Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Urbanization and its effects
Urbanization and its effects
Urbanization and its effects
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Urbanization and its effects
Finally, the municipal government relies on development costs to generate revenue. The basis for assessing development costs is driving the low density and it plays role in car-centered development. However, this requires investment and more expensive municipal infrastructure. Development costs are an important cost that can affect development locations, time schedules, and other decisions. Development costs may affect land resource consumption and community design, and are increasingly being used as revenue sources and growth management tools. Therefore, more municipalities should consider better adjustment of their development cost design and growth management policies. Developers pay development fees to the government for the infrastructure …show more content…
costs of sewage systems, roads and other infrastructure that are produced by development projects. Development cost is calculated through average cost pricing or marginal cost pricing. Public policy has led to rising prices for urban services and development, which have helped spread and hamper the redevelopment of urban renewal.
The root cause of the spread is identified as the average cost of development and municipal services. Like low density zoning development, water and sewer connections, or even seemingly ordinary service of average cost pricing makes lower costs in cheap construction. If there is no adjustment to meet the current more nervous and compact city planning objectives, the precious growth management tools would be wasted, and they missed the opportunity to reduce infrastructure costs in the future. In order to stimulate a more compact urban growth model, development costs can be adjusted according to exchange rates or time. In the reform development cost structure, the municipal authorities can make efforts to increase their income by raising the integral development cost income or revenue neutrality by reducing or remitting development costs, and loss of any income was offset by higher development costs of higher income. However, to prevent future fiscal shortfalls and avoid market distortions, development costs should not be lower than the level required to pay for infrastructure
costs. The book provides a clear and detailed description of the urban sprawl. The third part is a more specific and direct description of the views of the government planning issues raised by the first half of the book. Through the research on the development cost, the average cost is not only low but also inefficient in low density area. The problem of the government land planning and the low cost of land are not the root of the problem. Urban sprawl, is fundamentally about pricing, not planning. Therefore, this paper is a fundamental research on the mispricing of government policies and the hidden costs and land development problems caused by the property tax. And the problem of urban sprawl brought by development costs. For the author's views, the author over focuses on pricing, the main argument is that if the planners and policy makers will be able to get the right price, all the other cities problems will be solved. Pricing is important, but it is just one of the important elements of a city's planning. Policy co-ordination may be equally important. Governments need to focus both on the pricing and the policy aspects to plan the city and restraint the urban sprawl.
After tracing the evolution of the provincial-local financial relationship in Canada it has become apparent that the trend, throughout history, has been towards greater Provincial control and in turn less fiscal autonomy for the municipality. There has been an increase (due to demand as well as downloading from the provinces) in the functions and responsibilities of the municipality, as well as the cost of these functions, and a decrease in fiscal resources and revenue sources.
The City of Rock Hill has multiple budgetary funds. They have reported up to nine individual governmental funds, which include General Fund, SW TIF Fund, Street Bond Fund, and Capital Projects Fund (City of Rock Hill 2013, 6). The city also maintains other funds that are combined into one single fund called “other governmental funds,” which makes it easier to budget (City of Rock Hill 2013, 6). Within the other governmental fund category are the Police Training Fund, Asset Forfeiture Fund, Sewer Lateral Fund, McKnight Crossing TIF Fund, and the NW TIF Fund (City of Rock Hill 2013, 51). All of these funds make up the City of Rock Hill’s major and nonmajor funds. According to Bland, the City of Rock Hill is following the proper procedures, when it comes to governmental budgeting. The City of Rock Hill follows the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), which Bland states help standardized the governmental accounting profession (Bland, 107). As a lot of the of funds mention by Bland have different titles than Rock Hill’s funds, they operate in the same way. The cities Capital Project Fund increased by $252,940, and the SW TIF fund increased by $89,354(City of Rock Hill 2013, 10). Overall the cities combined fund balance decreased 28% or $1,237,418 from 2012, which the city said they could spend at their discretion (City of Rock Hill 2013, 10).
However, there is usually not enough land or housing for the city's growing population. There is also not enough jobs in the city to keep everyone employed. Poverty increases and jobs give lower and lower pay. The poor live in slums
In California, the finance structure of local government gives them more incentives to approve commercial (non-residential) housing development. Cities and counties find fiscal benefits come primarily from the commercial development, such as hotels, restaurants, and retail establishments. The tax revenue received from these establishments could often offset the cost for a local government to provide public services. On the contrary, the affordable housing developments cause more local costs than yielding high tax revenues. Therefore, local governments have the motivation to develop commercial establishments by zoning considerable lands for such purposes. Consequently, many cities and counties have approved their land use planning disproportionately towards commercial
cents” (Morris 23). According to this information, urban sprawl is costing tax payers in areas of
...by preventing access to potential places of employment and to positive network influences. Therefore, to solve the growing problem of jobless poverty the government should look towards developing mixed-use developments without strict zoning laws and increasing the public transportation infrastructures in cities.
