Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Software testing methods : case study
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Software testing methods : case study
Chapter 1 Introduction Software Testing Software testing plays a very significant role in the process of software development. Over time, the software testing has become a very challenging issue for enterprises. Because of technological complexities and software sourcing challenges are rapidly increasing. Generally, software testing is performed in the organization, or is outsourced to software services providers. Definitions A definition of software testing has been narrated in different perspectives by many authors. Pressman defines “Testing is a set of activities that can be decided in advance which are further conducted systematically” [54]. “Training a program with the specific intent of finding errors before delivering it to the end …show more content…
It compares actual output values and predicted output values for given application software. It also set up test control, test requirements and test reporting functions. [34] Performance testing , load, stress testing on implemented application are also performed. It has reduced time and cost, improved test coverage and improves accuracy in contrast to manual testing. [35] Comparison between Manual Testing and Automated Testing Sr. No Manual Testing Automated Testing 1 For executing test it involves human interference. Several tools are used to process testing. 2 It becomes cost effective because, It executes test cases manually thus it requires more testers for testing. By using automation tools the test cases are executed. Because of this limited tester are required in automation testing. (Less Investment) 3 Every time same effort is required. And It cannot be used again. Once applied efforts for testing can be reused for the lifelong. 4 It is less reliable .Because of human errors it tests may not be performed with accuracy each time. It is more reliable because each time it performs exactly same action. 5 Limited visibility is provided by manual testing Global visibility provided by automated …show more content…
By evaluating code it builds a system model and identifying test requirements from those models and to accomplish those test requirements wide human interaction is required. The approaches have shown promise in primary empirical studies in terms of support for building test suites. These approaches also have some limitations, in part due to differences between web applications and systems developed and operated under more traditional paradigms. Among these differences, we consider three in particular. First, web applications usage is changing rapidly. Any popular website gets thousands of hits per day [52]. If we consider the particular user profile for generation of test case then it will be inappropriate. Second, generally maintenance of web applications is at higher rate than other software systems. This also has the small changes in it [32]. To make those changes the testing should be automated and
This testing level will also occur during the early development of the application but not until each of one of the subsystem’s unit functions have been fully tested and are ready to be implemented. While all three subsystems, financial, appointments, and patient records may not be tested in tandem each should be able to have basic testing performed with the use of test cases for input. Once they have completed testing, we could then use the same or similar test cases for the integration level testing of all subsystems.
Web. The Web. The Web. 9 May 2012. Lipking, Lawrence I, Stephen Greenblatt, and M. H. Abrams.
When test results don’t have accuracy, additional testing may be needed to authenticate the results.
Providing Full-Text Access to Eric Digest. n.p. 2003. The 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the Web. The Web. The Web.
Zhang, Xihui, Thomas F. Stafford, Jasbir S. Dhaliwal, Mark L. Gillenson, and Gertrude Moeller. 2014. "Sources of conflict between developers and testers in software development." Information & Management no. 51 (1):13-26. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.09.006.
While developing a software many complex activities are required which in turn have dependencies along them. Large software projects require the involvement of programmers, documentation specialists, program managers, architects, database analysts, system analysts, , and trainers and last but not the least testers. Along with their independent responsibilities these persons are also responsible to maintain and keep a check on the software system quality as well.
It is cost effective. If the model and simulations are reliable it cuts down on the money required for testing.
.... Without knowledge of the reliability and validity of these two instruments we are unable to know if the instruments are consistent or if they measure what they intend to measure.
Which of the following could be used to assess the coverage achieved for specification-based (black-box) test techniques?
... tested in the same manner for a specified purpose in order to maintain consistency and validity within results.
...times developers may not carry out quality assurance test (which make sure that the software is in pristine condition), and as a result of this, there could be problem with the software. Testing software before it’s rolled out for clients is really important, because it could cause huge losses both for the developer and the client who are going to make use of it. Even though a developer cannot be charged (as long as he is not liable) for bugs that causes damage, but the reputation of the developer comes to stake.
Software development follows a specific life cycle that starts with designing a solution to a problem and implementing it. Software testing is part of this software life cycle that involves verifying if each unit implemented meets the specifications of the design. Even with careful testing of hundreds or thousands of variables and code statements, users of software find bugs. “Software testing is arguably the least understood part of the development process” and is also a “time-consuming process that requires technical sophistication and proper planning” (Whittaker 71) It is important to comprehend this concept by understanding the different characteristics and aspects of software testing, and then to examine the techniques, procedures and tools used to apply this concept. This will enable the user to realize the problems faced by software testers and the importance of software testing.
Ravitch, Diane “In Defense of Testing.” Forming a Critical Perspective, Ed, Ann Spurlock. 1st. Boston, MA: Pearson Learning Solutions, 2010. 194-195. Print.