Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction to the holocaust essay
Introduction to the holocaust essay
Introduction to the holocaust essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Introduction to the holocaust essay
The statement “Hitler willed and planned to kill the Jews from 1925” holds some truth. Hitler’s willingness to kill the Jews is evident however these killings were not master minded from the beginning of 1925 but rather it was impromptu or a gradual development. The intentionalist school of thought considers The Chancellor as to being organized and having an intention in his actions in the extermination of the Jews. However, it is better argued using that the killing of the Jews was a multiple step process, resulting from Hitler’s weak leadership is more convincing. This makes the statement partially true in that Hitler did have a will to kill the Jews although he was the one who did not participate and plan the killings.
The events that
…show more content…
The goal of the Party had no evidence in the precise steps that would be used to fulfill the achievement. The vagueness of the Nazi Party’s goals is seen as a result from Hitler’s weak dictatorship, which is seen as part of the functionalist school of thought. From the Chancellor’s absence in the planning of the killings of the Jews, prominent Nazi leaders were able to assume excessively powerful positions. With regards to policy making, government inaction stemmed from Hitler’s fear of decreasing popularity through unpopular decisions. From Decoding the Holocaust, historian Draper explains that it was Hitler’s fear, which reduced his power as a leader combined with his “deference to senior leaders” and his ‘unrelenting trust to their political instincts’ was pinnacle in highlighting Hitler’s inability to effectively exercise ‘government policy making procedures’. This had in turn, left a space for high-ranking officials of the Party to have a large input into political decisions. With the officials in power over Hitler, the high-ranking officials were guided by racial ideology and on the basis or goals of “making Germany…more National Socialist” as displayed in Nazism, Fascism and the Working Class. However, the officials were not united as an organized group but rather were “focusing solely on their respective jurisdictions” exemplifying the lack of unity and the image of a chaotic Party. According to historian Mason, he expresses “It is likely a general agreement was made… to generically seek persecution of the designated enemies of the cause”. The party had lacked the explicit and practical goal, which had result in issues being treated in the most radical of ways. This had caused political improvisation to be a resort that was used constantly due to the “lack of policy rested upon the deployment of extreme violence”. In addition, the Nazi Party had found
before he came to power, he just used World War II as his golden opportunity to turn his dream into a reality. Others, with Andreas Hillgruber, argue Hitler was the only reason genocide even happened. If Hitler had not been in control, the Holocaust would have ceased to exist. His key sources include the Nuremburg Trials, quoting him saying “this struggle will not end with annihilation of Aryan mankind, but with the extermination of the Jewish people of Europe.” By using Hitler’s own words against him, Hillgruber makes it easy to prove Hitler’s malicious intent clearly and depict him as the mastermind behind the mass murder of the Jewish population. Gerald Fleming creates the last sub-argument in his book, “Hitler and the Final Solution,” provides an in-depth historical evaluation of German fascism and the mechanization behind the Nazi Party bureaucracy. His main point of reference is David Irving’s, “Hitler’s War,”
The Ways the Nazis Tried to Eliminate all Jews in Europe The Nazis used many methods to eliminate all the Jews in Europe from 1941 onwards. They used concentration camps, ghettos, death camps. Auschwitz Group (murder squads) and the Final Solution. The Final Solution was the plan to annihilate all the Jews out of Europe.
People sometimes ask why the Jews were the people to get harmed during the Holocaust or why Holocaust even happened. Jews were the targets of Holocaust because Adolf Hitler hated Jews and blamed them for all of the problems in the world. He mainly blamed them for Germany's loss in World War I. Hitler told the German that they could have won the war, if the Germany had not been "stabbed in the back" by the Jews.
Hitler started volunteering for the German army.’ This supports one way of how he rose up to power and did everything he did. In addition, “As leader of the Nazi party he orchestrated the holocaust, which resulted in the death of four million Jews.’’ (BCC programmes) This shows Hitler was the one who was blamed and planned everything out.
Nazis and the Party had very similar ideologies. Although Nazis eliminated people because of their religion (Sauer 683) and the Party eliminated people because of their anti-Party feelings (Orwell 187), they both tried to eliminate anyone who did not agree with them. This practice was essential for controlling the masses and holding on to power. Retaining power is much easier for a government when the entire population that government rules agrees with its philosophies. No one would attempt to remove the current government from power if he or she agreed with that government.
