Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is important of education
The purpose of college education
What is important of education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is important of education
The importance of attending an institute of higher learning continues to grow as the job market becomes more competitive, and a diploma is essentially required to compete in it. However, with the growing demand for college and university successful students the concept of education has become clouded. In two commencement speeches, one by David Sedaris and the other by David Wallace, this concept of what education means and how it is viewed by the individual student is discussed as well as the process of thinking. David Seders, in his speech What I Learned, writes in a satirical format based on how education is being viewed. David Wallace in his commencement speech addresses the process of thinking and being self-aware with a college education. …show more content…
However the satirical format of David Sedaris brings a comical theme to a serious light. Sedaris writes the way he does to show how attending an institution of higher learning nowadays is viewed as solely attaining a diploma and a job, whereas he believes, as does Wallace, that it is the process of thinking that needs to be sought after. Sedaris argues that the most important thing you get out of college isn't tangible and never will be.
Its the education itself and how your idea of thinking changes, ultimately that is most valuable asset once you leave college. Sedaris writes how “The alchemy majors wanted to know how much money they'd be making after graduation.” Sedaris considers this a a very narrow minded view of your present self as your only worry is the unknowing success of your future. Also he would claim that it is a very limited view of your life and your future, because your not compelled to learn for your sake but rather for your future money’s sake. Wallace would coincide with Sedaris’ statement stating how “If you worship money you will never have enough of it”(34) Wallace claims that the money and rich that people strive for is inferior to the education and knowledge that can be achieved. Both Sedaris and Wallace value education higher then job security or money completely overlooking the reason for attending college; to learn how to …show more content…
think. Sedaris seeks to amuse with the satirical way of writing his speech in order to argue on how education is associated with growth but also corruption.
Sedaris throughout his speech writes in a humorous form, if it’s from claiming he went to school before jesus, to studying patricide and matricide. Sedaris writes how he “Enjoyed pillaging and astrology”(2) to reveal the absurdity of classes that had nothing to do with his real major. He says that these classes show how modern education requires students to take unreasonable classes only to never have them be relevant in their lives again. He also uses satire to describe parents, arguing how parents of college students are naive when it comes to their children studies. Sedaris’ own parents said “You’re going to study literature and get a job doing what? Literaturizing?”(Sedaris) Sedaris would claim how parents force feed their children a way of thinking. However attending an institute of higher learning requires one to think for themselves, be self aware as Wallace would say. Wallace would respond to Sedaris’ father by proclaiming that a parent should have no say when it comes to the self awareness of a student arguing how judging a student about his thoughts and beliefs is corrupting to his self awareness. These satirical remarks that sedaris uses publishes the role of parents taking away the education from their children. Both authors would agree that the students who have decisions made by their parents are going to college for the wrong reason and that instead it should be for selfish
matters. Students should go to to college to become more self aware and build on their thinking as sedaris satire confesses. Wallace would argue that the transition of satirical to seriousness in Sedaris’ essay is a result of him deciding what has meaning to him and what doesn’t have meaning to him. Sedaris uses satire in his speech until his graduation from college where a serious undertone sets in; “In time my father stopped wearing his Princeton gear. My mother stopped talking about my potential, and she and my dad got themselves a brown-and-white puppy.”(3) This change of tone from satire to seriousness shows the transition of Sedaris and his own process of thought. Wallace would point out that this transition is a matter of Sedaris choosing what has meaning to him. Wallace would respond to Sedaris saying “If you cannot not exercise this kind of choice in adult life you will be totally hosed.”(33) Sedaris had not figured out what has meaning to him and what he valued. This changes as Sedaris comes full circle and decides what has meaning to him and not. Princeton, he found superficial though their modesty, however he saw the meaning of the university, his parents, and what he learned there; “What had started as…out me through Princeton.”(Sedaris 4)
It may come as no surprise to some that a quality education has the power to provide, for those who seek it, the opportunity of personal and professional transformation. It can be said that a society which encourages higher education is more likely to yield a population of individuals who are civic minded and purposeful as opposed to a society which does not. In an article entitled “What Can College Mean? – Lessons from the Bard Prison Institute, author Ellen Condiffe Lagemann supports the importance of a liberal arts education but also presents the case that quality education in the United States is not available to all.
