Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Attitude to elderly
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Attitude to elderly
Thursday's class made me think about the connection between common courtesy and oppression. When does someone being rude count as oppression? When is oppression about someone being rude? How do we know the difference? When I heard the story about the elderly lady in the store, my first thought was that the man was just a rude salesperson. I shared during the discussion that he might have been rude to everyone that day. How would he react if I asked a question? Would he answer my question? Was he having a bad day? Was he was rude to all of the customers? Would he treat a man the same way? Was the woman treated poorly because of her age, her gender or both? Would he treat an elderly man differently? Is this discrimination or oppression? Is …show more content…
his salary based on commission? Would his right to make a living be infringed upon if he lost a sale to help a customer who did not make a purchase?
The more I think about the situation, the more questions I have. It is difficult to analyze everyday situations that involve people's emotions, moods, and experiences. There are plenty of people who are rude. Are they unpleasant people or oppressors? How do we determine the difference between the two? The conversation also made me think of a situation I experienced the weekend before. I went to Bloomingdales in Manhattan on Saturday after a birthday brunch. I was nicely dressed and wearing expensive jewelry. My cousin and I went to the fur salon to look at shearling coats. As soon as we walked into the department a saleswoman asked if we needed help. I explained to the saleswoman what I was looking for and my price range. While I was talking with my cousin, the saleswoman slipped a coat on me she thought I would like. When I looked at myself in the mirror, I saw I was wearing a full-length mink that cost $12,500. I took the coat off, handed it back to the saleswoman and told her I would like to try on coats in my price range. I was annoyed by the pushy sales tactic, but I realized she worked on commission.
Afterward, my cousin and I had a good laugh because she put that ridiculously expensive coat on an unemployed student! When I got home that night, I wondered how that saleswoman would treat a black woman. Would the saleswoman approach her and if she did would she have tried to sell her an overpriced fur coat? Who would she approach first if we walked in at the same time? Once again, so many questions that I am not able to answer. I am also wondering if I should be offended because the saleswoman made assumptions about me based on my appearance. I know my financial situation is better than most unemployed students, but I'm certainly not in a position to buy a mink coat. I don't believe the assumption the saleswoman made about me was oppressive, but it was a judgment based on my appearance. Where does this fit into our discussions about oppression? Since my positionality is in or close to the circle of power can I be oppressed by her judgments? I know a judgment about wealth is not the same as racial oppression, but I do believe it is inappropriate. The assumption that I would buy a $12,500 coat on a whim was what offended me the most. I am finding it hard to differentiate between assumptions, disrespect, and oppression.
The book “Defining Contested Concepts” does a swell job of explaining that race, class, gender, and sexuality are systems of oppression and are often contested within our society. The author, Lynn Weber (2010) argues that oppression through these titles exist within our every day interactions and that bigger powers in our political, economic and ideological make it possible for greater divisions between groups of people. These powers make the rules that give some people more privilege than others. Weber describes that there are four patterns of social relationships that are advocates oppression. These segregations are all controlled by the bigger powers, being characteristics that give affected individuals an unfair disadvantage to various interrelated aspects in their lives.
This article describes how rudeness and incivility causes great damage to everyone in the workplace even if it was only intended at a certain person. One professor at the McDonough School of Business at Georgetown University states, “Incivility is almost like trapping people inside a fog.” (Gurchiek, 2015, para. 4) In this quote, incivility is explained as something employees are all affected from and are not able to get away from. Moreover, many surveys are presented throughout the article to show how people either lose or quit their jobs because of the rude treatment that they experience in the workplace. Because of those survey results, many experts believe that rude behaviors in the workplace will begin to worsen in the coming years. However, steps to establish an atmosphere of respect and consideration for colleagues are presented at the end of the article to assist with changing that prediction.