The Nazi Party, and its leader Adolf Hitler, were an unchallenged political group. Following the final deal in January of 1933, Hitler secured the position of chancellorship. From there, he continued working, in order to ensure that the NSDAP would not be challenged politically. Firstly, he used the Reichstag fire to enact the Decree for the Protection of People and State. This took away any civil liberties from the people of Germany, and gave legal basis for the Nazi party to imprison and silence any opposition. This was a key step to ensure the establishment of a totalitarian regime, as it greatly increased the power of the Nazi’s and greatly diminished the power of any opposition, both at the federal and state level. Following this, the Enabling Act was passed in parliament, which gave Hitler the ability to pass laws without the Reichstag. Through
“Between 1933 and 1945, Nazi Germany established about 20,000 camps to imprison its many millions of victims.” Therefore, prior to the beginning of the war, there was intention to follow through with the ‘Final Solution’. The building of the Camps and Chambers began soon after Hitler became Chancellor (January 30, 1933). After Hitler became Chancellor, the genocide soon occurred, because it’s easy to follow a step by step plan. Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf, “...the correct use of propaganda is a true art…”
The Aims and the Results of the Attempts by the Nazi Regime to Transform German Society
The functionalist argument just doesn’t make sense to me nor many other researchers in the holocaust such as a lecturist Elly Dlin (Dlin 2). How could you set up hundreds of functioning concentration camps, deport all jews with their consent, and end up killing thousands of the jews without planning it out. The functionalists present a confused picture of the inner workings of the Third Reich. “Far from it being seen as a well-oiled hierarchy in which authority flowed downwards and obedience flowed upwards, the Nazi bureaucracy was described as a maze of competing power groups that revolved around the personalities of bitter rivals who were diametrically opposed to the policies and interests of each other and who were ceaselessly plotting against and clashing with their rivals.” (Elly Dlin
The debate as to whether Hitler was a ‘weak dictator’ or ‘Master of the Third Reich’ is one that has been contested by historians of Nazi Germany for many years and lies at the centre of the Intentionalist – Structuralist debate. On the one hand, historians such as Bullock, Bracher, Jackel and Hildebrand regard Hitler’s personality, ideology and will as the central locomotive in the Third Reich. Others, such as Broszat, Mason and Mommsen argue that the regime evolved out from pressures and circumstances rather than from Hitler’s intentions. They emphasise the institutional anarchy of the regime as being the result of Hitler’s ‘weak’ leadership. The most convincing standpoint is the synthesis of the two schools, which acknowledges both Hitler’s centrality in explaining the essence of Nazi rule but also external forces that influenced Hitler’s decision making. In this sense, Hitler was not a weak dictator as he possessed supreme authority but as Kershaw maintains, neither was he ‘Master of the Third Reich’ because he did not exercise unrestricted power.
...er of dividing and attacking his enemies one by one. He would win over people with tempting promises. In conclusion Racism,National pride and peer pressure played a major role in the German peoples participation in or indifference’s towards the state-sponsored genocide and murders in Germany.
On 30 January 1933, the German president, Paul von Hindenburg, selected Adolf Hitler to be the head of the government. This was very unexpected. Hitler was the leader of an extreme right-wing political party, the National Socialist German Workers (Nazi) Party. Hitler sought to expand Germany with new territories and boundaries. Hitler also focused on rebuilding Germany’s military strength. In many speeches Hitler made, he spoke often about the value of “racial purity” and the dominance of the Aryan master race. The Nazi’s spread their racist beliefs in schools through textbooks, radios, new...
Hitler was their "last hope". We can see clearly a distinct link between german unemployment figures and a rise in nazi seats in the Reichstag. People turned to Hitler for help due to the depression and the failure of the Weimar republic to cope with the ongoing problems in germany. In my opinion this is the main factor to why Hitler finally came about to doing a political deal.
When Hitler decided to go through with the holocaust, it there was a question of why did he want to kill Jewish people. Hitler decided to go through with the holocaust early to mid 1441, and brought this motion to full effect in 19421. The first notion that people thought of was that Hitler just wanted to physically exterminate the Jewish race2. Hitler's secretary remembers a private meeting between Himmler and Hitler in the early spring of 1941, after which Himmler sat at her desk with a very troubled look on his face, put his head in his hands and said: "My God, my God, what I am expected to do"3. If Hitler had a written order to kill the Jews, it has never been recovered, or has probably been destroyed. Two documents have been recently uncovered, which were the diary entries of Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels of December 12, 1941, and part of Reichsfuhrer-SS Heinrich Himmler's diary entry of December 18, 1941. The first is a diary entry by Joseph Goebbels of December 12, 1941.
Hitler’s plans for Germany were both meaningless and cruel. His first goal was to establish what he thought was the ‘supreme’ race, Aryan. Aryan people are tall and skinny, with blonde hair, blue eyes, and light skin (FYI: Hitler had none of these characteristics, and rumor has it that his grandmother was Jewish.). Every other person was not considered human to him, especially Jewish people. Hitler hated Jewish people the most because he thought that because of their beliefs and living style they lost World War I. Also according to Hitler, Jews were maggots, parasites, vampire spiders sucking blood, and vermin. Hitler thought it was not enough to only eliminate the ‘enemies’ of the Aryan race, but they also needed space to live. This is when his second goal came into play. He started relocating them, starving them, shutting down their shops and many more things. The worst part was that he lied to them when he said they were relocating them, he was really taking them to concentration camps.