Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflection on Epistemology
Essays on epistemology
Reflection on Epistemology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reflection on Epistemology
To fully explain the differences between philosophers such as Descartes and Kant from early, we must first step back and look at the structure of philosophy and then go into the factual differences of each philosopher and their beliefs. Philosophy can be broken down into five different subdivisions and schools of thought, which are: aesthetics, metaphysics, logic, epistemology and ethics. However, many philosophers have thought of several different disciplines of philosophy and they are not parallel with one another. Western Philosophy can be broken down into three epochs: the ancient epoch, the medieval epoch and the modern epoch. The ancient epoch was mainly utilized by schools of thought from Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. On the other hand, medieval epoch was mostly for Christianity thus incorporates philosophers such as St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas. The modern epoch embraces schools of thought that are ruled by Christianity and lead by Descartes. It is important to note that St. Thomas Aquinas, Plato, and Socrates all agree that particular eternal moral and political realities or actualities are reachable to human reason. …show more content…
Socrates is thought to be the first great philosopher.
He believes that people can absorb or acquire complete virtue and obtain actuality or reality. He pursued universal doctrines or ethics by following the pure, shared connotation of expressions, and made us all think more about some of the simple questions of knowledge and ethics. This was accomplished by Socrates using the Socratic method, in that he used conversations of questions and answers to sort of turn their answers back on themselves like a lawyer might do to a witness in a court room. In summary, Socrates argued that an individual is at no point supposed to do wrong whether in a direct or indirect manner and no individual who knows or distinguishes what is right will act in an opposing
manner. Plato was Socrates’ best student and recorded most of his conversations with him. In his theory of ideas, Plato creates this school of thought by viewing arguments that express universal perceptions by turning personal mental thoughts into ideas that are real. Plato came up with the idea that the real world is made up of universal ideas. He also claimed that the world that individuals perceive is developed by these ideas making it less factual because it is always changing. St. Thomas Aquinas is thought to be one of the best system builders in philosophy from the medieval epoch. This was when philosophers were trying to bring together the schools of thought of Christianity and the Aristotle’s rational expectations. Aquinas came up with the Summary of Doctrine, which contains coming up with questions, asserting oppositions, and then giving replies to each opposition. He tried to settle the rift between faith and reason by telling us that reason ought to consist of realities of nature, but that mystical certainties of revelation have to be acknowledged by faith. Aquinas argues that certain realities, for example, the existence of God are both shown and attestable or can be proved by reason. Descartes is considered to be one of the greatest philosophers that has ever lived because he was able to bring a clear distinction between the concept of reality and thought. Descartes is the founder of modern philosophy and is different from the ancient or medieval philosophers in that he believed in everything that exists in human beings in an innate conception. Descartes perceived ideas to be thoughts, which is different from Plato and Socrates. He lived his life on the concept that our thoughts are completely dissimilar from the reality that we experience. Descartes would argue with Ancient philosophers that had us believe that ideas, even those that are instinctive or inherent, are reality. Finally, Descartes would disagree with Aquinas, Socrates, and Plato in that the particular moral and political actualities are available to human reason.
The Examined Life, The Genealogy of Morals, and Meditations on First Philosophy were written by three philosophers of very different times, Cornel West, Friedrich Nietzsche, and René Descartes respectively. The intricate language, once deciphered, holds great meaning. The three texts are quite different from one another, but if one were to look closely and decipher the odd combination of complex wording, one would find that each of the texts has one major similarity. Each text looks at a flaw of humanity. The first text, The Examined Life, views the limitations of man and man’s inability to grasp the truth as the blemish of man. Nietzsche describes what he views as man’s flaw in the following sentence: “Man harbors too much horror; the earth has been a lunatic asylum for too long.” The fault of man as described in the final text, Meditations on First Philosophy, is that the will of man far exceeds the understanding of man. Outside of this similarity in seeking out man’s flaws, there are many differences.
