why it is important to have ethics that are integrated within an organization.
Decision-making has historical roots in philosophy, which generated two primary dimensions: one of logic and reason and one of ethics and moral judgment. Philosophers have primarily viewed these dimensions from a normative standpoint, providing arguments for each one to demonstrate how individuals think and decide. Since the evolution of normative theories of logic, which are mostly based on probability or utility, much work has been dedicated towards their expansion into descriptive models of actual reasoning processes. The ethics and moral judgment dimension remains largely normative, despite the fact that moral thinking is regarded as an important element in the decision-making process as a whole (Strong & Meyer, 1992).
... understand the other side’s point of view. All parties are able to identify areas of agreement and disagreement, creatively explore and evaluate alternatives, and select solutions to which they are all committed. Though collaborating is the only win-win approach preferred to resolving conflicts in many situations, there is time and place for the other styles as they may better meet the needs of the situation.