Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Significance of feedback in teaching and learning process
Significance of feedback in teaching and learning process
Four importances of feedback to learners
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Differences in rater behaviors are among the factors responsible for variability in the decision making process(DMP) during ratings. The interference of either the rater rating style or rater experience determines the validity and reliability of the rating score and the rater themselves. Factors related to rater inconsistencies identification and measurement in DMP is necessary to avoid factors underlying variability in decision making process . Several studies have identified rater proficiency level, rater experiences and tasks as its factors. The purpose of this paper is to critically review two articles that contribute to describe insights of rater behavior related to the factors studied. Barkaoui (2010) ‘Variability in ESL Essay Rating Processes: The Role of the Rating Scale and Rater Experience’ identifies effects of rating scales and experiences on raters behavior through think aloud protocol. While Baker (2012)’Individual Differences in Rater Decision-Making Style: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study” defines and addresses decision making style (DMS) as a factor related to decision making process in writing assessments rating. The following summary and critical evaluation of these articles explicitly provide what involves in raters decisions as well as the strength and weaknesses of these two articles. Summary of text 1 Barkaoui (2010) quantitative study of variability in raters assessments discusses the impact of rating scales and rater experiences in writing rating (p.54).12 ESL essays were holistically and analytically assessed by 25 raters, novice and experienced( Barkaoui,2010,p.56). Results shows that rating scales has greater impact on rating processes, especially in analytical ratings( Barkaoui,2010,p.56). ... ... middle of paper ... ... in rater training or rater profiling as well. As a final suggestion, the two studies discussed in this paper successfully identifies additional factors to rater decision making process and will be of great benefit for those who are interested in the area of rater assessments and rating consistencies. Works Cited Baker, B. A. (2012). Individual differences in rater decision-making style: An exploratory mixed- methods study. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(3), 225-248. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/docview/1364738673?accountid=12372 Barkaoui, K. (2010). Variability in ESL essay rating processes: The role of the rating scale and rater experience. Language Assessment Quarterly, 7(1), 54-74. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/docview/744444316?accountid=12372
Much research was completed for the making of this article. It was found that ELL’s need time to develop oral English proficiency, teachers need to use ongoing authentic formative assessments throughout the year due to
In “What is a Grade” by Pat Belanoff, she explains the pros and cons of the grading system. In Pats ' essay she states “Perhaps the solution would to abandon grading altogether in writing class. I confess that this a solution that appeals to me greatly.” (151). Grades should not be present in the way we test students’ learning ability.
Teachers would share information and research as well as their own experiences to support and develop the grading reform. An English teacher had shared her experience on using the method of practicing and retaking for her assessments. Students who didn’t do well in a section the first time had the chance to put their practice into extra work for the second time, and the grading of that work had replaced the first. As a result, more than 65% of her students scores had increased and they were able to master the skill. This development had strengthen their grading.
There are other problems associated with graphic rating scales besides the traditional problems of halo and leniency. Graphic rating scales have also been cited of having problems associated with validity, poor inter-rater agreement and personal biases of a rater (Kane and Bernardin, 2002). Though important, these other problems associated with graphic rating scales are not as prevalent in the research literature and have not traditionally been attributed the same level of importance and influence as halo and leniency.
There are numerous suggestions through research that provide possible answers to the questions at hand. Some say students tend to choose shorter questions, or questions placed first or second on the list. This research was inconclusive however. Polio and Glew argue that “the primary reason for offering students a choice of prompts is the belief that students should be allowed to choose a prompt that will enable them to display their best writing” (37). This applies especially to ESL students who come from a much larger variety of backgrounds than to regular English students. However, “there is no evidence that when students choose a prompt, they choose one that allows them to display their best writing skills” (38). It is also pointed out though, that giving choices decreases reliability, adding to the already difficult process of fairly scoring written tests. Some even think that choosing wastes time.
Farber, Jerry “ A Young Person’s Guide to the Grading System” Dissent Fall 1997: 102-04 in Mary Lynch Kennedy and Haley M. Smith. Reading and writing in the Academic Community. 2nd ed, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall 2001. 333-336.