Free speech. Affirmative action. Political correctness. These three things all have at least one key thing common and that one thing can be summed up as this: To you, the reader; to me, the writer; and to anyone and everyone you talk to about those three things, they will have a different meaning with a different story with a different reason for them being defined that way. The discussion cannot end simply with our own stories, but begin with those stories and transcend into something new with being exposed to different ideas and viewpoints that may or may not match our own. D’souza, Taylor, Robbins and all other authors mentioned in this piece can help everyone to grow in their personal definitions of free speech, affirmative action and political correctness.
Everyone at some point in time or another experiences discrimination; no one lives a sheltered enough life not to. As a society we need to admit that discrimination is present at all times and stop being so sensitive to how we are labeled or perceived. Pretending discrimination does not exists does not solve a problem, it makes it stronger. Until it is no big deal in the eyes of all involved it will still be an issue that no one is truly prepared to tackle due to the amount of hate that will then be heaped upon them. Dr. King’s example is also a tragic one, a man who preached love for all, equality for all, and a sense of the brotherhood of man, was gunned down by one man who didn’t agree with his views. So perhaps the individual approach will be the best for now as this shows us one man’s view changed a world and one man’s view ended a life.
With this understanding it can be acknowledged that one can be an oppressor at one point in time but be oppressed at another. These roles are constantly changing based on a variety of factors. Integrative anti-racism allows a better understanding these social oppressions. The author argues that in order for oppression to be vitally explored, the factors that create oppression must be realized. Oppression gives material advantage to the oppressor. "All social relations have material
Overall discrimination is an awful thing. It is like a STD, it can be passed from parent to child, or someone can become infected if you don’t watch out. Discrimination is also like the plague. It sweeps over a large amount of people, infecting most, and most don’t survive. Though today much of the discrimination is gone, just like the plague, but it is still there. Unfortunately for some people, they have to deal with people discrimination from others. Whether it be discrimination of one’s race, age, disability, or gender. Discrimination has numerous damaging effects to someone’s life. In Of Mice and Men the unlucky victims of discrimination also suffer from the same effects. They allow for people to have control of them and walk all over them. Discrimination is like a fire... It hurts.
We receive privilege’s that others do not, because of race, social class, education, and gender, even age and the way we present ourselves. Also as a white, married, middle-class, mother, in my thirties, I get respect from a stranger, whether it be at the store, restaurant, or out at a movie theater. I 'm approachable, or non-threating look. My husband also gets these perks, and even more than me because he is a man. Do I feel this is right, no? In the perfect world we would all be treated the same, but because of social location people will also be treated differently than others. We as a society should look at qualifications instead of gender or color.
Jealousy is an emotional state that erupts when a valued relationship is being threatened (Buss et al., 1992). Men and women both express jealousy tendencies when they feel their romantic relationships are being threatened. Many researchers have studied sex differences in romantic jealousy to investigate at what particular time do men and women feel the most distressed or jealous. For instance, Bus et al. (1992) and Harris and Christenfeld (1996), found that men feel more distressed when they think their romantic partner is engaging in sexual infidelity, whereas women feel more distressed when they think their romantic partner is emotionally attached to someone else. These findings may be very insightful and useful to many of us who experience jealousy episodes; but importantly, it will allow us to investigate the validity of the evolutionary theory that is used to explain most sex differences. In the following paragraphs, I will describe the evolutionary theory that explains sex differences in jealousy and four related empirical studies. Lastly, I will
Aggression is a sub-field under social psychology because social psychology is the study of how individual’s thoughts, feelings, and behavior changes in groups while interacting with other people. In comparison, aggression falls directly under this category because psychologist’s main goal is to try to understand how aggressive people tend to change in their behavior and mentality when their objective is to cause pain. People who are aggressive either physically or psychological educe pain and suffering upon an individual by verbally assaulting someone, berating them, spreading vicious rumors, or even name calling. Everyday schoolchildren are getting bullied, spouses are facing domestic violence, families encounter arguments, and the list continues because everyday aggressors react negatively to these scenarios. However, they are levels of extreme aggressive behavior compare to the others, such as violence being the highest form of aggression. Kassin et al. states compared to violence, the other forms of aggression, such as anger and hostility are less harmful compare to violence because “people can be angry with others and regard them with great hostility without ever trying to harm them” (2014). When someone is angry, they are usually experiencing irritation, hate, or other displeasing feelings. Similarly, those who express hostility, which are negative feelings the aggressor