Rene Descartes and David Hume both have had a profound effect on the philosophical world. Both these philosophers are associated explicitly with two separate schools of philosophy which are Rationalism and Empiricism. It is this division between Rationalism and Empiricism that allows for Descartes and Hume to present differing accounts of the mind and mentality.
As time passes ideology and government change, for the better or worse. Kant, Marx, and Hobbes all lived in a different world with their own set of set of difficulties and opinions. I believe none of them are truly correct in their ideas of humanity and government, and by understand their beliefs in relation to the time period we can better understand all of their works while at the same time formulate our own perspective on the issue.
He wants us to philosophize on life in the interest of having a philosophical life. He defends critical thinking. We can see in this text, Socrates go around the city and questions everyone, the merchants, the politicians … He questions the laws of society, the power that make the society function, challenges authority, wisdom, the common opinion, tradition and he questions god. This gives him the right to question their authority and accordingly their legitimacy as he finds out that authorities can be ranked; politics have authority and legitimacy but gods have more. Nonetheless, the ultimate form of authority and legitimacy would be an independent standard of right or wrong to which each one of us must obey to, first and foremost before anything else. You must live and act in a just and wise manner.
Socrates was a great Greek philosopher (Athenian) around 469 BC – 399 BC. He is known as one of the most important figures and one of the founders of European philosophy. Socrates never wrote philosophical texts. All the writings that exist and everything about Socrates such as his life and philosophy were from the writings of his students, mainly from Plato. In Plato’s eyes, Socrates was an idol, a saint, a prophet and a master in philosophy.1 However, others viewed him as a pathetic, ugly and annoying man. The reason why people didn't like him was because his mission in life was to approach people with prestigious positions and experts in their fields and to question them until he proved that all their beliefs were false (prove them wrong).This way of questioning people and making them doubt and contradict themselves was identified as the Socratic method which apparently inspired the well-known scientific method. He believed that the greatest quality of man is examining himself and others, to always try to grow and reach our utmost potential. He would say, “The unexamined life is not worth living.”2. He believed to be a moral hero, a teacher to the people of Athens and a messenger/prophet of the gods of Athens. This will be further developed in this essay with sources principally from Apology and Crito.
The subsequent essay will cover a short history of the existence of God from René Descartes through Immanuel Kant. First, section (1), covers Descartes’ view on the existence of God. Following this, in (2), I consider G.W. Leibniz’s view and George Berkeley’s view is explored in (3). These first three philosophers undeniably believe God exists. The remainder of the essay covers three additional philosophers whose views on the existence of God are less certain. These philosophers include John Locke covered in section (4), David Hume in (5) and, lastly, Immanuel Kant in (6).
Throughout the ages there have been many impactful theorists that have brought forward ideologies on way to live, to communicate, and to think. Immanuel Kant and Thomas Hobbes are two philosophers who have produced profound thought provoking theories on how mankind should comprehend and conceive ideas. Kant talks about an enlightened age, where people must disregard guidance from others and learn to become independent thinkers. Contrarily, Hobbes discusses a world where a higher authority makes the decisions and thinks for the people. Together, these two philosophers are both enlightened thinkers, however, their beliefs on the minds of the public and how decisions ought to be made differ greatly.
Socrates despised the Sophists. Sophists wouldn’t teach their students truths but instead would persuaded them to truths they’d made up. Socrates had seen through this and had challenged this way of thought by searching for the truth and not made up truths. Socrates had gone against the Sophist in order to provide a better education for students. Finally Socrates inspired people to question the very world we live in and it’s wonders. “He addressed timeless, universal, fundamental questions with insight and intelligence, our own understanding of such questions is heightened” (Nails). Socrates is a very well known person for asking questions all the time. Many people nowadays are doing it as well. Socrates had opened a gate way for others to explore. Before that people felt that most things were due to the presence of gods or beings. Socrates allowed thoughts and ideas to be challenged through curiosity and questions. Socrates has influenced many parts of today's world. He influenced western philosophy, how schools are taught, and people's curiosity. After Socrates came Plato, a student of Socrates. Like Socrates Plato too had many influences. Three of them being ethics, republic address and justice system, and literature. “Plato's Republic is a contribution to ethics: a discussion of what the virtue justice is and why a person should be just” (Eric). This was significant as it was one of the earlier attempts to justify someone doing as good or bad and set the border line for others to continue to develop and improve. Plato’s ethics had also helped with his making of the republic address and justice system. Plato was also very well known for helping form the republic address and justice system. In the republic Plato feels that justice is necessary. Plato believes that justice, individually is a human virtue. “He displays in his
Socrates is known for his Socratic method, a form of discussion, in which individuals asks and answering each other questions to stimulate critical thinking and enlighten ideas.