Job creation is a key factor for economic development. Toronto alone receives 100 000 immigrants each year, most of them in need of work. With Ontario’s investment in infrastructure, thousands of jobs would be created, not only in the construction industry but also within every industry indirectly affected by the construction. If we look back to 2008 during the recession, Ontario actually spent more on infrastructure knowing the job creation would significantly boost our economy. The Conference Board of Canada released a report in 2010 titled “The Economic Impact of Public Infrastructure in Ontario” which stated if we had not invested in infrastructure during the global economic crisis, Ontario alone would have lost 70 000 more jobs in 2009. This goes to show the truly immense impact our investment in infrastructure can have on Ontario’s economy. Basic Infrastructure not only helps a city or region in a functional way, it can also have an effect on the appearance of an area. If a city is physically attractive, businesses and labourers will be more inclined to migrate to that specific city rather than another, which in turn stimulates economic growth. This effect creates somewhat of a competitive nature between cities and businesses. The attractiveness of an area, in recent years, has had a huge effect on where people live and bring their business, especially in the knowledge-based economy we live in today. Cities throughout Ontario should want to attract investment, and developing infrastructure will only help them achieve
The primary purposes of the governmental budget are to legitimize public expenditures and to account for and control the usage of public resources. As budgets evolve, officials find that the annual budget should be used for planning, coordinating, and scheduling programs. Demands on municipalities force them to engage in establishing priorities and monitoring how well the priorities are achieved. It is no longer possible for a municipal government to do everything for everyone. A municipal government must prioritize the services that are mandatory, urgent, and that are done well. Resources must be aligned with strategies and citizen’s needs by allocating them over some time frame; usually twelve months – a fiscal year.
The structure of municipal government is important because it determines the individual or group who has the power to carry out administrative actions for a given municipality. When a city or village is in the process of passing a particular ordinance the structure of the municipal government will decide what routes must be taken in order to make the legislation into law. The structure also helps to identify who has the responsibility for resolving issues when they arise. In the state of Georgia municipal government generally takes one of two forms, the mayor-council form or the council manager form. With regards to the mayor-council form, the primary policymaking role is shared by the city council and the mayor (Structure of Municipal Government, 2014). In the council-manager form the primary policy making role lies with the city council. However, the council usually appoints a city manager who is held accountable for executive functions by the city council. The city manager will report to the full council rather than mainly to the mayor (Structure of Municipal Government, 2014). The two municipalities that will be discussed in this project are the cities of Oxford and Covington. Both are located in Newton County, Georgia. The city of Oxford has a mayor-council form of government while the city of Covington has a council-manager government.
A famous Canadian geographer was once quoted saying, “ …any region which has a well developed transportation and communication network also enjoys a high degree of economic prosperity…”. This statement has sparked much controversy between geographers, as well as economists. The argument is, is there a direct link between a developed infrastructure and economic prosperity. Without a doubt, there is a direct link between economic prosperity and a well-developed system of transportation and communication. It is possible to understand this direct link by reviewing and comparing the infrastructure and economy of three different cities. Toronto has well-developed transportation and communication systems, North Bay has terrible communication and transportation systems, and Brampton has just recently developed their communication and transportation systems.
...h municipalities. A simultaneous establishment of municipalities across the country requires more and more tangible materials to build them. This means that national budget that needs to be allocated for resources and materials in building constructions and setting up administration will be a vast amount.
In my conclusion, I will align with sociologist Feagin and Parker suggested understanding that political and economic leaders control urban growth. Here in my country. The urban mayors, and leading business class has hijack the land allocation. “economic and political leaders work alongside each other to effect change in urban growth and decline, determining where money flows and how land use is regulated,” (Little & McGivern, 2013, p.622).
...population distribution designed to reduce the rate of rural-urban migration appears to have had limited success in many developing countries. Policies must be directed at altering the rural economy in order to slow the rate of urban sprawl. Broad land use planning and changing of planning standards and governmental procedures would go a long way to reduce many of the problems that face urban populations in the developing areas, especially Africa. Urbanization can cause a lot of problems for a city or even a country. It can cause cities to become overpopulated which are known as mega-cites, and cause problems with living arrangements and finding a job. Urbanization can also cause health problems. Urbanization is supposed to be good for developing countries on the rise but with this rapid growth in Africa, these problems can become a major concern in the future.
The development hub concept is designed to build viable local economies by increasing the effect of state interferences for local economic growth and inspiring the impact of these interferences with a bunch of maintainable popular facilities. But for this current change of state interferences into a maintainable socio-economic growth procedure, a 'core functioning rationale' for the Growth Centre and its several facilities desires to be noticeably known.
Cities all over the world are developing. As war ended in 1942, a significant number of people move to the city because they want to improve life. This urbanization process is causing a number of problems and should be met by sustainable development policies. In the beginning, it is important to know the definition of sustainable development. There are some definitions for sustainable development, but simply they say that sustainable development is a development which using resources now and preserving them for future generations (Adams, 1999, p.137). This concept has been agreed internationally at a Rio Conference in 1992 to be implemented by all government policies which mostly known as “Agenda 21” principles (Adams, 1999, p.141). This paper will show that traffic jams and housing problems caused by urbanization can be met by sustainable development policies. The structure of this paper will first explain the situation that leads to traffic jams and housing problems. Next, it will elaborate the sustainable development solutions, implications for the solutions, and evaluations how effective the sustainable development solutions solved the problems.