Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Concepts and nature of psychology
Relationship between personality and behaviour
Basic terms of psychology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Concepts and nature of psychology
Psych 2410
Assignment 1
Arveen Mayordomo
Student Number: 769575
The focus of this paper is to define several key topics related to the events in the People’s Temple, and to formulate an experiment which tests the notion that flattery increases the chance of compliance. The first three paragraphs explain the terms charismatic leadership, pluralistic ignorance and the start small and build principle. The later paragraphs discuss a laboratory experiment designed to prove that there exists a causality between flattery and compliance.
Charismatic leadership is a characteristic in which a person has the ability to communicate with people in a deep and emotional level. Charismatic leaders are able to express their ideas and vision effectively.
…show more content…
The two main factors of this experiment are flattery and compliance. The independent factor being flattery and the dependent factor being compliance. Since flattery is the independent factor, it is manipulated in order to elicit a change in compliance. In this experiment we will assign two levels of change to the independent factor; flattery and no flattery. The participants of the experiment will be first year university students. There will be 100 participants in total, 50 males and 50 females. Each participant is randomly assigned to either the experimental condition (flattery) or the control condition (no flattery). Factors such as the experimenter and the room in which the experiments are conducted will be kept constant as well. In order to eliminate other causal factors, the experimental environment would be kept constant for each participant. The lighting, temperature, and overall look of the room would be kept identical. The time in which the experiment is conducted will also remain constant. The time is designated at 10 in the morning, during days in which the participants do not have class. The participant would be led into the room by an experimenter. The experimenter would ask the participants in a neutral manner. With the same tone and facial expression, the experimenter would present the participant with a short personality-based survey. The survey involves questions such as age, workplace, and GPA. They are also asked to rate attributes about themselves, such as attractiveness, helpfulness, and intelligence. After the participant answers the question, the experimenter briefly excuses himself and leaves to read their personality profile. To operationalize the variable, the experimental group will be complemented before the experimenter asks them to proceed with an a computer experiment that will take an additional hour. The compliment that will be
Milgram wielded with 40 males that were between the age ranges of 20 through 50. 15 men out of the 40 that were the subjects of this study were either skilled or unskilled workers, 16 men were white-collar sales or business men, and 9 were professional men. These subjects were preferred by newspaper ads and direct-mail application querying for the subjects to be rewarded participants for this study. With this research, Milgram uses two participants that was a confederate and an actor who looked authoritative. As each participant participated in the experiment, each one was to draw pieces of paper from a hat that determined if they were either a teacher or a learner. Yet, the drawing was manipulated so that the subject would become a teacher and the associate was the learner. The learner was destitute to a chair and wired up with electrodes that was attached to the shock generator in the adjacent room. There were questions that were proposed to the learner and for every answer that was wrong, the subject was to conduct an electric shock. For each wrong answer that was given, the subject was to increase the level of shock on the generator. Withal, the results of this research was that every participant continued to at least the level of 300-volt. Yet, 14 participants eluded orders to be free before reaching the maximum voltage and 65% pursued the experimenter’s commands and reached to the top of
In the random experiment, the targeted subjects were employees of the Compuware Corporation, an information technology service company in Detroit, Michigan. Two hundred and two employees were invited to participate in a study about meditation to reduce stress. The group filled out a survey and gave their consent, out of the 202 selected, 102 were assigned to the Loving Kindness meditation group and the other 100 were placed on a waiting list made up of a controlled group. After an elimination process based on violations such as failure to complete fewer than three sessions out of the six weeks and those who completed 30 of the 61 less than the assigned daily reports. Eventually, the total number of those eliminated was 63 of which, 34 were from the loving kindness meditation group and 29 from the waiting list, overall,
Charismatic leaders are individuals who seem to inspire others. There are all types of charismatic leaders; some people may deem what they do as evil and others may hold a different opinion. There are some leaders that are seen as saviors, coming along at the right moment when all hope is lost. There are other leaders that people slander their names with the word ‘Murder’. In the end it all depends on which side a follower is on. Jim Jones, Martin Luther King Jr. , and Gandhi were some of the most remember charismatic leaders in history. though very different in what they preach. Then there is the most iconic charismatic leader of all and he goes by many names: Allah, the Almighty, but many know him as Jesus.
