Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nike brief history
The role of celebrity endorsers in advertising
Celebrity endorsement qualitative
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Nike brief history
Phil Knight and Bill Bowerman founded Blue Ribbon Sports in 1964. The Nike brand was created in 1972 and renamed in 1978. Nike is the largest worldwide seller of athletic goods with about 168 Nike stores in the United States and is present in about 160 countries (Toulouse, 2012). Nike was exposed by celebrity athlete sponsors. The company’s manufacturing demands grew with the popularity of Nike’s products. In the late 1990s allegations about labor and human rights violations in Third World countries (Daniel Fund Ethics Initiative). Athletic footwear production has moved to other places with low labor costs. The assembly of shoes began shifting in the 1960s to Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and then China in the 1980s. Nike moved to overseas manufacturing as a way to cut costs on sports gear manufacturing. Japan became too expensive, so Nike moved to Vietnam, Indonesia, and China. Accusations of deprived conditions, child labor, harassment, and abuse have been issues for the company. The Asian factories have more subcontracted work and it is difficult for Nike to keep up with and control the working conditions and wages of the factories. In 1996, Life magazine published an article with photos of Pakistani children sewing soccer balls for Nike, Adidas, and other companies (Toulouse, 2012). The photos had an impact on Nike’s sales and their reputation. Nike experienced problems with Vietnam’s factory conditions. An audit was disclosed to the press and made front pages of The New York Times. The audit included intolerable levels of exposure to chemicals and documented cases of employees health problems related to the exposure. Nike had to take fast measures to redeem its reputation and fix problems in the policies and lack... ... middle of paper ... ...panies. Nike can develop more auditing tools to make sure factories are in compliance with its laws. With the Balanced Scoreboard, Nike should give the factories time to correct issues that has been reported and if they do not have the situation handled in the time frame given, Nike should stop its business with the factories. (5) As CEO of Nike I know that with a business comes many challenges and it is up to the company of how to handle the issues in order to stay on top. We should send our own people to visit the factories to ensure that they are abiding by the rules and regulations, instead of taking someone else’s word. International expansion is a great idea, but it will have to be managed closely to ensure that proper actions are being taken. Being an ethical company will attract more customers. Nike should create new products to increase revenue.
The customer and the market always help dictate what and where the needs are. Being an innovator in their industry is what has kept Nike at the forefront of the sporting world. The company has also been in the news for negative publicity for running sweatshops and child labor allegations. They have been criticized by activist groups for poor working conditions as well as violating minimum wage and overtime laws in their overseas factories.
Nike has been under a great deal of pressure to correct the misdoings that have been done regarding production facilities in the East. As Nike is responsible for these plants, their reputation has been tainted with increasing public debate about ethical matters. While Nike still promotes itself as one of the industry leaders in corporate social responsibility, workers in Asia are still forced to work excessively long hours in substandard environments and are not paid enough to meet the basic needs for themselves or their families. They are faced to a life of poverty and are unfortunate subjects to harassment and violent threats if they make any attempt to form unions or tell journalists about labour abuses in their factories. Phil Knight’s speech regarding Nike’s steps to improving human rights in Asian countries was a step in the right direction for Nike, but it would have been much more effective had Nike fully followed through with these initiatives.
Nike’s sweatshop manufacturing practices which can be seen through media have shown people that this company goes under the good guys images, these images which are displayed in their commercials show people that their employees are treated well and their happy in their working environment.
...rible situations for people who do not have the laws like U.S. workers have. Even though NIKE has implemented different methods to improve the companies’ image, there have still been many reports that show there has not been much change at all. At a net worth of 67 billion dollars and expected to grow, loyal customers is what allows this multi billion dollar company to grow in profit, the only way there will be an impact on those working in NIKE sweatshops is if today’s society takes action.
... ethics? Well, the honest answer would be to eliminate the sweatshops completely. This is unlikely because it would be very difficult for a company with such a broad reach in the corporate world to shut down its factories overseas. Companies will always continue to exploit lower wages as long as the opportunity is present. A possible way would be to improve their employee surroundings. Since Nike is benefiting from low wages, they should at least provide a safer working environment for its employees. No employee should ever be put at risk due to a lack of environmental awareness. Nike should also pay attention to wage laws that govern the area that they manufacture in. With all the profits Nike earns, it couldn’t possibly hurt them to pay their employees no less than minimum wage. Otherwise, any company that possesses such blatant greed will not last in the long run.
In June of 1996, Life magazine published a article about Nike’s child labor that was occurring in Pakistan. The article showed a little boy who was surrounded by pieces of Nike sports gear. The articles were shoes and soccer balls. Nike then knew then that they had to make some major changes in the way they were producing their items.
