Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cyberbullying causes and effects
Cyberbullying should be considered a crime
Impacts cyberbullying has on individuals and society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cyberbullying causes and effects
P4, LA Every day, millions of people surf the web for educational and entertainment purposes. Now that more and more people are using technology on a daily basis, there has been much discussion on whether or not cyberbullies should be prosecuted for writing vulgar or inappropriate messages towards other people. Cyberbullies should not be prosecuted for the statements they make on social media. Prosecuting cyberbullies would infringe on American’s first amendment, squander taxes, and discourage citizen’s responsibility. Although prosecuting cyberbullies may be beneficial, this proposal would have many negative consequences. Initially, cyberbullies should not be prosecuted due to the fact that it would infringe upon the first amendment granting
citizens free speech. In the article “Sacrificing The First Amendment To Catch ‘Cyberbullies’” Kirk Sigmon said, “Like it or not, implicit within the text of the First Amendment is the right to be as cruel as one wants, right up to the point of libel or slander.” What Sigmon is portraying is that anyone has the right to say whatever he or she wants to say even up to the point where it is false or is threating. Hurting someone’s feelings in real life has never been considered a criminal act and saying it over social media should be treated no differently. Although prosecuting cyberbullies may reduce the number of offenders, this act would violate against people’s free speech. Clearly, cyberbullies should not be prosecuted due to their free speech. Furthermore, prosecuting cyberbullies would squander American taxes and consume valuable time in court houses. According to “The Ophelia Project”, 20% of youth ages ranging from 11-18 have been a victim of cyberbullying. Thus proving, more time would be needed for the use of courthouses in order to carry out these cyberbullying cases. The American people would have to pay more tax money towards the utilization of these courts and thus waste money that could be spent on more significant projects and helping those in need. These prosecutions would also take up lawyer’s time and effort when they could be spending their time on more important clients. While this may lower the number of cyberbullies, having each victim and offender being brought to court would waste American’s tax money. Indeed, cyber offenders should not be prosecuted because it would waste American taxes and valuable court time.
(6) Right to a transcript of the proceedings: The Supreme Court did not rule upon the issue of defendant’s right to receive a transcript.
People say that schools should limit students' online speech because cyber bullying hurts students so the schools need to protect their student their body.If the students get hurt, there are many civil laws that can protect them.There is no need to make specific laws that limit online speech .
The first reason individuals should be prosecuted for statements made online is because of physical consequences to the victim. Online the victim could be getting picked on and when they go to school they still get picked on and beat up. They might not want to go to school
The internet provides an opportunity for individuals all around the world to communicate with one another; although this privilege has created the major issue of cyber bullying. Cyber bullying is the use of social networking sites to harass, threaten or embarrass someone (Rouse, 2015 ). Well regarded author Richard Webster, asserts that over 80% of teenagers use social media regularly, (Webster, 2015 ) giving the notion that teenagers are major stakeholders. Queensland parliament offers a variety of laws in attempt to maintain order with cyber bullying, however Victoria offers fewer laws which are more specific to cyberbullying such as Brodie’s law. The following essay will analyse the strengths and limitations of both state’s laws to determine
A decision from the Supreme Court is expected sometime in the spring of 2002. This case does not directly address the issue of how the community standards requirement applies to determining whether online material is obscene (speech that does not receive First Amendment protection) rather than merely indecent (harmful for minors but protected for adults). The court's ruling will nonetheless be significant in terms of the future of the "community standards" test for obscenity online.
The first amendment ensures us the freedom of speech. The people of this country use that to voice their opinion on issues in our society. What the average citizen doesn’t know is that their first amendment can be revoked in terms of time, place, and the manner they are exercising it. Recently there have been many protests following homicides of black males by the hands of law enforcement. We’ve seen across the country where an officer involved shooting results in violence among the community. There are rioting, violent protests, putting other citizens at risk of either property loss or being injured, and fires that are set. We know that every agency across the US is just one-officer-involved shooting away from staring down the barrel of that
--------------Hook-------------The problem is that cyberbullying is an act that must be stopped, but putting limits on students ' online speech is unnecessary. If you are not familiar with the word Cyberbullying, it is a is when an individual is tormented, threatened, harassed, humiliated, embarrassed or otherwise targeted by another individual using the Internet, interactive and digital technologies.But yet again I bring the point that schools should not limit the amount of students online speech. Schools must protect students’ First Amendment rights but also maintain the learning environment and safety at school. Three main reasons why school should not limit students online speech are there is not a large percent affected, it does not cause
The term “cyber terrorism” refers to the use of the Internet as a medium in which an attack can be launched such as hacking into electrical grids, security systems, and vital information networks. Over the past four decades, cyber terrorists have been using the Internet as an advanced communication tool in which to quickly spread and organize their members and resources. For instance, by using the instantaneous spread of information provided by the Internet, several terrorist’s groups have been able to quickly share information, coordinate attacks, spread propaganda, raise funds, and find new recruits for their cause. Instantaneous and unpredictable, the technological advantages these terrorists have obtained from using the Internet includes
...o protect children from offensive material and threats from online, congressmen making the laws will have to be careful not to violate the rights of the people.
