Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gift of the magi meaning
Gift of the magi meaning
Gift of the magi meaning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In class so far we have read many stories, but the two that should be compared are the very ironic stories of “the Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant and “The Gift of the Magi,” by O.Henry. The stories are very similar in the fact that they have two couples who are giving “gifts” but each couple has different motives. In “The Necklace” you have Madame Loisel and her husband. She is a poor woman who believes she should be rich and wants more than her husband can provide for her. Then in “The gift of the Magi” you have Jim and Della who work very hard for what they have and appreciate their things. Della Sells her hair to buy her husband a chain for his pocket watch, but unfortunately Jim sold his pocket watch to get Della a comb for her hair. While Both Stories seems to be set in or near the same time period, maybe 19th century, the stories couldn’t be different. “The gift of Magi” seems to be written in a more loving fashion. The way O. Henry writes the story is straightforward. He adds enough detail into his …show more content…
One time my dad gave my mom these beautiful diamond and ruby earrings. She had them for the longest time and one day she woke up with one missing. We search all over her room and we couldn't find the missing earring. A couple weeks later my dad took the lone earring to the jewelry store where he bought it and had it turned into a necklace. That same day my mom called me so happy, she had found the missing earring in her closet. Its ironic how the same day my dad went and got the earing turned into a necklace, is the same day my mom found the missing part. It relates to “the Necklace”, she lost a gift that my dad spent a lot of money on, like Madame Loisel thought her friend spent a lot on the necklace she lost. It relates to “The Gift of the Magi”, my dad tried to do something nice by turning the lone earring into a necklace, yet now it leaves my mom with one earring and a matching
“The Necklace” gives a strong representation of what the story is about. When Madame Loisel was looking for jewelry with Madame Forestier, “She came
which explains well how she had a finite amount of money and thought material wealth was more important than happiness. If she only knew before that she would spend the next decade working off her debt, she would have never asked for the necklace and she would have had a happy life. Furthermore, wealth isn’t the only thing that brings happiness to life. With an easy explanation, it explains how having material possessions doesn’t matter, because the moments we have are more valuable.
A reader looking for a story where there is drama, but still humor will be satisfied with Raymond Carver’s Cathedral and Guy de Maupassant’s The Jewelry. Both have some form of wit developed through a plot structure that appeals to the most common of people. Carver presents a man who is so narrow-minded that he is unable to grasp the idea of knowing a person who is blind. Maupassant creates a story of a man who is blind to the fact of the true actions of his wife and the lies she construed during their marriage. In these two stories the protagonists go through self-discovery, but each experience it in different ways. As such, the plot structures that form the infrastructure of these two tales allow the reader to see that although the two protagonists reached the same conclusions but through different events.
Situational irony occurs throughout most of The Necklace; it appears when Madame Forestier lends Madame Loisel a diamond necklace since “[she’s] upset because [she] haven’t a single piece of jewelry or a gemstone or anything to wear with [her] dress.[She’ll] look like a pauper. [She] almost think[s] it would be better if [she] didn’t go” and lets her borrow it for a ball one night so Madame Loisel can fit in; however, she ends up losing the necklace(174).Madame Loisel was not informed of the fact that the diamond necklace was actually fake. In a panic, Madame Loisel and her husband work hard and pay the loans off for many years trying to replace the necklace only to find out it wasn’t real; they gave up their decent lifestyle and had to save up for ten years. The situational irony is the fact that Madame Loisel thought that if she borrowed the diamond necklace it would help her become closer to the life she wanted, but the necklace ended up putting her and her husband into poverty and without the life that she longed for, instead. The ten years of poverty that Madame Loisel and
An example of this can be found in the quote, “She would dream of delicious dishes served on wonderful china, of gallant compliments whispered and listened to with a sphinxlike smile as one eats the rosy flesh of a trout or nibble at the wings of a grouse” (352). This quote occurs when Mme. Loisel is eating a dinner of stew with her husband. Her husband on one hand, is perfectly content with the stew and he quite enjoys it, Mme. Loisel on the other hand is not satisfied with the stew and dreams for bigger and better things. If it wasn’t already obvious enough, the stew symbolized the overall situation that Mme. Loisel and her husband were in. Her husband was very happy about the situation was, and he didn’t have any complaints about it. On the contrary, Mme. Loisel wasn’t content with their situation, she wanted more out of life than what she already had. However, the examples do not stop there. Believe it or not, the necklace itself is a symbol of Mme. Loisel’s slight loss of reality. The necklace that Mme. Loisel fell so madly in love with, may have been beautiful, but it was completely and utterly worthless, all a sham. The necklace represented the power of perception, along with the slight difference between fantasy and reality. Even though it was a fake, when she wore the necklace, she felt more wealthy, which in turn, made the people around her believe that she was wealthier too. The fact that the necklace is the result of the complete undoing of Mme. Loisel’s life as she knew it, leads me to infer that the story’s overall message is that nothing good ever comes from the denial of the reality of the
In fact, “The Necklace” and “The Lottery” was the two stories, which almost related with each other story in the street, society, and in the family. After reading the stories “The Lottery” and “The Necklace”, I learn many things to change my society. Both stories “The Necklace” and “The Lottery” started from street and ends in the street, both are about society and family