“Nike is criticized for using sweatshops in countries like Indonesia and Mexico. The company has been subject to much critical coverage of the often poor working conditions and the exploitativeness of the cheap overseas labor.” – answers.com
Many global companies like Nike, Inc. are seen as role models both in the market place as well as in society in large. That is why they are expected to act responsibly in their dealings with humanity and the natural world. Nike benefits from the global sourcing opportunities, therefore areas such as production and logistics have been outsourced to partner companies in low-wage countries like China, Vietnam, Indonesia and Thailand. As a result the company is limited nowadays to its core competencies of Design and Marketing.
Phil Knight started his shoe company by selling shoes from the back of his car. As he became more successful in 1972 he branded the name Nike. In the 1980’s Nike Corporation quickly grew and established itself as a world leader in manufacturing and distributing athletic footwear and sports' attire. The Nike manufacturing model has followed is to outsource its manufacturing to developing nations in the Asia Pacific, Africa, South and Latin Americas; where labor is inexpensive. It quickly became known for its iconic “swoosh” and “Just do it” advertisements and products. Its highly successful advertising campaigns and brand developed its strong market share and consumer base. But, the road has not always been easy for Nike; in the late 1990’s they went through some challenging times when their brand become synonymous with slave wages and child labor abuses. During this period, Nike learned that it paramount that the company understands its stakeholders’ opinions and ensures their values are congruent with their stakeholders. Nike learned that their stakeholders were concerned with more than buying low cost products; their customers were also concerned with ethical and fair treatment of their workers. Because Nike was unwilling to face the ethical treatment of its employees, the company lost its loyal customers and damaged its reputation. Nike has bounced back since the late 1990’s and revived its reputation by focusing on its internal shortfalls and attacking its issues head on. Nike nearly collapsed from its missteps in the late 1990’s. They have learned from their mistakes and taken steps to quickly identify ethical issues before they become a crisis through ethics audits. This paper is based on the case study of Nike: From Sweatsh...
manufacturing products overseas, specifically in Bangladesh. The focal point of the article was how Nike was attempting to achieve the lowest possible manufacturing costs while still maintaining worker safety and producing high-quality products. Both consequences and benefits of manufacturing in foreign companies was discussed in the article. In addition to how manufacturing costs affect the financial outlook of the company, the article addressed how having factories in less-developed countries has an impact on public opinion of Nike.
As we can see in the essay, “The Noble Feat of Nike” by Johan Norberg, the globalization of companies like Nike isn’t all bad. There is some positive light to it, for example, the fact that workers are finally making enough money to live a decent life and send their children to school. In addition to this, workers are guaranteed jobs and don’t have to endure the tough labor of working on farms in the harsh weather conditions. So from these effects we can conclude that the globalization of Nike in third world countries like Nike isn’t a disadvantage to these workers, in fact it serves as an advantage.
Nike’s Asian operations had previously continued to soar generating US$300 million in 1994 in revenues to a whopping US$1.2 billion in 1997. However based on the Asian economic crisis, this had adversely affected revenues, while regional layoffs were inevitable. Nike also performed well in the European market generating about US$2 billion in sales and a good growth momentum was expected, however, some parts of Europe were only slowly recovering from an economic downturn. In the Americas (Canada and the U.S.A.), Nike experienced a growth rate for several quarters. The U.S. alone generated approximately US$5 billion in sales. The Latin American market at this point was exposed to economic volatility; however Nike still saw them as a market with “great potential for the future”.
A former University of Oregon track team member, Phil Knight, created Blue Ribbon Sports (a.k.a.BRS) in 1962 when he made a deal with a Japanese shoe company to import their shoe to the United States.
Nevertheless, Nike is an extremely diverse company with outstanding organizational structure, impressive marketing strategy, and innovative products. The organizational structure of the Nike Corporation helped them become a leading innovator for the world with creative apparels and shoes. Their intelligent marketing strategies assist them in advertising their products to motive their customers and sell them. Their innovative product motivates customers with great performance footwear and quality designs to take on any obstacles. The Nike Corporation discovers various ways to improve their organizational structure to inspire the world.
For those marketing efforts, Nike does successful to promote itself with its not-quite-nice images and also generate some criticism that I think they are irresponsible as we can see from their ad that they does not create any positive effects to the society. For its use of overseas factories, it is great opportunity to expand the production base to the lower cost of labor, but it is totally irresponsible and unethical when labor practice does not meet the standard.