Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How to manage diversity in a classroom
Teaching strategies for inclusive education
How to manage diversity in a classroom
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How to manage diversity in a classroom
The inclusion of learners with special needs can be challenging, but when done correctly, it is extremely rewarding for the students and the teacher. Often teachers ascribe to the ideals of inclusion, but their actual practice falls short of complete academic inclusion. Within Mrs. Z's 6th grade math and science classroom, this situation is replicated. She describes her class the "hardest she has ever taught" and this seems to refer to the wide diversity of learners. The class is made up of about 30 students, including multiple kids with behavioral disturbances, multiple kids struggling with home issues, such as homelessness and nutrition, and there are a few kids with specific learning disabilities, and two with hearing impairments. There …show more content…
The ideal of equality, by simply giving everyone the same instruction, assignments, and reaction, creates unfair situations for students who do not fit the "standard" that this equality was designed for. For instance, a few of the students in the class often struggle with understanding concepts and finishing homework. Since they are held up to the same standard as someone who does understand the concepts, their homework is simply marked as not completed and they only receive a verbal warning and nothing else from the teacher. Occasionally, a special education helper will come into the classroom and will sit down with these students in order for them to get more individual and directed help completing their assignment. However, these situations of directed help occur less frequently than they need to succeed. In this system, then, students who do not understand the lesson and not do the homework can simply slip by doing and learning nothing. Additionally, the students with EBD's in the classroom, often disrupt class time and instruction. Mrs. Z gives these students equal time in their scolding and punishments as the other students. And since there are so many students with EBD's in this classroom, the lesson is barely ever gotten through. Finally, with the standardized instruction and constant pauses for disruption, students who are advanced in this subject are often left …show more content…
Firstly, communication is strongly needed between students, special education providers, and the teacher. As Wormelli (2007) states, teaching is a "collaborative" process; students often know what works for them and what doesn't (p.79). Establishing this link may help generate ideas on how best to get them to learn and participate in the lesson. Furthermore, both the "Guide to the Individualized Education Program" (2000), the "No More 'Waiting'" (2007), and "Wisconsin Response to Intervention" (2010) articles, state the need for "collaboration" between a wide variety of persons, including students, parents, teachers, administration, and others (Evers, 2010, p. 11). The second strategy I would recommend to this classroom is breaking up the type of lesson to accommodate more types of learners, or tiering. Mrs. Z does the exact same structured lesson every day. While the students do get more interactive learning during discussion of homework, it is already too late as they have had to already understand the concepts in order to complete the homework for today. I would suggest breaking the structure to include group activities, such as the "football" structure Wormelli (2007) outlines (p.91). Students would get a brief lesson together, split off into groups to work on problems, worksheets, or even the homework with the teacher
... be on a case-by-case basis with the good of the whole class in mind. “Equality and socialization should accompany – not replace – judgment and education. To substitute the former for the latter, or vice versa, is an unsafe practice, pure and simple” (Carpenter, 2008, p. 236).
What do we do with children with disabilities in the public school? Do we include them in the general education class with the “regular” learning population or do we separate them to learn in a special environment more suited to their needs? The problem is many people have argued what is most effective, full inclusion where students with all ranges of disabilities are included in regular education classes for the entire day, or partial inclusion where children spend part of their day in a regular education setting and the rest of the day in a special education or resource class for the opportunity to work in a smaller group setting on specific needs. The need for care for children with identified disabilities both physical and learning continues to grow and the controversy continues.
Disproportionate identification of minority students in special education is a major concern in schools today. This paper describes the issues in the assessment process with minority students and how we have arrived at a situation where minorities are being misdiagnosed into special education programs. Additionally, several legal cases are mentioned which show numerous actions and rulings that have tried to correct the disproportionate identification in special education. Some of the legal cases discussed include Larry P. v Riles, Diana v. State Board of Education, and Guadalupe v. Tempe Elementary School, which all significantly impacted special education today. Additionally, the Individual with Disabilities Education Act has enforced that minority groups must receive an equal education in the least restrictive environment possible. It is our duty as teachers and citizens to abide by these laws and find different ways to assess and correct the disproportionality of minority groups that exists today.
According to the film, fairness does not mean everyone get the same, it means everyone gets what he or she needs. In my ICT classroom, there was numerous times when I over heard teachers state that it is not fair that certain students have undeniable privileges. There was a student classified as emotionally disturbed. He constantly ran out the class, attacked students and teachers and became furious when completing academic task. Some teachers saw him on a skateboard gadget being pulled down the hallway. The excitement in his face annoyed teachers because they saw this action as a reward. However, the student was not being reward, he was in occupational therapy (OP) receiving his needs. Furthermore, teachers approached me complaining that my one to one student does not deserve the privileges he has due to his behavior. I found myself defending my student and feeling frustrated that his privileges were observed as a reward and not a need. The definition of fairness confirmed that I was not only defending my student, but also defending his needs. Now, I can share the definition of fairness with my colleagues to bring awareness of LD students receiving their
Including these children in general education ultimately leads to their progress. Not too long ago, these people were segregated and labeled as incompetent. It was not until special education reform came about and showed the countless capabilities these exceptional learners have to offer. Teachers play a vital role in these entities’ lives. It is up to them to facilitate their learning as well as modify their measurable goals. Before inclusion, these people could not reach their potential, and not much could be said about how they learn or grasp concepts. Through inclusion, professionals can ascertain students level of performance and utilize strategies that work best for the child. Inclusion allows educators to take note on what type of learners these exceptional individuals are. Schoolteachers can reveal if the youth is a visual, auditory, tactical, or even a kinesthetic learner. Unquestionably, inclusion has brought about an age of progression for instructors and students’ in special education.
