Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical issues of oil drilling
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical issues of oil drilling
Moral / Ethical Compass Essay Everybody uses their ethical and moral compass every day. People have to see whether their choices are ethical and moral, we all use are ethical and moral compass all the time. In the story The Most Dangerous Game, Rainsford used his ethical and moral compass to decide whether to hunt humans with General Zaroff or not, he knew that saying no was ethically right and morally right aswell so he decided to make that decision. Not only Sanger Rainsford had to use his ethical and moral compass, Val Plumwood from Being Prey had to use her ethical and moral compasses. Val Plumwood decided to defend the alligators because she was trespassing in the alligators territory, her moral and ethical compass told her that it wasn't right …show more content…
A good thing to learn about rainsfords choice was that in total he did more right than wrong, Rainsford killed Zaroff because he knows that he will fight back and possibly kill Rainsford and more innocent humans. Rainsford did not only think about himself, he thought about what damage Zaroff has already done and what Zaroff can still do. Our society struggles to make sure that people are using their moral and ethical compasses correctly like for example, the Dakota Access Pipeline vs Standing Rock Sioux event. Some people don't care about the Native American’s water supply and think its ok to possibly contaminate the water in the future for the cause of oil, but as of now the US is saying that they will try and reroute the pipeline so it won't be able to contaminate the water supply. That decision was made by people that used their ethical and moral
In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” Rainsford was justified in killing General Zaroff. Rainsford is a hunter. He was on a yacht that crashed and he was the only survivor. The island that he swam to was named “Ship Trap Island.” This where General Zaroff lived. He is also a hunter. He has hunted anything you can think of. Even… people. He has the survivors from the ship wrecks “play” his “game.” The survivors go out into the jungle and General Zaroff goes out and finds them. They have three days to survive. If they don’t get caught in those three days, they win. If they lose… they are killed. This happened to Rainsford. Rainsford, thankfully, won the “game.” He shot General Zaroff after his win.
Rainsford is an intelligent man. Early in the story, “Rainsford remembered the shots. They had come from the right, and he doggedly swam in that direction” (34). Rainsford had just fallen in the water, swam fifty feet further out, but he kept his senses in the right direction. In total darkness, Rainsford used his intelligence and intellect to reach the land. Also, I don’t think that Rainsford knew he was being sized up when Zaroff was staring at him, but when “Rainsford’s bewilderment showed in his face” (100), he quickly understood what Zaroff was leading too. Rainsford wasn’t a murderer. Sure he liked to hunt game, but he wasn’t bored as Zaroff was. Rainsford never bought into all the old tales. ‘“One superstitious sailor can taint the whole ship’s company with fear”’ (20). He never got worked up or stressed out.
In the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game”, Rainsford was justified in killing General Zaroff. Rainsford is a hunter. He was on a yacht until he fell off the boat. He swam all the way to shore because Rainsford heard three gun shots. He walked upon a gigantic mansion. This house was for a man named General Zaroff. He was an hunter just like Rainsford in a hunt , but hunted humans instead of animals. General Zaroff wanted to kill Rainsford in a hunt with the General. Also, the General threaten Rainsford if he doesn’t hunt with him; he will be sent with Ivan.
He’s alive and has stopped Zaroff from his hunting of a “new animal” but, does man really have a say in who’s life is valuable over the other? Rainsford was against killing man at the beginning but ended up murdering or… “hunting” two at the end of his journey. So, where does the line of sport and murder really
In the short story “the most dangerous game”, Rainsford was justified in killing General Zaroff.
The human moral compass serves the purpose of regulating judgment and deciding what is morally and socially right and wrong. While Walter White’s moral compass originally guided him toward legitimacy and integrity throughout his teaching career, he is eventually forced into a business filled with danger and corruption due to the financial demands of his chemotherapy bills. Existentially, our moral compass can deteriorate and be altered to become an impressionable state of mind, which can be influenced through choices and consequences in life. At first, Walter White is a virtuous, credible man who earns his living to provide for his family. But White’s career takes off and steers his ethics away from honesty.
