Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay what is ignorance
Definition essay on ignorance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay what is ignorance
Ignorance is bliss. Without the clutter and finality of knowledge, this idiom claims that even the fear of the unknown is trivial compared to the freedom of ignorance. But what defines ignorance? What characteristics make a person ignorant? Though the attribute of ‘ignorant’ has a complicated definition and place in society, it’s possible to propose a loose definition that will introduce its many facets. The Oxford Dictionary defines ignorant as “lacking knowledge or awareness in general; uneducated or unsophisticated.” With this definition, ignorant seems to be just another insult or adjective similar to stupid. However, stupid is defined as “lacking intelligence or common sense.” This unveils the paramount distinction between ignorant and …show more content…
Ignorant can be used as a synonym for rude or discourteous. This usage is seen as slang and is not heard as frequently in modern time, but it’s link to the original definition is understandable. It may stem from the Dunning–Kruger effect, a cognitive bias that results in uneducated individuals perceiving their abilities as superior than what is accurate. This bias arises from an inability to recognize one’s own ignorance. Charles Darwin reiterates this effect with, “ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge.” This misplaced certainty generally can produce anger or pretension—thus the slang meaning of rude or discourteous. This informal definition of ignorant also gives us an insight into the social and political usage of the …show more content…
It is accepted that the amount of ignorance necessary for blind hate is incurable. Society’s new definition of ignorance can be defined as—an irreparable lack of fundamental understanding that breeds only hatred. Tolerance can not be taught in a classroom. Though it may develop with age, it is not a knowledge a person can attain. This meaning no longer refers to the person or the potential at all, it instead refers to the epidemic that still holds the world in its clutches. Prejudice is described as, “an unfavorable opinion or feeling formed beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason.” With this description—that aligns so smoothly with the new and old interpretation of ignorance—it is possible to construct a revised definition of the word ignorant. Ignorant can be defined as, lacking the knowledge and understanding imperative in the pursuit of tolerance and open-mindedness. This interpretation of ignorant is the most troubling in that individuals that hate under false pretenses, truly believe they are valid―overconfidence in the face of a blaring blindspot. Whether it’s textbook or slang or societal, ‘ignorant’ is a serious accusation, it’s gravity cautioned in a quote by Martin Luther King Jr. "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious
it is seen that knowledge can hurt. It is also shown that sometimes one can know
We as humans tend to have an unquenchable thirst for knowledge. We look for knowledge about everybody and everything that surrounds us in our day-to-day life. Sadly though, we must accept that in the grand scheme of life we (as a society) tend to put pleasure above our quest for knowledge. The pursuit of knowledge tends to take time and energy, two things we call invaluable, and it also shows us things that might depress us. Contrastingly, ignorance takes no time and energy.
When the word “prejudice” is mentioned in public conversation, undertones of anger and unfairness usually accompany it. Prejudice is often defined as a predetermined opinion not based on fact,experience, or knowledge. Many acts of inequalities and discriminative wrong-doings in history can be traced back to being a result of prejudice.So what place does a concept with such a negative connotation have in an institution of higher education where students and faculty of varying cultures and backgrounds come together to learn? Instinctively, a good number of people would answer that prejudice and its negative consequences have no place in such an environment. However, a contradicting opinion is expressed in an article written by Jonathan Rauch titled “In Defense of Prejudice” . In this article, Rauch expresses his dissatisfaction with the
Prejudice can be defined as any preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience, 2. Harm or injury that results or may result from some action or judgment, and due in part to the first Amendment, which gave all Americans the right of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition, many Americans believe they have the right to verbally judge whomever and whatever they seem fit, to no extent. However these same American underestimate the impact prejudice can have on a person’s body and mind because as we all know prejudice grows. Prejudice can also affect all phases of life: the past, the present, and the future. Maya Angelou said, “ Prejudice is a burden that confuses the past, threatens the future and renders the present inaccessible.
Let me reference the Alcoff’s section on “situated knowers".She refers to chapters by Code, Harding, and Mills, within her proposal of three focus points for analyzing methods in which ignorance is produced. The first method involves individual situated knowers, the second is by group identities, and the third is via larger systems (Alcoff 2007, p. 40). The before mentioned micro to macro spectrum is heightened by Code’s formation of ecology of ignorance maintained by “webs of distortion and error” (Code 2007, p. 214) which proposes active correlation between agnotological positions. There is not absolute correlation amongst comprehension construction practices and inverse agnotological practices. I would not propose ecology of ignorance is consistent with Code’s grander concept of knowledge construction within Ecological Thinking (Code 2006). When I am pulled to discover the foundations of something I would describe it as “situated ignorances,” which would describe, the opposite of Code’s epist...
