Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Promote communication in the work setting
Factors that may influence communication and interpersonal communications
Factors that may influence communication and interpersonal communications
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Promote communication in the work setting
The Discipline of Communication and Human Interactions in Workplace
Effective communication of workers with other workers and their employers plays a key role in the development of a company. Various sorts of interactions take place between workers in a workplace. Some of them may seem to be included in interruptions during work. In a research dealing with these interruptions, Conaill and Frohlich (1995), their results showed that "in most cases, (64%), the recipient and the initiator received some benefit from the conversation. However in just over 40% of interruptions the recipient did not resume the work they were doing prior to the interruption." They have discussed the parameter of time space in workplace and how a person does not own it as his workspace. They occur in an unplanned manner. But, as according to the above stated statics, they do not create that much problem continuing your work as before.
According to their observation (Conaill 1995), on an average, 10 minutes of the recipient were expended for this, every hour. The research also showed the ways people use to ignore the interruptions, "In one case, the initiator was given a time limit in a joking fashion. In another, a request was made to the subject's secretary to hold calls."
It explains that whenever a person encounters a face to face interaction, he bounds the other person by giving him a time limit, so that the subject may not take his time that is preserved for his work. In case of phone calls, he tries to avoid it through holding it.
However, the research (Conaill 1995) depicts that these interactions are useful and they keep a person's mind involved in more than one activity and causes very little or no issue with his performance regarding his work...
... middle of paper ...
...heir behavior, history, habits etc. Judging from their gestures, tone, and through their intentional and unintentional acts and impressions, we get subtle cues about their nature.
Contrary to it, if we go toward online social spaces, "the online world can be far more muted"(Fisher 2003). There are social groups established online with their shared history. One can even not state that the person he/she is talking is the same one whose name is there or any other person. The mood and tone cannot be judged.
Instant messaging is the fastest way to get a reply but even it takes comparatively a longer time than if it was said face to face. Emails can be counted as slower media as the discussions going on there lasts weeks and months.
This paper will discuss the human interaction in a workplace with respect to the discipline of communication, sociology and anthropology.
Tugend goes over the impact of interruptions on work. She states that it takes a long time to get refocused after an interruption. Tugend notes that work gets done quicker when a person endures interruptions, but the work quality suffers greatly because of the increase in stress. She states that while other people are interruptions, the biggest interruption is ourselves (Tugend 717). Along with that, human attention spans are decreasing making interruption much more likely to happen. The time people spend on an activity before switching is not enough to really get into it (Tugend 717).
People no longer hold conversations in person and instead prefer to socialize through technology and social media.
Social media is the current fad and has been increasing over the past three decades. Today’s generation is all about who is on Facebook, Twitter, or Intagram, but what they are forgetting is who is actually sitting right beside them. At any given location, one can find several people sitting together at a table in a restaurant. What they see is different from decades before. People are not talking to each other instead they are on social media sites “talking” to someone else, maybe even in another country. That is the problem. People have lost the ability to be social among people in face to face interactions. There are two theories, Structural Functionalism and Symbolic Interaction, that can help
In conclusion, to achieve the connection of people, and sticking to stop multitask can eliminate many problems. Often, people try to change their habits, and they cannot get through a day, People who succeed give it a few days of discomfort, like a drug withdrawal, and then they can get through it. Overall, All of these distractions are mindless, so you might want to give yourself a little mantra or phrase that gets them to refocus or resist distractions and keep the entire brain strong at all times.
Nowadays, more individuals are previous the methodology of making telephone calls and are putting their fingers to great use to texting. Individuals assert that sending a texting is speedier and shabbier than making a call. Yes, if individuals are learned in the craft of messaging, possibly discussion could be speedier than a telephone call and can even be less exorbitant. Accommodation might be a gift, however excessively of a great thing is never perfect. In spite of the fact that telephone calls and messaging are to complete the same task, messaging can have earnest outcomes, for example: absence of true talks, improvement of standoffish conducts, and needed lingual authority discussion.
Stone, Patton, and Heen (2010) started to make me upset when they suggested to “hit pause” (p.275), because I personally know that most people are on their phones all the time, so spending too much time to respond can make me upset and start jumping to conclusions. They did save themselves by saying “let them know if there will be a delay” (p.276). It is very important to bring up how online conversations are different then in person because they are much more prevalent now. Think about how communication has even changed sense 2010, when this book was
When an employee wants to reach another colleague, they have pager-like devices in which they communicate and contact each other with. This is useful because if the manager is urgently needed to handle a difficult situation, the employee can contact him or her through this effective method.