During my research for this paper there was so much I knew about special education already. In our Intro to Education class we talked about a lot with this program. As a teacher you have to have your stuff together so you don’t get the students files mixed up. You also have to know exactly what you are doing. This whole thing can be so stressful. You have to make sure the students goals are not too much. Special Education teachers are hard to find. But when you get one you keep them for a long time.
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. once stated, “Most…think that education should equip them with the proper instruments of exploitation so that they can forever trample over the masses. Still others think that education should furnish them with noble ends rather than means to an end.” What Dr. King was getting at in The Purpose of Education is that education holds many different values for many different people. How can we go about determining one standard value of a college education for a country so recognized for its diversity? Also, is it really true that everyone in our divergent society has an equal opportunity to attend a university? We cannot ignore the fact that the characteristics that separate us will ultimately have a profound impact on both our individual opportunities for and values of a university education.
As classrooms become more diverse, and with the push-in model being implemented for special education, this can be a difficult task. There are many things to consider when deciding upon a teaching format for each lesson. The most important is the student’s instructional level or Zone of Proximal Development. There is a fine line between independent, instructional, and frustration level. Lessons should be differentiated so that all students are challenged. To meet the needs of all students it may be necessary to collaborate with the special education teachers and the ESOL teachers. Teachers should be facilitators to student learning. It is helpful to connect the learning to a student’s prior experience. Teachers also need to consider the role of technology in their
The true purpose of school is to prepare children for their future in becoming lifelong learners and global citizens. For children with special needs, special education services prepare and provide support for them in dealing with the challenges they face daily. Laws such as Individuals with Disabilities Education Act has enforced schools to provide education to all children and reinforces the purpose of the school, which is to provide children the Least Restrictive Environment to help them develop to their optimal potential. There are myriad of concerns regarding inclusion’s effect on typical developing students, yet a research done by Bui, Quirk, Almazan, and Valenti shows that “[p]resence of students with disabilities results in greater number of typical students making reading and math progress compared to non-inclusive general education classes” (p. 3). Therefore, inclusion not only benefits children with disabilities, but it also benefits typical developing student’s academic skills and allows them to learn acceptance and respect for students with disabilities.
Inclusion 'mainstreams' physically, mentally, and multiply disabled children into regular classrooms. In the fifties and sixties, disabled children were not allowed in regular classrooms. In 1975 Congress passed the Education of all Handicapped Students Act, now called the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). IDEA mandates that all children, regardless of disability, had the right to free, appropriate education in the least restrictive environment. Different states have different variations of the law. Some allow special needs students to be in a regular education classroom all day and for every subject, and others allow special education students to be in a regular education classroom for some subjects and in a separate classroom for the rest. There are many different views on inclusive education. In this paper I will address some of the positive and negative views on inclusion and ways to prepare educators for inclusive education.
The idea of inclusion within a classroom tends to breed controversy from many people. Currently there is no clear consensus on a definition of inclusion (Heward, 2006). There are many different views on how students with disabilities should be handled. Those views ranged from students being fully included, partially included, or not included at all in mainstream schooling. Different descriptions of inclusion tend to reflect the person's own opinions towards it. People who feel students should not be included in the classroom focus on the negative characteristics of inclusion, such as the challenges of developing plans for students as well as the hard work it requires to incorporate those plans. However, studies show that full inclusion has many benefits to the students, for both students with disabilities as well as students without them. Inclusion has shown to improve the student's social skills, encourage communication, inspire laws and regulations, and improve the overall schooling experience (Gargiulo, 2012). Although it will take longer then some would like or have the patience for, full inclusion can be done in the classroom, with its benefits outweighing the hard work that it requires.
The world is currently undergoing a cultural change, and we live in an increasingly diverse society. This change is not only affect the people in the community but also affect the way education is viewed. Teaching diversity in the classroom and focusing multicultural activities in the programs can help improve positive social behavior in children. There is no question that the education must be prepared to embrace the diversity and to teach an increasingly diverse population of young children.
Promoting fairness in the classroom not only gives the teacher respect but also gives the students a sense of safeness and trust within the classroom. Creating an environment that revolves around fairness, trust and respect will be beneficial to all of the children in the class. The terms respect and trust are pretty straightforward. There doesn’t need to be a debate on what those two mean, but the same cannot be said for fairness. When one usually hears the word “fair” it is often looked at as synonymous to the term “equal” but the two are not the same, especially in a classroom setting. The term fairness on the classroom level means that the individual students are given what he or she may need in order to be successful; fairness does not
There is so much to know about special education that is separate from teaching in a traditional classroom. One thing that has really stood out to me is how many acronyms and terminology these teachers need to know. IEP, LRE, IDEA, FAPE, IFSP, and that is just to name a few (DREDF, 2017). Special education teachers, really need to be knowledgeable about a ton of things. Not only all of the terminology associated with special education, but about disabilities and the best way to go about educating a child with disabilities. When working with children in special education, there will be students of all ages with all kinds of disabilities and different ability levels that you are teaching. It is important to know about each child’s disabilities, what they should be learning and how they should be learning it. There may be times that are challenging education students with disabilities, but when a teacher properly educates themselves on all the aspects of special education and the resources out there for them, it may help make your classroom run more smoothly and easier to