Denying Global Warming

1272 Words3 Pages

Brian Sussman and Mark Hendrickson both deny global warming is due to the fact that human are polluting the earth with emissions and other waste products. They both agree that the climate around the globe is changing, but they both say that it is a natural occurrence. Mark Hendrickson and Brian Sussman both made great arguments against manmade global warming, but I am still a little undecided as to which side of the fence I am standing on. Beginning with Mark Hendrickson’s argument, he recognizes that the climate is changing. He wrote in his article “Climate Change-Hoax or Crime of the Century” that the Earth has emerged from a Little Ice Age not that long ago, and it would be worrisome if the climate around the globe was not warming up. The science and data that has been recorded supporting this argument does agree with this argument. He also stated that it is beneficial, since human thrive in warmer climate. Mark also writes that the recent recorded temperatures may be flawed. He says due to the urban heat-island effect the temperature sensors that are near asphalt parking lots are not accurate. This may be true, but are the scientists analyzing and reporting the global warming data only emphasizing the urban heat-island effect? Or are they averaging it all out around the globe? The most accurate measures of temperature come from satellites. One satellite image shows that the Urban Heat Effect has no significant influence on global temperature trends. The NASA/GISS data showed the biggest change in global temperature from 1885 to 2006 happened in Russia, Alaska, Northern Canada and Greenland, where no major urban growth has occurred. Mark also states that the Earth is not getting dangerously warm and that nobody actually k... ... middle of paper ... ...t is not affecting the global atmosphere. Scientists are able to measure it, and have found a correlation between higher levels of CO2 and higher temperatures. I do believe that global warming is happening. The data that I have seen does suggest that there is a natural cause to global warming. There is also data I have seen that also supports the human cause of global warming. The amount of CO2 and other greenhouse gases humans are propelling into the atmosphere and into our oceans is un-natural. The balance is thrown off because of our use of fossil fuels and deforestation. It does not make sense to me for people to defend fossil fuels and delay new green alternatives, knowing they will run out in the future. Hendrickson and Sussman both seem to have cherry picked their facts they presented, making global warming seem like a hoax, but I don’t buy their arguments.

Open Document