Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theory statement of Human Motivation
Theory statement of Human Motivation
Short note on self motivation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Theory statement of Human Motivation
Motivation can be most commonly defined as the reason or reasons one has for acting or behaving in a particular way. However, motivation according to Daniel H. Pink in his book Drive can be explained in several different ways. Motivation for me differs from these explanations as it is not only about rewards and punishment, but also about self-gratification. An example of something that personally motivates me in my endeavors is becoming successful in the future. Daniel H. Pink divides motivation into 3 categories; motivation 1.0, motivation 2.0, and motivation 3.0. Motivation 1.0 explains the theory that humans are biological creatures struggling to obtain basic needs for food, security, or sex. This theory is logical and I can somewhat agree with this. I agree with the idea that we are …show more content…
Pink describes motivation 2.0 as humans responding to rewards and punishments. He explained this theory was accurate for routine tasks however inaccurate and incompatible when tested with how we organize what we do, how we think about what we do, and how we do what we do. I can relate to this theory more so than the others. I believe I am mostly motivated by getting rewards. An example of this would be striving and doing as well as I can in school to reach my dream of becoming a CHP. This would be the biggest reward I can obtain in my life as I would not only become the man I aspire to be but to also make my family proud. This is what motivates me the most. As far as the inaccuracy of this theory I would agree that it is not comparable or compatible with the way I organize, think about, or take action in my life. Also, when I was younger, my parents would always bribe me with money, luxury, vacations to get things finished. It would be based off of something as small as cleaning up the house and around the house, doing good in school and making sure I have good grades, to winning my football or baseball game. The variations of the tasks were scattered and all
In the book Drive by Daniel H. Pink his argument is how motivation 3.0 differs from motivation 2.0 and how there is type I behavior as well as type X behavior. Type I behavior was people with intrinsic motivation who did not look for rewards to complete their tasks or assignments. Type X behavior was people with extrinsic motivation who need a reward to complete what they are asked. Motivation 2.0 was an operating system that used the method of “carrots and sticks” to either promote good behavior or greater progress in businesses. Through this method people were offered a reward for completing their task or a punishment if they failed to complete it. At the beginning it worked well, but then our economy started changing
In my future career I plan to use the Motivation 3.0 option because it allows employees the change to put their own spin on things and make them feel more important in the job itself. Autonomy, mastery and purpose are definitely the key aspects and they are the reason Motivation 3.0 has its perks such as creativity and freedom. Although I do see Pinks point in how carrots and sticks would work, but I do not believe there is enough evidence that it would be successful in a management or long term
What is motivation? According to text, motivation is defined as a set of factors that activate, direct, and maintain behavior, usually toward a certain goal. Motivation is the energy that makes us do things: this is a result of our individual needs being satisfied so that we have inspiration to complete the mission. These needs vary from person to person as everybody has their individual needs to motivate themselves. Depending on how motivated we are, it may further determine the effort we put into our work and therefore increase the standard of the productivity. There have been a wide variety of theories about motivation developed over the years. Several are drive-reduction theory, arousal theory, psychosocial (both incentive and cognitive) theory, and Maslow’s H...
In the book Drive by Dan pink he points out the three main factors that motivates us as humans. Dan uses a lot of evidence from lab experiments to prove this point as to why some beliefs about what motivates us as human isn’t technically correct. One of the experiments which Dan Pink proves to not be accurate is the carrot and stick experiment doesn’t work anymore. In his book the three factors of motivation Dan states are Purpose, Autonomy and Mastery. In his book Dan explains that as humans the idea that we are motivated by rewards and punishment (he also refers to it as motivation 2.0) is not true, he explains that as humans we are more diverse and complex than we think. As humans we have the desire to always know more we strive to know
The author trusts that all humans have some level of motivation as long as they exist. In turn, there are several well-known classic approaches that consider motivation such as instinct, drive reduction, arousal, incentive, and humanistic approaches. It is beyond the scope of this paper to describe all in detail, but a brief synopsis of each follows: (1) Instinct approach theorists suggest that humans have many diverse instincts that are biologically determined and cause innate patterns of behaviors such as reproducing, territorial protection, curiosity, acquisition, and fight, flight or freeze to name a few (McDougall, 1908). (2) Drive-reduction theory proposes that individuals have needs that are essential for survival and this need cause a tension to act called a drive. These drives entail primary drives for physical needs such as water and food, and acquired drives realized through conditioning or experience such as the need for income or social acceptance; whereas, one must meet the need to reduce the drive to return to a state of homeostasis (Hull, 1943). (3) Theorists who support an Arousal approach believe that humans are motivated by stimulation and people develop an optimal level of stimulus tension; whereas, task performances may suffer if the level is too high such as severe test anxiety or even too low such as boredom
Over the course of human civilization, we have transcended through at least two full stages of what drives our motivation. Originally, in motivation 1.0 (P. 30), our behavior was simple, what motivated us was the pursuit of food, shelter, and the desire to reproduce. This platform of motivation or human operating system was simple and worked effectively until the population of humanity grew so large that it became imperative for humans to interact with one another and work together i...
