Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
America racism history
The history of racism in us
America racism history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Amidst the aftermath of the 2011 riots in the United Kingdom, politicians pointed their fingers nervously to different factors that could have sparked the riots. David Starkey, a famous British historian, went on BBC’s Newsnight in August 2011 and put the blame squarely on the lap of the black community. In this interview, which will be analyzed here, David Starkey depicts black people synonymously with violence and destruction through biased language, sweeping generalizations and allusion. First of all, David Starkey speaks about black culture in a very disapproving manner through his use of epithet. He uses many terms synonymously with black culture. Early in the interview he lists several abstract nouns, saying the riots were caused by “a …show more content…
particular sort of violent, destructive, nihilistic gangster culture” which speaks the language of “patois” and listens to “rap music.” When asked to further expand on his understanding of rap music, and whether rap music is to be blamed for the riots, David Starkey responds by saying that “it certainly glorifies violence.” By constantly referring to ‘black culture’ as “violent, destructive and nihilistic,” he is inadvertently depicting black people as the root of the problems that caused the London riots of 2011. Secondly he his very selective in the evidence that he uses to support his arguments.
He refers to TV host David Lammy as an “archetypical, successful black man” who speaks with a white accent, thereby equating white English with success and sophistication. Once again ‘white’ is equated to ‘good’ and ‘black’ is equated to ‘bad’. Even though another guest, Owen James, tells Starkey that he is making a false analogy, Starkey continues with his selective arguments. During the interview, Starkey turns to another guest, Dreda Say Mitchell, who is black, and says “you don’t talk like them either.” She is offended and reminds David that rap music and the Patois language are very rich in culture and that he should not speak about a ‘them and us’ paradigm. Doing so, she argues, leads to a divided country that riots and loots even more. Again Starkey does not listen and continues to list examples of white people acting ‘black’ disgracefully, referring to the Olympic flag bearer for the UK, whom he quotes using slang as she was caught looting on TV. He refuses to see Dreda Say Mitchell’s point because he has come with such selective arguments to prove his own point, that black ‘culture’ is the root of the problem. Unfortunately, every time he refers to ‘black culture’ he is offending and black viewers as …show more content…
well. Finally, David Starkey commits himself even more to this extreme position through multiple allusions to Enoch Powell’s ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech from 1964.
It helps to have a contextual understanding of this speech, in order to understand the position of David Starkey. Enoch Powell warned that England would fall like the Roman Empire through an enemy that attacked from within, saying that London, like the river Tiber (which runs through Rome), would foam with blood. Powell was an MP who spoke out against immigration policies in the UK, predicting that immigrants would destroy British culture and tear down society from within. David Starkey quotes Powell early in the interview and continues to refer to it. Starkey believes Powell’s prediction has come true; London is collapsing like the Roman Empire. Starkey points out though that Powell was wrong in his prediction that the “black man would have the whip over the white man.” Instead, as Starkey so famously states, “the whites have become blacks”. Again, Starkey has equated black people with the problems that caused the riots in the summer of 2011. This time he does it by alluding to the Rivers of Blood speech, which is just as contentious today as it was
then. While the riot was racially charged indeed (a white police officer shot a black man and refused to answer the family’s request for clarification), ‘black culture’ in general cannot be blamed. By doing so, David Starkey inadvertently blames black people, causing a greater polarization of communities and potential for violence. In this interview on Newsnight, Starkey’s use of labels, generalization and allusion all depict black people as the root of the problem that caused the riots in 2011. As a result David Starkey has most likely ended his career as a well-respected author and speaker. Understandably, many reactions to this interview have accused David Starkey of being a racist.
‘’Jeffrey Smart was born on July 1921 and pasted away on the 20th June 2013. He was an Australian painter known for his clear depictions of urban landscapes. Jeffrey Smart was born and educated in Adelaide where he worked as an Art teacher. After departing for Europe in 1948 he studied in Paris at La Grande University and later at the Academia Montmartre with great success. He returned to Australia in 1951, living in Sydney and began exhibiting frequently in 1957.later in his life he moved to Italy in 1971 after a successful exhibition in London, to continue his art career until his death. His art well reflected his art form.