Kelley, R.E. (1988). In Praise of Followers. In Wren, J.T. (Ed.). (1995). The Leader’s Companion (pp. 193-204). New York: Simon & Schuster.
Avolio, B. J., & Yammarino, F. J. (Eds.). (2013). Transformational and Charismatic Leadership:: the Road Ahead. Emerald Group Publishing.
Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285-305.
As stated in Discourses of Charisma: Barack Obama’s First 6 Months as President of the USA, “charismatic leadership can be divided into ethical and unethical charisma” (Takala, Tanttu, Lamsa, & Virtanan, 2013, p. 155). For the above noted reason, the charismatic leader is heavily reliant on impression management, resourcefulness, and manipulation. When considering methods to garner production and increase performance, then, the charismatic leader seeks domination as a means to complete self-interest for their own purposes. This observation is in stark contrast to the individual consideration exhibited by the transformational leader and the characteristic of servitude from the servant
The experimental hypothesis states that the participants would rate the lower class job titles lower on likeability and financial status and the higher class job titles higher on wealth and likeability. The hypothesis being that the job title of solicitor would be rated higher in all aspects of likeability than the job title of Dustbin man.
One of the most important components of leadership is the leader. A leader is responsible for his or her followers and the overall goal of the group or organization. Leaders are the people held accountable or everything that happens, good or bad. On the other hand, the second major component of leadership is the followers. Without followers, a leader would be worthless. Followers make up the backbone of a leader because they are the masses that get goals accomplished. A leader is just one person, but the number of followers is countless. In order to be an effective follower, there are a countless number of characteristics that allow a follower to be the best they can be. Five of these characteristics include a positive attitude, communication skills, being part of the process, being open to new ideas, and patience.
A charismatic leader is one whose followers are drawn to his or her personality and magnetism. They have extraordinary qualities and are described as almost god-like to those that follow them and look up to them. With being a team leader, their whole purpose is to try and allow for their passion and enthusiasm to rub off on their team members by portraying a positive and energetic attitude. Charisma stems from participating in something you truly have a passion for, something that undoubtedly sparks your interest. Charismatic leaders seem to become apparent in troubled times, whether it being within personal relationships or within an organization, simply because an inspiring personality helps to reduce any stress or anxiety amongst its followers. Charismatic leaders strongly appeal to the values and morals of their followers and the psychological ...
Charismatic Power – The ability to influence followers based on the leaders personality. Politicians often use this kind of power to get follower’s to support them.
In charismatic style of leadership the leader is the role model for employees who inspire, challenge and motivate them. In case of IKEA Ingvar Kamprad was 17 years old when he started the business by selling match boxes. he was a source of inspiration and motivation for his followers due to which IKEA became world’s largest furniture retailer in 2008.so charismatic style of leadership also suits IKEA’s
Another aspect of leadership includes leadership traits such as being influential and inspirational. There also different contexts of leadership, e.g, leading oneself, leading other individuals, leading groups, leading organizations. Some traits that are often associated with being an effective leader include a measure of intelligence, high energy, self confidence, dominance, and a need for achievement. An effective, charismatic leader must lead by example. That leader must be able to know what is going on, the job or task that is being accomplished, and be able to lead the group into performing the task at hand successfully.
The experiment given by Aronson and Cope tested the attractiveness and punishments given by a person based on their relationship with another person. Forty male and forty female were randomly assigned to get a harsh experimenter and pleasant experimenter, harsh experimenter and harsh supervisor, pleasant experimenter and pleasant supervisor, or pleasant experimenter and harsh supervisor. The people who participated in the experiment thought they were participating in a study on creativity. The college students had to write a creative story on each picture that they were shown. The graduate student, who was the experimenter, always had a negative reaction to their stories but was either considerate about letting them know or was really harsh and rude about informing the students about their not creative stories. Then the experimenter would put his foot on the on the vent in the room and that would signal the supervisor to come interrupt the session to let the experimenter know if they had done a good job or bad job on the research that he had been conducting. This research is ba...
Dubrin, A. J. (2007). Charismatic and transformational leadership. In Leadership: Research findings, practice, and skills (5th ed., pp. 83-98). Boston, NY: Houghton Mifflin Company.