Django Unchained: Violence And Racism With A Purpose?

649 Words2 Pages

Django Unchained: Violence and Racism with a Purpose?
In Django Unchained, a freed slave and a bounty hunter team up to rescue the slave’s wife from a ruthless plantation owner; yet, while the plot description may suggest dramatic comedy, the film turns out to be an uncomfortably comedic exploration of race and violence.
“Anybody bring any extra bags?” says a KKK member whose eye holes are a bit subpar. For Tarantino, creating moments of awkward humor seems to be a cinematic requirement. That laughter-at-a-funeral feeling–the fear of judgment paired with an uncontrollable desire to burst in hysterics–is a frequent sensation when viewing Django Unchained. And if racism isn’t paired with comedy in a certain scene, then gruesome violence probably is. For example, bodies are often shot straight on, but then fly unexplainably to the left or right as blood splatters on a distant wall. Furthermore, the characters often speak or act in a manner incongruous with the emotional representation that would be expected in a brutal or life-threatening scene. It’s funny. It’s uncomfortable. It’s histrionic. It’s unpredictable. Yet, is it worthful?
One question tends to linger around Tarantino’s work: is it art with a purpose or is it art for art’s sake? With …show more content…

Django leads us to question without ever giving us an answer. When considering Tarantino’s reputation and past cinematic accomplishments–Pulp Fiction, Inglorious Basterds, Reservoir Dogs– a pattern begins to emerge: his work is artistic yet controversial. However, since the controversy is left to interpretation, many wonder if he’s just tickling his own fancy through his ability to successfully pair such conflicting representations and sentiments. Is he simply amused by the combination of racism and humor, violence and irrationality, laughter and fear? And if so, can we accept this as a

Open Document