In his opinion, life in the white community is like a dream, since there were no discrimination, no oppression, no threats for violence etc. He expressed the idea that it was impossible for the white people to give up this dream and they would do whatever necessary to defend it. “The problem with the police is not that they are fascist pigs but that our country is ruled by majoritarian pigs.” Coates believed that the root to all the unfortunate events were because of the country’s leadership. America had benefitted from slavery and many other policies that were discriminating against African Americans, yet the leaders failed to recognise the contributions they had made for this
It is theorized that the phrase “angry Black man” is a social construct created during America’s Colonial period. It was supposedly used to negatively describe African-American men who spoke out against what they considered to be an incongruous and xenophobic society and more specifically the institution of slavery. The phrase’s essence has been intentionally misconstrued. The three words together were said to have been used by whites as a dismissive tool; a method of sabotaging the validity of an outspoken Black man’s claims of an unjust and oppressive system. This was done in an effort to detract from the legitimacy of the outraged Black man’s cries of injustice.
The main theme of A Prayer for Owen Meany is religious faith -- specifically, the relationship between faith and doubt in a world in which there is no obvious evidence for the existence of God. John writes on the first page of the book that Owen Meany is the reason that he is a Christian, and ensuing story is presented as an explanation of the reason why. Though the plot of the novel is quite complicated, the explanation for Owen's effect on Johnny's faith is extremely simple; Owen's life is a miracle -- he has supernatural visions and dreams, he believes that he acts as God's instrument, and he has divine foresight of his own death -- and offers miraculous and almost undeniable evidence of God's existence. The basic thematic shape of the novel is that of a tension being lifted, rather than a tension being resolved; Johnny struggles throughout the book to resolve his religious faith with his skepticism and doubt, but at the novel's end he is not required to make a choice between the two extremes: Owen's miraculous death obviates the need to make a choice, because it offers evidence that banishes doubt. Yet Johnny remains troubled, because Owen's sacrificial death (he dies to save the lives of a group of Vietnamese children) seems painfully unfair. Johnny is left with the problem of accepting God's will. In the end, he invests more faith in Owen himself than he invests in God -- he receives two visitations from Owen beyond the grave -- and he concludes the novel by making Owen something of a Prince of Peace, asking God to allow Owen's resurrection and return to Earth.
whites down by their capacity to suffer, and ‘non-violence weakens the oppressor’s morale and exposes his defenses. And at the same time it works on his conscience’. He was against violence and said it ‘destroys everybody’, and repeated that violence would not help the people. situation, instead it would instigate white violence. So when the 3,300 black men, women and children were peacefully demonstrating for civil rights, they were attacked by the police with tear gas, fire.
The black rage is activated through the continual disavowed manner of which black people’s humanity is called into question. GC laments, “To be regarded always as subhuman is a stultifying experience.” Black rage is the result of a constant disengagement of seeing the worth of a person. GC realizes that in order for black people to overcome such trauma there must be an outlet. Black rage is the outlet from which they notice that black people deal with the hopelessness. The genius in thier estimation is that black folks find theses outlets in so many different ways –church, barbershop, home and a myriad of other places. Oftentimes these places are fortitudes of solace that solidify status to a people who have been deemed
The essay of Debra Dickerson’s “Who Shot Johnny?” she explains how Americans only see the gangster, uneducated, homeless, careless black community and doesn’t
The way Staples structures this essay emphasizes his awareness of the problem he faces. The essay’s framework consists mostly of Staples informing the reader of a scenario in which he was discriminated against and then following it with a discussion or elaboration on the situation. This follow-up information is often an expression stating comprehension of his problem and than subtitle, logical criticisms toward it. For example, Staples describes women “fearing the worst of him” on the streets of Brooklyn. He then proceeds to declare that he understands that “women are particularly vulnerable to street violence, and young black males are drastically overrepresented among the perpetrators of that violence.” Staples supports this statement with information about how he had witnessed gang violence in Chester, Pennsylvania and saw countless black youths locked away, however, Staples pronounces that this is no excuse for holding every young black man accountable, because he was an example of a black man who “grew up one of the good boys” coming “to doubt the virtues of intimidation early on.” This narrative structure highlights that Staples is not a hypocrite because he is not show ignorance toward the problem he is addressing unlik...