“We’d rather e-mail than meet; we’d rather text than talk on the phone,” says Paul Booth, “an assistant professor of media and cinema studies in the College of Communication at DePaul University in Chicago” (Keller). Paul Booth is saying people are alright with not speaking in person these days. New technology is decreasing the chance of face to face communication each day. Booth puts a lot of emphasis on the fact that even though people talk more online, you don’t get as linked as you would speaking
Social networking has now introduced an innovative way of attaining these norms through virtual communities on the Web. Socialization prepares us for our life experiences. It can be considered a reverential foundation for society. We may not agree to some rules in society, but without socialization a civil society would cease to exist. In addition, any influence on the socialization process has a profound effect on how we function as a community, with some of the more notable discovery’s being email and instant messaging.
While with the constant use of these social technologies, less people are communicating in person, this type of technology might be doing more harm than good because with the rise of websites such as Facebook, social networking may be on the verge of replacing traditional personal interactions for the next generation. Social networks were created for the sole purpose of helping individuals communicate. There are many other reasons that these technologies are used, but communication is still the number one. It is not only changing how we communicate, but how we interact with each other in daily life.
Social networking is doing more harm than good in society, if traditional and personal interactions continue to be replaced with conversations through online networking sites, it won’t be long before they are perceived as the ‘norm’. Traditional methods of interaction will continue to be at risk if the effects of social media are not realised. Social networking sites were created as a means of making it easier for individuals to communicate in a timely and efficient manner, they were not created to take over face-to-face communications altogether. The constant use of online networking is doing more harm than good not only individually, similarly through the community
It is argued whether sociological theories are relevant in the modern day contemporary workplace. In order for one to come to a conclusion for whether the statement above is true or not, one needs to consider and understand Sociology’s role in society and the workplace to help understand how it can assist and benefit human resource managers in the workplace. For one to draw a conclusion, its important one examines the various factors. These factors include; what human resource and their everyday functions are as well as sociological theories from different perspectives, then conclude whether they are relevant or not.
Communication is an interdependent process of sending, receiving, and understanding messages. The definition implies that the components of the communication process cannot be examined separately. Rather, the relationship exists between the sender and the receiver, as well as the environment of the communication event, must be viewed as a whole. According to this perspective, if any of the components and circumstances change (that is, the number of individuals involved in the interaction, seating arrangements, or the time of the day) the communication event is altered. Communication is an ongoing process; we never stop sending and receiving messages. As we will discover, communication is a dynamic process, a process that changes from one communication setting to the next. Although it is difficult to predict, the ways of interpreting communication, certain components are always present in the communication process.
As in all aspects of personal and professional life, having effective communication is a key element of success. Effective communication can benefit your relationships with people. By conveying your message and integrating them as a member of the team and not just a subordinate leads to better production. By effectively communicating you can clearly define job responsibilities and expectations. The better you are able to communicate the less likely organizational turnover of personnel will occur. Supervisors and leaders in the professional workplace find that the most important factor in advancement and retain ability is effective communication. Senior level executives and human resources managers are stressing the importance of communication and providing more training for mid-level management. Emphasis is placed on communication being clear by being transmitted strongly.
“In order to maintain a positive on-going relationship in any difficult face-to-face circumstance, an individual must learn the appropriate socialization rituals. Knowing these rituals and being able to play a proper front stage role is crucial in order for an individual to get along with others (Brignall and Valey, 2005).” With the relatively recent rise of social networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook, the means for maintaining relationships through these platforms rather than speech communication and face-to-face communication are becoming much more apparent and widespread throughout society. However, it is difficult to maintain these relationships without knowing proper social skills especially if these skills are not practiced or introduced to an individual. Although, “Communication frequency and self-disclosure play a role in computer-mediated communication and the formation of online friendships just as they do in face-to-face interactions and offline friendships (Subrahmanyam and Greenfield, 2008).” Yet, in our vast digital world that we reside in today, the ways in which we choose to communicate are becoming hindered by our participation in online communication. “We must have a philosophical understanding of the purpose and importance of communication to individuals and based upon this understanding, shape our attitude and value toward the communication process (McFarlane, 2010).” It is extremely crucial to understand communication’s importance and to not tuck the original beliefs and values regarding the tool underneath the rug, resorting and succumbing to communicating poorly in a fashion that mimics what we have now experienced via our devices. “As with any social change, we also believe there is a need to study and understand the impacts that change might have, regardless of whether such changes are viewed as positive or