Color Vision Development in Infants: The Responsibility of Cone Types and Wavelength in Order of Color Development
It is a wonderful thing to witness a sunset and see all the various colors that occur in our world. What would it be like if we didn’t view the sunset with all the beautiful colors that are perceived in it? According to Brown, Lindsey, Mcsweeney, and Walters, (1994) without factoring in brightness, newborn infants cannot differentiate between colors. This was found by testing infants in forced-choice preferential looking experiments or FPL experiments (Brown et al., 1994). It is astonishing to think that we haven’t always viewed the world in various vibrant colors. So at what point do we as individuals develop full color vision?
It was determined that infants develop color vision at or around three months of age and that when final results were evaluated and compared to adult (only) measures, actually have better quality color vision (Brown et al., 1994). An interesting study by Chase (1937) made efforts to discover the identities of color in which infants that aged 2 to 10 weeks old were tested to find out what colors they could perceive. The results they came up with were that very young infants could tell the difference between the primary colors and combinations but there were numerous limitations to the study (Chase, 1937). The study had placed infants to lie down and view a screen while observing eye movements (Chase, 1937). Findings by Franklin, Pilling, and Davies (2005) explain that color categorizing occurs in four month old infants and adults alike. A study by Bornstein, Kessen, & Weiskopf (1976) has supporting evidence that color is categorized in 4 month old infants and determined the boundaries within...
... middle of paper ...
... it is new in their development of color. Some limitations may be order effects of pairs given to each participant or the age of individuals. Participants three weeks old may be too “old” to identify before color development starts and it seems unethical to test a 1 week old. Another huge factor that could have given more clearly concise results would have been to conduct a longitudinal study to find exactly mark at which they begin to view the color green.
Conclusion
This study will enable individuals to get more precise, specific details on how color is developing in early infants. By making this information available to the public, it could help parents further understand their child and what changes are going on in the developmental stages. It could also help the consumer production by producing stimulating child toys at different stages of color development.
Marr, D. (1976). Early processing of visual information. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London Ser. B, 275, 483-524.
In the Radiolab episode “Colors,” Adam Cole hosts Jay Neitz, a neurologist and color vision researcher at the University of Washington, to discuss colorblindness in primates and humans. Neitz hypothesizes that the test they used to cure colorblindness in squirrel monkeys could also cure the same disorder in humans. Colorblindness is a genetic disorder that causes the cones in the eye to perceive colors differently. In the back of the eye lies the retina that holds three photoreceptor cells called cones. Each cone is sensitive to either red, green, or blue and when functional, allows the brain to process the different wavelengths of color. Humans and some primates have two genes on the X Chromosome that encodes visual pigments, one holds green
Colors of cretin things can appear different at some situations. For example, blood as we know it is red, that color that you see through your eyes of the blood in our veins is “red” but underwater, at 30 feet underneath the surface your blood turns, or rather appears green due to the light bouncing off of it is much less than it is at the surface as mentioned in the article “Did you know that your blood is green underwater?” by Fun Facts (see Article 2). These examples got me interested from the class discussions we had and how the philosophers viewed sense perception and the kind of thought they had of
In the beginning of the film, I suspected that color appeared after some loss of innocence. For example, I assumed that sex, or sexual awakenings, was the reason why they bega to gain color. An important aspect of this is when Jennifer exposes Skip to sex. Jennifer seems to know exactly what to do here, but Skip is relatively unsure. He has never experienced anything of the like before. However, he himself does not gain color until the very end of the film. While driving home, Skip notices a red rose. Roses are generally in considered a symbol of love and passion, and this was the very first object to gain ...
In 1794 he was elected a member of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society. There he read his papers and identified the phenomenon of colour blindness, which he and his brother shared. When showed a colour spectrum besides blue and purple Dalton was only able to recognise one other colour, yellow. Or as he says ?that part of the image which others call red appears to me little more than a shade or deflect of light. After that the orange, yellow and green seem one colour which descends pretty uniformly from an intense to a rare yellow, making what I should call different shades of yellow?