It should not be a surprise that many people believe that a college degree is a necessity in today’s world. We are taught to believe this at a young age. The average citizen will not question this statement due to how competitive the job market has become, yet does graduating college guarantee more success down the road? Peter Brooks is a scholar at Princeton University and publisher of an essay that questions the value of college. He obviously agrees that college can help securing a job for the future, but questions the humanities about the education. He uses other published works, the pursuit of freedom, and draws on universal arguments that pull in the reader to assume the rest of his essay has valid reasons.
The right and privilege to higher education in today’s society teeters like the scales of justice. In reading Andrew Delbanco’s, “College: What It Was, Is, and Should Be, it is apparent that Delbanco believes that the main role of college is to accommodate that needs of all students in providing opportunities to discover individual passions and dreams while furthering and enhancing the economic strength of the nation. Additionally, Delbanco also views college as more than just a time to prepare for a job in the future but a way in which students and young adults can prepare for their future lives so they are meaningful and purposeful. Even more important is the role that college will play in helping and guiding students to learn how to accept alternate point of views and the importance that differing views play in a democratic society. With that said, the issue is not the importance that higher education plays in society, but exactly who should pay the costly price tag of higher education is a raging debate in all social classes, cultures, socioeconomic groups and races.
Based on Three Reasons College Still Matters, there are three main reasons why a college education is so important. From an economical standpoint, an education is most of the time needed to earn enough money to live comfortably. Attending and completing college provides a possibility for future economic stability. Within a highly competitive workforce a college degree can put a foot in the door to a job of a person’s choice. Statistics show that people who obtain a bachelor’s degree or higher get paid more than those who do not obtain one. Many question the worth of a college degree because of how expensive it is, though some say that the money spent is an investment on a person’s future. One can say that the worth of a college education is within the eye of the beholder. Many q...
Doing something you’re good at, and learning the different skills that will help you better yourself in the job are more important that what you could learn in a school. College isn’t for everyone, but you can learn just as much without it. Nothing beats, “The satisfaction of being good at what does for a living” (Murray 237). Education is important, it’s been taught since before Kindergarten that a good education will open more doors. And that’s true, however there are also a number of things that you learn through hard work that can’t be taught, instead “work smart...make every move count” (Rose
During my first few days of sophomore year at Stuyvesant High School, I saw how the ways of thinking were diverse in each of my classes. In my European Literature class, where, in our first reading assignment, we questioned the purpose of education itself. I always went with the flow in my learning, and never stopped to say to myself, “Why am I doing this to myself?”. However, once I read Live and Learn by Louis Menand, I started to think about Menand’s three theories of college and juxtapose each of them to my experience so far in high school. In the end, I concluded that many of my classes followed the main points of Theory 2, which was the theory that I mostly agreed with when I read the article for the first time.
It is Addison’s belief that one enters the college experience as a rookie (Addison 213). This theory contradicts Murray’s thought that not every person would benefit from a college-level liberal education. Addison also believes that ...
The conflict on how students should be taught and how well is addressed in the book, College: What It Was, Is, And Should Be by Andrew Delbanco. The book addresses what college is for, describes the origins of colleges, and explains who goes and who does not. Colleges started with a religious aspect and have formed the foundation of contemporary, liberal education. Colleges are also meant to help an individual understand what inspires them and understand the social implications of ideas. Delbanco says that learning should bring to bear in a situation where students have to respect, consult and aid each other. This point is highlighted when Delbanco declares, “A college should not be a haven from worldly contention, but a place where young people fight out among and within themselves contending ideas of the meaningful life, and where they discover that self-interest need not be at ...
