Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ancient greece/athenian democracy essays
Short note on Greek democracy
Features of Athenian and classical democracy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ancient greece/athenian democracy essays
The Democracy of Greek States in the Classical Era
The extent that ancient Greek states promoted democracy in the classical era was very limited. Based on the text democracy was views as poor man’s government, and in this paper I will explain why the educated felt that only the poor could support the democracy. Also, I will explain why the idea of democracy was rejected and considered to be futile. Lastly I will break down the social differences, and explain how that applies to the division of the political system. The social classes in the Greek times were extremely different compared to todays. Education had a huge impact on the structure of the society, and if you were not a part of a certain class at birth there would be no chance of advancement
…show more content…
Plato also agreed with the idea of no democracy “Plato proposed organizing government in harmony with the needs of human nature (Plato 429- 347 B.C).” Plato believed that those who had wisdom should be in charge of the political power “and the few who have the capacity for wisdom-the-philosophers- should be entrusted with political power (Plato 429- 347 B.C).” The philosophers were thinking of the democrats as not being smart enough to lead the nation. Although there was not any proof that non-philosophers were not as prepared for the position, it was still deemed as a …show more content…
Equal rights are what was wanted, but the wealthy did not think it to be ok. Because they wanted a person with a prestigious background to be in charge, and when that did not happen they started to have confusion. They also thought that e democracy came to power through force “They kill some of the opposite party, banish others, and grant the rest an equal share in civil rights and government officials usually being appointed by lot (Plato 429-347 B.C).” Although democracy is regarded as being influenced by the people and for the common man. Instead of that being the case in this instance, it seems as if wealth and education are attempting to be the deciding factors. Social differences arise in Greek culture due to the implementation of slaves and royalty. In between the low and the high was the medium, and the medium happened to be land property owners, and people who assisted the wealthy as well. To impose democracy means you would have to take into account the opinion of the common man; which at the time was the slave who served a master. According to Socrates the idea of democracy required a body made up of people with educations, and when you were a slave an education
The lawyer and scholar believed that there should be one universal government ruling the people, this government would be a led by a mix of all three classes. He states how a monarchy would be the ideal rule, but is extremely unrealistic as all humans reason equally. By instating a mixed form of government, people would feel more of a connection with the laws and more of a personal responsibility to follow them if they had a part in creating them. Additionally, all people would be seen as equal before the law as all have equal capabilities and through effort, a common good can be achieved; the only thing differentiating humans is their variety of gifts, besides this, there is no variation. A person’s economic status by no means defines their ability to lead, by all groups participating in government, there are no idle citizens that are not a part of the
Three of the arguments in the Republic that I agree with stress equality. They include women and men sharing the same responsibilities, having women and children in common, and recognition being based on ability. These would make life less confusing for everyone, and the city would be more efficient as a whole. Another point, which Socrates makes that I agree with, is that the best philosophers are useless to the multitudes. This is because they are the ones that make progress in how society views the world, and not everyone can clearly understand the importance of this. I also agree that the rulers should think like philosophers because after all it is their job to see that the city improves, and that its intentions are just.
It is surprising indeed that Even today, tyrannies and dictatorships exist in the world when more than two and a half thousand years ago the ancient Athenians had developed a functional and direct form of democracy. What contributed to this remarkable achievement and how it changed the socio-political. scene in Athens is what will be considered in this paper. The paper will have three sections, each detailing the various stages. of political development from the kings of Attica to the time of Pericles when, in its golden age, Athens was at the height of its. imperial power.
This Athenian democracy was the first of its kind, and was certainly not the last. After Cleisthenes returned from exile, he created the first real government of the people – the demos, aroun...
During the age of Pericles, the ideal form of government was believed to be a government formed by all of the citizens regardless of wealth or social standing. This was known as democracy, literally meaning “ government of the people” [Document 3.] This government favored the many instead of the few. Athens was a direct democracy, meaning every citizen participated in debates. Western civilization used this philosophy of government by many, and created an indirect democracy where citizens elect officials to make and enforce laws.
Raaflaub, Kurt A., and Josiah Ober. Origins of democracy in ancient Greece. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007.
The majority of Socrates’ criticism of democracy in the Republic deals with how he ideally thinks a society should be structured. However, if individuals witnessing this dialogue in fifth century Athens were considering this argument simply in terms of how a government should run, they would be missing Socrates’ main point. For Socrates is actually discussing something much more personal to his audience through means of the republic, their soul. He states this when he introduces the republic, “Therefore, I suggest that we first consider the nature of justice and injustice as they appear in the republic, and then examine the individual, going from the larger and the smaller and then comparing them” (Anderson 56). For the thoughtful citizens of late fifth-century Athens, Plato’s Republic would provide a very useful tool to criticize not just simply democracy but more so how the way they form their government affects the balance of their souls. Socrates criticizes democracy as insufficiently balancing the souls of its people, and he does this in two ways. First, Socrates’ criticizes democracy for its lack of cultivating rationality among its citizens, meaning that the people of democracy do not reason with truth but rather faulty opinion because of their governmental structure. Secondly, Socrates’ criticizes democracy for encouraging the lack of self-control over one’s pleasures, meaning that a democratic society is both born by and fosters the incorrect belief that all there is to life is freedom. Socrates’ creates a republic to criticize democracy, and by doing this he compares the healthy soul to the unbalanced one.
