Distributed Leadership

1767 Words4 Pages

Over the last 20 years, a growing literature has emerged on the idea of distributed leadership. In this section, I will draw upon this literature to critically analyse its poor implementation at my school.

What is Distributed Leadership?
According to Yukl (1999) the appeal of distributed leadership lies in its opposition to the concept of the heroic leader or ‘great person’. The ‘great person’ approach to leadership has dominated leadership theory; Charismatic, Transactional, and Transformational are examples of theories in which agency is primarily with the main leader. In these theories, they explain ‘effectiveness’ in terms of the personal characteristics of the leader. Yukl (1999) called for “greater emphasis on reciprocal influence processes …show more content…

Rather, it is the reverse; “the heroic leader impulse…may be the aberrant development, rather than distributed leadership” (Gronn, 2008, p. 142). The author does acknowledge that distributed leadership exposes the limits of what an individual leader can do, though he warns of theorising to the extreme ends of a concentrated-dispersed leadership continuum of which “may do less than full justice to patterns of divergent leadership practice” (Gronn, 2008, p. 143). This sentiment of avoiding extreme dichotomy is, perhaps, the salient point in all of the literature; different contexts will require a different form of centralised or distributed influences. It will be shown later in this paper that a strong senior leader is an essential component of leadership from a distributed perspective. The current implementation of grade-level teams at my school is an example of a team foundering without guidance from …show more content…

The first is a distribution of responsibility in response to the ever more expansive number of leadership tasks within schools, and the recognition that no one person could be reasonably accountable for it all (Harris and Spillane, 2008). Secondly, it has become clear that the work of educating students is becoming ever more complex, necessitating a more reactive form of leadership which utilises the skills and knowledge of staff to overcome new challenges or seize opportunities (Gronn, 2002). Knowing the breadth and depth of the skills and knowledge in the faculty at my school, I firmly believe that this is where the opportunity lays. What is missing is a plan for effective implementation or, put another way, for distributed leadership practice to

Open Document