Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary analysis essay
Literary analysis essay
Literary analysis essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Walt Disney once said, “We keep moving forward, opening new doors, and doing new things, because we're curious and curiosity keeps leading us down new paths.” Have you ever felt curious before?Curiosity can be dangerous at times but it also allows you to make new experiences.Rikki-tikki-tavi by Rudyard Kipling is a fictional story that illustrates the theme to always find new experiences through curiosity.
Rikki Tikki, the main character, is a curious and brave little mongoose in the story. In paragraph 14 Rikki-Tikki-Tavi says, “ ‘There are more things to find out about in this house,’ he said to himself, ‘than all my family could find out in all their lives. I shall certainly stay and find out.’ ”This demonstrates that Rikki-Tikki-Tavi is
…show more content…
curious and that he wants to find out about everything he can.Furthermore, it allows Rikki to make new experiences because he is curious and curiosity allows him to explore the bungalow.In paragraph 7 it says, “ It is the hardest thing in the world to frighten a mongoose, because he is eaten up from nose to tail with curiosity. The motto of all the mongoose family is ‘Run and find out,’ and Rikki-tikki was a true mongoose. He looked at the cotton wool, decided that it was not good to eat, ran all round the table, sat up and put his fur in order, scratched himself, and jumped on the small boy’s shoulder.This shows that Rikki is a very curious little critter and that he will not be scared because he is “eaten up” with curiosity.Furthermore, this means that Rikki is consumed by curiosity.As you can see, Rikki-Tikki-Tavi is a very curious mongoose and he can also be brave at times. Nagaina, the antagonist, is a witty and vengeful cobra that tries to avenge her husband, Nag.In paragraphs 26,27, and 28 it says, “Nag was thinking to himself and watching the least little movement in the grass behind Rikki-tikki.
He knew that mongooses in the garden meant death sooner or later for him and his family, but he wanted to get Rikki-tikki off his guard. So he dropped his head a little and put it on one side. ‘Let us talk,’ he said. ‘You eat eggs. Why should I not eat birds? ‘Behind you! Look behind you!’ sang Darzee. Rikki-tikki knew better than to waste time in staring. He jumped up in the air as high as he could go, and just under him whizzed by the head of Nagaina, Nag’s wicked wife.”This demonstrates that Nagaina is witty, she,knowing not to make an entrance, chooses to ambush Rikki instead. Furthermore, it shows that Nagaina isn’t like Rikki because she doesn’t question who Rikki is like what a curious and decides to remove what may be a possible threat. In paragraph 80 it says, “Nagaina lifted up her head and hissed, “You warned Rikki-tikki when I would have killed him. Indeed and truly, you’ve chosen a bad place to be lame in.” And she moved toward Darzee’s wife, slipping along over the dust.” This shows that Nagaina is vengeful because she wants to avenge her husband by killing everyone involved in the murder.Therefore, it shows that Nagaina isn’t similar to Rikki-tikki do to the fact that Rikki-tikki would be less witty and that he would be curious …show more content…
instead and take risky chances. As you can see, Nagaina is a vengeful and witty cobra that tries to kill Rikki-tikki. Rudyard Kipling, the author, uses personification in this story to help demonstrate the theme to always find new experiences through curiosity.
