Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Dividend policy case study
Dividend policy theories
Dividend policy case study
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Dividend policy case study
Changes in dividend provide a signal to the market regarding the expected future performance of the company’
Companies are set up to meet set objectives which are both economic and social. Financial management achieves its goal by maximizing the wealth of shareholders; maximizing the value of the company by measure of the stock price and rewarding them with investment income known as a dividend to further spur investments. Dividends are usually paid out at the end of the financial year to investors from the retained earnings as determined by the dividend policy. It is generally accepted that a dividend announcement affects the stock price around the announcement day, that the announcement of unanticipated dividend changes by the management
…show more content…
DEUTSCHE BANK
Deutsche Bank is facing questions about whether it can afford a penalty of $14bn (£10.5bn) from the US Department of Justice for mis-selling mortgage bonds a decade ago. Shares in Germany’s biggest bank have sunk to a 30 year low and are trading just above €10 a share, illustrating investors’ concerns that they will be asked to bolster the institution’s coffers through a cash call. The bank has put strategies in place that will see a turnaround in the performance of the bank by proposing to cut jobs and dividends. This announcement has led to a further drop in the share price by 7%.
The dividend cut announcement for the next 2 years shows that the company is in greater trouble than what the management is presenting. Analysts have insinuated severally that the bank will need to be bailed out by the German government due to the extent of the financial mess they are in.
The share price of Deutsche Bank has dropped significantly from a high of $30 to a low of $11.It should, however, be noted that the price drop has not entirely been based on the dividend cut but other issues that the company is
Overall, The Home Depot’s market conditions are improving as basic earnings per share increased, as well as dividend yield percentage. The decrease in the P/E and dividend payout ratios can be explained through positive
Theoretically, it is the foundation of simpleness and reasoning for stock valuation as any cash payoff from company is entirely in form of dividends. However, in practice, this model require further hypothesis on company’ dividend payments, future interest rate and growth pattern. Therefore, it is assumed that the DDM model merely applies to evaluate roughly minor proportion of the value of company’ share price. Specifically, the JB HI-FI value obtained from the DDM is 30.65 higher than their actual currently trading share price 24.1; a different of 6.55, and then the stock is undervalued. Consequently, DMM is not applicable for stock price valuation in case of JB HI-FI since it is not an individual approach of stock
The year 2008 was a very scary one for anyone involved in the US stock market. Due to subprime lending, and cheap mortgages, the housing market became grossly overinflated. Naturally, as with a balloon that’s filled too much, it “popped”. The resulting collapse of the housing bubble had severe implications for the rest of the US economy, housing, and related industries such as lumber, construction, and realty all came crashing down, and the people employed in those fields soon found themselves out of work. As with the stock market crash of 1929, fear of the economic instability caused people to pull their money out of any investments they had. This can be a problem for a healthy bank, being unable to supply the money people are requesting if it’s tied up in loans. However, this would prove to be an even bigger problem if the money never existed in the first place, and would take down one of the largest scams in American history.
In the midst of the current economic downturn, dubbed the “Great Recession”, it is natural to look for one, singular entity or person to blame. Managers of large banks, professional investors and federal regulators have all been named as potential creators of the recession, with varying degrees of guilt. No matter who is to blame, the fallout from the mistakes that were made that led to the current crisis is clear. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the current unemployment rate is 9.7%, with 9.3 million Americans out of work (Bureau of Labor Statistics). Compared to a normal economic rate of two or three percent, it is clear that the decisions of one group of people have had a profound affect on the lives of millions of Americans. The real blame for this crisis rests on the heads of the managers that attempted to play the financial system through securitization, and forced the American government to “bail out” their companies with taxpayer money. These managers, specifically the managers of AIG and Citigroup, should be subject to extreme pay caps for the length of time that the American taxpayer holds majority holdings in their companies, as a punitive punishment for causing the Great Recession.