The author trusts that all humans have some level of motivation as long as they exist. In turn, there are several well-known classic approaches that consider motivation such as instinct, drive reduction, arousal, incentive, and humanistic approaches. It is beyond the scope of this paper to describe all in detail, but a brief synopsis of each follows: (1) Instinct approach theorists suggest that humans have many diverse instincts that are biologically determined and cause innate patterns of behaviors such as reproducing, territorial protection, curiosity, acquisition, and fight, flight or freeze to name a few (McDougall, 1908). (2) Drive-reduction theory proposes that individuals have needs that are essential for survival and this need cause a tension to act called a drive. These drives entail the primary drives for physical needs (water and food) and the acquired drives learned through experience or conditioning (need for money or social approval); whereas, one must meet the need to return to a state of homeostasis (Hull, 1943). (3) Theorists who support an Arousal approach believe that humans are motivated by stimulation and people develop an optimal level of stimulus tension; whereas, task performances may suffer if the level is too high such as severe test anxiety or even too low such as boredom (Teigen, 1994). (4) Incentive
What is motivation to you? Motivation to me is the process by which one is moved, whether the process is external or internal. It encourages one to do something they fear or achieve something good. It can bring about positive change or a negative reaction depending on the situation. The intouchables movie has many great examples of motivation. In this film Philippe is an extremely wealthy man who, after a paragliding accident became a quadriplegic. As as quadriplegic Philippe needed an around the clock caretaker to look after him, ironically out of all the men, he employs a poor man named Driss, who just got out of jail. Driss initially had no intention of being hired, and had applied for the job simply to be eligible for unemployment benefit. One could say that Driss was a selfish human being for only going to
What is Motivation? Motivation can be described as a driving force within us. It makes people try and achieve certain targets in order to satisfy a particular need or expectation. It makes an individual behave in a certain way and makes them make decisions to act in a certain way and to continue with these actions until they satisfy their needs and expectations.
According to Greenberg (1999) motivation is defined "as a process of arousing, directing and maintaining behaviour towards a goal." Where directing' refers to the selection of a particular behaviour; and maintenance' refers to the inclination to behave with consistency in that manner until the desired outcome is met.
Motivation characterized as the strategy that starts, guides, and keeps up goal-oriented behaviors. Motivation is what causes you to act, whether it is getting a glass of water to reduce thirst or perusing a book to increment your information.. What are the things that actually urges us to act? There are many theories of motivation that are viewed in different approaches. We have the instinct, drive-reduction, arousal, incentive, cognitive and Hierarchy of needs approaches.
There are many different ways of interpretation of the concept of motivation. To define motivation in general I relied on Oxford Dictionary (2017): “A reason or
According to Greenberg (1999), motivation is defined “as a process of arousing, directing and maintaining behavior towards a goal.” Where “directing” refers to the selection of a particular behavior; and ‘maintenance” refers to the inclination to behave with consistency in that manner until the desired outcome is met.
¡§Motivation¡¨ derives from the Latin verb ¡§movere¡¨ which means ¡§to move¡¨. Beck (2004, p.3) defined Motivation as an internal state which is the driving force that activates behaviour or gives directions to thoughts, feelings and actions of an organism.
Motivation is best defined as the needs, wants, and beliefs that drive an individual. It is the basis of what people work for and keeps them doing things they otherwise would never do. People act in a whole new manner when they are motivated by something. Motivation gives them a whole new perception of the task at hand. Motivation is not always positive though, and it does not always just come from one place, for example, your boss. Motivation can be negative by not receiving something, and contrary to popular belief it is not always money that motivates people to do what they do. People have different needs, wants, and desires and the finding what is most important to those individuals is the key to motivation. People and companies have used countless techniques and approaches to motivate others and employees, but what works for one person does not necessarily work for the other.