Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sexual identity stereotypes
Sexual identity stereotypes
Sexual identity stereotypes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sexual identity stereotypes
In the popular press article titled “The Science of Dating: Wear Red” Professor Andrew Elliot makes the claim that the reason the color red increases attraction in human males towards females is due to biological impulses and cultural influences (Luscombe, 2010). The professor makes the claim that societal use of red to symbolize sexuality, lust and passion influences how we perceive the color. Additionally, Professor Andrew claims that primal biological impulses influence how we perceive the color due to the fact that from an evolutionary perspective, a red rear end symbolizes that the female is in heat (Luscombe, 2010. After reading the original scientific article, which the popular press article was based on, I choose to reject the claim that the …show more content…
This decision is based on the fact that the popular press article recreated the experiments without a control group, the experiment lacked standardized phrases and the claim made in the article was not supported by the experiments conducted.
The lack of a control group in the popular press article made the results unreliable. Without a control group, how did the researchers know when a group exhibited more or less of a certain behavior? Contrast this with the original experiment where the researchers included a control group by making sure that the colors used matched in lightness and chroma (Kayser, Elliot, & Feltman, 2010). By making sure that the colors matched in lightness and chroma, the researchers were able to rule out confounding variables that might’ve affect the results. Controlling for the aforementioned confounding variables allowed the researchers to come to the conclusion that the effect observed was due to the color and not due to lightness or chroma (Kayser et al., 2010). However, in the popular press experiment, the researchers conducted the experiments with a woman wearing red or
"...the effect is a tendency toward lighter complexions, especially among the more active elements in the race. Some might claim that this is a tacit admission of colored people among themselves of their own inferiority judged by the color line. I do not think so. What I have termed an inconsistency is, after all, most natural; it is, in fact, a tendency in accordance with what might be called an economic necessity. So far as racial differences go, the United States puts a greater premium on color, or better, lack of color, than upon anything else in the world."
... understand the motives behind dehumanization and possible cause of dehumanization, and clearly the benefits of this research outweighed, if any, harm done to the participants. There was no real deception involved in this experiment. The participants were given informed consent. The instructions were clear, though they did not know what the experimenters were looking for; nonetheless I did not observe any true deception involved in this experiment. The participants were all debriefed at the end of the experiments, and seeing this, the experiments were clearly all ethical.
The negative aspect about this study is that it did not consist of a control group to demonstrate if the experimental group in fact had a substantial outcome on the social roles of the participants. Zimbardo definitely was not able to compare the experimental group with the control group in consideration that he was not capable to contrast the product of the experiment to that of the control group throughout his
The romantic red effect is the concept of men being more attractive and having more sexually desires for women that are wearing red. This effect fits within the color-in-context theory because the perception of the color red has many meanings. (*or women see other women wearing red, they do not feel the same way as men) The color-in-context is concept that states that a color can have different implications based on the various contexts. The color red acts as an aphrodisiac, which is a sexual desire, because it supports romance within heterosexual interplay. The color red might have different effects in various situations depending on how they perceive it. For some, the color red could automatically be linked to failure. Others may see red
The meaning, significance, and definition of race have been debated for centuries. Historical race concepts have varied across time and cultures, creating scientific, social, and political controversy. Of course, today’s definition varies from the scientific racism of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries that justified slavery and later, Jim Crow laws in the early twentieth. It is also different from the genetic inferiority argument that was present at the wake of the civil rights movement. However, despite the constantly shifting concepts, there seems to be one constant that has provided a foundation for ideas towards race: race is a matter of visually observable attributes such as skin color, facial features, and other self-evident visual cues.
It is said that because he chose his participants the findings are not accurate. However, researches have argued that Milgram’s study has been replicated in other cultures and the majority has come to the same conclusion (McLeod, 2007). Therefore, it is not believed the findings would be any different regardless of an ethnic or cultural group because other cultures have conducted the test and have the same conclusion. Furthermore, in some situations women may react differently than men. The gender of a person of the specific study was that of men, in which it would be difficult to determine if these findings are accurate for all of
Going into details of the article, I realized that the necessary information needed to evaluate the experimental procedures were not included. However, when conducting an experiment, the independent and dependent variable are to be studied before giving a final conclusion.