In paragraph 32 and 33 it says, “when Teddy came running down the path, Rikki-tikki was ready to be petted. But just as Teddy was stooping, something wriggled a little in the dust and a tiny voice said: ‘Be careful. I am Death!’ It was Karait, the dusty brown snakeling that lies for choice on the dusty earth; and his bite is as dangerous as the cobra’s. But he is so small that nobody thinks of him, and so he does the more harm to people. Rikki-tikki’s eyes grew red again, and he danced up to Karait with the peculiar rocking, swaying motion that he had inherited from his family. It looks very funny, but it is so perfectly balanced a gait that you can fly off from it at any angle you please; and in dealing with snakes this is an advantage. If Rikki-tikki had only known, he was doing a much more dangerous thing than fighting Nag, for Karait is so small and can turn so quickly that unless Rikki bit him close to the back of the head, he would get the return stroke in his eye or his lip.” This is an example of personification because it shows that Rikki-tikki is gaining human values by protecting someone he cares about like teddy. This personification proves the theme by showing that Rikki-tikki is curious about Karait and he is developing human traits by protecting someone he cares about. In paragraphs 48, 49, and 53 it says, “He stole
off to Teddy’s bathroom, but there was nothing there, and then to Teddy’s mother’s bathroom. At the bottom of the smooth plaster wall there was a brick pulled out to make a sluice for the bathwater, and as Rikki-tikki stole in by the masonry curb where the bath is put, he heard Nag and Nagaina whispering together outside in the moonlight. ‘When the house is emptied of people,’ said Nagaina to her husband, ‘he will have to go away, and then the garden will be our own again. Go in quietly, and remember that the big man who killed Karait is the first one to bite. Then come out and tell me, and we will hunt for Rikki-tikki together.’... Rikki-tikki tingled all over with rage and hatred at this, and then Nag’s head came through the sluice, and his five feet of cold body followed it. Angry as he was, Rikki-tikki was very frightened as he saw the size of the big cobra. Nag coiled himself up, raised his head, and looked into the bathroom in the dark, and Rikki could see his eyes glitter. ‘Now, if I kill him here, Nagaina will know; and if I fight him on the open floor, the odds are in his favor. What am I to do?’ said Rikki-tikki-tavi.” This is an example of personification because Rikki-tikki is feeling hatred towards creatures that want to hurt people that he cares about. In addition, this proves the theme, to always find new experiences through curiosity, by showing that Rikki-tikki’s curiosity led him to the danger that would harm his family. Rudyard Kipling used personification to illustrates the theme by showing how Rikki-tikki was gaining human values through curiosity. Rikki-tikki-tavi is a fictional story by Rudyard Kipling that demonstrates the theme to always find new experiences through curiosity. The main character, Rikki-tikki is a curious and brave little mongoose. On the other hand, the antagonist, Nagaina, is a witty and vengeful cobra. They both demonstrate their character traits through personification and the story demonstrates the theme to always find new experiences through curiosity. Conclude with a powerful statement about how this lesson applies to everyone. “The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existing.” ~ Albert Einstein.
Then she also used simile of figures of speech to describe the dead snake. For instance, “He is as cool and gleaming as a braided whip”, the speaker compared the black snake with a braided whip, and “he is as beautiful and quiet as a dead brother”, she regarded the black brother. Let’s start with the first one of two sentences, the speaker chose the braided whip as vehicle because its shape also was as same as the black snake’s, but different from an old bicycle whip, the speaker chose some positive words that were “cool” and “gleaming” to describe the black snake, I thought the conver of diction presented changes in her delicate feelings. Subsequently, the second sentence made me understood what changes were. I thought that was she no longer think the black snake was a snake but her compatriot, because she said that he was her dead brother. These similes also expressed the speaker’s affection in
I cannot get that song of the brave Rikki Tikki Tavi the mongoose out of my head. A mongoose is a furry creature from India who kills cobras or other types of snakes and if its eyes get red, the mongoose is mad. Also the mongoose is a curious creature It is strange how similar the book is in the movie. Some of these similarities are the conflicts, the resolution and the rising action.
Characterization is the way a writer makes a person in a story, book, play, movie, or television show seem like a real person. A person that is the best person to characterize is Rikki-Tikki. Rikki-tikki can be characterized as curious because everytime he wakes up he checks the house. he can also be characterized a courageous because he fought Nag and Nagaina single handedly and killed them both. Another thing he could be characterized as is strategic because he killed the babies so Nagarina could not breed them to be like
The snake’s calm demeanor when they first meet, his confidence and power, and his gruesome death help evoke sympathy in the reader. The reader’s first impression of the snake is that “he held his ground in calm watchfulness.” His stance was tense, but not threatening, as “his head was not drawn back to strike.” He does not intend to attack without being provoked; he
Comparison, diction and personification are applied in the story to make the snake seem more human-like and the man’s actions seem less justified, therefore crafting
Indirect characterization is a main reason the author shows the theme to the reader. The author shows this through the actions the character produces. When Rikki-Tikki-Tavi must kill Nag, he shows an indirect characterization of action. When the moment comes for Rikki-Tikki-tavi to kill Nag, “[he] jumped.