If there is a fascinating thing about human beings, it is how we are capable of loving, hatred and making rational decisions. Those characteristics set us apart from animals and have led people to believe that we are greater than what we truly are. Trusting in our discernment of how things should be and having that superiority complex, we tend to absolutize our opinions about a certain matter, with no proven evidence which is the worst of all. About this topic E. B. White said: “Prejudice is a great time saver. You can form opinions without having to get the facts”. In “Cathedral”, “Sonny’s Blues”, and “Say Yes”; each author demonstrates the theme of prejudice to concentrate on how people see only what they want to. And how this narrow perspective
"Prejudices, it is well known, are most difficult to eradicate from the heart whose soil has never been loosened or fertilized by education; they grow there, firm as weeds among stones."
Ignorance is a lack of knowledge. People are so set on their ideas they set in the past, that they do not want to face the present or future. People that are racist and prejudice are ignorant. Ignorance is passed on and spread, therefore there will always be a person in America who are ignorant, and we will never achieve racial equality. Martin
Albert Einstein once said “A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. So is a lot.” Knowledge can be good because it makes one successful. Then, it can also be very bad such as a criminal being too smart for the police, he or she can keep committing crime. Too much knowledge is dangerous because it may harm many, which means that many die or get scarred for life because of one simple guy with an excess of knowledge.
Schwartz, S. (2006) The arrogance of ignorance:Hidden away, out of sight and out of mind. Retrieved November 18, 2011, from http://nativevillage.org
People believe that they are “wise” when they “know” something. A common member of society most often feels that knowledge enables people to feel powerful and misknowledge shows a certain weakness. Thurman explained, “Being right means that the world affirms us in what we think we know. ‘Knowing’ something is a way of controlling it, being able to put it in its proper place in relation to us so that we can use it effectively… So, knowledge is power, in the sense that it empowers us to act successfully. Misknowledge… is weakness, in the sense that our action may fail in their aim, backfire, or have unintended consequences. Knowledge is security, in that we know our vulnerabilities and can avoid harm. Misknowledge is danger, in that we don 't know what others might do to us or what traps may await us. We therefore feel powerful and secure when were right, weak and vulnerable when were wrong” (Thurman 446). Thurman took a distinctive approach and taught that not knowing meant obtaining freedom and achieving wisdom. Thurman taught, “… the Buddha discovered that this most certain knowledge of the ‘self’ is actually ‘misknowledge’—a fundamental misunderstanding, a delusion. And what 's more, he realized that this discovery was the key to liberation, the gateway to enlightenment” (Thurman 447). From a social standpoint, “wisdom” allows people to obtain a certain knowledge of themselves and in this way, acquire freedom. Once this “wisdom” is gained, one becomes selfless and allows him or her self to be a greater part of
The basis for this concept, begins with the causes of prejudice. While there are many causes that relate to prejudice, the context ...
...g it. As Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “nothing in the world is more dangerous than a sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.”
Prejudice refers to one’s biased opinions and ideas of others, based on secondary information. Hence, the internalized ideas concerning the prejudiced members in society does not result from personal experiences, but information from third parties. Where prejudice is prevalent, the social relationships between the concerned individuals become strained and unmanageable. The existence of equality in society discourages the frequency of prejudice on racial grounds. The content of this discussion explores the concept of prejudice, as it relates to racial inequality and discrimination. The discussion features the Emmanuel AME Church shooting scenario, which characterizes racial discrimination and inequality. The discussion further examines the role
Cypher seems to suggest that there are times when ignorance is bliss, and one is better off maintaining a positive illusion than facing a hard truth that one is not ready to accept. His statement could also be viewed as rigid close-mindedness, a non-willingness to see reality for what it is; a refusal to consider conflicting ideas based on a desire to maintain one’s beliefs. Generally, The Matrix raises a profound question as to why human beings want to know the truth. This paper will argue why one cannot be justified in choosing the “bliss of ignorance.”