Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of advocacy to patients
Importance of advocacy to patients
Importance of advocacy to patients
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of advocacy to patients
“Customer Advisor Groups: Another Way to Listen to the Marketplace” was educational to CAGs. I know patient surveys, even having town hall meetings/committees, but not CAGs. Therefore, this article was insightful to concepts of CAGs, giving a better understanding of the background, benefits and different types of groups classified under CAGs. I agree that it’s essential to listen to customers to develop customer- focused strategies; therefore, I like the idea of CAGs. However, with CAGs only targeting specific group(s), I wouldn’t have the same confidence in CAGs as I would with patient surveys. “Who Is a Hospital’s ‘Customer’?” introduced CMS, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, an organization unknowing to me. It’s amazing that neither patients nor physicians see patients as customers. Patients may not buy products as regular consumers do but they pay for provided services, making them customers. Not knowing this can be detrimental for hospitals, so I see how it was discovered that those hospitals that didn’t acknowledge this, were less successful reaching patient experience goals. It’s critical to know that you must improve patient care to improve patient experience, as the two correlate. However, as mentioned, it’s important to the find patient care satisfaction for each individual patient/customer. Allocating more resources for patient care is a very smart decision for hospitals as better resources equals better patient care results. And I definitely agree, “customer is always right,” is VERY problematic. …show more content…
Difficult at first, the article’s systematic approach was key to my understanding. The views from tables 2-8, were a big help focusing on significant material helping to create my
Due to the increasing financial implications, patient satisfaction has become a growing priority for health care organizations, as well as transitioning the health care organization’s philosophy about the delivery of health care (Murphy, 2014). This CMS value based purchasing initiative has created a paradigm shift in health care in which leaders and clinicians must focus on patient centered care and the patient experience which ultimately will result in better outcomes. Leaders and clinicians alike must be committed to the patient satisfaction. As leaders within the organization, these groups must be role models and lead by example for front-line staff. Ultimately, if patients are satisfied, they are more likely to be compliant with their treatment plans and continue to seek follow up care with their health care provider, which will result in decreased lengths of stay, decreased readmissions, increased referrals and decreased costs (Murphy, 2014). One strategy employed by health care leaders to capture the patient experience, is purp...
In her paper emerging model of quality, June Larrabee discusses quality as a construct that includes beneficence, value, prudence and justice (Larrabee, 1996). She speaks of quality and value as integral issues that are intertwined with mutually beneficial outcomes. Her model investigates how the well-being of individuals are affected by perceptions of how services are delivered, along with the distribution of resources based on the decisions that are made (Larrabee, 1996). She speaks of the industrial model of quality and how the cornerstone ideas of that model (that the customer always knows what is best for themselves) does not fit the healthcare model (Larrabee, 1996). Larrabee introduces the concept that the patient va provider goal incongruence affects the provide (in this case the nurse) from being able to positively affect healthcare outcomes (Larrabee, 1996). The recent introduction of healthcare measures such as HCAHPS: Patients' Perspectives of Care Survey has encouraged the healthcare community to firmly espouse an industrial model of quality. HCAHPS is a survey where patients are asked questions related to their recent hospitalization that identifies satisfaction with case based solely on the individuals’ perception of the care given. This can lead to divergent goals among the healthcare team or which the patient is a member. Larrabee’s model of quality of care model
[19]Press I. 2005. Patient Satisfaction: Understanding and Managing the Experience of Care, 2nd Edition. Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.
This force states that the consumer base as a whole can bargain for what is considered to be a reasonable cost, and quality or quantity of services offered. (Lester & Parnell, 2006). When working in the health industry, patient or responsible party satisfaction become the essential part of performance. This is highly important because an organization must comply with their product or services that are affordable and competitive with others in their areas. They will lose business if they are overpriced or have a substandard operation. Porter’s five forces offer a framework and evaluation in the industry’s structure and it’s influence on the organizations (Lester & Parnell,
Healthcare clinics are under a great deal of pressure to reduce costs and improve quality of service. In recent years, healthcare organizations have concentrated on preventive medicine practices and have tried to reduce the length of time that patients stay in a hospital. Outpatient services have gradually become an essential component of healthcare. Organizations that cannot make their outpatient component cost-effective are finding themselves financially burdened in this ever-changing industry (Caldwell, 2005).
Patients make up a huge part in achieving service excellence for the healthcare industry. My healthcare facility helps the patients redeem themselves and correct with sensitivity. The patients are my customers, and my healthcare facility must remember our mission and vision of giving spectacular healthcare to our customers who are our priority. By giving quality customer service, my healthcare facility earns the gratitude and patronage of its patients. The patients pass their experiences to their families and that keeps my healthcare facilities’ reputation successful
As early as the 1990’s, outpatient care only made up for 10 to 15% of a hospital’s total profits, compared to inpatient care. Since the start of the twenty-first century, this figure has increased to approximately 60%. This shift in healthcare has been occurring in different medical organizations such as university medical centers, local hospitals, for-profit chains, and not-for-profit suppliers. The increase in outpatient services compared to inpatient has been showing no indication of slowing down. The main reason for the development in outpatient care is because of all the medical advancements in techniques and technology that allow for patients to be treated less invasively. Health care organizations are now being compensated in a way that puts emphasis on both the quality and the total care of the patient. Even though these organizations are achieving exceptional ambulatory performance in a manner that improves health and patient experience, cost is vital to future health system success.