DuPont is a very big company with a low debt policy designed to maximize financial flexibility and insulate operations from financial constraints. It is one of the few AAA rated manufacturing companies due its investments are primarily financed from internal sources. However, because prices fell in the 1960’s thus DuPont’s net income fell also. The adverse economic conditions in 1970’s escalated inflation: increase in oil prices increased required inventory investments of the company. 1975 recession negatively affected DuPont’s net income by 33% and returns on capital and earnings per share fell. The company cut dividends in 1974 and working capital investment removed. Proportion of debt increased from 7% in 1972 to 27% in 1975 and interest coverage falls from 38 to 4.6. The company perceived increase in debt temporary but moved quickly to reduce its debt ratio by decreasing capital expenditures. Debt proportion dropped to 20%, interest coverage increased to 11.5 by 1979.
The stock price is currently 103.31, down from a recent high of 121.50. The P/E ratio is declining at 28 and beta at .67, which is expected to grow closer to 1.0. A recent earnings surprise last December yielded a 15% difference from the lower expectations and the latest earnings reports late last month also surprised investors. Estimates for the 2000 fiscal year are being raised by a large majority of analyst who believe that earnings per share will increase and the stock price will reach close to 150.
...o renegotiate credit agreements with banks. However, the liquidity was a result of structural changes and would not bring significant effect to the company because it is unusual and infrequent (the extraordinary credits of $15 million fall in this category also). The financial report must be consistent year-by-year. A company should do the same or similar activities, especially operating activities, to generate “money” every year and recognize “money” as its profit. However, this is not the case for Harnischfeger. We are doubtful that the company will perform well in the future. The company recorded modest profit this year because it reduced operating cost not because it increased operating revenue. Since Harnischfeger did not generate its profit by operating activity, it would be too risky to predict if its stock price will reach $6.00 per share in the 1986-87.
The answer is likely to be a combination of the elements presented in this report, and the fact that Deutsche Bank does not appear to have a clear path for resolving the issues it faces. Further, the portfolio of solutions that the bank has is restricted. Deutsche Bank cannot consider pivoting on other arms like UBS did around its wealth management division, neither considering the retail option, back in the fragmented home retail market, as Santander has done . Moreover, there is also the political implication of a possible government intervention, which is not allowed from the new EU regulation on public bailout . This will also create a precedent that Italy is keen to follow, to revamp its suffering banking
Primarily, financial managers look at the market price in maximizing the value of the firm. The market value is the present value of the net cash flow divided buy the risk. Investors consider the firm’s future and present earnings, disadvantages or risks and other factors that will influence a firm prior to deciding to create an investment decision and the market price of the stock that will reflect all the information considering these factors (Arain, 2011).
...ccurately reflects the intrinsic value of the company from the shareholders point of view and their expectations of future earnings.
With improving cash flows and more reasonable debt load, the airline will be in a strong position to start paying a dividend to its shareholders towards the end of this year. Alternatively, it could also choose to resume its share repurchase program.
In previous years the big financial institutions that are “too big to fail” have come to realize that they can “cheat” the system and make big money on it by making poor decisions and knowing that they will be bailed out without having any responsibly for their actions. And when they do it they also escape jail time for such action because of the fear that if a criminal case was filed against any one of the so called “too big to fail” financial institutions it...
If they company thinks that the earning will fall, stocks will decrease; deterring from investors losing money these types of
The basic earnings per ordinary share in 2016 is RM19.14 and RM14.30 in 2015. This shows that the ordinary share had been increased RM4.84 compare to 2016 based on 2015. In the other hand, this company had declared a first interim single-tier dividend of 10 sen per ordinary share amounting to RM22.88 million in respect of the financial year ended 31 December 2016. They sold their ordinary shares of RM400,000,000 units of RM0.50 per each in 2016 and RM200,000,000 units of RM0.50 per each in 2015 to their shareholders. It is increased from 2015 to 2016 with 200,000,000 units. The other investments that available for sale is RM1000 same as in 2015 and 2016.
This paper will discuss the role of the financial manager and how that particular role, in the area of corporate expertise, differs from that of the shareholder and of the employee. The discussion the paper provides will help determine how the financial manager maximizes shareholder value in today's financial market. Lastly, the viewpoint of the financial manager will be compared to that of the shareholder and employee.