Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Aristotle principles of virtue ethics
Experiencing other cultures
Virtue ethics of aristotle
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Aristotle principles of virtue ethics
Aristotle would not approve of David and Julia’s relationship because adultery, by nature, contradicts the essence of virtue ethics. Virtues can be defined by characteristics like honesty, integrity, faithfulness, and compassion. Aristotle defines the word “ethic” as a creation of virtuous habits; and by religiously practicing such virtue until it is imbedded into their DNA, will yield positive influences to one’s character. On the contrary, this behavior negatively affects their character when a vice is practiced, such as adultery - encompassing vices like betrayal, dishonesty, and guilt.
Assuming that David and Julia’s affair lasted at least a few years, given an ambiguous timeline of their relation, it can be argued that during this period
…show more content…
The first formulation states that one should, “act only on that maxim whereby thou canst at the same time will that it should become a universal law” (Kant 307). Universalizing adultery under, David and Julia’s situation, would permit married individuals to engage in intercourse with others, aside their partners, whenever they feel unhappy. If one were to will this maxim to become a universal law, it would contradict itself because it would deteriorate the integrity of marriages. Although sex is not the only reason two people should get married, it does, however, symbolize an intimate and private relationship sacred to that pair. Universal adultery would not constitute an appropriate maxim and therefore imposes no duty to adhere to such …show more content…
Julia has stated several times that she feels guilty for what she is doing behind the back of her family, confirming what she already knows to be unethical. The idea of the Infinite creates a sense of obligation to thy neighbor. Levinas argues that because humans are intrinsically insatiable, the desire they seek is beyond what is tangible. Whatever the object may be, it is only obtainable through cultivating relationship with thy neighbors and enacting justice and compassion. Lastly the Infinitude of the Other is the realization that there is no self without the other, because everyone is or was dependent on someone. Having the ability to think requires one to know a language; a language that has been taught to us by someone else. In theory, if an individual has a cognitive ability to internally think, then they are dependent upon someone
Richard Wasserstrom argues the theory of open marriage is not acknowledged as immoral by the virtue of not breaking the conditions and principles in adultery and morality defined by
McKeating, Henry. “Sanctions Against Adultery in Ancient Israelite Society with Some Reflection on Methodology in the Study of Old Testament Ethics.” Journal for the Study of the OldTestament. Vol. XVII (Mar. 1979).
Clearly, this essay has shown that the main factors which impact upon adultery being acceptable is being loyal, loving, and forgiveness. Adultery in all reality is actually a terrible thing and is frowned upon, but The Crucible and The Scarlet Letter prove adultery is acceptable in many ways. Life is like a pen, so any mistake made will never be able to be erased or taken back.
Aristotle’s virtuous person and Kant’s moral worth have two different meanings. Kant and Aristotle, from different times, have different ways of looking at what makes people make the best decisions. Coming from different sides of ethics in Deontology and virtue ethics, they agree and disagree with each other as most other schools of ethical thought do as well. After stating both their positions, I will prove that Kant’s view of morality is more correct than Aristotle’s view of the person.
In today’s society, adultery is not viewed as it would have been viewed back in the 1600’s. Adultery is defined as a voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and a person who is not his or her spouse. In society today, people understand that it is not right to commit adultery, despite knowing that it is often done more. Adultery is committed more now, in the view of its not a punishable act, as it was in the 1600’s. Committing adultery in the 1600’s was considered committing one of the sins that can not be forgiven. Many people were killed for this type of act, however as generations past people begin to view adultery differently.
Its primary aim is to praise and blame and it deals with excellence, goodness, shame, nobility, honor and matters of vice and virtue. According to Aristotle, virtue comprises courage, justice, magnificence, liberality, self-control, magnanimity, gentleness and wisdom that is speculative.
17, No. 3, p. 252-259. Urmson, J.O., (1988). Aristotle’s Ethics (Blackwell), ch.1. Wilkes, K.V., (1978). The Good Man and the Good for Man in Aristotle’s Ethics. Mind 87; repr.