Personification is presented by the author as the only explanation for the narrator’s consumption. “The Blue Estuaries” begins to stir the narrator’s own poems (line 24) until she bores down on the page once more, coming back into what is perceived by the reader as a much more clear state of mind. Then, the narrator claims to have “lost her doubts” for a moment (line 34). This was a turning point in the narrator’s tone- signalling a shift in her thoughts, and was a strikingly out of place claim- especially coming from somebody so preoccupied- making the reader wonder what she had thought about for a moment. The narrator then begins to read once more (Line
Beattie expresses the how the man felt about the snake and the community that he wanted to protect. In paragraph 4, “I have never killed an animal I was not obliged to kill… But I reflected that there were children, dogs, horses at the ranch, as well as men and women lightly shod; my duty…kill the snake…” Beattie is expressing the mans feelings about killing and how the mans character prevented him from killing. In addition to the mans character, Beattie adds in the factor to obtain sympathy for the man’s actions by listing all the characters that the man is protecting through his “courageous” actions. In the 7th paragraph, “I did not cut the rattles off for trophy; I let him drop into the close green companionship of the paper-bag bush…” Beattie expresses the self guilt that the man had about killing the snake to tell readers about the man’s original
An example of personification is, “Do you think a snake killer kills muskrats?” said Rikki-Tikki scornfully. (paragraph 34). This is an example of personification because animals can not talk and do not have human-like qualities. This personification proves my theme because when Rikki-Tikki does this it shows his bravery to talk to Nagaina in that kind of tone. Another piece of evidence is “ “Then Rikki-Tikki came up and cried: ‘Turn round, Nagaina; turn and fight!’” (para 88). This is an example of personification because it gives the animals human-like qualities and that Rikki Tikki is talking to Nagaina as if they were people. He shows that he is brave by wanting to start a conflict between Nagaina. By using personification, it gives the text more exaggeration to show the fighting between Rikki-Tikki and
The effect the reader perceives in the passage of Rattler is attained from the usage of the author¡¯s imagery. The author describes the pre-action of the battle between the man and the snake as a ¡°furious signal, quite sportingly warning [the man] that [he] had made an unprovoked attack, attempted to take [the snake¡¯s] life... ¡± The warning signal is portrayed in order to reveal the significance of both the man¡¯s and the snake¡¯s value of life. The author sets an image of how one of their lives must end in order to keep the world in peace. In addition, the author describes how ¡°there was blood in [snake¡¯s] mouth and poison dripping from his fangs; it was all a nasty sight, pitiful now that it was done.¡± This bloody image of snake¡¯s impending death shows the significance of the man¡¯s acceptance toward the snake. In a sense, the reader can interpret the man¡¯s sympathy toward the snake because of the possibility that he should have let him go instead of killing him.
He displays his rudeness many times when he is with Darzee. Darzee loves to sing songs and he is currently sing about how Rikki killed Nag, when finally Rikki loses it and says “Oh, you stupid tuft of feathers!” said Rikki-tikki angrily.”Is this the time to sing?” ” (P.23) Rikki hates when Darzee sings because he never listens when he sings. So Rikki always gets annoyed with Darzee and starts being rude to him. Another example of Rikki being rude is when he is talking to Nagaina about letting his family go in exchange for her last cobra egg.” “Nagaina, Come and fight with me. You shall not be a widow long.” Nagaina saw that she had lost her chance of killing Teddy, and the egg lay between Rikki-tikki's paws.”Give me the egg, Rikki-tikki. Give me the last of my eggs, and I will go away and never come back,” she said, lowering her hood. ”Yes, you will go away, and you will never come back; for you will go to the rubbish-heap with Nag. Fight, widow!“ “ (P. 25)When Rikki says this to Nagaina she is upset about Rikki killing all of her baby cobra eggs. All Nagaina wants to do is take her one baby cobra egg and she will leave the garden and never come back again. But Rikki doesn’t want that, he wants to kill her and her last baby even after he killed all the others. Rikki is so confident that he is telling Nagainia that she won’t be a window very long, implying Rikki will kill her soon enough. The last way Rikki is
The author use personification in the poem because he sees but things will be easier to explain if he uses figurative language. The metaphor comparing to things without using like or as like when she said in the poem ´´ Big ghost in a cloud´ ´ She used metaphor to give a better example of what she sees and what she sees Is cloud shaped as different animals or anything but in the poem she pretty much-seen cloud shaped as the ghost.
Throughout the poem, the author uses various types of figurative language to immerse the reader in the thoughts and feeling of the speaker. The personification of fear in the form of Mr. Fear provides one such example.
In "Elegy for Jane", Theodore Roethke uses personification by describing the way that the leaves, the wren, the branches and twigs, the shade and the mold all moved in some way or another. He gave them
... Nature, including human beings, is `red in tooth and claw'; we are all `killers' in one way or another. Also, the fear which inhabits both human and snake (allowing us, generally, to avoid each other), and which acts as the catalyst for this poem, also precipitates retaliation. Instinct, it seems, won't be gainsaid by morality; as in war, our confrontation with Nature has its origins in some irrational `logic' of the soul. The intangibility of fear, as expressed in the imagery of the poem, is seen by the poet to spring from the same source as the snake, namely the earth - or, rather, what the earth symbolizes, our primitive past embedded in our subconsciouness. By revealing the kinship of feelings that permeates all Nature, Judith Wright universalises the experience of this poem.