In a sociocultural perspective, the color red would have an effect on others because group norms guide our thought and behavior. If all people wearing red were considered promiscuous because of a societal norm, we will also view red as promiscuous. In a bio-social perspective, the color red would have an effect on people’s perception of others because the thoughts and behaviors have been passed down genetically. Therefore, if our ancestors believed that seeing red was attractive, we may believe the same because we have inherited that thought and behavior. In a behaviorism perspective, the color red would have an effect on people’s perception of others because organisms are designed to seek pleasure and avoid pain. If the color red can give us our biological or psychological needs – such as food or sex – we will tend to seek it; however, if the color red is of something detrimental to our well being – such as signs of danger – we will avoid
I found the problem with the argument of the article was there was no set argument that was clearly stated. If there was an argument in the article it was not clearly stated and I personally did not catch onto it. Altogether this was a well written article without a clear argument.
That alone provides a great source of credibility to the paper. The idea that this is an author who has done the research, gathered the numbers, and analyzed the data, allows the reader to rest in the idea that they are reading a valid article, and receiving good, hard, evidence. Twenge also uses a very logical tone throughout her article, maintaining the idea that the data is as clear as day, and that there is no disproving it; the numbers show true facts.
... it is new in their development of color. Some limitations may be order effects of pairs given to each participant or the age of individuals. Participants three weeks old may be too “old” to identify before color development starts and it seems unethical to test a 1 week old. Another huge factor that could have given more clearly concise results would have been to conduct a longitudinal study to find exactly mark at which they begin to view the color green.
...experiment, felt that the experiment made such a deep impression on him that he became convinced that “social sciences and psychology, are much more important in today’s world.'; One can only imagine the inner conflicts that were running through his head. After the experiment, he described the mood, “I did want to stop at that time. I turned around and looked at [the experimenter]. I guess it’s a matter of…authority.';
A fundamental aspect of psychology is the concept that psychology is empirical. The premise of psychology being empirical essentially states that psychology’s conclusions are drawn from one’s direct observations as opposed to one’s reasoning, speculation, core beliefs or common sense (Weiten, 2014). This approach relies on scientific experiments and the experimental method. The experimental method, essentially, is where an investigator creates a testable hypothesis, accordingly adjusts a single variable (experimental group) under carefully monitored conditions, then observes whether any changes have occurred on a second variable (control group). Neither Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Study nor Milgram Obedience Study met the traditional
Pink is for girls and blue is for boys. Isn’t that a stereotype we deal with from the time we escape the womb? Gender is part of our social structure, just as race and class are. When applied to Camara Phyllis Jones ' article, "The Gardener 's Tale," men are the red flowers and women are the pink. From the moment of birth, men and women are put into different pots. (UK essays,2015). For decades Psychologist have been conducting experiments to determine what has an effect on a person’s gender identity. Their conclusions show that biological influences, environmental influences, social learning theory and gender schema theory all have some type of effect on gender identity. There are many sides to Nature vs. Nurture, specifically when it comes to gender identity. However, both sides discussed here agree that nature and
So, I was disappointed to see that I prefer Blacks over Whites. On the other hand, it’s not that I support Whites over Blacks. Instead, I wanted my test to show an impartial outcome, where I am akin to Blacks and Whites. Conversely, according to David Perrett, there is a logical reason why some are favored over others. Spelled out in his book, In Your Face: The New Science of Human Attraction, Perrett documents the evolution of the human face and how our brain mechanism analyzes faces and attractiveness, which in turn affects how we respond to others. For instance, “The relationship between beauty and health is inconclusive; Perrett reports studies that show the influence on facial fat (less attractive) and skin colour (oxygen- and carotenoid-rich skin is more attractive) on attractiveness ratings.” Although we can’t unwire how we are programmed, if Perrett’s findings are accurate, we can expose ourselves to what’s unlike us to study and appreciate the