Carlos, JP. "Object Permanence: The 6 Stages in Infant Growth and Development." HubPages. N.p., 11 Novem 2012. Web. 2 Mar 2014. .
He suggests that when analyzing colors and their role in brain processes, we are misinterpreting the way it should be understood. When we speak about these sensations that are synonymous with the brain processes, it should be said as “There is something going on which is like what is going on when ____,” (149). In the case of seeing red as mentioned before, the statement would appear as “There is something going on which is like what is going on when I have my eyes open, am awake, and there is an emission of red cast from an object, that is, when I really see red." Ultimately, I do not believe this response is an adequate answer to the objection. It appears that Smart is merely altering the linguistic nature of the question rather than providing a solution to the problem. This “something” neutralizes the difference between a brain process and a sensation without giving a sound reason as to why or how they would be considered identical rather than
A common area of perception that many may not think about is the ability to recognize faces. Facial recognition, however, is not consistent from infancy to adulthood but develops throughout an individual’s life. During infancy, the ability to see detail is quite poor compared to the average adult (Goldstein & Brockmole, 2017). When objects are within close distances, studies have shown that infants are able to perceive and detect a few features of the object; this idea can then be related to facial recognition in infants (Goldstein & Brockmole, 2017). The details that infants are able to perceive are associated with contrast in light, especially the difference between dark and light areas. Though this does
Baillargeon, R., & Graber, M. (1987). Where’s the rabbit? 5.5 month-old infants’ representation of the height of a hidden object. Cognitive Development, 2, 375-392.
Although there is no way to treat colorblindness the people who have it have never known any different; it is not that big of a deal to them. I’m sure that people with colorblindness wonder what it’s like to see color the way other people see it, but t...
It is worth noting, according to Inman, that human beings have only three color-receptive cones, dogs have only 2, and butterflies which are near the top of the food chain have five color-receptive cones. Mantis Shrimps have even a better vision than butterflies with
In April 5, 1968 one day after the death of Martin Luther King, Jane Elliott tried to explain her third-grade students why Mr. King had been shot to death. He thought of an experiment that would help her explain that her students that the main reason was racial discrimination. The experiment was based on the idea that melanin was a chemical that cause intelligence, thus brown-eyed people were better than those with blue eyes. Children received specific instructions on how to act depending on the color of their eyes. During the experiment children took up the roles that they had been given.
However, categorical perception and its effects are not limited to auditory stimuli. As mentioned earlier, a categorical perception effect can also be seen in different kinds of visual stimuli.The perception of colors in a rainbow may be the most obvious example of CP. Even though a rainbow consists of many different wavelengths of visible light, observers only perceive distinct colors and not the full continuum of existing visible light (Goldstone, 2009). In addition to applying to relatively simple stimuli such as colors, categorical perception can also partially explain expertise in certain subject areas. Radiologists, for instance, are particularly skilled at spotting differences between X-Ray images. These experts have developed an ability to spot meaningful (cross-category)differences while minimizing irrelevant (within-category) ones (Goldstone, 1994). Categorical perception has also been demonstrated in facial expressions and basic shapes (Beale and Keil,
When we think of color vision, we imagine the variety of colors the human eye can see. Perhaps people may believe having color vision is a huge benefit for animals as opposed to having dichromatic or even monochromatic vision. If that would be the case, then why do not all the animals have color vision? A thought to keep in mind is what is the purpose of seeing color for animals. We will dive deeper into how color vision may play a role in the lives of animals and humans. The different groups of animals we will examine are the marine animals, wild Neotropical monkeys, primates, and humans as well.
The results showed that the older age groups could distinguish more colors in less levels of lighting than the younger age groups. The younger age groups would be considered 7 and under, while the other age groups would be considered the older age groups. The results of the experiment refuted the original hypothesis, which is: If age affects the amount of light needed to help distinguish colors, then younger ages will be able to distinguish colors in less lighting compared to older ages.