The balance between quality patient care and medical necessity is a top priority and the main concern of many of the healthcare organizations today. Due to the rising cost of healthcare, there has been a change in the focus of reimbursement strategies that are affecting the delivery of patient care. This shift from a fee-for-service towards a value-based system creates a challenge that has shifted many providers’ focus more directly on their revenue. As a result, organizations are forced to take a hard look at the cost of services they are providing patients and then determining if the services and level of care are appropriate for the prescribed patient care.
The world keeps changing, and so does healthcare and marketing. The relationship between these two parameters has been studied and continues to be an object of great interest, both in terms of the consumers of this industry and rapidly evolving healthcare service providers. What seems most interesting to me is the fact that, the consumer today is still naïve about how actually this industry markets its services. This tends to happen because health is a matter of concern to each one of us, and when certain services are highlighted and provided to us like a gift package, we accept it without a second thought. This has been observed by the experts in the field of healthcare markets and hence, they keep coming up with brilliant strategies to sell us their services, and keep us happy.
There are two types of consumers; the informed and the uninformed. The patient, i.e. the consumer, is typically unaware of the total cost of health services provided to them. They may have a copay or deductible, but the explanation of benefits and outline of care comes after treatment has been rendered. This approach has made it difficult for patients to be able to “shop around” for the best prices when in most cases they are not sure what the cost treatment will be. They were, by no fault of their own, uninformed consumers due to plan designs.
What captured the patients about this doctor’s office was the respect the patients received from the doctor and the respect for the patients time (Jacobs & Chase, 2011). The doctor’s office did there absolute best to be on time for every appointment and the doctor’s office gave the patients respect by letting them know when something came up where the doctor was going to be late (Jacobs & Chase, 2011). When the doctor had an emergency, the office gave the patients choices to either wait or reschedule their appointment (Jacobs & Chase, 2011). The doctor’s office held themselves to a high standard of punctuality and they held the patients to the same standards concerning their appointment times (Jacobs & Chase, 2011). The doctor did not waste time on the phone or unnecessary task that would cause delays and scheduling conflicts (Jacobs & Chase, 2011). The doctor did not have a phone hour to answer calls and the doctor trained the assistances to handle most of the phone calls and answer medical related questions over the phone (Jacobs & Chase, 2011). When an individual wanted t...
The cost of industry has a significant impact on health care so much so that while health institutions attempt to save money with cutbacks they see little reward and few gain in return. With technological advances, reduced staff numbers, and further push for greater efficiency the health care industry should see a great amount in savings which then should be pasted on to patients unfortunately this is not the reality. With all of the rising health costs and increased demand, health organizations are being forced to absorb more costs associated to patient care. A majority of the savings that come from cutbacks are being used to make up for those losses so that the institution can stay afloat.
In recent years there has been a marked change in the inpatient hospital experience. Many of these changes are related to funding and payment. Insurance companies no longer reimburse hospitals for providing services, but have begun to provide payment based on hospital performance measures (Knudson, 2013, C8). Adverse events that occur during a patient’s stay now leads to financial loss. Hospitals have to absorb the additional treatment cost of “never events” such as injuries from falls, infections from urinary catheters, and pressure ulcers that are acquired during a patient’s admission (Agency for Healthcare Administration, 2012). Patient perception of the hospital environment is increasingly important with the ability of potential consumers
Among caregiving institutions, patient satisfaction is an important, but historically neglected, concern that administrators now view differently. Traditionally, medical institutions have not focused on this issue, because other matters often supersede this priority. However, as fiscal matters move to the forefront, encouraging patients to return when the need may arise is a top priority. Taking a lesson from the business world, cultivating patient advocates is the solution to meeting financial goals in the healthcare setting.
The majority Americans expect better quality health care seeing how expensive it is in the US. Since the nation spends so much on health care, the people expect better results and outcomes from doctors but this isn’t the case. Doctors that require more money in order to be treated do not have better patient outcomes. A study found that higher spending doctors do not have lower death rates or less readmissions after being discharged (Tsugawa 3). This study shows that even though people think that their outcomes are affected by the sizable amount of money they pay to be treated by these doctors, they get the same, if not worse, care if they were to pay for the less expensive doctors. Better, more costly medical equipment patients pay extra for do not attest to better patient outcomes. Advanced, more expensive medical equipment has not led to better patient outcome for citizens in the US. The US has one of the most unfavorable health statistics in the world, despite the advanced medical technology (Kangas 25). The exorbitant equipment that patients long to receive treatment from don’t convey better outcomes compared to the less expensive, older equipment, even though the high price makes people falsely assume otherwise.Patient outcomes are not positively affected by higher spending doctors more costly doctors. Doctors and physicians in hospitals are all