Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Genesis and Gilgamesh comparison
Genesis and Gilgamesh comparison
Genesis and Gilgamesh comparison
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Genesis and Gilgamesh comparison
The story of Gilgamesh relates to the foundation texts of Hebrew Cultures in that the people in both narratives were created to serve their Gods. In Gilgamesh, the characters are consistently giving offerings to their Gods in order to show their appreciation to them. In the epic no matter what Gilgamesh and Enkidu are doing they always stop and think about how they need to show their Gods their gratitude. Offerings are a common way that Gilgamesh and Enkidu show their Gods their respect and gratitude for them. The text says, “You are the offspring of Ninsun the wild cow. You grew up to fulfill the oracle of Shamash, lord of the mountains” (Norton 60). This excerpt from the epic explains that Gilgamesh was created to serve and do as the Gods …show more content…
tell him. This is similar to The Book of Genesis in that both of the characters in each text were created by Gods to serve Gods. The Book of Genesis explains that God’s idea of being served by humans is much different from that of the Gods in Gilgamesh, but in both stories the characters were created to serve them. In Genesis, there is only one God instead of there being multiple like in Gilgamesh. The characters in Genesis, Adam and Eve, were created “in God’s image” (Genesis), and in a way, the characters in Gilgamesh were too. The epic doesn’t explicitly state that the characters were, but Gilgamesh is two-thirds God and therefore created from the image of another God.
In Genesis, the characters serve their God much differently than those in the Epic of Gilgamesh. In Genesis 1 God instructs Adam and Eve to populate the earth, rule over the animals, and to eat whatever plant they wished. Adam and Eve listened to God and they served him through their unconditional love for him. That’s is another difference between the two texts. In Gilgamesh, the characters don’t express love for their Gods, only respect, but in Genesis, Adam and Eve express their love and respect for their God. Lastly, both works are similar in that the characters in both works eventually disobey and go against their Gods. In the epic, Gilgamesh kills Humbaba to challenge the Gods. His act of going against them is his way of proving that the Gods rules are not unbreakable and that no one has true power over him. In Genesis, Adam and Eve eventually go against God by eating from the tree at the center of the Garden of Eden. The difference in the characters from each text’s act of rebellion is that Gilgamesh did it to spite his Gods, and Adam and Eve did it out of curiosity and loyalty to one
another. Both acts show the characters going against who they were created to serve, but for different reasons and in different ways. The story of Gilgamesh is related to The Book of Genesis in that the characters in each text were created to serve their Gods. (498 words)
I would describe the Mesopotamians ideal of kingship as courageous and a shepherd of the people. The basis of the monarch’s legacy is his arrogance, courage, beauty, and god like self.
The theme in Gilgamesh, Genesis and Sur 11 are comparably the same in that the people in each story were with sin and wickedness. In all three literatures, the people in the beginning were mean and sinful. The people in the Epic of Gilgamesh were evil and when Gilgamesh came to power he did not known what to since it was his first time beinging king. So, he would rule in a stern way to keep the people from sin. On Genesis God wanted to flood the Earth from the people who were sinful. God asked Noah to build an ark and to take his family and two of each animal.
The "Epic of Gilgamesh," is told by mouth up until the time the author recorded it on paper. His original purpose of recording the story is to keep the characters immortal. The book of Genesis is recorded by a Hebrew from the telling of God to immortalize a religion whereas "The Epic of Gilgamesh" is told in words to immortalize a hero. The story is told with pride and bravado. The Hebrew writer of Genesis uses an old formal tone to tell the story of Adam and Eve to remind the reader that it is history and man's origin. Both Enkidu and Adam fail to live forever in body. Yet, they forever are remembered by their roles in shaping the lives of other men.
Gilgamesh, without Enkidu, is like fire without oxygen. Enkidu is needed by Gilgamesh in order to flourish; not being able to survive long without his sidekick. Both men were created, by the God’s, for each other. They were built to be together and work off each other’s strengths, being able to accomplish great things together. Without Godly intervention, the two may have gone unmatched and never met their other half. The question is: would the story, The Epic of Gilgamesh, have the same outcome without Enkidu and what would become of Gilgamesh.
In the Epic of Gilgamesh, we see a significant transition or development of the main character as the story progresses. Throughout the epic, we see Gilgamesh act as a tyrant, fearless warrior, depressed man, a man filled with fear, and a man who has finally accepted his fate. The epic begins by describing Gilgamesh as a king who tyrannizes his people. “He will couple with the wife-to-be, he first of all, the bridegroom after” (pg 15). We see that Gilgamesh abuses his power as king and terrorizes the people. The people of Uruk plead the gods to ease Gilgamesh’s burden. The gods answered the prayers created an equal to match Gilgamesh. Enkidu a wild-born chimera, part animal and part man, would
The Epic of Gilgamesh is a historic story of the king of Uruk, Gilgamesh. The story depicts the short lived friendship of Gilgamesh and Enkidu. The story begins as Shamat the harlot seduces Enkidu and convinces him to go to the city of Uruk and meet Gilgamesh. From that moment on, the two were very close. They planned a trip to the forest of cedars to defeat the monster known as Humbaba so that Gilgamesh could show his power to the citizens of Uruk. However, Enkidu tried “vainly to dissuade” (18) Gilgamesh in going to the forest. Despite Enkidu’s plead, the two continued on their voyage to the forest where Humbaba lives. Once they arrived, they found the monster and killed him.
