Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Abstract of decision making
Abstract of decision making
Decision making and its consequences
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Abstract of decision making
Simone Ekles Once said “I wish I could turn back time, but I can’t. I made a decision because I thought I was invincible, and I’ll pay for it the rest of my life” And Mhariri McFarlane said “Do nothing and nothing happens. Life is about decisions. You either make them or they’re made for you, but you can’t avoid them.” The point of this essay is that one decision you make can be the decision that can change your life. You can run from them but you can’t hide. There are three short stories that go by the meaning of these quotes. The first story is The Necklace. In the Necklace Mathilde Loisel is a woman who is ungrateful of the things she possesses. Her husband tells her that there is a party that he wants her to attend with him. He gives her money to buy a dress. She realizes that she has no beautiful jewelry to match her dress. He says that she …show more content…
In this story the main character Rainsford is on a ship with is hunting buddy Whitney where their mission was supposed to be hunting a leopard. Rainsford falls of the yacht trying to get a better look of why he just heard a gun being fired. Rainsford swims to a nearby island where upper-class people hunt other humans. He runs into Zaroff and Zaroff’s servant Ivan. Zaroff tells Rainsford that he has a choice of hunting other shipwrecked sailors that come ashore or be hunted by Zaroff. This is a hard decision because you don’t know if Zaroff is a good hunter or not. But if he’s not Zaroff sends Ivan with a pack of dogs out for three days to finish the job. If he doesn’t choose to be hunted then you don’t want to hunt other people as they come from off shore onto the island as helpless as he was. To know that he felt and thought the same things that they did. The last thing that would make this a hard decision is that Rainford’s life is at stake and doesn’t know if he will live or die in this situation. Would you rather hunt or be hunted. Rainsford chooses to be hunted, and
In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” Rainsford was justified in killing General Zaroff. Rainsford is a hunter. He was on a yacht that crashed and he was the only survivor. The island that he swam to was named “Ship Trap Island.” This where General Zaroff lived. He is also a hunter. He has hunted anything you can think of. Even… people. He has the survivors from the ship wrecks “play” his “game.” The survivors go out into the jungle and General Zaroff goes out and finds them. They have three days to survive. If they don’t get caught in those three days, they win. If they lose… they are killed. This happened to Rainsford. Rainsford, thankfully, won the “game.” He shot General Zaroff after his win.
Your fate is not based upon anyone’s actions other than your own. Both Wes Moore’s experienced a circumstance in which they required a second chance. The decision of how to use that second chance is the vital part to succeeding, for the difficult part learning how to “distinguish between second chances and last chances” (Moore 67). Wes— The author— was given a second chance after joining military school. Although it was originally an unfortunate turn of events, Wes quickly learned the opportunities that surrounded him were to fade rapidly if he did not improve his way of life. This experience is an example of how a single person can set themselves up for success or failure based upon their individual
In the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, the protagonist, Rainsford, is a smart, clever, resilient man who keeps a cool head in stressful and dangerous situations. Rainsford is not allowed to leave the island he washes up on after he falls off the yacht he was traveling on, because the mentally disturbed general wants to hunt people with Rainsford. Rainsford makes a deal with the general to win his freedom. If Rainsford can evade Zaroff for three nights, then Rainsford is free to leave the island. During the hunt, Rainsford must think quickly and be resourceful in order to stay alive. Rainsford is an extremely experienced hunter who writes books about his hunting experiences. When Rainsford is running from the
Have you ever wondered what being hunted in the jungle would feel like? For one man this nightmare becomes a dangerous reality. In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, a man named Sanger Rainsford faces conflict while being stranded on what he thinks is a deserted island. While on the island he falls into the hands of the maniacal Russian General Zaroff. How many steps is one man willing to take in order to ensure his safety. How far is one man willing to go to fulfil his quest of hunting the most dangerous game. Although both characters are very similar, there are inherent differences that are brought forth during the struggle for survival.
Throughout life, individuals are faced with decisions and obstacles that must be overcome. These decisions and actions are easily influenced by outside forces and motivations and the outcomes of our actions can have a drastic effect on one's destiny. The act of deciding a course of action is not always simple, but it is made even more difficult when we are faced with a time period and a negative outcome if we chose not to continue on our journey. In the short story “Winter’s Bone,” written by Daniel Woodrell, we are taught that throughout life people make choices between what they want to do and what they need to do. Sometimes those choices lead to unfavourable outcomes,
When Rainsford falls off of the boat, he has to try his best to stay afloat until he can find something to latch on to. He swims vigorously until he reaches Ship-Trap Island. "Jagged crags appeared to jut up into the opaqueness... dense jungle came down to the very edge of the cliffs." It is midday and he is just searching for a place to rest when he runs into Ivan, the astonishingly large guard of the island. Zaroff, the owner of the island, joins in on their conversation about hunting. The conversation is interesting to say the least. Zaroff says, "You'll find this game worth playing…your brain against mine. Your woodcraft against mine. Your strength and stamina against mine. Outdoor chess! And the stake is not without value, eh?" Zaroff is trying to point out that he finds interest in hunting humans, and he wants to know if Rainsford will rise to the challenge. Rainsford is left with a choice to make; will he fight Zaroff, or will he decline and get killed by Ivan. The choice in this situation is pretty self- evident.
