Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of technology on interpersonal
Impact of technology on social interaction
The effects of technology on interpersonal
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effects of technology on interpersonal
APPLICATION AND CURRENT RESEARCH (in relation to contemporary media)
The four contemporary articles which will be analysed, are reflective of the current research on media rituals and contemporary technologies. The research of these authors (Anderson, Bilic, Csaszi and Maj) has been focused on broadening the concept of media rituals and their applications, particularly in relation to digital and internet forms. By critically analysing the content of these authors’ essays, this will further explain the significance of media rituals to everyday life.
Siblings in Cyberspace: Carey’s Ritual Model of Communication in the Digital Age by Helen Anderson (2011)
Firstly, Helen Anderson’s essay “Siblings in Cyberspace: Carey’s Ritual Model of Communication in the Digital Age” exemplifies the notion of contemporary media rituals in relation to Youtube. By a case study of the “vlogbrothers” John and Hank Green and their videos on Youtube, Anderson relates their video series “Brotherhood 2.0” to Carey’s ritual model of communication. By contrasting Carey’s ‘transmission model’ of communication where media is seen as a transmission of signals going back and forth, the ‘ritual model’ rather focuses on concepts surrounding ‘sharing’, ‘participation’ and ‘fellowship’ (Anderson, 2011, p.93). Thus, the ritual model resembles the Youtube culture and the project of “Brotherhood 2.0”. The “vlogbrothers” in the realisation that they were spending too much time using textual forms of communication such as texting, emails and instant messaging (which in itself has become ritualised) decided to “fight technology with technology” (Anderson, 2011, p.93). Thus, the brothers decided to go without textual communication for one year and instead, only commun...
... middle of paper ...
... with, English Wikipedia." New media & society 1461 (2014): 4448.
Csigó, P., eds. "EastBound vol. 2010 issue 1: Popular Culture and Citizenship.", “Broadening the Concept of Media Rituals: Tabloids as “Low Holidays of Television” (2010).
Maj, Anna, and Michal Derda-Nowakowski. "Ecosystem of Knowledge: Strategies, Rituals and Metaphors in Networked Communication." At the Interface/Probing the Boundaries 85 (2012)
From James Carey, Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society. Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1985; repr. London/New York, Routledge, 1992
http://www9.georgetown.edu/faculty/irvinem/cctp748/carey-summary-comm-culture.html
Martin Irvine
cct.georgetown.edu/irvine
http://www.deliberatelyconsidered.com/2012/09/digital-events-media-rituals-in-the-digital-age/
Digital Events: Media Rituals in the Digital Age
By Lisa Lipscomb, September 3rd, 2012
The protestations which he argues makes the reader debrief himself about his own lifestyle; Birkerts claims, “The electronic media are invisible in process, but omnipresent in product” (Birkerts). This claim is plausible to make his readers ponder about the electronic media as a negative
Hartley, John (2002), Communication, Cultural and Media Studies: The Key Concepts, London, Routledge, pp. 19-21.
Rideout, Victoria and Hamel, Elizabeth. (2006). “The Media Family: Electronic Media in the Lives of
Media and Popular Culture. The McGraw-Hill Reader: Issues across the Disciplines. Ed. Gilbert H. Muller. 12th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2012. 426. Print.
Habermas, J. (2000). The public sphere. In P. Marris & S. Thornham (Eds.), Media Studies : A reader(2nd.) (pp. 92–97). New York: New York University Press.
Are technology and the media shedding the very fabric of the existence we have known? As technology and the media spread their influence, the debate over the inherent advantages and disadvantages intensifies. Although opinions vary widely on the subject, two writers offer similar views: Professor Sherry Turkle, director of the MIT Initiative on Technology and Self, in her article “Can You Hear Me Now” and Naomi Rockler-Gladen, who formerly taught media studies at Colorado State University, with her article “Me Against the Media: From the Trenches of a Media Lit Class.” Turkle asserts that technology has changed how people develop and view themselves, while at the same time affecting their concepts of time management and focus (270). Similarly, Rockler-Gladen believes media and its inherent advertising have had a profound effect on the values and thinking of the public (284). I could not agree more with Professor Turkle and Ms. Rockler-Gladen; the effects technology and media have worried and annoyed me for quite so time. The benefits of technology and media are undeniable, but so then are the flaws. People are beginning to shift their focus away from the physical world to the virtual world as they find it easier and more comfortable. The intended purpose of technology and media was to be a tool to improve the quality of life, not shackles to tie people to their devices. I no longer recognize this changed world and long for the simple world of my youth.
