David Bohr's Catholic Moral Decision Making

977 Words2 Pages

David Bohr, author of Catholic Moral Tradition, gives the reader an outline and foundation as to what this Catholic moral tradition is and the function it has within the Catholic Church. Bohr defines the moral tradition as one being challenged “to put into the practice the intimate communion of life and love we share with the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit through faith and baptism.” In simpler terms, it allows one to apply the teachings of the Triune God to their life on Earth. Throughout history, theologians have developed various arguments and doctrines that are now implemented in to the Catholic moral tradition. One that we can call to mind is Augustine of Hippo. Augustine explores the whole notion of what happiness is and how one can live a happy life. We can see that Augustine’s teachings are the cornerstone of the Catholic moral tradition; more specifically seen in the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops document on morality.
Bohr goes into …show more content…

For a moral act to be considered plausible, there are three foundations that are considered. The first being the objective act, which involves what the person is doing and their purpose. Objective acts are a key component for one to be able to receive love, which is seen in the arguments made by Augustine. The next credential is the subjective goal, which poses the question, why one is performing the act. The Catholic moral tradition says that love is not entirely based off the subjective aspect of the moral, but is still needed. The third and final element that a moral act consists of is the situation within the act. Some acts on the other hand do not require all three fundamentals because evil by default (i.e. murder). We can see that these teachings in the Catholic moral tradition are also present in Augustine’s, hence making his teachings a point of

Open Document