Facing hardships, problems, or obstacles shouldn’t discourage one from completing their task or job. Many of authors usually put their characters through tough complications to show the reader that no matter what happens; anyone could pull through. In the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connel, the main character Mr. Rainsford gets stranded on an eerie island with a bad reputation. He meets General Zaroff and gets thrown into a huge hunting game, where his life is on the line. In the end, he wins the game and will continue to hunt animals, but not people, as the general once did. He will continue to hunt because one, hunting means everything to him. Two, he will not continue the general’s crazy ways, and resort back to the legal and non-dangerous to other humans sport. Third, he feels powerful when he becomes the hunter and not the hunted. Giving up hunting would be like giving up his life, so just because of a minor block he had to overcome, he will not give up hunting.
In this suspense-filled short story two very skillful hunters, become fully aware of what the word game truly means. Zaroff an ex military general,expresses how sports of hunting animals has begin to bore him. On the other hand, Rainsford thinks that animals don’t have feelings they don’t feel anything when they are being hunted. In “The Most Dangerous Game” the three main conflicts are Zaroff vs. Rainsford, Zaroff vs. Rainsford’s malay mancatcher , and Rainsford vs. His idea to survive.
Rainsford is disgusted by Zaroff, and says, “Hunting? Great Guns, General Zaroff. This is a grisly joke,” (8). Zaroff dismisses Rainsford’s feelings and refuses to believe “that so modern and civilized a young man as you seem to be harbors romantic ideas about the value of human life,” (8). In the narrative only one of these men go through changes in their character. Rainsford is a dynamic character who goes from disregarding how the “huntee” feels, to keenly understanding their fear and pain. During the exposition of the story, Rainsford tells his hunting partner, Whitney, “Who cares how a jaguar feels?” Then, during the falling action of the story, he takes the place of a huntee, and he is able to understand what they feel. Rainsford also experiences a shift in morals considering he declares during the rising action that his experience in the war did not make him “condone cold-blooded murder” (8). In the resolution, the general says, “One of us is to furnish a repast for the hounds. The other will sleep in this very excellent bed. On guard, Rainsford.” Rainsford fights Zaroff and feeds him to the hounds,
Hunting can lead to death or death of others. In the story the most dangerous game Zaroff kills people instead of animals. He gets bored of killing animals so he starts hunting humans. He treats human as if they are animals. Rainsford the main character falls off his ship and ends up on the island. Zaroff greets Rainsford into his home but then later tells him about the game. Zaroff wants to hunt Rainsford. The short story was written by Richard Connell. Zaroff is a very good hunter who hunts humans for fun. Rainsford is a professional hunter who ends up on the island. Fear and danger can be felt by the bravest of men.
It is said that “everything that shines isn't gold.” A difficult situation can result a vast illusion that is not what one thought it would be, which leads to disappointment and despair. Just like Guy De Maupassant stories, “The Necklace” and “The Jewel.” In the first story, the protagonist, Mathilde Loisel’s need for materialistic fulfillment causes her hard labor which ends her natural beauty. In the second story, the husband Monsieur Latin ends up living a dreadful life due to the passing of his wife and her admiration for jewels. “The Necklace” and “The Jewel” both share many similarities such as the unconditional love each husband haves toward their wife, the necessity each wife haves towards materialistic greed, the beautiful allurement
In class so far we have read many stories, but the two that should be compared are the very ironic stories of “the Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant and “The Gift of the Magi,” by O.Henry. The stories are very similar in the fact that they have two couples who are giving “gifts” but each couple has different motives. In “The Necklace” you have Madame Loisel and her husband. She is a poor woman who believes she should be rich and wants more than her husband can provide for her. Then in “The gift of the Magi” you have Jim and Della who work very hard for what they have and appreciate their things. Della Sells her hair to buy her husband a chain for his pocket watch, but unfortunately Jim sold his pocket watch to get Della a comb for her hair.
Around the world, values are expressed differently. Some people think that life is about the little things that make them happy. Others feel the opposite way and that expenses are the way to live. In Guy de Maupassant’s short story, “The Necklace”, he develops a character, Madame Loisel, who illustrates her different style of assessments. Madame Loisel, a beautiful woman, lives in a wonderful home with all the necessary supplies needed to live. However, she is very unhappy with her life. She feels she deserves a much more expensive and materialistic life than what she has. After pitying herself for not being the richest of her friends, she goes out and borrows a beautiful necklace from an ally. But as she misplaces the closest thing she has to the life she dreams of and not telling her friend about the mishap, she could have set herself aside from ten years of work. Through many literary devices, de Maupassant sends a message to value less substance articles so life can be spent wisely.
“The Necklace”, narrated by Guy de Maupassant in 3rd person omniscient, focuses the story around Mathilde Loisel who is middle class, and her dreams of fame and fortune. The story is set in 19th century France. One day, Mathilde’s husband brings home an invitation to a fancy ball for Mathilde; to his surprise Mathilde throws a fit because she doesn’t have a dress or jewelry to wear to the ball. M. Loisel gets her the beautifully expensive dress she desires and Mathilde borrows a diamond necklace from Mme. Forestier, a rich acquaintance of Mathilde. Mathilde goes to the ball and has a night she’s dreamed of, until she gets home from the ball at 4 A.M. to find
In the story the Star the setting is on a rocket ship with astronauts and the setting in the necklace is old France in the late 1970's. The Star is a science fiction story while the necklace is an illustrative story.