In 510 B.C the first known democratic constitution was created by Solon, lawgiver of Athens. Almost a century later, Solon’s reforms were modified by Cleisthenes. The laws in a particular city or state today should reflect on equality and human rights; but until the implementation of Solon’s and Cleisthenes’ reforms, the aristocratic families of Athens ruled over the poorer citizens.
The government structure reflected the Athenians’ belief that individual contribution is crucial for sustaining a productive society. In the Classical Era, which was from 490-323 BCE, democracy was implemented and resulted in the power over the state lying in each citizen’s hands. Every vote affected the decisions that were made for the community, and every person had a say. The democratic system increased the individual’s involvement and interest in state affairs, therefore making each citizen more aware of what was happening in his community. As Thucydides said in Pericles’ eulogy, “Here each individual is interested not only in his own affairs but in the affairs of the state as well: even those who are mostly occupied with their own business are extremely well-informed on general politics.” By being well informed, the Athenians made better choices for their polis and cared more about what was going on in their city.
on in the Greek society, poor and rich students all went to school and all men
“The polis itself became a major economic factor in terms of public employment on juries or in large public building projects, like Acropolis, or the famous Athenian navy ( Augustana university, n.d.)” Democracy provided significant benefits in an economically sense as office holders, jurymen members and administrative council of 500 as people where paid for their time served (Cartledge, 2011). “Power to the people, all the people, especially the poor majority, remained the guiding principle of Athenian democracy (Cartledge, 2011).” This government also paid the citizens to attend assembly, this enabled the poor to be able to attend the assembly (Blackwell, 2003). Democracy also contributed to a stronger army and navy” it was evident that the Athenian army and navy were more powerful because their men believed they were fighting for their own democracy and for their own freedom” ( Augustana university, n.d.). Athens this evidence clearly establishes that democracy gave many Athenian citizens employment and it also lead to victory in the wars. This system of government was a revolutionary idea, overall it provided a just government and formed a system were the whole citizen body can actively participate in the political system. This lead to the economic and political success of the democratic system in Athens that has since developed
Before democracy, Athens was a city-state no different than any other. A few powerful, aristocratic families controlled all governing power. Most of the population held little or no role in the political life of the city. Athenians changed this, and created a system where participation was encouraged and opinions were valued. While some other Greek cities were also setting up democracies, none were as stable or well documented as that of Athens. The reason for why the Athenians moved toward a democratic society instead of an oligarchy or monarchy is still debated by historians. However, one common belief is that it rose due to a rapid population growth in their lower class, which may have caused them to have more power in the government compared to other Greek poleis during the Lyric Age. This time period took place between 800 and 500 B.C.; it represents a very vibrant, evolutionary stage in Greek history. The rise of the lower class in Athens probably did help spark ideas of democracy, yet the significant contributions of the political leadership of Solon, Cleisthenes, and Pericles can undisputedly be credited for the primary development of Athenian democracy. In 594 B.C., the first major political and economic reformer Solon came into power. The next reformer was Cleisthenes; he lived from 570 to 508 B.C. The final, and most revolutionary of the three was Pericles. Pericles is responsible for the last and most glorious stage of Athens. By expanding its power and building patriotic pride, he forever changed the system of democracy.
Ancient Greece was made up of individual city states, known as a Polis, which relied heavily on citizen participation in politics. The idea of self-rule was an entirely new way of governing. Citizenship was unheard of at the time. Although still considered citizens not everybody was allowed to participate. In Athens only adult males who had military training were allowed to vote. The majority of the population, namely slaves, children, metics (free noncitizens) and women were excluded from participation in politics. “[Metics] and women were not citizens and did not enjoy any of the privileges of citizenship.”(Sayre, 137) Athenian citizens had to be descended from citizens, excluding the children of Athenian men and foreign women. Individuals could be granted citizenship in to Athens by the assembly this was usually as a reward for some service to the state. Ancient Greece paved the way for the representative democratic style of government that is practiced by many countries today. Much like how voting rights started out in America, originally only the wealthy land owners were allowed to vote and call themselves citizens, but soon all men were allowed to have a vote and a voice in their states politics. Essentially the Greeks were the first to introduce citizen rights and freedom similar to what’s seen today.
Although the Greeks coined the word “democracy” – the words demos “people” and kratos “rule” conjoined together to mean, literally, “rule by the people” – there is speculation about weather or not certain other peoples, such as the Sumerians and the Indians, managed to engage in democratic methods of governance first. However, the history of democracy is not what is being discussed here; we are focusing on Plato’s criticism of democracy, particularly with regards to the Athenian model and his...
...held the most amount of prominence in the group benefited the most through the collective vote, and morals would often be disregarded in the policies. In addition, individuals would live in fear from the policies endorsed by the group, because they could not openly contest them. In Hecuba, democracy did not live up to its potential to be just to all members of society.