Last year, two Cloverdale teenagers pleaded guilty to federal charges. What did they do that the FBI raided their homes and seized their computers? They hacked into Pentagon computer systems. These two teenagers, Makaveli and TooShort, were also suspected of breaking into computers at universities, government agencies and military bases. This example and many others show the increase of hackers and their crimes over the years. In another story that is similar to the story about Makaveli and Too Short, from a BBC News story, Hackers target Nasa and Pentagon, an international group of computer hackers broke into Pentagon computer systems and also said they had stolen key software from Nasa. The group consisted of eight Americans, five British and two Russians. They called themselves the "Masters of Downloading." They were considering selling the information to international terrorist groups or foreign governments. The number of hacker related crimes seems to be increasing year by year. Theft on the internet is costing companies billions, and the high-tech industry is struggling to stop it. According to Michael Meyer's Crimes of the "Net", last year roughly $2 billion worth of software was stolen over the internet last year. Also that year, the leader of an international piracy ring operating out of Spain, pleaded guilty to a brand of fraud destined to become commonplace. According to U.S. investigators, they stole 140,000 telephone credit-card numbers. Hackers used the numbers to make a total of $140 million worth of long-distance phone calls. Now, the question is who is really at loss here. The answer is simple. Companies like GTE, AT &T, Bell Atlantic and MCI. Because of these hackers, those companies lost a lot of money. What actions must be taken to stop these theives? According to the hackers, they call what they are doing sharing. Hackers are criminals that steal from others to better themselves. They are leeches, feeding off other peoples' personal items. People have to become aware of the risk they face with hackers. Software and phone cards isn't the end of the stealing hackers. Everything from computer parts to flowers and teddy bears are at risk to hackers. With the increasing technology, the abuse is almost endless.
What defines a true computer geek? People have several different views on what a computer geek actually consists of. It is important to notice how society places certain people into this category automatically without even knowing much about them. Growing up with all sorts of television shows, most of the time there would be a nerdy character. That is how I believe my definition for a computer geek formed. Like all ideas in life, there was some kind of influence that shaped it.
First of all, if a crime doesn't result in a physical loss, can it even be considered a crime? Theft on the web is, in actuality, the theft of an idea. If an idea is placed on the web, is it not open for everyone to see, experience, or even take? Is a rape in cyberspace really a rape if there is no physical contact? Author James Harrington says "This attempt to censor cyberspeech raises two major constitutional problems: Can the government limit access to sexually explicit information on the internet to adults who want it, and, if so, who decides what is 'offensive' and thus punishable?" (Harrington 157). It is true that these cyber crimes and their outcomes cross the line from VR to RL in the sense of emotion for many. People have been made to feel violated by other users many times, and one good example of this is shown in Julian Dibbell's essay "A Rape in Cyberspace". Criminals, such as Mr. Bungle, have their fun and log off, leaving other users in a state of victimization. These virtual criminals should be punished, but how can users defend themselves until a means of punishment is decided upon?
According to the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance Survey, 15% high school students from grade ninth to twelfth were the victims of cyberbullying in 2013. This statistic shows that violence in the Internet is increasing and becoming a serious problem in recent years. One of the reasons for this is that people tend to participate more in online discussions, YouTube, and social networking sites, and they fill comment sections with violent and practical jokes which can be described as “trolling.” Many people say that these comments are very necessary for the online environment, and they also have the right to express what they think in the internet due to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. However, trolling comments may actually
Increasing computer technology is a double edge sword. Computer is a convenient tool, which is used in a lot of business, education, and government systems nowadays. Which is also used by criminals in criminal activities, and young people in pranks. More problems arise with the grow of computer usage in criminal activities. Law and punishment alone is not adequate to prevent the increasing of future crimes, unless the new generation of young people could be guided to the correct path.
The spawning of the public Internet as we know it today provided a brand new type of communication, virtually unrestricted, and naturally, as with nearly every other form of communication, has been exploited by pornography. This newly-invented category of pornography, to be called “cyberporn,” would not only revolutionize its own industry, but also help to speed the development and growth of the Internet. Feeding off of each other, technology and pornography have played an equally transforming role in our current methods of communication.