There has been a huge debate throughout the years of whether humans are ethical by nature or not. Despite Christian Keyser’s research evidence that humans are ethical by nature, the evidence from the Milgram experiment shows that we are not ethical by nature. Humans learn to be ethical through genetic disposition as well as environmental factors such as culture, socialization, and parenting. In order to understand if we are ethical or not, we need to understand the difference between being moral or ethical. Many people believe that being moral and ethical are the same thing, but these two terms are a bit different. “Morality is primarily about making correct choices, while ethics is about proper reasoning” (Philosopher, web). Morality is more
Your moral compass forms an ethical norm, and this is very much an impulsive decision, not one
Many people may think that a being a paralegal is just like being a lawyer, but that is not the case. In fact, there are different types of paralegals just like there are different types of lawyers. These are some of the different types of paralegals that are out there: intellectual property (“IP”) paralegals, family law paralegals, and bankruptcy paralegals (“What Are The Different Types Of Paralegals?” n.d.). According to, “What Do Paralegals Do? (n.d.),” the duties of a paralegal are, “Conduct client interviews and maintain general contact with the client, locate and interview witnesses, conduct investigations, statistical and documentary research, conduct legal research, draft legal documents, correspondence and pleadings, summarize depositions, interrogatories and testimony, attend executions of wills, real
In Ethics there are certain factors that influence the individual to distinguish from right or wrong such as, our culture, family, life experiences, our environment, religion and many more. But in today’s contemporary ethical dilemma many tend to view serious issues such as abortion and euthanasia with a different approach. Many view these issues with a different dilemma because yet again everyone has different views on how they view life and what they come to conclude as morally wrong. This view also brings the challenge whether the government should have power over decisions like this. Most of our decisions are based on our moral values since “our values shape our thoughts, feelings, actions, and perceptions” (Velasquez 431). But in today’s
Moral compass is an internalized set of values and objectives that guide a person about ethical behavior, decision making and to judge what is right and wrong. Meaning we individuals each create our own and unique moral compass. Our moral compass is composed with our values, religious, beliefs, parents, government and other. For example, if I were to ask myself how to do I currently see the world I am living in? My answer would be I live my life by day to day passing. Meaning I do not take nothing or anyone for granted I enjoy and make sure I value my loved ones on daily basis. Also, I do not use government or authority figures as my guides. Why? For example, when trump was running for president and winning everyone was angry and upset. Well me of course I wasn’t a fan of trump wining
A person making an ethical judgment uses reason to decide what is the best alternative to resolve one problem or to determine that one alternative is morally right and another alternative morally wrong. In short, ethical judgment is a process of considering several alternatives and choosing the most ethical one. In the natural sciences there are always ethical norms that limit how knowledge can be produced. In the natural sciences, experimentation is an important method of producing knowledge but ethical judgments can limit the use of this method.
To be ethical also meant that one has to be reasonable. Although most people would relate the term ethics with feelings but feelings can be unstable making it hard to make rational decisions. No doubt that emotions are powerful, but they’re also temporary causing regrets if unwanted actions does take place. When one is angry, frustrated, jealous, or sad, it’s hard to separate what is right from wrong. People have been killed or seriously injured only because they have cut someone off on the road or say some things that the other person did not like hearing. "Reason" on the other hand are supposed to guide people in the right direction and avoid what is bad. People have to live their life with reasons. Take a war, for an example, if people were going to war just because they feel like it then thousands of people would end up dead but for what cause? One of the criteria for a “j...
It is not easy to always be a good person, even if you want to be. I think the important thing is to recognize that there is always an ethical issue. There is always an ethical dimension to any decision that we make. Personal values, morals and ethics can influence decision making. Not everyone has ethical standard. A person’s ethics choice have a lot to do with how they are raised. What they believe is right or wrong and their own personal values. When coming up with process for ethical decision making, you mentioned to me that I might have a thinking of a relativist, especially when I stated that there should be an emphasis on personal ethics. Which is true but I will like to adjust it and also consider happiness as well.
Ethics is a system of moral principles and a branch of philosophy which defines what is acceptable for both individuals and society. It is a philosophy that covers a whole range of things that have an importance in everyday situations. Ethics are vital in everyones lives, it includes human values, and how to have a good life, our rights and responsibilities, moral decisions what is right and wrong, good and bad. Moral principles affect how people make decisions and lead their lives (BBC, 2013). There are many different beliefs about were ethics come from. These consist of; God and Religion, human conscience, the example of good human beings and a huge desire for the best for people in each unique situation, and political power (BBC, 2013).