Most individuals identify morality as a set of rules that are clearly right or wrong. On the other hand, philosophers like Immanuel Kant and Jean-Paul Sartre attempt to discover the ways in which these rules can be legitimized. Kant’s moral system is grounded in rationality, in how any rational being would acknowledge objective, universal moral laws. Kant theorizes that humans are moral beings that are rational and have free will. Using our rationality, we as human beings are able to make the distinction between the moral and immoral by considering where the action falls in the “categorical imperative” (Kant 198). Kant’s idea of this categorical imperative can be summed up in his statement, “Act only on that maxim whereby at the same time you
Michael Russo's Introduction to Socratic Ethics profiles Socrates and aspects of his most formative philosophies and teachings. While we only know Socrates through other’s impressions of him, Plato’s dialogues feature what appears to be the most genuine representation of Socrates’ thoughts and philosophy. In this, ignorance, the Socratic method and Socrates’ thoughts on virtue are detailed. Russo argues that Socrates believed that happiness stems from virtue, which in turn stems from elenchos and episteme. For the most part, I agree with Socrates’ claims on ignorance and the yearning for self-examination and introspection, yet I disagree with his stance on virtue as knowledge.
Socrates was one of the first philosophers of the civilized world. He spent his life publicly dedicating himself to the Greek gods and to fixing the people of his city. Throughout his life, Socrates upheld his views that truth and wisdom were very important. While some people suggest that Socrates should have lived a private life in order to avoid his trial and death, living a private life would have meant giving up what he deemed important.
Socrates says that God determines what is right and wrong. “I owe a greater obedience to God then to you and so long as I draw breath and have my faculties, I shall never stop practicing philosophy and exhorting you and indicating truth to everyone I meet” (Apology, 29d). God’s rules and commandments are what you need to follow in order to assure a good life after death. God and his commandments come first over everything else. Socrates believes in the divine command theory and how you must listen to Gods commandments. God decides what is moral and obedience to God is how you live justly. Socrates also says he will never stop practicing philosophy because in his eyes philosophy is the way to live life. He has said that living without examining life is a life not worth living. Questioning and indicating truth to others by pointing out their ignorance is what he saw as an essential part of being moral. Morality ties in to the question of solution by asking questions and seeking wisdom you are doing what is just and fixing the condition of humanity. Morality also relates to condition because the soul must be more important than material objects in order to be moral. He says you must follow cities laws and obedience to Gods laws as well in order to be just. On top of that you should be self-examining yourself so that you can better the soul as much as
Socrates felt that, above all, one should be a good citizen and always do the right thing (Plato 18). However, many in his time did not worry about doing what was correct. Socrates realized this, and understood that they did not care to look into their actions and beliefs. Their first thoughts were on the goals that they had, such as money and pleasure, rather than the thought of whether or not the goals they held were actually what should have been considered important and right (Plato 26). Socrates knew that, unless they took the time to question their lifestyles, they would never do the right thing. By living a life that was being examined, the citizens would be living a life that was, for the most part, also right. Socrates believed that a life that was not right was not worth living, which is why he also felt as though an unexamined life would also be not worth living.
Well for this I think first we should know what nature Socrates had, it will help us knowing the uniqueness of Socrates’ method.