First, I remember my first experience with oppression. One day my mom and I went to Barnes & Noble so that I could get a book that I had been asking her to buy. While I was looking for the book, I noticed that one of the employees was following me, so I told my mom about it. When my mom confronted the employee she said that she wanted to make sure that I wasn’t stealing anything. Consequently, I started worrying that people wouldn’t treat me fairly because of the color of my skin. Second, as a child, I was marginalized every day. One example was when my 5th grade teacher took us outside to have a foot race and she picked two captains to pick the people they wanted on their team. I was overweight and I couldn’t run fast so my classmates never picked me. I was excluded because I wasn’t small in size and I cried each day and would only eat one meal and drink water to lose weight. Third, I was alienated because I was bullied in the 6th grade. Kids would tease me because of the way my skin looked due to eczema and wouldn’t sit with me during lunch time. Kids would look at me in disgust if I tried to talk to them. I dreaded going to school just to be teased and feel lonely each day. Fourth, I had one experience where I had a position of power. My teacher had to leave the classroom to discuss something with a parent and she put me in charge. She told me to write down the name of any student
Discrimination is known to exist in all workplaces, sometimes it is too subtle to notice, and other times it is exceedingly obvious. It is known that everyone subconsciously discriminates, dependant on their own beliefs and environments that surround them. However, discrimination can be either positive or negative in their results, and sometimes discrimination is a necessary part of life.
What is discrimination? Merriam Webster, defines it as “the practice of unfairly treating a person or group of people differently from other people or groups of people”. But more generally, why does it occur? Is it because of inherent inferiority, or is it simply conformity? These questions are generally unanswered in today's society, but can be understood through careful analysis of what it means to discriminate. The text, A Class Divided, by William Peters attacks this question through analyzing both sides of the discrimination spectrum (ie. the inferior and superior group) from the perspective children. In response to the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., Jane Elliott, a third grade teacher in a predominantly white, middle-class
“Social forces create the 'feeling ' or 'decision ' to change your behavior in someway and to be very careful to check on the formality of future gatherings to which you are invited” (Pearson 43). The authors explain how when a person was invited to a faculty barbecue. The person attended the barbecue in casual clothing T-shirt, shorts, and sandals, but the rest of the faculty was dressed in formal clothing. The person felt a sense of embarrassment. A person can be very courteous to a different person of another race. A group can then make fun of the person for treating them equally to their race. Then the person who treated the other race with respect, will then discriminate the race because the person felt a sense of embarrassment from their own race, and want to be accepted by their race. To solve racism with social forces is to respect all races because no is superior or better than another race.
According to Tony de Joux, author of “Rights go with responsibilities, “Society must realize that rights and obligations go hand-in-hand. Until then, we 'll continue to have a society that has difficulty establishing moral boundaries.” This problem is an ongoing battle and needs to be further addressed starting with our children at home. “For every right, there 's an equal obligation, but nowhere are these seen” states Tony de Joux (Rights). If we establish a stricter rule of thumb for occasions when rudeness arises, we can meet this head on and hopefully bring it back into the minds of the public. Thus, possibly curing this ever growing infection of rudeness; bring back the Ten Commandments, so we may love thine neighbor as we love ourselves and refresh our children’s moral
Animosity can be comprehended in different ways. It can be conceptualized as an identity quality or including causes inside a troublesome disposition as such animosity might be inborn to the person. Another perspective of hostility distinguishes it is an indication with or without expectation or versatile capacity. Animosity may likewise mirror a behavioral example that can be ascribed to a disorder, for example, Lesch-Nyhan disorder. A wide range of forceful conduct