Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The history and purpose of war poetry
The history and purpose of war poetry
The history and purpose of war poetry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The history and purpose of war poetry
Different Attitudes to War in Post-1914 War Poetry
Rupert Brooke and Wilfred Owen are poets who fought for England in the
First World War. Both poets depict the same topic of war, but through
different views and opinions. Despite them pertaining to the similarly
themed subject, their language and tone invoke contrasting feelings in
readers and affects their impression of war in opposite ways. Examples
of these differences can be seen in the two poems by Rupert Brook 'The
Dead (iii) and 'The Soldier' and two by Wilfred Owen 'Anthem for
Doomed Youth' and 'Dulce etDecorum Est'.
Rupert Brooke writes 'The Dead (iii)' in an extremely relaxed and
romantic mood.Brooke had not experienced war, so with this in mind the
poem seems very clear and concise. Brooke aims to show us the glory
that is brought about by dying for your country. He thinks that war is
a simple and dignified cause. He aims to make us more patriotic and
convince us to die for our country in war.
The first line is very energetic and joyous for a horrendous subject
such as war. This may mean that Brooke tries to symbolise enthusiasm
and glory. Since bugles are used at a grand occasion, but also
militarily charges and retreats he may be trying to indicate that
dying for your country is a glorious way to end your life.
"Blow out, you bugles, over the rich Dead!"
As he says, it has made them 'rich'. This probably means that they are
wealthy with glory, praise and admiration. He makes no mention of the
pain and suffering in war. The third line explains that dying has
again made them important.
But, dying has made us rarer gifts than gold.
Gold is very rare, so...
... middle of paper ...
...e still fresh in his mind and the public's.
Owen, on the other hand, wrote his poem three years into the war and
in that time was able to see and accept the realities of war, so his
perception of war was changed to bitterness and this was reflected in
his many poems such as Anthem for Doomed Youth in which he reveals the
same feelings on war as he does in Dulce et Decorum Est. In one of his
previous poems, The Ballad of Peace and War, he himself had supported
the idea of,
'How sweet it is to live in peace with others, but sweeter still far
more meet to die in war with brothers. '
Therefore, it would be concluded that the only reason why the two
poets have conflicting ideologies of war, is time. If Brooke had
experienced more of the war he might have wrote later poems that
portrayed the same bitterness as Owens.
that it wasn't the case. He found out that war wasn't all fun and games. What it actually was
Not because of strong convictions, but because he didn't known. He didn't know who was right, or what was right, he didn't know if it was a war of self-determination or self-destruction, outright aggression or national liberation; he didn't know if nations would topple like dominoes or stand separate like trees; he didn't know who really started the war, or why, or when, or with what motives; he didn't know if it mattered; he saw sense in both sides of the debate, but he did not know where the truth lay; he simply didn't know. He just didn't know if the war was right or wrong or somewhere in the murky middle. So he went to war for reasons beyond knowledge. Because he believed in law, and law told him to go. Because it was a democracy...He went to war because it was expected. Because not to go was to risk censure, and to bring embarrassment on his father and his town. Because, not knowing, he saw no reason to distrust those with more experience. Because he loved his country, and more than that, because he trusted it. Yes, he did. Oh, he would rather have fought with his father in France, knowing certain things certainly, but he couldn't choose his war, nobody could. (p. 234-235)
about the war and his lack of place in his old society. The war becomes
war often, for the sake of his country, but when he did he put in a
He tried to portray the world through the terms of compassion and hope, but at the same time “he was profoundly disturbed by the brutality of totalitarianism and the savagery of war,”
others for the violence of the war, and summarizes his view on revenge perfectly: “I joined the
middle of paper ... ... He says “War is hell, but that’s not the half of it, because war is also mystery and terror and adventure and courage and discovery and holiness and pity and despair and longing and love. War is nasty; war is fun. War is a drudgery.
The Poem “Dulce et Decorum Est” attempts to make war seem as repulsive as possible. The author’s goal is to discourage people from joining the war or any future conflicts by shattering the romantic image people have of the fighting. The setting of this poem helps
The simple definition of war is a state of armed competition, conflict, or hostility between different nations or groups; however war differs drastically in the eyes of naive children or experienced soldiers. Whether one is a young boy or a soldier, war is never as easy to understand as the definition. comprehend. There will inevitably be an event or circumstance where one is befuddled by the horror of war. For a young boy, it may occur when war first breaks out in his country, such as in “Song of Becoming.” Yet, in “Dulce et Decorum Est” it took a man dying in front of a soldier's face for the soldier to realize how awful war truly is. Both “Song of Becoming” and “Dulce et Decorum Est” are poems about people experiencing the monstrosity of war for the first time. One is told from the perspective of young boys who were stripped of their joyful innocence and forced to experience war first hand. The other is from the perspective of a soldier, reflecting on the death of one of his fellow soldiers and realizing that there is nothing he can do to save him. While “Song of Becoming” and “Dulce et Decorum Est” both focus on the theme of the loss of innocence, “Song of Becoming” illustrates how war affects the lives of young boys, whereas “Dulce et Decorum Est” depicts the affect on an experienced soldier.
By denying the war was real he was able to maintain a level of peace about his accident but until the truth came out about his accident he would not be able to gain the inner peace he really
As a poet, Wilfred Owens wants to show the effects of warfare from the viewpoint of a soldier during a War. Owens uses his own experience as a fighter to capture the reader’s attention and get across his point. He often uses graphic imagery and words to depict his thoughts about war. Wilfred Owens, poems, “Dulce et Decorum est” and “Anthem for doomed youth” talk blatantly about the effects of warfare on the soldiers, their loved ones, and those who make an ultimate sacrifice by making a statement about the efficacy of war.
The next line expresses the way in which he has no grave stone, just a
Considered the leading English poet of the First World War, Owen is remembered for realistic poems depicting the horrors of war, which were inspired by his experiences at the Western Front in 1916 and 1917. Owen considered the true subject of his poems to be "the pity of war," and attempted to present the true horror and realities of battle and its effects on the human spirit. His unique voice, which is less passionate and idealistic than those of other war poets, is complemented by his unusual and experimental style of writing. He is recognized as the first English poet to successfully use pararhyme, in which the rhyme is made through altered vowel sounds. Owen’s distinct way of both writing and reading poems led to influence other poets in the 1920s and 1930s.
There are many things in this world that are impossible to understand without first hand experience.This can be especially irritating for people who have the knowledge, but see everyone else with the wrong idea. Philip Larkin and Wilfred Owen show this in their poems about the common misconception of war glorification. Through imagery and the use of similes, they explain what it's really like for a person to go into battle. To outsiders, fighting in war is a noble cause worthy of envy and praise, but from the inside perspective the only thing war does is take away the innocence of
The quote “all’s fair in love and war” means nothing is out of bounds when it comes to love and war; everything is fair game. Nicholas Sparks, Norman Rockwell, and Robert Frost do an excellent job depicting this quote in their work. Nicholas Sparks is famous for his romantic novels; many of which involve a man in the military falling in love with a woman and doing whatever it takes to be with one another. Norman Rockwell’s paintings are simple but also show the love and war. Though Robert Frost’s poem are not particularly about love and war; he does have many poems about love between two people as well as poems about war and what it takes to survive. All three people are extremely talented and I enjoy all of their work.