Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of communication theories
The importance of communication theories
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of communication theories
As we talked about in class for the past few weeks, it is becoming increasingly hard to argue that the field of Communication is a field and providing current research. This lack of a clear and definable position of the field has made it a subject of great focus as many scholars strive to give Communication a definition. This week, the collection of articles provide only a small look into a collection of scholars providing a definition of Communication, each providing their own unique contribution to the definition. This leads me to my argument of are you really even able to define the field of Communication if the field itself provides a variety of definitions. Robert T. Craig through his articles “Communication Theory as a Field” and “Pragmatism in the Field of Communication Theory” provides the idea of defining Communication through the lens of the theories that the field provides. Herman Cohen, who has created what can be considered as the best and most complete history to the field, brings emphasis on the importance of the research that the field has provided in his article “The Development of Research in Speech Communication: A Historical Perspective.” W. Barnett Pearce provides the insight on the application of scientific methodology into the field in only recent years in his article called, “Scientific Research Methods in Communication Studies and Their Implications for Theory and Research.” The final perspective that is provided this week is Bruce E. Gronbeck. Gronbeck provides the connecting article in which he explores not only whether or not the field of Communication fits into the field of humanities, but how does this field fit into the realm of academia in his article, “Is Communication a Humanities Disciplin... ... middle of paper ... ...ld of Communication that they need their own degree? My answer is simple, the field of Communication provides necessary skills in the sharing of ideas that can be applied to a variety of fields. Sure people with a degree in Communication my not be able to make ground breaking research in microbiology, but they can could possibly find a way to better help those in the field communicate their ideas to a larger audience. Think of defining the field of Communication as a field that allows for people to better understand how to communicate their points of view in a variety of ways. However, this is only my interpretation of the field. If there was one unified definition of the field of Communication, there would be more similarities between degrees in the field of Communication across a variety of universities and scholars would not be struggling to define the field.
The most important aspect of the article “Northrop Frye Talks About the Role of Humanities” is Frye’s assertion that the inability to articulate thoughts and ideas results in the impoverishment of the means of verbal communication. Verbal communication becomes impoverished because the ability to articulate is discouraged in society, articulating thoughts are inconvenient for humans, thus simplistic means of communications is preferred and verbal communication is hindered by ill and unfit words to convey one's thoughts. Verbal communication becomes impoverished because the ability to articulate is discouraged in society. Modern technological systems of communication have evolved in a way that prevents the ability to articulate one's thoughts.
Communication in History. Technology, Culture, and Society. Ed. Crowley, D.J., and P. Heyer. Allyn & Bacon/Pearson, 2010.
Through concepts and principles which we studied in the “dialogic communication studies”, “Dialogue” is a special form of communication that creates positive results for individuals, group, organization and communities. This concept has become a central of various theoretical perspectives in humanity and social sciences studies by looking at social relation and interaction as dialogue.
Griffin, Emory A. (2009). Chapter 3: Weighing the Words. A first look at communication theory(7th ed., pp. 27-29). Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education (Asia).
Women's Studies in Communication 27.2 (2004): 177-203. ProQuest.com - a free online shopping experience. Web. The Web. The Web.
Hartley, John (2002), Communication, Cultural and Media Studies: The Key Concepts, London, Routledge, pp. 19-21.
Pages 261- 267. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.10.006. Cameron, D. (2001). The 'Case Working with spoken discourse and communication. London: Thousand Oaks & Co. Carson, C., & Cupach, W. (2000).
Communication involves the exchange of messages and is a process which all individuals participate in. Whether it is through spoken word, written word, non-verbal means or even silence, messages are constantly being exchanged between individuals or groups of people (Bach & Grant 2009). All behaviour has a message and communication is a process which individuals cannot avoid being involved with (Ellis et al 1995).
With this major, I will be able to further my education in ways to be healthy and possibly learn how to help others. I decided that being a health physician or nutritionist was something that I was really interested in. This is where communication studies come in. I figured that if I minored in communication studies, I could improve my oral and written communication to better help in my future of nutrition. Communication studies was a good pick for me because, although there is always room for improvement, I can still garnish with some more knowledge and information to better improve my oral skills.
West, Richard, & Turner, Lynn H. (2000). Introducing Communication Theory: Analysis and Application. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield publishing.
Gumperz and Gumperz (1982) argue that communication cannot be studied in isolation. Its effects on people’s lives should also be analysed thus creating a holistic approach in detailing observations and findings of social interaction. Through communicative interaction, a speaker is constantly organising and reorganising who they are and how they relate to the social world (Norton 1997). In other words, speakers demonstrate their “linguistic features and communicative functions and social distribution” (Androutsopoulos & Georgakopoulou
In interpersonal communication there are many theories that are similar yet different in many ways. The theories can be combined to describe people and how those people interact and communicate with each other. Many of these theories help explain how people in society form impressions of others, how they maintain these impressions, why people interact with certain people in society, and how people will use these impressions that they have formed later on in life. These theories also help people to better understand themselves, to better understand interpersonal communication, and to better understand people in general. There are two theories in interpersonal communication that, despite their differences, can go hand in hand. The first is interaction adaptation theory and the second is emotional contagion theory. These two theories’ similarities and differences and their relevance to my everyday life will be discussed in this paper. These two theories are very important in understanding how people interact with others and why people do the things they do sometimes.
“Communication is defined as the giving or exchanging of information through oral, written or non-verbal means” (Blais & Hayes 2016), and
Communication is a huge part of our lives because through communication and language is that how we make sense of the world around us. Through language we can share information, express our feelings and creativities. In support, Stanley A. Deetz who wrote the book Democracy in an Age of Corporate Colonization, Dan O’Hair and Mary Wiemann who wrote the book of Real Communication has agreed on the concept of language is symbolic and we need language to better understand the world around us. Thus, this experience has gave me a better understating of the importance of communication. It has a lot taught me how to respect others and how to value time. It made me realize that I have such a rich culture but many people are losing it because of what they had gone
Speaking is a natural ability given to most reluctant individuals. Since the beginning of time, it has been assumed that we have a right to speak and use words, thus we naturally begin our development of language during the early stages of live. After years of grasping and perfecting our vocabulary and language, it seems unnecessary to study the purpose of our development. Why, then, should we study “oral communication?” There are many purposes, benefits, and institutions that branch from oral communication. Of course, communication is the basis of interaction with other individuals through the use of expressions and words; however, through studying oral communication, one can take the words and expressions being used and apply them to his or her own life. After all, the most effective and useful knowledge is applied knowledge.