Living in a world where anything can be judged by anyone, misunderstood, and alter your own point of view about what is certainly a mundane topic, this compare and contrast essay between the two stories of The Monkey's Paw by W.W. Jacobs and Dinnertime by Helen Epstein, could be effortlessly, one of these flaws, and this is a commodity we must consider analyzing. The Monkey’s Paw is a story of a family that happens to get a mystical object, in this case, the title of the story, which capacitates them with three wishes, what they didn't know where the tricky ways this object granted those wishes. Dinnertime is a story about a family that has to deal with the past of the holocaust where the parents itself had been tagged by their past in concentration camps, which is narrated by the daughter of this family, and explains their troubles that were dragged with this terrible past. The elements that are going to be prioritized in this stories are the: Motif, Setting, and plot of each
It is said that “everything that shines isn't gold.” A difficult situation can result a vast illusion that is not what one thought it would be, which leads to disappointment and despair. Just like Guy De Maupassant stories, “The Necklace” and “The Jewel.” In the first story, the protagonist, Mathilde Loisel’s need for materialistic fulfillment causes her hard labor which ends her natural beauty. In the second story, the husband Monsieur Latin ends up living a dreadful life due to the passing of his wife and her admiration for jewels. “The Necklace” and “The Jewel” both share many similarities such as the unconditional love each husband haves toward their wife, the necessity each wife haves towards materialistic greed, the beautiful allurement
“But she hugged them to her bosom, and at length she was able to look up with dim eyes and a smile” (Henry 206). Tones can make a short story intriguing, emotional, and gripping. In "The Gift of the Magi" by O. Henry and "The Scarlet Ibis" by James Hurst, the underlying themes of both short stories are about the love the main characters have for certain members of their family, both stories are somber and thoughtful, and the main characters are serious and family-oriented. Overall, this can lead to key tones in each book. Towards the beginning in "The Gift of the Magi," the short story is dreary and sad. Since Della can't afford anything for her husband for Christmas, "she stood by the window and looked out dully at a gray cat walking a gray fence in a gray backyard" (Henry
“The Necklace”, by Guy de Maupassant and “A Good Man is Hard to Find”, by Flannery O’Connor are two short stories that take place in two different eras of time. “The Necklace” takes place in Paris, France around the late 1800’s and “A Good Man is Hard to Find” takes place in Georgia, USA sometime in the mid 1900’s, mainly in the car, traveling to Florida on vacation. At first glimpse these too stories appear
The “Gift of the Magi”, by O. Henry, is a short story that unfolds in an unanticipated and remarkable way that gently tugs the reader in which makes them want to continue reading. The story is about two characters named Della and Jim. For Christmas, Della cuts her hair to sell for money to buy Jim a chain for his watch while Jim sells his watch to buy Della some fancy combs. They both couldn’t use each other's gifts properly by reason of them sacrificing what they loved likewise finding delight in giving - what is foolish in the head, may be wise for the heart.
I looked curiously over the counter, wondering what it might be. The man came back with a small box a short time later. He handed it to me and then resumed his work. My slender hands trembled as I opened the tiny box. Inside was a beautiful silver locket. As I opened the tiny heart up, I saw something I didn't expect to see. The beautiful faces of my family, including my brother.
O. Henry’s short story “The Gift of the Magi,” is about a couple who most unwisely sacrificed for each other the greatest treasures of their house. The story takes place on Christmas Eve in a furnished apartment at eight dollars a week. I feel that the narrator mocks Jim and Della for being poor. “It did not beggar description, but it certainly had that word on the lookout for the mendicancy squad.” (O. Henry 165). Della and Jim’s income shrunk from thirty dollars a week to twenty dollars a week causing them a great deal of financial problems. They both are troubled that Christmas is tomorrow and they cannot afford to buy each other a nice gift. Jim’s gold watch and Della’s hair play an important role in the story.
Around the world, values are expressed differently. Some people think that life is about the little things that make them happy. Others feel the opposite way and that expenses are the way to live. In Guy de Maupassant’s short story, “The Necklace”, he develops a character, Madame Loisel, who illustrates her different style of assessments. Madame Loisel, a beautiful woman, lives in a wonderful home with all the necessary supplies needed to live. However, she is very unhappy with her life. She feels she deserves a much more expensive and materialistic life than what she has. After pitying herself for not being the richest of her friends, she goes out and borrows a beautiful necklace from an ally. But as she misplaces the closest thing she has to the life she dreams of and not telling her friend about the mishap, she could have set herself aside from ten years of work. Through many literary devices, de Maupassant sends a message to value less substance articles so life can be spent wisely.
As a child, I was always mesmerized with beautiful things. My dad had a watch which I liked to loosely drape around my wrist and my grandmother had an exquisite fur coat which I loved to get lost in when she came to visit. One thing, however, captured my attention and managed to retain it for all these years. I first noticed it when I was younger, clasped around my mother’s neck. As time went on, my fascination did not fade. This piece, that had so enthralled me, was a locket. While trends changed, this locket never seemed to go out of style. I knew there was something significant about this locket and I wanted to know the mystery behind it. My mom used to tell me how my grandmother gave it to her for her eighteenth birthday as a special gift in honor of becoming an adult woman. In a recent interview I asked my grandmother about the locket and how it came to be in her possession. She revealed to me that the locket was given to her on her eighteenth birthday just like my mother and that was how she decided to make it tradition that on her eighteenth birthday the oldest daughter would receive the locket. She opened the locket and a small, sentimental smile crept onto her lips as she pointed to two people, who I had been told several times were my great-grandparents, and told me about how amazingly intuitive this gift was on their part. It had not only beauty but also a photograph of them so that no matter how far away she was from them, they would still be in her heart. My grandmother decided that it was important for me to know what she knew about the history of the necklace, how her mother had bought it in an antique store where the clerk had told her it was made in the late 18th century by a little known Russian jewe...