The epic begins with the men of Uruk describing Gilgamesh as an overly aggressive ruler. "'Gilgamesh leaves no son to his father; day and night his outrageousness continues unrestrained; And he is the shepherd of Uruk, the enclosure; He is their shepherd, and yet he oppresses them. Strong, handsome, and wise. . . Gilgamesh leaves no virgin to her lover.'"(p.18, Line 23-27) The citizens respect him, but they resent his sexual and physical aggression, so they plead to the gods to alleviate some of their burden. The gods resolve to create an equal for Gilgamesh to tame him and keep him in line. This equal, Enkidu, has an immediate impact on Gilgamesh. When they first meet, both having never before met a man equal in stature, they brawl. "They grappled with each other, Snorting like bulls; They shattered the doorpost, that the wall shook."(p.32, lines 15-18) In giving Gilgamesh a real battle, Enkidu instantly changes him; having this equal gives Gilgamesh a sense of respect for another man. These two men fighting each other creates a serious mess, but they both end up without animosity toward the other.
After reading the two stories I concluded that forty days and forty nights was too long for it to rain without stopping; that is why the flood in Gilgamesh is more realistic. The length of the rains in the flood story in The Epic of Gilgamesh is easier for someone to believe than the length of the rains in Genesis. Even though the stories were different there was many similarities in the stories.
“Gilgamesh bowed to his mother, the goddess Ninsun, and said I must travel now to the cedar Forest, I must journey to meet the fierce monster Humbaba. I must walk a road that no man has traveled, I must face a combat that no man has known, Dear mother, great goddess, help me in this, give me your blessing before I leave so that I may comeback from the Cedar Forest victorious and see your face again” (Mitchell 98). Gilgamesh often prays to the Gods for guidance and protection. He appeared to be a little afraid and needed the Gods to grant him protection and other good things. I feel like the main point of praying to the Gods is to keep them happy. Keeping them happy will ensure good fortune during the gift giving process. The last example of literal gift giving in Gilgamesh is between Ishtar and Gilgamesh. Ishtar wants him to be her husband, and she offers him gifts of a chariot and a beautiful home. Ultimately Gilgamesh refuses her gifts since she has been with too many other men and have fallen out of love with all of them. If Gilgamesh accepted Ishtar’s gifts then he would have had to reciprocate and give her the gift of his love back. He knew thatthis would not have worked out
In the Epic of Gilgamesh, because the gods/goddesses to have control of life and death along with fate it is essential that they have a close relationship with humans. All creation stories start with the gods/goddesses are creating the world and everything in it. In the story, they always play a big part. If they did not exist there wouldn’t be any creation. It is very important for them to have some kind of relationship with their creations, human or not. The type of relationship that is depends solely on the type of creation
The relationship between the gods and humanity in The Epic of Gilgamesh and The Odyssey are the same. In each saga, the gods seem to live nearby and are always present. Both epic poems portray humans as simply at the mercy of the gods. The gods feel that it is their duty to intervene if they feel that man is traveling off course from his destiny. However, the gods are not all powerful.
The flood of Gilgamesh was written before 2000 B.C, while the Genesis story was written in 400 BC Which was much later then the Gilgamesh flood. Biblical writers probably knew of the much older flood but revised it so that it fit with their own history and worldview. They most likely intended the original story with their own mythology. Despite the many similarities between the two stories, the differences are revealed in a number of different topics that distinguish the biblical version of the story from the ancient version.
Gilgamesh was two thirds of a god who possessed beauty, a gorgeous body, and great amounts of courage and strength that surpassed all other humans. His greatness was established through the wonderful walls he built around Uruk, a rampart, and a temple for Anu and Ishtar (Gilgamesh & Sandars, 61). Enkidu on the other hand was initially an uncivilized man created by the goddess of creation, Aruru. His appearance was strictly barbaric with his long hair and hairy body, whose innocent mind knew nothing of a civilized human culture (Gilgamesh et al., 62). He ate grass and lived among the other animals in the woods until a trapper spotted him while trying to catch his game and noted to his father that he “was the strongest man in the world [and] is like an immortal from heaven” (Gilgamesh et al., 62). The trapper indicated his feeling of inferiority to Enkidu in the woods as he says he is afraid of him. One could say that Enkidu rules the woods of the uncivilized just as Gilgamesh rules over the city of Uruk; over the civilized. Both men are characterized as powerful, strong men in their domain yet Gilgamesh is in fact stronger and more powerful than his brother, Enkidu whom he calls his servant, fore he is the king of Uruk and is two thirds god. Enkidu also dies halfway through the adventure the two have while Gilgamesh, who is afraid of death, goes on to find a way to live immortally. Though inferior to his king brother, Enkidu completes the other half of Gilgamesh: while Gilgamesh knows the ins and outs of the city he rules, he is not familiar with the woods or nature in the ways that Enkidu is. Though they are different from each other, they both hold parallels with one another by bringing out the best in each other, thus reasonabl...
The Epic of Gilgamesh has many similarities to the Bible, especially in Genesis and it’s not just that the both begin with the letter “g”’! One major similarity being the flood story that is told in both works. The two stories are very similar but also very different. Another being the use of serpents in both works and how they represent the same thing. A third similarity being the power of God or gods and the influence they have on the people of the stories. Within these similarities there are also differences that need to be pointed out as well.
Everyone has qualities that are heroic and noble, and everyone has their flaws. No matter who they are, or how perfect others think they are, people still have some negative qualities that can hurt their heroic ones. In the book, The Epic of Gilgamesh, by Benjamin Foster, both Gilgamesh and Enkidu had positive and negative characteristics that affected the outcome of their journey and their adventures they experienced throughout their lives.