In 2014, Dr. Wallace Best wrote a candid article for the Huffington Post discussing what he deemed as the irrational fear of black bodies. The context surrounding this critique stemmed from the surge of black men dying by white police officers. In the article, Dr. Best provided historical insight into this deeply rooted, unwarranted anxiety that white Americans have used as probable cause to commit violent acts against blacks, as well as systemic control over black men as a means of protection to maintain societal order. With this assertion, Dr. Best offered a critical analysis in understanding the fanatical need to preserve ownership over black movement due to this ubiquitous threat of black skin and the African American male. However, what
In White Teeth, Zadie Smith warns against the dangers of purism and letting cultural background completely shape one’s identity while simultaneously paying tribute to the rich heritage and beliefs of her characters. It is a cautionary tale for immigrants but is never dismissive of their past. Smith is merely advising against tunnel vision and stressing the need to adapt to one’s environment. She shows the beauty that can stem from adaptation while warning that an inability to do so will lead to one’s downfall. London plays an especially important role as the battleground where the past and the present clash; a melting pot with a large immigrant population and inevitable moral struggle.
Geoffrey Blainey is one of the most prominent historian in Australian. He was once described by Professor Graeme Davison, the Head of Historical Studies in Monash University as the most prolific, wide-ranging, and controversial of Australia's living historians (Davison, Hirst & Macintyre 2001, p. 74). Born in Melbourne on 11th March 1930, Blainey was graduated from the University of Melbourne, the same university where he was held the Dean of the Faculty of Art during his controversial speech in 1984 which resulted Blainey being the subject to threats of violence and eventually resigned from the position. He has published close to 40 books between 1954 to 2015 and his works on shaping the major themes of Australian history are hailed by Allsop
In this narrative essay, Brent Staples provides a personal account of his experiences as a black man in modern society. “Black Men and Public Space” acts as a journey for the readers to follow as Staples discovers the many societal biases against him, simply because of his skin color. The essay begins when Staples was twenty-two years old, walking the streets of Chicago late in the evening, and a woman responds to his presence with fear. Being a larger black man, he learned that he would be stereotyped by others around him as a “mugger, rapist, or worse” (135).
This can be seen especially in the selective and biased evidence that he choses as a supportive material for his argument that “whites are becoming black”. He refers to the TV host David Lammy as an “archetypical successful black man” whom he believes, speaks with a white accent. This associates success with being white hence causing outrage within the audience due to the undertone of white being linked to sophistication and goodness and black being linked to violence and backwardness. Moreover, Owen James, a fellow guest, also spots Starkey’s selectivity and points out that he is making a false analogy. However Starkey ignores James and continues on with his biased argument thus showing the audience his close mindedness. Additionally, David Starkey also claims that the other guest, Dreda Mitchell ‘speaks white’ by saying, “you don’t speak like them”. This, as she points out, further creates a sense of them vs. us hence leading to more riots and a divided country. Furthermore, Starkey claims that “a substantial section of the chavs have become black” and goes on to gives the example of the Olympic star bearer who uses slang, which he believes is representative of black culture, as she was caught looting. Again here it is possible to see the manner in which the black community is being equated with violence and the cause of the riots. This causes an indignant mood within the audience as Dreda Mitchell’s again reminds David Starkey patois language and rap music are fundamentally rich in
Richard Quinney is an American philosopher and criminologist who is best known for his approach in criminal justice research. Quinney held his career in the study of crime, law, deviance, and social problems. According to the video upload by Am Soc of Criminology, the spokesman John Laub stated that: Quinney is particularly well known for his work in criminological theory for his outstanding contribution to criminology professor Quinney was awarded the Edwards from the American society of criminology in 1984 (Criminology). Criminological Theory targets why individuals commit crimes and why they behave in certain situations such as killing, stealing, and other forms of breaking the law. The spokesman John Laub also stated that Criminological Theory, in fact, is a very important work in 1964 looking at the year urban Corletta serve of crime, Quinney
Whenever a tragedy like the non-indictment of 12-year-old Tamir Rice’s killers happens, the racists inevitably come out to do battle with activists posting indignant Facebook statuses, eager to deflect attention to police officers killing black children to the specter of “black-on-black crime.”