The world is shrinking and the networks are growing at an unprecedented rate. This is possible because of our technological advances in recent decades – especially computer and networking technologies. The Internet changed the way we connect and communicate with others; it made dissipating information as easy as clicking a button. The advent of social media coupled with the powerful mobile networks and devices have enabled us to be connected twenty four seven. But this always-on connectedness is not without its downsides, it has come to a point it’s being counterproductive. Two essays, Sherry Turkle’s “The Flight from Conversation” and Claudia Wallis’s “The Multitasking Generation” in the text “Reading Critically, Writing Well”, shed light on how these technological advancements are affecting us wholesomely - the way we communicate, the way we perceive our identities and the way we live our lives.
Up until recently television has been the most prominent medium of entertainment and information in our lives. Nothing could beat Saturday morning cartoons, the six o'clock news and zoning out from the world by the distractions of prime time sitcoms. It is all of these things and more that formed television into what was thought to be the ultimate entertainment medium, that is, up until now. Television in the twenty-first century is not the television our parents watched or in fact what we watched as children. Today’s generation are no longer satisfied with the traditional television experience. Today’s audience no longer has to follow the network’s predetermined schedule nor is television the one dimensional experience it used to be. Viewers no longer need to schedule a fixed time in order to gather information or watch their favourite show (Smith 5). They can record it with the push of the DVR (Digital Video Recording) button or watch it on a device and obtain background information via the Internet. In addition, viewers now have the opportunity to interact with, share, and produce their own material from their favourite show (5). In order to not lose the authenticity of television, media theorists have created transmedia. This new twist on television gives the user more control and more involvement than ever before. The concept has been termed as transmedia storytelling. The online journal Infoline defines transmedia storytelling in its January 2014 issue as “social, mobile, accessible and re-playable.” Originally coined in the 1990’s it was not until 2003 when Henry Jenkins, a professor of communications at the University of Southern California, wrote his article “Transmedia Storytelling” that the term began being ...
“Technology is supposed to make our lives easier, allowing us to do things more quickly and efficiently. But too often it seems to make things harder, leaving us with fifty-button remote controls, digital cameras with hundreds of mysterious features.” (James Surowiecki) Whether or not is known, technology has become too heavily relied on. It is replacing important social factors such as, life skills and communication skills. While technology is created to be beneficial, there must be a point in time where we draw the line. Once face-to-face conversations begin to extinguish, this means that there is too much focus on the “screen culture”. In her writing, “Alone Together”, Sherry Turkle talks
Media has long been the bullseye of negative critique and arguments targeting digital activity as passive. However, technological times surround us and it is more useful to observe how these platforms can be beneficial, than to become victims of an instrument created by and for man.
Campbell, Richard. Media & Culture: an introduction to mass communication. Bedford/St. Martin?s: Boston, N.Y. 2005.
Sinclair, John (2002) “Media and Communications : Theoretical Traditions”, in Stuart Cunningham and Graeme Turner (eds), The Media & Communications in Australia, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, pp.23-34.
Tolson, A. (1986), ‘Popular culture: practice and institution’, in C. MacCabe (ed.), High Theory/ Low Culture: Analysing popular television & film, Manchester, Manchester University Press.
Sewel, Philip W. “From Discourse to Discord: Quality and Dramedy at the End of the Classic Network System” Television and New Media 11.4 (2010): 235-59. Web. 18 January. 2014.
Rosen, senior editor if New Atlantis, on her essay published in Wilson Quarterly in autumn 2009 “In the Beginning Was the Word,” points out how digital technology, especially in communication and entertainment, affects negatively on our lives socially and cognitively. She believes that although technology might appear as sign of our progress as humans, it is withdrawing us from the core literature. Rosen explains th...