To begin with, Aristotle tells us his meaning of virtues and vices. They are not just any habits that we experience, but the outcome of what we feel as pleasure or pain. A virtuous person feels pleasure at the most beautiful action. A person who is not virtuous will feel their pleasure misleading. the definition of virtue is a behavior showing high moral standards or good characteristics. Virtues comes as a consequence of following the right habits. There are two different types of virtues: Intellectual and moral. To have virtues you have to have intellectual morals. This means you ethically do things on your own, you comprehend what doing, and realizing why you doing it. Aristotle says we can describe virtu...
These two examples can demonstrate how each person can use the two formulations of the Categorical Imperative to decide whether a maxim is moral or not. Throughout Kant’s, Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, some questionable ideas are portrayed. These ideas conflict with the present views of most people living today. Works Cited Kant, Immanuel.
Virtue theory is the best ethical theory because it emphasizes the morality of an individual in which their act is upon pure goodness and presents as a model to motivate others. Aristotle was a classical proponent of virtue theory who illustrates the development habitual acts out of moral goodness. Plato renders a brief list of cardinal virtues consisting of wisdom, temperance, courage, and justice. This ethical theory prominently contradicts and links to other theories that personifies the ideal being. However, virtue theorists differ from their own expression of these qualities yet it sets a tone that reflects on the desire to express kindness toward others.
Aristotle's ethics consist of a form of virtue ethics, in which the ethical action is that which properly complies with virtue(s) by finding the mean within each particular one. Aristotle outlines two types of virtues: moral/character virtues and intellectual virtues. Though similar to, and inspired by, Plato and Socrates’ ethics, Aristotle's ethical account differs in some areas.
To achieve this topic, I have sectioned my paper into three main sections, in which I have subsections supporting. In the first section, I will provide much information about Aristotle and his beliefs in virtue and obtaining happiness. Using information from his book of ethics I will provide examples and quote on quote statements to support his views. In the second section, I will provide my agreements as to why I relate and very fond of Aristotle’s book of Nicomachean Ethics. In the third section, I will provide research as to why there are such objections to Aristotle’s book of ethics, and counter act as to why I disagree with them. Lastly I will conclude much of my and as well as Aristotle’s views on ethics and why I so strongly agree with this route of ethics for humans.
s turn towards Aristotelians’ approach to defining what character and virtue mean. In Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotelian is defined. Character is about a current state of being and action. In virtue ethics “character traits are stable, fixed, and reliable dispositions.” This means that a person with a specific character trait is constant in their actions. So someone who is honest is constantly honest in any situation whether or not it is easy. We are born with “natural tendencies” that help shape our character. Our environment can mold and create our character in a positive or a negative way. As a result character is a long progress. In life we tend to look up to older people to be our role models in life. These role models help us to become
Aristotle, argued that he could not judge a person on the basis of one example and wanted to look at the whole over time. Additionally he argued virtue was found between the extremes of each characteristic. Balance between the extremes of emotion was his main concern (Manning and Stroud 59). Virtue ethics requires one to strive for excellence, a process that happens over a long period of time. It includes learning about ethics, struggling with them, and eventually living ethically (Class
MacIntyre acknowledges historical accounts of virtue and analyzes how they have become incompatible with theories of virtue and he concludes that these contrasting views are attributable to various practices that create differing conceptions of virtues and the virtues that are behind moral traditions. MacIntyre has argued for a radical change in the way that morality is viewed in regards to tradition. Whether it is a call for change the emphasis obligations, there is a return to a general comprehension of ethics or a tradition that unifies the practices that generate virtues. In the views of MacIntyre, he believes that if an individual follows tradition, then are achieving moral progress. Since MacIntyre upholds the view of an Aristotelian, if an individual upholds tradition in virtue ethics they are making moral progress. To be a virtuous person, one must fulfill the tasks of a virtuous person. It is important to acknowledge that a moral character particularly one who upholds a living moral tradition develops over a period of time. People are born with different natural tendencies; some may be positive tendencies such as friendliness and some may be negative tendencies such as jealousy. These tendencies are and can be encouraged and grow or thwart because of the influences an individual may exposed to when growing up. There are factors that play a vital role in this