How does the grading system and learning go together? What makes learning something gradable? How can the grading system determines a child 's knowledge based on a test alone? These questions have popped up in educators ' minds for years. These are the thoughts that motivated people like Liz Mandrell, Jerry Farber and Steven Vogel rectify the grading system in their own views. These authors give valid reasons for understanding why students are affected by the grading system.
English language learners are at different levels of proficiency. Listening, reading, verbal, and writing skills of ELLs will require a variety of instructional levels to meet their varied needs. Understanding the knowledge, skills, and abilities of the learners, will enable the teacher to develop lesson plans that meet and challenge the skill levels of each student. Writing is one of the most productive activities for ELLs (Saville-Troike, 2012). Writing is a common method for testing knowledge and is used frequently for academic
...mperative that an evaluator maintain objectivity in their assessment. An evaluator must be able to substantiate their ratings with specific, relevant examples, or the evaluation quality and employee will ultimately suffer. Great care should be taken in the process in order to relate the actual findings of the evaluation to the correct numbers on the scale.
By involving referees, a researcher candidate can get a clear understanding about the items used as well as the validity of such items to the content of the research conducted. In this study, the researcher sent his questionnaire to some PhDs holders in the field of applied linguistics and English language teaching (ELT) to get highly valid and reliable data. At the first step, the researcher discussed the questionnaire items with some PhD candidates in the field of ELT. Then, after that discussion, the researcher sent the questionnaire items to Dr. Paul John Kurf, Ph.D., Academic Specialist, Michigan State University, UAS. Dr. Paul sent back the questionnaire with some comments and suggestions, which the research took into account and modifying the draft of the questionnaire. The researcher then sent the questionnaire to Dr. Reza Mobashshernia who holds PhD in Applied Linguistics and is employed by English Department, at Islamic Azad University, in Chaloos, IRAN). He is one of the Iranian PhD experts in the field of Applied linguistics. Dr. Mobashshernia was asked to check the content validity of the items as they related to the research questions. The researcher 's items designs got a high score of validity from Dr. Mobashshernia, that is, a score of 96%. The data related to that score is included in the appendix. The researcher also sent the
The degree of agreement between the scores of raters is the interrater reliability of that instrument. Instruments of this nature include semistructured interviews, observational coding systems, behavior checklists, or performance tests.
I found this article appealing because it deals with English for purposes or academic writing, such as that found in the secondary and tertiary schools. This is the area in which I currently work, and as more RFEP students are working alongside native speakers in the classroom and the workplace, these students will need writing skills similar to those demonstrated by their peers. My choice of article was also informed by my experience as a writing teacher for native-speaking students whose writing did not meet the expectations of their grade level. I anticipate using my TESOL degree to work primarily with students who are learning English in order to have better access to education, because I believe that a high school diploma and at least some college will continue to be expected by many employers in the future, and because I believe that many of the world’s best colleges will continue to provide at least some instruction in English.
Another thing that I learned through this experience is how difficult it can be to code the tone of paragraphs as positive, negative, or neutral. This is a completely subjective task, and it is easy to see how there could be some disagreement in assigning scores between different coders. What one person sees as being a negative paragraph in tone, another person may read the same thing and see it as being neutral. I spent quite a bit of time contemplating how to code each paragraph. Since the accuracy of the results depend on coding the paragraphs with consistency between coders, I used my best judgement and tried to think about how others would code each paragraph as well.
According to (Benesch, 1996; Johns & Price-Machado, 2001; Spack, 1997b) cited in Ferris and Hedgcock (2005:73) “particular expertise is required to teach writing to non-native speakers of English, therefore we need a systematic way of inquiring into the diverse background features, skills, schemata, and expectations of ESL writers so we can take this information into account when planning instruction”. After having collected the profile of the students it is important to set the goals and objectives of the lesson. Graves (2000:79) cited in Ferris and Hedgcock (2005:87) claimed that “clear goals help to make teaching purposeful because what you do in class is related to your ...
It has been many years since I have taken a writing class in a college setting. Before English 43, I would’ve described my writing skills as novice, but I feel that this class has given me the tools to successfully advance and excel in English 49. Given the fact that I have gained the tools, experience, and confidence in my writing through English 43, I am without a doubt primed for the English 49 curriculum.