As students around the world have reached the end of their high school career all must choose to go into the work force or college for a higher education. As generations have progressed it seems now the only option for our youth is to get a college degree. Now it seems almost all jobs that pay at or above salary in the United States acquire some form of higher education. The articles The New Liberal Arts, College Prepares People for Life, and Hidden Intellectualism are only a few of many essays/articles that dive into the subject of college, and the impact it may or may not have on one’s future.
In addition, the writer of “The Benefits of a College Degree” wrote that”One of the most important and obvious reasons to earn a college degree is to increase your earning potential”(“The Benefits”). While it is true that college is indubitably expensive, the years of learning a particular trade or skill for the future of career of these students is important and worth the cost. Also, students can apply for a variety of scholarships for different amounts of money to help pay for college and lower the amount of debt caused by schooling. Furthermore, multiple students believe that a college education is not needed for their future and that they can get good paying jobs without it. This philosophy does not apply to any good paying careers with the exception of the military and some construction jobs. The good paying jobs require at least a bachelor’s degree in many cases, except for a few that require an
Something I have always known since I was a little kid is that the educational system in this country is a complete fraud. American schools claim to live by the ideal of No Child Left Behind, but millions of students get cast aside each and every year. In schools these days, it is obvious which students are the elite—those that are raised up and motivated to go to college—and the ordinary student— those that are somewhat ignored throughout their schooling and are lucky if they even earn a GED. As a recent graduate of high school, and a product of this country’s educational system, I have had the opportunity to develop my own opinions regarding the myth of education in our society. Based upon my observations going through the school system, and the various arguments posed by several authors in “Rereading America”, I strongly believe that schooling in this society caters solely to students in the elite category while ostracizing students that do not live up to the elitist ideal.
Studying a university degree is one of the biggest achievements of many individuals around the world. But, according to Mark Edmunson, a diploma in America does not mean necessarily studying and working hard. Getting a diploma in the United States implies managing with external factors that go in the opposite direction with the real purpose of education. The welcome speech that most of us listen to when we started college, is the initial prank used by the author to state the American education system is not converging in a well-shaped society. Relating events in a sarcastic way is the tone that the author uses to explain many of his arguments. Mark Edmunson uses emotional appeals to deliver an essay to the people that have attended College any time in their life or those who have been involved with the American education system.
Education, to me means the ability to obtain knowledge about the world and finding yourself through each learning experience. Through the media and the walls of a class room I have found myself being more educated in society and my self surrounds. Education is a chance for a brighter future and finding a better You. Frank Bruni’s opening question in his New York Times “Op-Ed” piece, “College’s Priceless Value: Higher Education, Liberal Arts and Shakespeare,” and James Baldwin’s “A Talk to Teachers” both relate to my own experiences in different ways. Bruni’s article gave me a goal on what I want to become and Baldwin’s passage gave a more thorough explanation on what I have learned and achieving an identity through the questions about society. Douglass and Freire made me rethink some of my past choices and I have I realized
How do we get educated? To most, education is an arduous slog through school; starting with simple stories about naughty rabbits swapping bologna sandwiches. As we grow, we move on to more and more intellectual pursuits- onward to ancient kings being depressed. By the time we graduate we are ready for a life as a ‘productive member of society’. One may find themselves wondering where that shift is from ignorant to educated. Most people will tell you it comes when you graduate high school, some will argue that it will not happen until you become a parent, others will say it never happens. David Foster Wallace and Mike Rose believe that being educated is not a matter of how well you have been educated, but how you grow as a person. Mike Rose’s life experiences illustrate this perfectly.
The idea of education has been a big part of each and every culture on earth. However, as we all know, there are many questions on what it means to be educated in the form of higher education: questions we, as students, must face sooner or later. Here I am, my junior year in college. In a couple of years, I will be either prolonging my education or out in the real world trying to make a living. I must ask myself these questions: What is the purpose of my higher education? What exactly am I learning? Is the education I am receiving here at the University of Arkansas going to be good enough for a future employer? If I am educated does that mean I am trained to do only one thing? Am I one-dimensional?